Marcos echoes frustration over Senior High School, says system has ‘no advantage'
President Ferdinand 'Bongbong' Marcos Jr. expressed frustration with the current Senior High School (SHS) curriculum under the K to 12 program, saying it burdens parents financially without offering clear benefits to students.
In the latest episode of the BBM Podcast, Marcos responded to Senate President Pro Tempore Jinggoy Estrada's call to reassess the basic education system by possibly removing SHS. Marcos said Estrada's concern reflects his own sentiments.
'It's costing parents more because of the additional two years, and there's no clear advantage. SHS graduates still struggle to find jobs,' Marcos said in Filipino.
While noting that Congress holds the authority to amend or repeal the law mandating K to 12, the President said that improvements must continue in the meantime. 'I told Secretary Sonny Angara: let's improve it as much as we can while it's still in place,' he added.
Education Secretary Angara recently admitted shortcomings in SHS implementation over the past decade. He cited an overloaded curriculum and limited student choice as key issues.
'There were too many subjects, and students were boxed in. They couldn't choose what subjects to take,' Angara said.
Still, he emphasized that only Congress can decide the future of the SHS program.
In August 2024, Marcos ordered a review and rationalization of the SHS curriculum to ensure graduates are better equipped for high-quality employment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dubai Eye
43 minutes ago
- Dubai Eye
Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle
The Republican-controlled US Senate narrowly advanced President Donald Trump's, sweeping tax-cut and spending bill on Saturday, during a marathon weekend session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats sought to slow the legislation's path to passage. Lawmakers voted 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill, with two of Trump's fellow Republicans joining Democrats to oppose the legislation that would fund the president's top immigration, border, tax-cut and military priorities. Trump on social media hailed the "great victory" for his "great, big, beautiful bill." After hours of delay, during which Republican leaders and Vice President JD Vance worked behind closed doors to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the measure, Democrats demanded that the megabill first be read aloud in the chamber - a task that could delay the start of the debate until Sunday afternoon. Democrats say the bill's tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social programs for lower-income Americans. "Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don't realise what's in it," Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor. "Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish," he said. Once the bill has been read, lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by a marathon amendment session, known as a "vote-a-rama," before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Republican Senators Thom Tillis and Rand Paul voted against opening debate, a move that seemed for a time to be in danger of failing. Trump attacked Tillis, who opposed the bill's cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for lower-income Americans, which he said would be devastating for his native North Carolina. Tillis is up for reelection next year. "Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis. I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks," the president posted. Paul opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit on the $36.2 trillion US debt by an additional $5 trillion. "Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???" Trump said on social media. IN LIMBO Saturday's vote was in limbo for hours as Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other top Republicans sought to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the legislation. It was not clear what deals if any were struck to win over their support. Hardline Republican Senators Rick Scott, Mike Lee and Cynthia Lummis, who want deeper cuts in federal spending, voted to support the bill in the end. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, initially voted no but flipped his vote and backed the legislation. Trump was monitoring the vote from the Oval Office late into the night, a senior White House official said. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. The nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee released an analysis projecting that the Senate bill's tax provisions would reduce government revenue by $4.5 trillion over the next decade, increasing the $36.2-trillion US government debt. The White House said this month the legislation would reduce the annual deficit by $1.4 trillion. The world's richest person, Elon Musk, also took a swipe at the bill, which would end tax breaks for the electric vehicles that his automaker Tesla manufactures. Calling the bill "utterly insane and destructive," he risked reigniting a feud with Trump that raged earlier this month, before Musk backed down from his rhetoric. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!" Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. MEDICAID CHANGES Republicans from states with large rural populations have opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers, including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation would delay that reduction and would include $25 billion to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032. The legislation would raise the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to $40,000 with an annual 1% inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current $10,000. The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than $500,000 a year. That is a major concern of House Republicans from coastal states, including New York, New Jersey and California, who play an important role in keeping the party's narrow House majority. Republicans are using a legislative maneuver to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber. Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. The bill also would raise the Treasury Department's debt ceiling by trillions of dollars to stave off a potentially disastrous default on the nation's debt in the coming months. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month.
