logo
Corporate Accountability And Global Climate Justice Groups Issue Statement On Breakdown Of UN Climate Talks In Bonn

Corporate Accountability And Global Climate Justice Groups Issue Statement On Breakdown Of UN Climate Talks In Bonn

Scoop20-06-2025
The following statement was delivered today by Rachel Rose Jackson, Corporate Accountability's Director of Climate Research and Policy, on June 19th, 2025 in Bonn, Germany at a UNFCCC press conference. For the full press conference alongside partners, see webcast here: https://unfccc.int/event/dcj-daily-press-conference-2
As the saying goes, 'It takes two to tango,' and this is certainly true when it comes to international collaboration, whether on climate action or anything else. But let's be absolutely clear. The United States has always been a very dreadful dance partner. From day one.
Nothing has changed in this regard here at Bonn,, apart from their physical absence from the dance floor, which sends a very clear message to the world that, truly, the United States cares for no one and nothing but itself. Now, at least the only thing that's different, is that it's clear for all the world to see what those of us who have spent many years in these halls have always witnessed—that the US never was and never has been serious about international collaboration of any kind. That the US throws its neocolonial and capitalist weight around to bully, block, and stall progress on any issue that would require it to act meaningfully. And that the US never has and never will care about saving lives, protecting the planet, or avoiding an entire societal collapse that it has played a direct hand in orchestrating for decades, if not centuries.
But, at the same time, if you're not going to bother to show up to the dance floor to tango, then simply put, maybe don't bother to show up on the dance floor at all.
Yet, rather than than simply abandoning their dance partners,, they have turned off the lights, broken the music player, put oil across the floor, tied everybody's shoe laces together and smashed the windows on the way out of the disco — all to ensure that with or without them here, the dance cannot proceed, and this process is rigged to fail.
The US is acting in a way that is way more than bad faith. This is backhanded. It's manipulative. It's reckless. And it's also senseless and illogical, because the US. cannot seem to understand that an inadequate global response to climate change will not only condemn millions around the world to death and destruction, it will also condemn millions of its own. Especially those people of color, Indigenous communities, and low-income workers and communities.
A dance that could have led to beautiful climate action decades ago has now become, to put it very simply, a dance of death. Because, the US doesn't care, and neither does the European Union or the Umbrella Group of countries, or the supposed Environmental integrity Group. The Global North has always been partnering with the United States in the toxic tango of poisoning international collaboration.
Here in Bonn, we see only moves that will bring us closer to societal collapse and planetary destruction. And in the agenda fight over the opening days, the EU and others not only refused to come to the dance floor, they refused even to discuss the dance song or the choreography when all the Global South wanted to do and all they were asking for was the chance to discuss - * discuss *, not even deliver - meaningful climate finance and the climate debt owed to the Global South.
The Global North has absolutely no intention of delivering this debt. They have already orchestrated their get out of jail free cards. Here, they will not even allow the pretense of a discussion about finance, and at COP last year in Bakù, they helped ram through the rules on carbon markets that provide the key to their great escape and their final destructive dance. Here and at home, they are also embedding these carbon markets into their pretend NDCs, to be seen to be taking action without really doing anything to do so.
We are told time and time again that there is no money, that carbon markets are the only way for Global South communities and countries to receive any support to address climate change. All of this while they spend billions and trillions on military support to Israel, on their industrial military complexes, and now threatening the same in relation to the very disastrous developments unraveling in Iran.
These countries have all the money in the world. They have amassed infinite wealth off the backs of frontline and Global South communities who they are now indebted to. Carbon markets are their way to shift all responsibility for the climate crisis to the very same communities that are already shouldering the greatest impacts, and to ensure that these Global North countries and Big Polluters can continue to pollute with impunity.
But carbon markets don't work. Though they have been existing in some form for as long as the UNFCCC has, they have never, not once, correlated with a global decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. They harm communities, they destroy ecosystems, and they allow the fossil fuel industry, Big Ag, and other polluters to continue to pollute unchecked. They have been shown, time and time again, not to work, and are proven to fail. And they are not climate finance or climate action.
