The Government to Stop Tracking the Costs of Extreme Weather
The move would leave insurance companies, researchers and government policymakers without information to help understand the patterns of major disasters like hurricanes, drought or wildfires, and their economic consequences, starting this year.Those events are becoming more frequent or severe as the planet grows hotter, although not all disasters are linked to climate change.
It's the latest effort from the Trump administration to restrict or eliminate climate research. In recent weeks the administration has dismissed the authors working on the nation's biggest climate assessment, planned to eliminate National Parks grants focused on climate change, and released a budget plan that would cut significantly climate science from the U.S. Geological Survey and the Energy and Defense departments.
Researchers and lawmakers criticized Thursday's decision.
Jesse M. Keenan, associate professor and director of the Center on Climate Change and Urbanism at Tulane University in New Orleans, said ending the data collection would cripple efforts by federal and state governments to set budgets or make decisions on investment in infrastructure.
'It defies logic,' he said. Without the database, 'the U.S. government's flying blind as to the cost of extreme weather and climate change.'
Few institutions can duplicate the kind of information provided by the database, said Virginia Iglesias, a climate researcher at the University of Colorado. 'It's one of the most consistent and trusted records of climate-related economic loss in the country,' she said. 'The power of the database lies in its credibility.'
So-called billion-dollar disasters — those with costs that balloon to seven figures are more — have been increasing over time. In the 1980s, when NOAA began compiling these lists, there were just over three per year, on average, when adjusted for inflation. For the period from 2020 to 2024, the average was 23 per year.
In total, at least 403 such events have occurred in the United States since 1980. Last year there were 27, a tally second only to 2023 (which had 28).
Last year's disasters included hurricanes Helene and Milton, which together caused about $113 billion in damages and more than 250 deaths, a severe hailstorm in Colorado that caused about $3 billion in damages and a yearlong drought across much of the country that caused $5 billion in damages and claimed the lives of more than 100 people from heat exposure.
NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information plans to stop tracking these billion-dollar disasters in response to 'evolving priorities, statutory mandates, and staffing changes,' the agency said in an email.
When asked, the agency did not say whether another branch of NOAA or federal agency would continue tracking and publicly reporting the price tag of such disasters. The announcement said the agency would make archived data from 1980 to 2024 available. But the dollar amount of disasters from 2025 on, such as the Los Angeles wildfires and their estimated billions of dollars of damage, would not be tracked and reported to the public.
'You can't fix what you don't measure,' said Erin Sikorsky, the director of The Center for Climate and Security. 'If we lose this information about the costs of these disasters, the American people and Congress won't know what risks climate is posting to our country.'
Other institutions or agencies would likely be unable to duplicate the data collection because it includes proprietary insurance information that companies are cautious to share, Ms. Sikorsky said. 'It's a pretty unique contribution.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tax breaks and spending cuts: Here are the winners and losers in Trump's big bill
There are major changes coming for Americans' finances, after the House of Representatives passed a landmark tax and spending bill at the center of President Donald Trump's domestic agenda. House Republicans passed the legislation Thursday in a 218-214 vote along party lines. The Senate passed it in a 51-50 vote two days earlier. Trump's signature, which came Friday, was the last thing needed to usher in the changes that many people will start seeing early next year. Now that the megabill has passed, expect a ton of short-term debt to be sold to finance the government's deficit 'I'm single': At 70, I have $500,000 in stocks and $220,000 in savings. How do I invest my $130,000 windfall? 'Today is my 61st birthday': I have my ex-spouse's Social Security benefits. Should I retire at 65 and travel? 'I do all the yard work, cooking and cleaning': I live with my daughter and her lazy boyfriend. She wants me to buy her house. Do I say yes? My wife and I are in our late 60s. Do I sell stocks to pay our $30,000 credit-card debt — or do it gradually over 3 years? The bill is permanently etching lower income-tax rates into the tax code and averting a widespread 2026 tax hike, when the 2017 tax cuts from Trump's first term were supposed to expire. But the bill is about more than tax cuts, and its myriad provisions mean that some Americans will benefit from the legislation while others will lose out. For a law Trump calls the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' the beauty may be in the eye of the beholder. For example, millions of Americans are poised to receive tax cuts — but richer Americans are more likely to see bigger tax savings. There are new tax breaks geared at low- and moderate-income households, but also spending cuts that could make it harder for some to receive public assistance or hold onto health insurance. Homeowners win, so long as they live in areas where they can put a more generous write-off to good use. Car buyers win too, depending on the vehicle they are getting. 'The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers for the American people,' Republican Rep. Jason Smith of Missouri, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a predawn floor speech. 'This is the largest tax cut for working families, farmers and small businesses in U.S. history.' But House Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries railed against 'this one big, ugly bill,' recounting the stories of people across the country who talked about the necessity of their Medicaid health insurance — and their fears of losing the coverage. The bill is 'the largest cut to health care in American history,' he said in his marathon remarks. In promoting the bill, the White House and Republican leaders emphasized the wins for everyday Americans. The widely-used standard deduction is becoming more generous, along with the child tax credit. There are new deductions for tips, overtime and other expenses that will add to the ways many Americans can cut their taxable income. The full force of taxes and predicted economic growth would boost annual take-home pay up to roughly $10,000 for a family with two kids, according to the White House. But there's also the value of provisions like a permanently higher estate tax, generous business expensing and partnership accounting rules that all help richer taxpayers. Outside models agree the majority of taxpayers are getting tax cuts when the tax provisions are tallied up. Yet those estimates show that the higher up the income ladder, the better those cuts look. That's both in dollar value and as a share of after-tax income. Estimates from the Tax Foundation, the Tax Policy Center and the Penn Wharton Budget Model show the pattern, each comparing the bill to what would happen if the 2017 tax law expired. In the Tax Policy Center numbers, a household making between roughly $67,000 and almost $120,000 a year would be getting a $1,780 tax cut next year, a 2.3% addition to their after-tax income. The top 20% of households, in a band that starts with households making nearly $220,000 and soars to multimillionaires, get an average $12,500 tax cut. That's a 3.4% increase in their after-tax income. The Penn Wharton Budget Model takes into account the effects of stricter rules for Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — two programs geared at low-income households — in determining how the bill would affect Americans' incomes. In 2027, a household making less than $18,000 would lose $165 and a household making less than $51,000 would gain $30. By 2030, when temporary deductions go away, households in these income bands would be projected to lose more than $1,000. For the top band of households, 2027 increases in after-tax income range from nearly $6,700 to over $300,000, Penn Wharton researchers said. The nation's 4 million tipped workers are getting a deduction worth up to $25,000 in a win for hairdressers, bartenders and waiters, among others. Workers who rely on tips could save an average of $1,700 per year, according to the White House Council of Economic Advisers. The tax break runs from 2025 from 2028, meaning people could start taking the deduction on the 2025 taxes they file next tax season. The question is how many tipped workers will use the tax break, according to the Yale Budget Lab. More than a third of the nation's workers relying on tips had incomes so low, they didn't have to file an income-tax return in 2022, while only 4% of workers earning less than $25 an hour received tips. The break on overtime could save workers between $1,400 and $1,750 per year, the White House Council of Economic Advisers said last month. It runs from 2025 to 2028. Workers who earn regular overtime pay, like nurses, firefighters and construction workers, also stand to benefit from the bill's tax provisions. It's a sliver of the workforce, with 8% of hourly workers and 4% of salaried workers conceivably qualifying for the deduction, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Car buyers will gain a deduction up to $10,000 on their auto loans, applying to the interest paid on loans for new vehicles assembled in the U.S. The average buyer paid $1,332 on auto-loan interest charges in 2024, according to AAA. The tax break is available for loans through 2028, but it's limited to new cars. It's expensive buying a new car, with the average final price at $48,799 in May, according to Cox Automotive. So the question is how many people take up the offer of a tax break? A new-vehicle buyer's income averaged $115,000 in 2023, Cox