
Beggars, rough sleepers, Palestine protesters on drugs... London is a showcase for Starmer's Britain
Sure, it was ever thus: rich and poor have always led divergent lives, knowing little to nothing of how the other half lives. What is genuinely new, however, is the devastating impact of mass, uncontrolled immigration; ballooning dependency on the welfare state; and the associated sky-high taxation of workers and wealth creators.
Of the many issues blighting Britain, the loss of control of our borders has the gravest social, economic and cultural implications. The tidal wave of incomers who enter the country illegally, speak no English, and are dumped on already downtrodden areas, is exacerbating the grinding poverty that has always existed in those places.
In the last 12 months alone, the number that have crossed the Channel – around 45,000 – would be too many to fit into Chelsea FC's Stamford Bridge stadium. Unless someone, somehow, stops the boats, by this time next year, the total number would fill Wembley Stadium. The more that come, the more resentment grows among those who have always lived here and are now forced to compete on equal – or even disadvantaged – terms.
In parts of the UK where it is not normal to spend a tenner on a piece of purple sprouting broccoli, there are all manner of other desperate problems. Central London is a showcase. To the casual eye, the capital certainly looks splendid in the sunshine, but the rampant crime and aggressive promotion of foreign cultures and causes is impossible to ignore.
Mid-afternoon on Embankment, I watched as a Rastafarian swaggered down the middle of the road, high as a kite on God knows what. He was waving two gigantic Palestinian flags – far more prolific, it seems, in town centres these days than the Union Jack. Pathetically, Sir Keir Starmer now says he didn't mean it when he talked of an 'island of strangers', but such spectacles suggest he is right. Near Lambeth Palace, a tented shanty has sprung up on the steps of an underpass. As the rubbish piles up, the authorities do nothing.
Then there's the pickpockets, shoplifters, spliff smokers and Tube dodgers who have always been around, but have never before operated with such open contempt for authority or their fellow citizens. In the last fortnight alone, two friends have had phones snatched by masked muggers.
On the Strand, dozens of rough sleepers hang around gurning at tourists and breakfasting on cans of cheap cider. Around Charing Cross, there are so many ruffians that fashion retailer Jigsaw – a most unlikely sounding target for thieves – now locks its doors. This isn't Tiffany's, or even Greggs the baker: it's a mid-market women's clothing retailer. Who on earth is stealing linen skirts?
Opposite the headquarters of Coutts, a soup kitchen draws all manner of toothless desperadoes. On the doorstep of the prestigious bank, an old retainer, suited and booted, is part security guard, part symbolic buffer between the destitute and the company's well-heeled clientele. He watches silently as a shirtless man calling himself 'Little J' reels around the pavement, swearing he is the King of Iran. Half an hour later, Little J's story changes: he is one of Elon Musk's many secret children, and had £900,000 in the bank, until someone took it.
Some 40 per cent of rough sleepers in London are foreign nationals who have discovered the streets of Great Britain are not, in fact, paved with gold. Nonetheless, several told me that they can make £40 an hour just by sitting on the pavement with a dog and a sad sign. Evidently not all are genuinely homeless: many privately admit to claiming benefits.
Spend too much time in places like my village, and it is quite possible to imagine that none of this is happening – or worse, not to care. Amid the heady scent of climbing roses and the chime of ancient church bells, I too almost fell into this trap. After the aphrodisiac, however, comes cold hard reality. For the time being, at least, I was not wrong to step away from this dizzying decline.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain should be thanking Thatcher for the Oasis reunion
With the much-anticipated Live '25 reunion tour by a newly-peaceful Oasis spectacularly kicking off at Cardiff's Principality Stadium last weekend, there is an unlikely heroine linked to the Mancunians' meteoric success, the birth of Britpop and the 90s Cool Britannia movement which exploded in its wake. Labour's Tony Blair may have basked in the morning glory of Cool Britannia, hailing its protagonists in Downing Street in 1997 and riding the wave of a creative tsunami which saw music, art, fashion, film, the media, politics and football coalesce in an unimaginable way. Yet there is an improbable political figure who some might say deserves acclaim for the popular culture juggernaut which raced through Britain almost exactly 30 years ago. Step forward Margaret Hilda Thatcher. Thatcher and the Gallagher brothers may seem implausible bedfellows and Lady T may have exited her stage in 2013, but without one of her government's 1980's policies in particular, Britpop – and thus this momentous Oasis Live '25 tour – may have never birthed. The reunion is projected to gross £400m and takes Liam and Noel across Britain, to the Americas, Japan, South Korea and Australia. Working for The Sun in the 1990s and becoming editor of its show business column, Bizarre, I had a ringside seat for the group's – and the