So in the Global North's deceptive dance of climate breakdown, the moves we are seeing on the dance floor here in Bonnare the finale. And we must be attuned to their deadly agenda, and we must resist. We must call them out and we must hold them accountable. Not only to paying their long overdue climate debt. But to finally doing their fair share of climate action.
The truth is it doesn't only 'take two to tango' when it comes to addressing the climate crisis. It actually takes everyone, together in this moment, on the dance floor dancing to the same music to have a dance of climate action. Without this,it is to become a dance of climate death and destruction..'
Quotes from other members of Demand Climate Justice (DCJ):
Meena Raman, Third World Network:
'… For many of us who come to these UN processes, we really always feel whether the UN will live up to its multilateral agreements. So what we see here is that we as the peoples of the world, and particularly from the Global South, we have to hold governments to account, particularly in the Global North. Now the United States is not in this process, and perhaps to some extent that seems to be a good thing in the sense that the halls here are a little bit more less [sic] toxic. However, the Global North, those who remain here, continue to do and take the positions that the United States had been taking.
So what you see here happening now is actually akin to a dance where you have only if you're doing the tango, you do need… two sides to tango. But what you see happening here is that the other side doesn't want to tango. It does not even want to have a discussion. So you can't have a dance like this… you need to tango together …so this is really about the multilateral regime and how we as peoples of the world have to hold governments to account and say honor, respect international law, respect human rights, respect what you have agreed to. And so this is what is really so important in terms of the overall…
…all parties are responsible. We hold our developing country governments to account. But like I said, you need two to tango, and so we have to get on and not rely on and wreck the multilateral system through unilateral measures, whether they are trade, whether they are economic, whether they are by bombs and whether they are by total impunity destroying the very fragile international regime.'
Pang Delgra, Asian People's Movement on Debt and Debt Development:
'You know as a young person from the Global South I am consistently baffled by the hypocrisy that we see in adaptation talks here at the UNFCCC. Despite ostensibly keeping adaptation in the agenda with five different negotiation streams, there has been no real progress in unlocking adaptation action on the ground, and this has been the case for years.
The Adaptation Fund in its 16 year history has only received a meager $1 Trillion in support, while the adaptation finance needs of the Global South continue to balloon every year as we come closer and closer to hard adaptation limits. And need I remind everybody in the room that the consequences of this clear inaction are very clear and devastating.
In my country, the Philippines, the lack of support for adaptation has led to loss and damages with 20 plus typhoons annually, leaving many of us homeless, bankrupt and unable to rebuild our lives. All over the Global South, agriculture is collapsing under the weight of climate extremes, threatening food sovereignty and pushing entire communities to hunger and displacement. Women around the world who are first to bear the brunt of the climate crisis are left to carry this burden on their own with little to no support even from their own governments. And the future that we're handing down to the future generations is marked with irreversible loss of homes, livelihoods and lands.
And the heart of the issue here, as Meena has already said, is, you know, justice and reparations. This is why developed countries don't want to talk. They don't want to go to the table. And they will continue to stall these adaptation negotiations because they still refuse until now to recognise their role, the historical and continuing responsibility in causing the climate catastrophe and the resulting disproportionate vulnerability of the Global South that's being caused by their actions.
We're locked into maladaptive pathways making basically adaptation action on the ground impossible because we have no finance…without urgent public grants based on adaptation finance…we are being condemned to permanent harm and we are not just being denied support, we are being sacrificed here. This is not a technical issue. This is not just all blah blah blah in those rooms. This is a political choice, as Meena said, a deliberate act of abandonment by the EU, the EIG, the umbrella group and their invisible allies in the U.S.
We need adaptation justice now, and they don't want to give that to us. But we need it not just to adapt to our new catastrophic realities in the Global South but to ensure that we actually survive through this. And this is an issue that the Global South will continue to bring to the table and we as DCJ will continue to bring it to these rooms.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Greenpeace International Begins Groundbreaking Anti-SLAPP Case To Protect Freedom Of Speech
Greenpeace International Begins Groundbreaking Anti-SLAPP Case To Protect Freedom Of Speech

