National, Labour agree changes needed for weather-event buyouts
Photo:
Tim Cuff / POOL
The two major political parties want a bipartisan approach towards dealing with climate adaptation and property buy-outs during weather events.
Last week, an independent reference group made recommendations for climate adaptation legislation, including that people
should not expect the government to buy out
severely weather-damaged homes.
The group, set up by the Ministry for the Environment, recommended after a 20-year transition period, homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buyouts.
It said individuals should be responsible for knowing the risks and making their own decisions about whether to move away from high-risk areas.
no captoin.
Photo:
RNZ
The group also recommended that funding for adaptation measures, such as flood schemes, sea walls and blue-green infrastructure, should follow a 'beneficiary pays' approach in most cases.
While the government is yet to formally respond to the report, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said in principal, the government
won't be able to keep bailing people out
.
He said Climate Change Minister Simon Watts had been working hard to get a bipartisan view on how to deal long term with these weather events.
"This is a long term issue. We need a proper framework in place to work out whether its landowners, councils, whether its central government, banks, insurers that actually have to create a framework for dealing with these weather events an how we handle them going forward."
Hipkins agreed that the frame work needs to be worked through on a bipartisan basis so the issue doesn't become a "political football".
"We have to be realistic. Government is not going to be an insurer by default, but there are decisions that governments has taken, whether it's local government or central government, where houses can be built and there is some consequences for that," Hipkins told
Morning Report.
"We have a share of the liability here, but it doesn't mean we have all of the liability."
While Hipkins would not say whether he agrees in principal to phase out the buyouts, he said whatever we come up with needs to be fair and consistent.
"Fairness has to be at the heart of it," he said.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
Finance Minister Nicola Willis told
First Up
the government is working to ensure councils are clear about natural hazard risks when they allow people to build.
Willis said authorities must strike a balance between identifying hazard risks, and ensuring sufficient investment in infrastructure to prevent catastrophic damage.
"You come to this question of when people know that they are building on a flood plain, or they know that the area they're building on is at very high risk, is it fair to ask tax payers to always bear the costs of that? And those are some of the questions that this independent have been working through," she said.
Willis said extreme climate events are increasing and we can expect that to continue as a result of climate change.
She said it is going to be important for New Zealand that we carefully plan where housing development occurs, what kinds of infrastructure we build and what investment we make into adaptation such as stopbanks.
"We need to have frameworks as a country that work not just as an ad-hoc basis, but to the extent possible, can endure from one Parliament to the next because these are long-run issues, so long-run incentives are needed."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
MoE Advice Reveals Cost-Cutting Takes Priority Over Quality In ECE
Newly released advice from the Ministry of Education to Minister David Seymour shows the Government is more focused on helping ECE providers cut costs than on making sure young children get high-quality, safe accessible early learning. In the document Options to reduce ECE service staffing costs, four options were provided (three of which remain redacted), all aimed at cutting the most significant cost for providers: staff wages. One of those options which has recently been implemented, allows employers to pay new teachers the minimum starting rate, regardless of their qualifications or experience. 'This advice confirms what we feared, that cost savings for providers are being prioritised over children's learning and wellbeing,' says Kathy Wolfe, Chief Executive of Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand. 'Reducing pay for qualified teachers not only undermines professional standards, but it also risks deterring future teachers from joining the sector. Is this really what the Minister and Associate Minister of Education want? We were told their goal was to lift education outcomes and that journey begins in early childhood.' The Ministry's advice, requested by Minister Seymour, states that this cost-cutting measure is expected to save providers up to $22 million over two years. It also acknowledges the serious risks associated with this approach. 'The Ministry's own words say it all, this move makes ECE teaching 'less attractive for those considering studying and entering the workforce',' says Cathy Wilson, Chief Executive of Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand. 