Macquarie's quarterly profit falls, CFO Harvey decides to step down
Harvey will retire mid-2026 after completing an extended handover to his successor, Frank Kwok, who has been with Macquarie for 28 years and currently serves as deputy CFO, the company said.
The leadership changes come as Australia's corporate regulator (ASIC) has sued Macquarie, alleging it misreported up to A$1.5 billion worth of short sales over a 15-year period, misleading the market and violating transparency rules put in place following the global financial crisis.
Macquarie indicated it may adjust executive bonuses following the ASIC lawsuit, stating, "So far as remuneration impacts are concerned, this will be an FY26 matter, about which the board will come to a view over the period ahead."
"As CFO for the last eight years, Alex has delivered a significant transformation in Macquarie's financial management and stakeholder engagement activities, playing a key role in driving the global growth of the Group," Macquarie said.
The bank's first-quarter net profit declined due to lower contributions from its Asset Management arm and Commodities and Global Markets unit.
Macquarie Asset Management experienced a softer quarter compared to last year, with net profit contribution down primarily due to timing of investment-related income from asset realisations.
Meanwhile, Commodities and Global Markets unit's net profit contribution fell due to reduced contribution from Commodities, which recorded lower net interest and trading income in North American Gas and Power.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
9 hours ago
- Forbes
Why Every Leader Needs A Side Hustle Mindset
To thrive in today's volatile work environments, leaders need the agility and mindset of an ... More entrepreneur. The line between entrepreneurship and traditional leadership is becoming increasingly blurred. A 2024 study by researchers at James Cook University found that both managers and entrepreneurs require similar core abilities—dynamic capabilities, which include self-efficacy, alliance management and marketing capabilities—to excel in post-COVID, VUCA work environments (volatile, uncertain, complex, ambiguous). Increasingly, professionals across sectors are embodying this shift. The percentage of people working both salaried and entrepreneurial jobs (i.e., side hustles) has grown from 13% in 2020 to 38% in 2025, down slightly from 44% in 2022, according to annual LendingTree surveys. While many professionals pursue side hustles for the extra income, the benefits run far deeper. Side hustles require and foster a particular mindset—and build a skill set—that can add massive value to salaried roles and shore up long-term career security. That is because these high-value dynamic capabilities (a side hustle mindset) are exactly what companies need to stay competitive and relevant in times of rapid change, tech innovation and upheaval. Why The Side Hustle Mindset Matters More Than Ever With all the economic uncertainty and instability In this job market, the invitation to all professionals is to be more adaptive, scrappy and inventive. But leaders in particular must deepen their entrepreneurial agility. Delivering excellent results is necessary, but no longer sufficient. As AI and lean teams shrink org charts, leaders must create their own value-add rooted in their distinctly human gifts and talents. For rising and established leaders alike, career longevity requires building more and more options for one's career trajectory—as opposed to clinging on to the dream of 'climbing the ladder' within the same organization. We can meet this moment with the side hustle mindset, which encompasses skills like resourcefulness, self-direction, calculated risk-taking, market-driven thinking and digital fluency. What The Side Hustle And Mindset Can Look Like At Different Career Stages For early-career professionals, side hustles can serve as self-created, self-driven apprenticeships that solidify fundamental professional skills: communication, organization and time management, client or customer service, analytical thinking and problem-solving. For those in extended job searches, side hustles can also provide structure, a sense of purpose, fulfillment and momentum. They also offer valuable work experience that can be parlayed into future salaried positions or scalable businesses. In other words, a side hustle can be the fastest way to build portfolio experience and road-test your career interests—on your own terms. For mid-career professionals and leaders, entrepreneurial throughlines in your professional branding can set you apart in a crowded and competitive job market. Review your body of work through an entrepreneurial lens and determine how to weave those elements into your career narrative and highlight them across your professional assets (LinkedIn profile, online bio, executive summary on your resume). It could be the differentiator that lands you the coveted leadership role you've been working towards. If you have a side hustle, leverage it to grow your leadership, innovate solutions and develop your risk management skills—all while building your executive presence and honing your ability to pitch ideas with confidence. A side hustle (or the mindset alone) will force you to expand your horizons and your network—all of which strengthens your 'career insurance' for when 'stable' jobs suddenly disappear. For senior leaders, you likely already have a plethora of entrepreneurial leadership examples to draw from—conduct an audit on your own or with an expert to ensure you're positioning yourself strategically and advantageously. At this stage of your career, side ventures, investment projects or advisory work can keep your entrepreneurial edge sharp. Research, vet and join appropriate peer cohorts or engage in micro-learning to stay relevant without overcommitting yourself given the demands already on your plate. How To Cultivate A Side Hustle Mindset—Even If You're Not Launching A Business No matter your career stage or specific circumstance, given how the landscape is trending, it is imperative to think like a founder in your role. Practice this by identifying root problems, creating actionable solutions and carefully studying the market. Invest in your entrepreneurial skill-building through small-scale experiments (entrepreneurial programs, pilot projects, advisory roles, partnerships) that let you fail fast and help you adapt even faster. This self-directed learning can be one of the highest-ROI investments you make in your career. Leadership isn't about waiting your turn—it never was. It's about making your own moves and strengthening your dynamic capabilities, entrepreneurial skillset and side hustle mindset. Whether or not you ever launch a formal side hustle, you will need that mindset and those dynamic capabilities to succeed in the decades ahead. And the good news is that a side hustle mindset is fully learnable and fully portable. Once you build it, no one, no organization, no downturn can take it away from you.
Wall Street Journal
16 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
China Strong-Armed Japan Over Rare Earths. It's a Lesson for the U.S.
TOKYO—The U.S. found out this year that China could use its chokehold on rare-earth minerals as a coercive tool when Beijing imposed export controls. For Japan, it was déjà vu: It had been the victim 15 years earlier. Tokyo vowed in 2010 to be ready for next time and over the years put hundreds of millions of dollars into Australian supplies.
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Brambles Limited's (ASX:BXB) largest shareholders are individual investors with 52% ownership, institutions own 48%
Key Insights Brambles' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 39% ownership Insiders have been buying lately Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Brambles Limited (ASX:BXB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Institutions, on the other hand, account for 48% of the company's stockholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Brambles. See our latest analysis for Brambles What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Brambles? Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Brambles already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Brambles' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Brambles. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. Insider Ownership Of Brambles The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Brambles Limited. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own AU$19m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling. General Public Ownership The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 52% of Brambles shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions. Next Steps: It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Brambles better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Brambles . But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