Scoop

time21 hours ago

  • Scoop

Greenpeace International Begins Groundbreaking Anti-SLAPP Case To Protect Freedom Of Speech

In a landmark test case of the European Union's new legislation to protect freedom of expression and stop abusive lawsuits, Greenpeace International has overnight challenged the US oil pipeline company, Energy Transfer, in court in the Netherlands.[1] The multi-billion-dollar company brought two back-to-back SLAPP suits against Greenpeace International and Greenpeace in the US, after Greenpeace showed solidarity with the 2016 peaceful Indigenous-led protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline. The first case was dismissed, but the Greenpeace organisations continue to defend against the second case, which is ongoing, after a North Dakota jury recently awarded over 660 million USD in damages to the pipeline from Greenpeace International and allies were present outside the courthouse in Amsterdam for the first hearing in the case with a banner reading " ENERGY TRANSFER, WELCOME TO THE EU - WHERE FREE SPEECH IS STILL A THING". Mads Christensen, Executive Director, Greenpeace International, says:"Energy Transfer's attack on our right to protest is an attack on everyone's free speech. Greenpeace has been the target of threats, arrests and even bombs over the last 50 years and persevered. We will continue to resist all forms of intimidation and explore every option to hold Energy Transfer accountable for this attempt at abusing the justice system. This groundbreaking anti-SLAPP case against Energy Transfer in the Netherlands is just the beginning of defeating this bullying tactic being wielded by billionaires and fossil fuel giants trying to silence critics all over the world. Something absolutely vital is at stake here: people's ability to hold corporate polluters to account for the devastation they're causing." Russel Norman, Executive Director, Greenpeace Aotearoa, says:"The timing of this case is particularly poignant given that we are about to mark the 40th anniversary of the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior by agents of the French Government here in Auckland. The bombing was an act of desperation by the French Government in the face of our successful, people-powered campaign to end nuclear testing in the Pacific. "Forty years ago, we showed that we could not be intimidated. Greenpeace only grew stronger, and together with the nuclear-free Pacific movement, we put a stop to nuclear testing. Now, as Greenpeace International goes to court in Amsterdam, Energy Transfer would also like us - and all climate activists - to be afraid and to shut up - but once again, we will show that we will not be silenced."The lawsuit is an important test of the European Union's Anti-SLAPP Directive, adopted in April 2024.[2] The Directive is designed to protect journalists, activists, civil society organisations, or anyone else speaking out about matters of public concern, from Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) - unfounded intimidation lawsuits brought by powerful corporations or wealthy individuals seeking to suppress public debate.[3] Since Greenpeace International is a Netherlands-based foundation and the damage caused by Energy Transfers's US SLAPP suit is occurring in the Netherlands, both Dutch and EU law apply. Amy Jacobsen, Senior Legal Counsel, Greenpeace International, says,"This case paves the way for protections from bullying lawsuits being implemented throughout Europe and beyond. The lawsuits that Energy Transfer have brought against Greenpeace International are the perfect example of the kind of abusive legal proceedings that the anti-SLAPP Directive is designed to protect against. By calling upon the EU anti-SLAPP Directive's protections, Greenpeace International refuses to allow the bullying tactics of wealthy fossil fuel corporations like Energy Transfer to compromise our fundamental free speech rights." Following a dawn ceremony on the 10 July 2025 in Auckland, the Rainbow Warrior will be open to the public for tours and talks with the crew on the weekends of 12 July and 19th July. Notes: [1] The new EU rules are aimed at addressing the growing number of abusive lawsuits against journalists, media outlets, environmental activists and human rights defenders. In February 2025, Greenpeace International initiated the first test of the European Union's anti-SLAPP Directive by filing a lawsuit in Dutch court against Energy Transfer. Greenpeace International seeks to recover all damages and costs it has suffered as a result of Energy Transfers's back-to-back, meritless lawsuits demanding hundreds of millions of dollars from Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US. [2] EU Member States have until 7 May 2026 at the latest to transpose the rules into their national laws, but the Dutch government has indicated that the Directive's protections can already be applied under existing Dutch legal frameworks. [3] Big Oil companies Shell, Total, and ENI have also filed SLAPPs against Greenpeace entities in recent years. Some of these cases have been successfully stopped in their tracks. This includes Greenpeace France successfully defeating TotalEnergies' SLAPP on 28 March 2024, and Greenpeace UK and Greenpeace International forcing Shell to back down from its SLAPP on 10 December 2024. Greenpeace Romania was being sued by the energy company Romgaz in 2025 - with the aim of dissolving the organisation, but their claims were withdrawn and they were forced to pay the court expenses to Greenpeace Romania. Greenpeace Italy and Greenpeace Netherlands are facing the Italian oil giant Eni in an ongoing court case in Italy.

NGOs Call For The Immediate Release Of Two Indigenous Penan From Sarawak, Malaysia
NGOs Call For The Immediate Release Of Two Indigenous Penan From Sarawak, Malaysia

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

NGOs Call For The Immediate Release Of Two Indigenous Penan From Sarawak, Malaysia

The Sarawak NGO Keruan and the Swiss based NGO Bruno Manser Fonds are calling for the immediate release of two Indigenous Penan from Sarawak, Malaysia, following their arrest by police on June 28th, 2025. (Sarawak / Malaysia) On June 28th, two Penan from Long Tepen were arrested by forestry officals while resting with a friend on the side of the road near Batu 12. While one of three Penan escaped with minor injuries and reported the incident to the police, the other two Penan were detained for at least four days under Section 103 of the Forestry Ordinance. The Long Tepen Village Residents Action Committee emphasised in its media statement over the weekend: «It is believed that the claims of obstructing public servants and issuing threats were fabricated. This incident appears to be a case of abuse of power by the Forest Department team.» It is pertinent to note that the Penan community from Long Tepen has filed numerous police reports in September 2024, March 2025 and June 2025 against the logging activities of the Malaysian company Shing Yang on their ancestral lands and the dismantlement of their blockades. Komeok Joe from the Penan organization Keruan concludes: «The Penan from Long Tepen have repeatedly filed police reports against the destruction of their forests by the company Shin Yang, only to see their rights ignored and their defenders criminalized. Instead of addressing the community's legitimate concerns, authorities have chosen to target those who stand up for their land and culture.» Keruan and the Bruno Manser Fonds urge the Malaysian government to support the immediate release of the two Penan forest defenders and to take action to stop logging in indigenous territories. The rights of indigenous peoples to their land must be respected and protected. In today's letter to the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) the NGOs request assistance in this matter.