Al Etihad
4 hours ago
- Al Etihad
US Senate opens debate on Trump's controversial spending bill
29 June 2025 09:12 WASHINGTON (AFP)The US Senate on Saturday narrowly voted to begin debate on the sprawling domestic policy package carrying President Donald Trump's agenda, clearing a key procedural hurdle after Republican leaders cut a series of deals with holdouts in hopes of winning the votes to pass "One Big Beautiful Bill" is a proposal that would deliver key parts of the US president's domestic agenda while making massive cuts to social welfare programs. The President is hoping to seal his legacy with the spending bill, which would extend his expiring first-term tax cuts at a cost of $4.5 trillion while also beefing up border Republicans eyeing 2026 midterm congressional elections are divided over the package, which would strip health care from millions of the poorest Americans and add more than $3 trillion to the country's Senate formally opened debate on the bill late Saturday, after Republican holdouts delayed what should have been a procedural vote. Senators narrowly passed the motion to begin debate, 51-49, hours after the vote was first called, with Vice President JD Vance joining negotiations with holdouts from his own two Republican senators joined 47 Democrats in voting "nay" on opening has pushed his party to get the bill passed and on his desk for him to sign into law by July 4, the United States' independence opposed to the legislation and Trump's agenda have vowed to hold up the debate, and began by insisting that the entirety of the bill be read aloud to the chamber before the debate bill is roughly 1,000 pages long and will take an estimated 15 hours to passed in the Senate, the bill would go back to the House for approval, where Republicans can only afford to lose a handful of votes -- and are facing stiff opposition from within their own in the US are scrambling to offset the $4.5 trillion cost of Trump's tax relief, with many of the proposed cuts to come from decimating funding for Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income are split on the Medicaid cuts, which will threaten scores of rural hospitals and lead to an estimated 8.6 million Americans being deprived of health spending plan would also roll back many of the tax incentives for renewable energy that were put in place under Trump's predecessor Joe analysis also claims that the bill would pave the way for a historic redistribution of wealth from the poorest 10 percent of Americans to the bill is unpopular across multiple demographic, age and income groups, according to extensive recent polling. Although the House has already passed its own version, both chambers have to agree on the same text before it can be signed into law.
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Musk Lambasts Trump's Senate Tax Bill Over Clean‑Energy Cuts
Senate Republicans have advanced a version of President Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill that would accelerate the end of several clean‑energy incentives, prompting fierce criticism from Elon Musk, who warned the proposal threatens millions of jobs and harms future industries. The legislation aims to eliminate the federal $7,500 tax credit for new electric vehicles and a $4,000 credit for used models by September 30, 2025, and speeds up the repeal of wind and solar tax breaks—undermining incentives originally enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act. Musk described the Senate draft as 'utterly insane and destructive,' declaring on X that the bill grants 'handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future'. The Senate cleared a key procedural hurdle with a 51‑49 vote to formally begin debate, pausing Medicaid rollbacks and other spending cut provisions until a final vote. Republicans have urged swift passage before July 4, though the House must reconcile its version, which retains EV credits through 2025 and 2026 under certain thresholds, before the bill can become law. ADVERTISEMENT Energy advocates and industry leaders say the accelerated repeal threatens clean‑energy investments and competitiveness. The revised Senate text not only repeals incentives but also introduces new charges on wind and solar farms that incorporate Chinese materials after 2027. Analysts warn these provisions could jeopardise up to 830,000 clean‑energy jobs by 2030 and elevate electricity bills. Musk, who briefly led Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, has returned to full public criticism since departing the role, branding the bill a 'disgusting abomination' and cautioning its passage would represent 'political suicide for the Republican Party'. He also highlighted a projected $5 trillion rise in the national debt tied to the legislation. Republican voices have diverged sharply. Some libertarian‑leaning senators, including Rand Paul and Mike Lee, echoed Musk's warnings about deficit growth, while others accused him of hypocrisy, pointing to earlier statements expressing openness to EV credit elimination. Trump has defended the measure, branding it historic—claiming it's 'the biggest tax cuts in history'—and dismissed Musk's criticisms, accusing him of being aware of the provisions from the start. Industry response has varied. Renewable energy companies like NorSun, Qcells, and Talon PV argue the rollback undermines clean-energy momentum and threatens jobs, while proponents of fossil fuel see the bill as redressing a balance skewed by green subsidies. Analysts note that without clear incentives, U.S. firms risk ceding ground to China and the EU in EV adoption and green-tech development. Economic modelling by the Congressional Budget Office anticipates a $2.4 trillion increase in deficits tied to the bill, with Trump's office arguing tariff revenues will offset some costs. Senate Majority Leader John Thune is negotiating over state and local tax deductions, but energy provisions have remained largely intact from the committee version—the exclusions are non‑negotiable in the Senate's timeline. Without bipartisan support, the bill's tight 53‑47 Senate margin leaves little room for defections—making the final outcome unpredictable. Meanwhile, environmental organisations and energy‑sector analysts have labelled the bill a retreat from climate leadership—criticising the sudden reversal away from the objectives of the Inflation Reduction Act. With the U.S. facing intense global competition in clean technology, the legislation's fate will likely shape the nation's economic and strategic positioning in the coming decade.