Automotive data said. Other research suggests a six-figure salary is necessary to afford a new car. Homeowners are getting more firepower to write off their state income taxes and local property taxes. After much wrangling, the state and local tax (SALT) deduction is going to at least $40,000. It will drift higher with inflation through 2029 before tumbling back to $10,000 in 2030. The quadrupled deduction is a win for people living in areas with high state income taxes and big property-tax bills. Critics say that's a giveaway putting other homeowners at a disadvantage if they live in states with lower tax bills. People ages 65 and up are getting a $6,000 deduction, in a nod to Trump's campaign pledge to end taxes on Social Security benefits. The tax break coming to seniors technically isn't excluding their benefit money from taxes, due to the budget rules lawmakers had to follow. But the White House says the deduction zaps out the tax differently. The deduction will exceed taxable Social Security benefits for 88% of recipients. The deduction will reach 51.4 million beneficiaries, according to the Council of Economic Advisers. It's a major break for older Americans living on fixed incomes. Coupled with a standard deduction that's already enhanced for seniors, deductions would total $23,750 for single filers and $46,700 for married couples. It's a short-term win with a tax break that runs from 2025 to 2028. But the bill creates indirect problems for retirees, according to critics. Less tax revenue coming into Social Security and Medicare trust funds will speed up insolvency, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Starting in 2034, Social Security trust funds will hit a shortfall and pay 81% of the promised benefit, according to the latest official projections. Social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are getting tighter eligibility rules and more verification requirements. More SNAP administrative costs are getting pushed onto states and new limits are coming for the ways states generate the fund to pay their side of Medicaid. A tax-credit boost is going away for people getting their health insurance through the Affordable Care Act exchange. Almost 12 million more people will be without health insurance by 2034, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's tally of the bill. An earlier CBO estimate put the number at 16 million. Democrat criticism is a scare tactic, Republican leaders say. No one who really needs public assistance will lose it, they say, and work requirements are worth adding to promote work and prevent benefit misuse, they say. Still, the Medicaid changes and their possible fallout have been enough to concern some GOP members. Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against the bill due to parts of the Medicaid changes. A reporter asked Trump on Tuesday about the CBO's estimate of nearly 12 million people losing health insurance. The amount of people falling off Medicaid would be smaller and that amount would be targeting Medicaid's waste, fraud and abuse, he said. Medicaid is also the country's biggest payer for long-term care including nursing homes, according to the AARP. Tighter funding may have implications on nursing home access and staffing levels, according to KFF. But the White House says Medicaid without waste, fraud and abuse can better serve the populations it's supposed to help, including low-income seniors. The bill's other main flash point was its price. The bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, coming at a time when national debt exceeds $36 trillion. Deficit critics on Capitol Hill slammed the bill. So did Elon Musk. Consumers who need financing may lose out with the national debt worries. Lenders use Treasury yields to help determine interest rates for mortgages, car loans and more. For example, the rate on a 30-year fixed mortgage tends to follow the 10-year Treasury note BX:TMUBMUSD10Y. A bond's price and its yield move in opposite directions. If the Treasury Department issues more debt to finance government operations and buyers aren't willing to buy as much, that would lower the price of government debt and raise its yields — which would raise consumer borrowing costs. The bond market has been watching the bill's twists and turns, said Lawrence Gillum, LPL Financial's chief fixed-income strategist. Though investors are expecting higher deficits, Gillum said their reaction will depend on how big those deficits go. The one thing Gillum can say with some certainty 'is that interest rates are not going to go down because of this bill.' An excise tax on private university endowments is becoming steeper. The excise tax tops out at 8% for universities with a per-student endowment value of $2 million or more, but constitutes a significant increase from the current, flat rate of 1.4%. That's likely a hit to schools, including those in the Ivy League — like Harvard University. Schools will have less money for research and financial-aid packages, said Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations with the American Council on Education. 