accompanying movement's – explosion onto the front pages. I witnessed the band's bombastic live shows from 1994 in London and via Tokyo, California, Oslo, Milan, Majorca and Exeter, but peaking at Manchester's Maine Road and Knebworth in 1996, around the time of The Sun's highest ever daily full-price sale of 4.78m, in March of that glorious year. Musical, media and technological landscapes have fractured so significantly over the past decades that I cannot envisage any British group hereafter emerging with such impact and cultural significance. But, according to leading figures from that era, the seeds for the Gallaghers' rise and resurrection may have been sown back in 1983, when Thatcher launched the Enterprise Allowance Scheme. The brainchild of her Chancellor Geoffrey Howe, its aim was to stimulate entrepreneurship, with the jobless rate standing north of 11 per cent. Recipients were provided with £40-a-week for up to a year and claimants needed to prove £1,000 in savings and to have been unemployed for at least eight weeks. The scheme supported 103,000 people annually at its peak, but received criticism from those who felt it was simply shielding true jobless figures. It is, however, credited with helping 325,000 people to become self-employed. But an unanticipated side effect of the policy was its stimulation of the creative sector with many key Cool Britannia figures taking advantage. One man the PM helped was somebody firmly on the other side of the political divide – Creation Records' Alan McGee, the man who discovered Oasis in 1993. He admits: 'Say what you like about Thatcher, may she rot in hell, but her enterprise allowance helped me and a lot of others who probably wouldn't want to put their hand up to it. It's what funded most people at Creation Records to begin with.' Young British Artist Tracey Emin, synonymous with Cool Britannia, thinks Thatcher should be credited for her role in the creative industries – and the artist's own career, insisting: 'How did I get here today? The Enterprise Allowance: thank you Margaret Thatcher. It was a really difficult time, but whatever Margaret Thatcher was or wasn't, she obviously did some things right. It was f---ing brilliant. You set up your own business and got a guaranteed income for a year. Life on the enterprise allowance was so much better than life on the dole. The majority of us were really grateful for every little bit we were given from the government.' Other Thatcher beneficiaries include Pulp's Jarvis Cocker, back at Number One in the album charts last month, Portishead, Chris Donald, the founder of Viz magazine, Julian Dunkerton of fashion label Superdry, and Turner Prize-winning artists Jeremy Deller and Rachel Whiteread, its first-ever female recipient. Another was Keith Jeffrey, who used the funds to establish Newcastle's legendary venue The Riverside where Kurt Cobain's Nirvana played their first ever non-US gig in October 1989. So, Thatcher brought grunge to Britain, too. Happy Mondays frontman Shaun Ryder is adamant that Britpop and his role in the Madchester scene, which predated and inspired it, would not have happened without Maggie's Magic Money Tree, admitting: 'We probably wouldn't even be in a band if it wasn't for her, she started us up with the Enterprise Allowance Scheme. So when we was on it, it was guys setting up their shoe-selling business or people going into selling flowers and we was setting up a band. Because there was no jobs around at the time, you either went into crime or into making music.' When asked whether Thatcher saved him from jail, Shaun answered: 'I guess so.' Tory stalwart Lord David Willetts believes Thatcher would have been proud of her creative legacy: 'She liked the idea of get-up-and-go, encouraging entrepreneurialism. The benefits bill was surging so much that you could justify relatively modest schemes like this. I'm sure that's how it was sold to her. It wouldn't have been her taste in music, but she was a fan of anything that made Britain prominent. I'm sure she'd have found their politics juvenile, but as long as they didn't end up back on benefits, that was fine.' And Thatcher's successor John Major concurred: 'Success is economically good for our country. Ian McKellen's skills as an actor or Tracey Emin's as an artist, and so on. It's not only the great captains of industry or the politicians, or the big companies that build our national success. It's also the aggregate importance of individual effort that adds to the diversity, the culture of our country, and this our national economic well-being.' And the Oasis dates will certainly benefit a struggling UK economy with experts estimating they will generate £940 million in fan spending. According to research from Novuna Personal Finance, almost 1.4 million fans will spend an average of £682.80 per person on tickets, travel, food, drink, accommodation, and shopping. Most is expected to stay within local communities, with 57.9 per cent of the total spend – equivalent to £544.9 million – projected to flow directly into the economies of the four host cities – Cardiff, Manchester, London and Edinburgh. Fellow Mancunian Morrissey of The Smiths, an Oasis hero and influence, once sang about his dream of seeing Thatcher on a guillotine. But, according to the cast of Cool Britannia, the controversial leader helped fashion a musical and artistic legacy which will live forever and continues to stimulate the UK economy today.