Voices Of Power: Regional Exchange And Solidarity Building In Defense Of Indigenous Peoples Rights
Voices Of Power: Regional Exchange And Solidarity Building In Defense Of Indigenous Peoples Rights

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Voices Of Power: Regional Exchange And Solidarity Building In Defense Of Indigenous Peoples Rights

In building unity and support for Indigenous women paralegals and rights defenders, IPMSDL gathered Indigenous women partners and members from the Philippines, Northeast India, Bangladesh, West Papua, Burma and Borneo last June 20, 2024 for the 'Voices of Power: Regional Exchange and Solidarity Building in Defense of Indigenous Peoples Rights' in Penang, Malaysia. The regional gathering was one of the side-events during the two-day International Festival for Peoples Rights & Struggles that brought together hundreds of attendees from people's movements from around the world. The regional activity followed a series of online discussions, local para-legal training, rights and anti–judicial harassment campaigning led by Indigenous women. 'We gather to hear the lived experiences and challenges faced by communities and the different but common struggles on Indigenous women and Indigenous Peoples against criminalization due to their defense of their rights, lands and territories,' said Paul Belisario, IPMSDL global coordinator. Opening the event was a traditional prayer and ritual by Indigenous Dayak from Sabah, asking for the ancestors and spirits to bless and guide everyone. Ananya Chakma shared the experiences of Bangladesh's Jumma peoples displaced from the militarized Chittagong Hill Tracts under the guise of development projects. 'In order to occupy the land of Indigenous Peoples, they always target women, children and their families, threatening their lives and safety,' she said. From Manipur, Sorokhaibam Panthoi Chanu and Kiranmala Laishram exposed the brutality following India's military forces using extrajudicial killings, sexual violence, and a militarization. Under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) which legalized attacks and perpetuated impunity among our women suffer the most,' they stressed, urging the repeal of AFSPA and respect for Indigenous autonomy. Naw Paw Pree from Burma presented accounts of airstrikes on schools and churches, including the March 2024 bombing in Doo Tha Htoo, northern part of Mon State, Burma. 'End military dictatorship and ethnic chauvinism,' she contended. Meanwhile, Filipina activist Mae Fe Ancheta-Templa uplifted the role of Lumad women in Mindanao, portraying them as educators, warriors, and healers despite the continuous militarization and ancestral land theft. Her rallying cry—'Kamalitanan, maghiusa!'—then called for unity amid struggle. Her speech was seconded by Eufemia Cullamat, which emphasized that Lumad women, especially those choosing the road for liberation and revolutionary struggle, have always been sacrificing their lives and becoming martyrs. Sayang Mandabayan of West Papua condemned Indonesia's transmigration program for eroding Papuan identity, capturing their lands and criminalizing and imprisoning Indigenous activists for self-determination. These became a huge toll to women and children left in refugee camps and forcibly removed from their communities. A survivor of political imprisonment, she reminded the world that West Papua bleeds behind silence but they will not disappear. Common in the sharing was the heavy militarization linked to development projects and land grabbing by government and corporate interests. Each also shared how the paralegal training project, network building, sharing of stories and rights campaigning offered overall education and learning, awareness raising and capacity building in terms of IP women rights, IP rights, and immediate paralegal and legal knowledge necessary for IP women to identify steps in protecting themselves, their communities, organizations and families. The event also cemented and initiated the ground work on how Indigenous women from different places can support one another, exchange experiences and meaningful experiences to challenge any attacks and rights violations. Giving solidarity and support, Datuk Dr. Haji Sangkar Rasam, Chairman of Felcra Niaga Sdn Bhd and Head Branch of Peoples Justice Party Keningau, also extended inspirational message and stories of Indigenous Peoples persistence to push for their welfare and own development. In Penang, the affirmation that there is still a lot of work needed to be done for all Indigenous women and Indigenous Peoples further emphasized the key role of solidarity building between and among Indigenous women and communities. The actions and steps to safeguard ancestral lands, the safety and protection of communities and leaders, and the strengthening of local struggles to realize a self–determined future is a step by step journey. And with these regional exchange, bold strides are now being led by brave Indigenous women. The event is made possibe with the support from FIMI-AYNI, The Christensen Fund and Possible Futures.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store