'Students will lose out in that,' he said. The bill is also set to overhaul the way students repay their federal student loans. Among other things, it's scrapping many repayment plans and going with two ways borrowers can repay their debts. The bill does have some help for borrowers repaying their loans. Workers don't have to count it for tax purposes when their employers paid up to $5,250 on these bills. The bill makes the tax break permanent. The legislation is tough news for Americans who want to buy electric vehicles. The bill eliminates a $7,500 tax credit for the purchase or lease of new EVs, as well as a $4,000 credit for used EVs. Those are just some of the clean-energy tax breaks fading fast under the legislation. 'Renewable energy is the big loser, set to lose hundreds of billions in Biden-era subsidies, while most companies that spent 2025 playing defense on taxes walked away mostly unscathed,' John Gimigliano of KPMG. Now, would-be EV buyers have to step on it if they want the tax code to help defray their costs. The credits on new and used EVs are good through Sept. 30. What personal-finance issues would you like to see covered in MarketWatch? We would like to hear from readers about their financial decisions and money-related questions. You can fill out or write to us at . A reporter may be in touch to learn more. MarketWatch will not attribute your answers to you by name without your permission. My wife and I have $7,000 a month in pensions and Social Security, plus $140,000 cash. Can we afford to retire? 'Finance makes me break out in hives': I inherited $240K from my parents. Do I pay off my $258K mortgage and give up my job? The Dow and Russell 2000 are joining the stock market's party. Is it a game changer for the bulls? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum — or $355 a month for life? I'm a stay-at-home mom. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Grok uses climate change stats to explain Karoline Leavitt's post about Texas floods
Grok, Elon Musk's artificial intelligence bot on X, summarized a post from the White House Press Secretary about the devastating Texas floods, providing information on how global warming increases the likelihood of extreme weather. On Saturday, Karoline Leavitt re-posted a Truth Social message from President Donald Trump acknowledging the intense flooding that has killed at least 32 people and informing the public that the administration is working with local Texas officials to assist. When asked to summarize the post, Grok said Trump was referencing the tragic July 4 flooding event in Texas but then provided some background information on how climate change is making flooding worse. 'Climate models from the IPCC and NOAA suggest that ignoring climate change could intensify such flooding events in Texas, as warmer air holds more moisture, with peer-reviewed studies (e.g., Trenberth et al., 2018) indicating a 7% increase in atmospheric water vapor per 1°C warming, potentially exacerbating future disasters,' Grok summarized. Since January, the Trump administration has drastically rolled back climate regulations, cut research funding, and essentially eliminated climate programs. Trump has called climate change a 'hoax' and downplayed concerns about severe weather becoming more common and deadly despite science showing otherwise. The administration has made cuts to the National Weather Service, the government agency responsible for monitoring weather events, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the agency tasked with coordinating disaster response and administering recovery efforts. Both NWS and FEMA play major roles in warning people of inclement weather, coordinating a response, and delivering relief to those in need. Yet, Trump has characterized FEMA as an unnecessary federal resource intervening in state-level issues. 'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor,' Trump said last month. The administration also made cuts to the NWS, which led to the departure of nearly 600 employees – hundreds of whom are critical in monitoring weather and issuing warnings to residents. While the agency is hiring new staff to 'stabilize' itself, former NWS directors warned that cutting staff could understaff offices so much so that 'there will be a needless loss of life.' Further cuts to programs that monitor climate and weather patterns, such as the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which produces congressionally mandated reports on how climate change is affecting life, could hinder preparations for extreme weather. Texas officials said, over the weekend, they were unprepared for the amount of rain that flooded nearby rivers and created lethal flash flooding overnight.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Bob Lazar ‘S4' Film Due Out Soon. The Director Shares His Thoughts