'We're already in a teacher workforce shortage and need to attract more teachers and retain a higher number of teachers. How can we expect to maintain a high-quality system when we devalue the people who deliver it? This short-term thinking will only create bigger problems, with fewer qualified teachers, more instability in the workforce, and a greater risk to children's safety and well-being. How does that help prepare tamariki for school?' Even more concerning is the Government's apparent intention to abandon the Pay Parity scheme. This initiative links the pay of ECE teachers in education and care centres to that of kindergarten teachers, who are funded directly by the government and have pay parity with primary teachers. The system was designed to ensure fairness across the teaching profession, recognising experience and qualifications whether a teacher is in ECE, primary, or secondary education. 'Teachers are teachers, whether they're working with infants, children, or teenagers,' says Mrs Wilson. 'Undermining the pay and conditions of ECE teachers sends a clear message that their work is valued less. That's not only short-sighted, but it's also damaging for teachers, tamariki, and whānau alike.' The implications are serious. In wealthier communities, providers may simply pass increased costs on to parents who can pay. In lower-income communities, however, providers will be more likely to cut wages, reduce qualified staff, or take advantage of any future changes that lower the minimum qualification requirements, effectively creating a two-tier ECE system. 'We're staring down the barrel of deepening inequity in early childhood education,' says Mrs Wolfe. 'If qualification requirements are relaxed and pay is suppressed, the quality of teaching in some demographic areas will decline, and with it, outcomes for tamariki.' This direction, Mrs Wolfe warns, will increase teacher turnover, shrink the future workforce, and accelerate the decline of New Zealand's globally recognised high-quality ECE. 'It is horrifying to see our world-leading early childhood education undermined in the name of short-term savings,' she says. 'Our tamariki deserve qualified, well-supported teachers. They deserve safe, rich learning environments. And parents deserve to know that their children are safe and getting the best possible start in life, no matter their postcode.' Te Rito Maioha and Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand are calling on the Government to reverse this direction and invest in quality, not cuts. 'The funding review is underway; however it already seems to have been undermined, and the Minister's outcome predetermined. We urge the Government to properly fund ECE, not by slashing teacher pay or lowering standards, but recognising the vital role teachers play and committing to equity and excellence for every child,' Mrs Wolfe says. Notes: The advice requested by Minister Seymour was based on the knowledge that the ECE sector would receive only a 0.5% funding increase in Budget 2025, well below the 2.5% rate of inflation. The Ministry's paper acknowledges this shortfall would place significant financial pressure on providers. In response, the Minister specifically asked for advice on how to reduce the sector's largest cost: teachers. The ECE sector has already experienced a multi-year funding freeze prior to 2017 under the then National government leaving the sector approximately 11% behind CPI over the last 10 to 15 years. ECE is considered a public good with investment outweighing the costs. For more information on the need to sufficiently fund ECE services About Te Rito Maioha: Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand is a leader in early childhood and primary education – growing teachers, leaders, knowledge and bicultural practice so every child learns and thrives. As a membership organisation we are a strong voice for young children and quality education, advocating for the ECE sector and connecting our members with the latest sector-related issues, policy and professional development. As a specialist tertiary provider, we grow valued teachers, educators, leaders and experts with diploma, degree and postgraduate qualifications in early childhood and primary education.
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Youth Homelessness Crisis Escalates: Urgent Action Needed
Kick Back, a Youth Development organisation responding to Youth Homelessness, is calling for the Government to act with urgency in response to the growing Homelessness crisis children and young people are experiencing. The recent Homelessness Insights Report confirmed what front line services and our communities have been telling our Government. The Homelessness crisis is escalating. Kick Back is concerned that an increasing number of children and young people are experiencing homelessness. About 30% of young people and children Kick Back has served through our outreach and crisis centre, The Front Door, came to Kick Back within 2-4 weeks of their experience of homelessness. Kick Back is concerned that there is a growing number of new children and young people experiencing homelessness. No child or young person should ever be without a safe or stable home. Kick Back believes this crisis can be solved, but we must act now! Though recent Government decisions have increased the risk of homelessness for our children, Kick Back believes it is important to recognise that Homelessness is a product of a housing system which views housing as a commodity, rather than a basic human need we all have as people. "We believe it is important to acknowledge that Homelessness is a manufactured crisis. No service, charity or amount of wrap around services, can fix this problem. If we are going to achieve housing justice for our young people we must begin to understand the manner in which homelessness serves as a product of Capitalism and Colonisation! Until we address the structural issues that allow homelessness to persist, we will never bring this crisis to an end. Our #Right2Housing as people, is a fundamental human need, essential to the thriving of our communities." Says Aaron Hendry, co-founder and General Manager of Kick Back. Kick Back calls on the Government to act with urgency in response to this crisis by: • Immediately rolling back the Emergency Housing Reforms • Providing fast release funding to support local communities to activate community solutions • Begin an escalated project of work to progress #Duty2Assist Legislation to ensure rangatahi and whānau can access the housing support they need • Resource a Strategy to End & Prevent Youth Homelessness • Fund a rangatahi specific Immediate Housing System to support young people in Immediate Housing need • Commit and resource a strong Public Housing build program with a mandate to #HouseThePeople "The time to seek advice and gather information has passed. The Government knows what they need to do. Our tamariki are suffering, our rangatahi are dying, the Government must act!' says Aaron Hendry.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
The value of Youth MPs put under a question mark
Photo: VNP/Louis Collins A former politician says change is needed to the Youth Parliament system if it's to stay relevant. MP-turned political commentator Peter Dunne says the scheme isn't just "a rag-tag collection of young people coming together for a couple of days to play at being MPs", but if the event is going to be taken seriously, more consistency is required around its processes. That's not the case at the moment, in everything from how the teens are selected to the quality of the mentorship they're getting. The tri-annual event usually passes under the media radar, but this year's event was overshadowed by what a handful of Youth MPs said was censorship of their speeches . Dunne says he could understand the intention behind the message from the Ministry of Youth Development, which asked some students to remove parts of their speeches where they lacked political neutrality, but the issue could have been handled better. In the end, none of the students were stopped from making their speeches, even if they didn't make the changes. Youth Parliament has been held every three years for the past three decades and is described by the government as, "a unique opportunity for young New Zealanders to learn first-hand about our democracy, influence government decision-making, and have their voices heard". In many ways it's like the real thing, with MPs selecting teens to represent them for a couple of days in Parliament where they debate, give speeches and discuss fictional legislation. Dunne says often the young adults outshine the older MPs. "The contrast has usually been between the impeccable behaviour of the youth MPs and the somewhat unruly behaviour of their adult counterparts," he says. The first Youth Parliament was held in 1995 and initially was just a couple of days. Now the programme has expanded, running from April to August and Dunne questions how much teens take out of those extra two months and 29 days. "And more importantly, what weight is attached to that? They've got no formal status in the community, so what role can they play?" he asks. Dunne says much of what the young aspiring politicians learn and do is dependent on the MP they are mentored by. "In some cases they won't do very much, in some cases the MP will work actively with them and assign them a particular project," Dunne says. There also aren't any rules around how MPs select their mentee. Some get applicants to write essays, this year David Seymour held an election, and Dunne says a couple just shoulder tap the kids of a mate. "The time is right to have a proper review into its function and purpose, including the role of the Youth MPs, how they're selected and what are reasonable expectations of them. "Because I think that with a much clearer focus the youth parliament can play a much greater role than it has done to date," Dunne says. Oscar Duffy, representing List MP Melissa Lee became interested in politics last year when his nan was in hospital. "She's a Māori lady and she didn't have the best experience ... so that was a pretty key driver in me being interested in what's going on. "Obviously there's so much tension between Māori and the Crown ... and that affects my family really directly," he says. Duffy agrees that the degree of mentorship varies. He spent substantial time working on projects in his community and in Lee's Mount Albert office but says others didn't have the same experience. "[Ministers] have no time right? Ministers are so busy, I roomed with Simeon Brown's Youth MP and he didn't really see Simeon a lot, if at all," he says. Duffy sees youth parliament as an opportunity for those interested in politics to get an insight into the system. He says everyone attending this year had a keen interest in advocacy and change-making, but he admits that at times some see their role as more important than it is. "There's just a lot of politically charged people in one room. "Putting them all in the same room is great and it gets everyone talking to each other and firing off really good initiatives ... but yeah I guess some of them do think they are a bit more important than they are which is a shame because they probably should be more important and have more of a say," he says. But if he could change one thing Duffy would raise the age bracket because he thinks 16 is too young. "Even just move it up one year, 17-19, so there's more first year uni students who have been through high school, who have seen the whole system," he says. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter .