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
New online safety rules are here but as tech races ahead, expect changes
It's surely the darkest fear of any mum or dad - losing their child to a world that's out of sight, a place where they can't protect Ghey, Ian Russell, Mariano Janin, Liam Walsh, Ellen Roome, Lisa Kenevan, Hollie Dance and Judy are all parents who believe the internet played a part in the death of their children: Brianna, Molly, Mia, Maia, Jools, Isaac, Archie and they've courageously told us their stories, sharing their pain, partly in the hope of pushing the authorities to regulate what happens on the internet more years of campaigning and political debate, tech platforms will - within weeks - be legally obliged to stop kids seeing harmful content online, including pornography and material encouraging self-harm. They'll be expected to check users' ages, and if they don't, they could be punished with heavy the debate over whether the changes will have the right effect is already raging. In private, the government freely admits the new rules already need an update. So what is going on? Technological advances "If it does what it says it does, it should be really big," said one Whitehall source, with high hopes of the change on the will be responsible for enforcing new child safety rules which will require platforms to check users' ages. These take effect on 25 July - and Ofcom's chief executive, Dame Melanie Dawes, will join me live in the studio tomorrow morning to explain regulator won't tell platforms exactly how to verify users' ages. But it could be sharing a selfie in real time, or checking bank details. Without proving they are 18, a child or teenager should theoretically not be able to see content that might do them measures to make tech firms remove illegal content have already come into force. A senior Whitehall source said: "We have had 20 years with no attention being paid to safety." You can't say that some observers take a very dim view of how much the new rules are going to campaigner said: "If we believed the breathless PR, we could all take to our deckchairs and just enjoy the sun."Rightly or wrongly, the new rules don't cover what kids share with each other on messaging apps, and they don't block risky stunts or challenges or in-app purchases like loot boxes that end up costing some families a as technology races ahead, the rules don't fully cover AI chatbots which are increasingly grabbing kids' Online Safety Act, which was passed in 2023, didn't tackle material that is harmful but legal for adults - not least because of an almighty row in the Conservative Party when they were in was it set up to tackle misinformation or hate, which MPs warned on Friday left serious holes in the new system designed to protect the Online Safety Act is - and how to keep children safe online The Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, which investigated the law in the wake of the Southport riots, said internet users were being exposed to large volumes of harmful and misleading content "which can deceive, damage mental health, normalise extremist views, undermine democracy, and fuel violence".MPs in the committee concluded that the Act failed to keep UK citizens "safe from a core and pervasive online harm".Many safety campaigners think the rules simply don't go far enough and that Ofcom has been far too cautious. A former cabinet minister tells me: "I just don't understand their lack of pace or urgency."It took years to get the Online Safety Act passed as law in the first place. Parliament spent a long time grappling with real dilemmas - especially how to protect fundamental rights of free speech and Ofcom took many months to write the codes of practice that have come into force over time. They wanted to create rules that were practical for the tech platforms industry source says Ofcom had been "sensible and grown-up", and while the rules weren't "revolutionary" they were important, positioning the UK between tighter regulations in the EU and a more lax regime in the you look at it, these new laws have been a very, very long time coming. And while Whitehall has been grinding along, technology, and the kinds of experiences we all have online, has been racing had really heard of AI five years ago? Many sources I've spoken to question now if the way the whole system has been designed is the right former minister I spoke to said it was a "category error" to regulate the internet in this way, questioning whether Ofcom was the right body to do the ultimately, Ofcom can only work within the laws MPs set. While we'll be focusing in the studio tomorrow on the effect the new rules will have, there is already an obvious demand among politicians to go education secretary branded the Tories' suggestion to ban phones in schools a "gimmick". The PM said it was "unnecessary". But the House of Lords might back the idea in votes in mid-autumn, pushing the question back to some newly emboldened Labour backbenchers be tempted to support it too? One of them told me if there were a reshuffle, and a new education secretary, "I'd be straight in there to say, ditch the battle, get on the right side of the public and parents, and agree to the Tories' proposal."But I understand there are new measures developed in government that might emerge even before then, shortly after the the age verification measures about to come into force, the cabinet minister in charge, Peter Kyle, wants to shift the conversation towards healthy habits. The Online Safety Act focuses on what we can see on the internet. But Kyle's next focus is on how we use it, considering how some apps could be addictive.A source said: "kids shouldn't have to be grateful they can't see violent porn on their devices… the next debate is about what is healthy online." Ministers are considering how they could protect children from algorithms that "can make kids feel out of control", or drive compulsive behaviour. Proposals on the table include an "app cap", screen time limits, extra rules on live streams, and making more of a distinction between what 13 and 16-year-olds can do legislation is likely to bring in the next round of changes, but right now, as one MP said: "it is stuck somewhere in the system."You can expect the next round of conversations about how governments can protect the public from the worst excesses of the internet while enjoying its incredible opportunities to be part of the political soundtrack of the has changed so many aspects of our lives so fast for the better in recent years. But for too many families, their experiences online have brought terrible pain. Just as our heads might spin trying to understand all the changes, politicians have perhaps struggled to balance the dangers as well as the opportunities, and how they might be called on to protect the happens online is not the usual turf of politics like making ends meet, running schools or hospitals. But just as our virtual lives are an increasing part of our world, they are becoming a bigger part of our political life too. A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line Sign up for the Off Air with Laura K newsletter to get Laura Kuenssberg's expert insight and insider stories every week, emailed directly to you. BBC InDepth is the home on the website and app for the best analysis, with fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions and deep reporting on the biggest issues of the day. And we showcase thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. You can send us your feedback on the InDepth section by clicking on the button below.