Physicist Bob Lazar Courtesy of Project Gravitaur The documentary "S4," due out by the end of the summer, has been delayed more than once. Why? Perhaps because it covers the controversial life of outspoken former Area 51 employee, Bob Lazar. For those who don't know, Area 51 is a large, secretive military base in the remote Nevada desert where several exotic military aircraft have been developed and tested over the years, including the venerable U-2 spy plane way back when. Lazar, during the roughly half-year he was there, says he saw more than just exotic aircraft, however. He contends that what he worked on was something so sophisticated that it could not have been built by humans. And therein lies the controversy. In my own work as an adventure journalist, I've interviewed several prominent astronauts and pilots, including moonwalkers. Many will admit to believing life forms other than ours exist in the universe. It's a statistics thing, really, they say. What they won't comment on publicly is whether such life forms have visited Earth, though some have told me they've seen things they can't explain. I'm not here to weigh in one way or the other on the topic. But I will let Luigi Vendittelli, executive producer and director of "S4," describe his work on the documentary with Lazar, now 66. Following are edited excerpts from a longer Zoom conversation. Jim Clash: Let's start with Bob Lazar as to credibility. He's been on a number of podcasts, most notably Joe Rogan's, discussing his early life and work at the S4 part of Area 51. He seems smart and composed. Do you believe what he says? Luigi Vendittelli: There is no doubt in my mind that if Bob made all of this up, he's the best actor of my time. If he were lying, he fooled not just me but my entire documentary team, a few who are not UFO-inclined or believe in government conspiracies. Guard Gate at Area 51 (Groom Lake, Dreamland) near Rachel, Nevada (Photo by Barry King/WireImage) WireImage Clash: I've read that the documentary has been delayed a few times. True? Vendittelli: Let's say there are companies out there that want to monopolize control of all documentaries in what is called the "fantastic" space. UFOs, as much as they've trickled down into mainstream, still fall under that category. Two different people have actively tried to get us to sign over exclusive film distribution rights to them while behind our backs have been telling others they're doing it just to sabotage the film. If we did sign over the rights, we would have no way of distributing the film if they decided never to put it out. One company cost us seven months of delays with lawyers and what not, the other a few more months. When the film comes out, you'll be surprised at who and why. Clash: You've mentioned there will be new Lazard information in 'S4' that hasn't yet been released. Is there anything that you can tell us about that? Vendittelli: We needed a device whereby we could bring the eighties to the present. What better vehicle than the time-travel DeLorean used in 'Back To The Future.' I made some calls and found it could be rented. So we filmed Bob driving it in the desert. He had a blast [laughs]. Clash: I once interviewed the late great physicist Dr. Edward Teller. Wasn't there some connection between Teller and Lazard early in Lazard's career? Vendittelli: Teller was the reason Bob got the job at EG&G [the former defense contractor]. Bob was working at Los Alamos in 1982. He had modified a 1979 Honda Civic hatchback, put a jet engine on the back and would ride it to work. The thing made a lot of noise and could reach 200 mph. He was known at Los Alamos as this crazy scientist guy [laughs]. They put him on the front page of the Los Alamos "Monitor." It happened to be the same day Teller was speaking there. Bob sees Teller standing outside reading the paper, walks up and introduces himself, saying, 'I'm the guy on the front page." Teller found it amusing. By 1988, Bob had moved to Las Vegas, and sent some resumes out to get work, one to Teller at Lawrence Livermore National Labs. Teller was retired by then, but called Bob, probably because he remembered his jet car. He gave Bob a name at EG&G in the special projects area. Bob got an interview then a job in propulsion, and was eventually sent out to the test site. Clash: You told me earlier that you've been interested in UFOs yourself since you were a kid, and have even seen two up in Canada. What made you approach Lazard initially? Vendittelli: I'll never forget what Bob said when we first met at his house in December of 2021. His wife had flown to California and it was just the two of us. He sat me down at this table, looked across at me and said, "You seem like a nice kid. Do you really want to do this? Because you're probably going to get some problems. You don't need this in your life. I want you to think about it." He was very much trying to warn me. Poster for soon-to-be-released Bob Lazar documentary, 'S4.' Courtesy of Project Gravitaur Clash: Did that warning play out? Vendittelli: I've been in business for 25 years and don't believe I've ever been in danger. But I started getting threats last year - phone calls and messages. In the very beginning, I took it lightly, brushing it off, but Bob told me not to be so quick. Really, though, who is going to call to let me know they're going to harm me? It doesn't make sense. A friend of mine is a police officer. He told me to give him the phone numbers and to file a report. The numbers were untraceable, of course.