The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump authorizes Ice agents to protect themselves using ‘whatever means' necessary
Donald Trump has given 'total authorization' to federal immigration agents to protect themselves after a series of clashes with protesters, including during a enforcement raid on a California cannabis farm. 'I am giving Total Authorization for ICE to protect itself, just like they protect the Public,' Trump posted on Truth Social on Friday, adding that he was directing the homeland security secretary, Kristi Noem, and border czar, Tom Homan, to arrest anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) protesters who impede immigration enforcement operations. Trump said he's told the administrators to 'instruct all ICE, Homeland Security, or any other Law Enforcement Officer who is on the receiving end of thrown rocks, bricks, or any other form of assault, to stop their car, and arrest these SLIMEBALLS, using whatever means is necessary to do so'. The president appeared to be referring to an incident on Thursday when federal agents clashed with protesters during immigration raids on two farms in California's Ventura county, north of Los Angeles. At one site, Glass House Farms in Camarillo, masked federal agents appeared to use crowd-control measures including teargas to curb a protest, which was responded to by thrown bricks. About 200 suspected undocumented immigrants were arrested, according to the Los Angeles Times, and a farmworker was critically injured after falling from a roof. In a second raid 35 miles up the coast in Carpinteria, federal agents entered another Glass House Farms site. The United Farm Workers union said one worker fell at the Camarillo location and was later reported to be critically injured. Homeland security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin later told Fox News Digital that the injured man was 'not in and has not been in CBP or Ice custody, although he was not being pursued by law enforcement, this individual climbed up to the roof of a greenhouse and fell 30ft. CBP immediately called a medivac to the scene to get him care as quickly as possible.' California's governor, Gavin Newsom, said the administration's actions were 'inhumane' and it's tactics 'evoke chaos, fear and terror within our communities at every turn'. Newsom's office later posted in response to a tweet from Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff for policy and homeland security adviser: 'This fascist cuck in DC continues his assault on democracy and the Constitution, and his attempt to replace the sovereignty of the people with autocracy.' The twin raids in California come despite guidance from Tatum King, a senior official with Ice, to regional department leaders at Homeland Security Investigations directing them to stop workplace immigration enforcement actions unless related to criminal investigations. 'Effective today, please hold on all work site enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels,' King wrote in the guidance last month. But the raids are continuing, along with clashes between protesters and federal agents. Last week, 10 people were arrested on attempted murder charges in connection with a shooting outside the Prairieland detention center in Alvarado, Texas. A police officer was shot in the neck during what US prosecutors say was a 'planned ambush' by assailants dressed in black, military-style clothing. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion An 11th suspect, Daniel Rolando-Sanchez Estrada, is the husband of one of the charged attackers, and was arrested on charges of conspiracy to tamper with evidence while attempting to execute a search warrant, according to Ice's account on X. He allegedly had 'insurrectionist propaganda'. The FBI said on Friday it is searching for a 12th person involved in the 4 July ambush, naming the suspect as Benjamin Hanil Song, a former Marine Corps reservist. Police say he should be considered armed and dangerous. Three days later, on 7 July, a man with a rifle and tactical gear was shot dead by police after he opened fire at a border patrol facility in McAllen, Texas, near the US-Mexico border. Two officers and a border patrol employee were injured in the attack, including one who was shot in the knee, according to a statement by the Department of Homeland Security. Police identified the suspect as 27-year-old Ryan Lewis Mosqueda. In his statement, Trump said he had watched the California raids 'in disbelief as THUGS were violently throwing rocks and bricks at ICE Officers while they were moving down a roadway in their car and/or official vehicle. 'Tremendous damage was done to these brand new vehicles. I know for a fact that these Officers are having a hard time with allowing this to happen in that it shows such total disrespect for LAW AND ORDER.'