Jury set to deliberate Sean 'Diddy' Combs's fate
NEW YORK - Jurors will begin deliberating whether Sean "Diddy" Combs parlayed his celebrity, wealth and business empire into a decades-long criminal ring that saw him force women into drug-fueled sexual performances with escorts.
The dozen New Yorkers tasked with deciding the music mogul's future will begin poring over thousands of phone, financial and other records along with the stories of 34 people who testified against him over seven painstaking, and at times excruciating, weeks.
Combs faces upwards of life in prison if convicted on five federal charges that include racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation for purposes of prostitution.
The producer and entrepreneur, once one of the most powerful people in the music industry, denies the charges.
On Friday, his lawyer vied to skewer the credibility of his accusers -- namely, two women he dated for years -- saying they were out for money, while rejecting any notion he led a criminal ring.
But in their final argument, prosecutors tore into the defence, saying Combs's team had "contorted the facts endlessly."
Prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors that by the time Combs had committed his clearest-cut offences, "he was so far past the line he couldn't even see it."
"In his mind, he was untouchable," she told the court. "The defendant never thought that the women he abused would have the courage to speak out loud what he had done to them."
"That ends in this courtroom," she said. "The defendant is not a god."
Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo scoffed at the picture painted by prosecutors of a violent, domineering man who fostered "a climate of fear."
Combs is a "self-made, successful Black entrepreneur" who had romantic relationships that were "complicated" but consensual, Agnifilo said.
The defence has conceded that Combs at times beat his partners -- but insists the domestic violence does not amount to the sex trafficking or racketeering he's charged with.
Key to the prosecution's case were witnesses Casandra Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane, both of whom described abuse, threats and coercive sex in wrenching detail.
In their closing arguments, the defence dissected their accounts and at times even mocked them, insisting the women were adults making choices that were best for them.
On Monday, Judge Arun Subramanian will explain to them how apply the law to the evidence.
Then, the eight men and four women will begin deliberating.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Firm linked to two cops in line to score big from purchase of properties by Crime Intel
A new information has revealed that the unit is in the process of purchasing two properties in Durban, through a company linked to members of SAPS. Image: SAPS CRIME Intelligence has been rocked by another scandal as the new information shows that the unit is in the process of purchasing two properties in Durban, through a company linked to members of SAPS. The properties would be purchased through Matla Storage (Pty) Limited, which was set up last year. The directors of two police officers who are stationed in Pretoria - Captain Madumetja Mabusela and Nomzamo Nqwelo. Certified fraud examiner and founder of Forensics for Justice, Paul O'Sullivan, forwarded this information to the National Prosecuting Authorities' Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) and Office of the Inspector-General for Intelligence (OIGI). It is believed that the purchase has been approved. This comes as investigations into the alleged looting of the Crime Intelligence secret account continue following the arrest of Dumisani Khumalo, the head of the division, and seven others. Khumalo was arrested at OR Tambo International Airport in Johannesburg last week after what authorities described as an 'extensive' investigation into the allegedly unlawful acquisition of two high-value properties. The properties include a boutique hotel in Pretoria North, Gauteng, reportedly purchased for R22.7 million and a commercial building in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, valued at R22.8m. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Both acquisitions are alleged to have been made without the requisite ministerial approval. It has been alleged that Khumalo and the National Commissioner, Fannie Masemola, received kickbacks from these deals. The City Press on Sunday reported that Masemola could be arrested for the irregular procurement of crime intelligence buildings worth more than R120 million. For the two properties in Durban, it has been alleged that Matla Storage has drawn up the memorandum motivating the expenditure of R38m plus R10m in purported transfer costs. In the application for funds, seen by Independent Newspapers, the offer to purchase was accepted by the seller on December 30, 2024, for a purchase price of R22.8m in terms of the agreement. A deposit of R2m was paid on January 7, 2025. This was signed by Mabusela, who is also the supply chain management, and the acting head of finance and administration, Colonel S Mayekiso, as well as the chief financial officer, Major General Lushaba. Mabusela did not respond to messages and calls. Nqwelo also dropped the call when asked to respond. Police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe said the SAPS does not comment on any aspect related to the crime intelligence space. IDAC spokesperson Henry Mamothame said the division cannot comment on matters under investigation or the sources of our investigations. 'Matters are referred to IDAC in terms of Sec 27 of the NPA Act and can be referred to us by anyone,' he said. OIGI spokesperson, Nomsa Mlambo, said the Inspector General will formally respond to the question on Monday. Masemola also did not respond to calls and messages. The Police Ministry said itnoted with concern some media reports speculating about Masemola's imminent arrest. 'We have not been made aware of such impending arrest. We have also noted the response from the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) on this speculation. We plead with the media to avoid any speculation on this as speculation of this nature has an adverse impact on the named person and also has an effect of destabilising the work of the South African Police Service.'
Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Jury set to deliberate Sean 'Diddy' Combs's fate
NEW YORK - Jurors on Monday will begin deliberating whether Sean "Diddy" Combs parlayed his celebrity, wealth and business empire into a decades-long criminal ring that saw him force women into drug-fuelled sexual performances with escorts. The dozen New Yorkers tasked with deciding the music mogul's future will begin poring over thousands of phone, financial and other records along with the stories of 34 people who testified against him over seven painstaking, and at times excruciating, weeks. Combs, 55, faces upwards of life in prison if convicted on five federal charges that include racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation for purposes of prostitution. The producer and entrepreneur, once one of the most powerful people in the music industry, denies the charges. On Friday, his lawyer vied to skewer the credibility of his accusers - namely, two women he dated for years - saying they were out for money, while rejecting any notion he led a criminal ring. But in their final argument, prosecutors tore into the defence, saying Combs's team had "contorted the facts endlessly." Prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors that by the time Combs had committed his clearest-cut offences, "he was so far past the line he couldn't even see it." "In his mind, he was untouchable," she told the court. "The defendant never thought that the women he abused would have the courage to speak out loud what he had done to them." "That ends in this courtroom," she said. "The defendant is not a god." Defence attorney Marc Agnifilo scoffed at the picture painted by prosecutors of a violent, domineering man who fostered "a climate of fear." Combs is a "self-made, successful Black entrepreneur" who had romantic relationships that were "complicated" but consensual, Agnifilo said. MANIPULATION The defence has conceded that Combs at times beat his partners, but insist the domestic violence does not amount to the sex trafficking or racketeering he's charged with. Key to the prosecution's case were witnesses Casandra Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane, both of whom described abuse, threats and coercive sex in wrenching detail. In their closing arguments, the defence dissected their accounts and at times even mocked them, insisting the women were adults making choices that were best for them. Speaking for the government on Friday, prosecutor Comey snapped back at that notion, saying the women were "manipulated" into "brazen" acts of sex trafficking. Ventura and Jane both said they experienced emotional manipulation and threat,s which made them feel obliged to meet Combs's sexual demands. Throughout the trial, jurors were shown voluminous phone records, including messages from both women that Agnifilo argued implied consent. But prosecutors said those messages do not paint the whole picture and referenced testimony from a forensic psychologist who explained to jurors how victims become ensnared by abusers. Central to their case is the claim that Combs led a criminal enterprise of senior employees who "existed to serve his needs" and enforced his power with offences including forced labour, kidnapping, bribery, witness tampering and arson. But Agnifilo underscored that none of those individuals testified against Combs, nor were they named as co-conspirators. Many witnesses were given immunity orders so they could speak without fear of incriminating themselves. To convict Combs on racketeering, jurors must find that prosecutors showed beyond reasonable doubt that he agreed with people within his organisation to commit at least two of the eight crimes forming the racketeering charge. On Monday, Judge Arun Subramanian will explain to them how to apply the law to the evidence. Then, the eight men and four women will begin deliberating. They must reach a unanimous decision, reaching either a guilty or not guilty verdict on each count.
eNCA
9 hours ago
- eNCA
Jury set to deliberate Sean 'Diddy' Combs's fate
NEW YORK - Jurors will begin deliberating whether Sean "Diddy" Combs parlayed his celebrity, wealth and business empire into a decades-long criminal ring that saw him force women into drug-fueled sexual performances with escorts. The dozen New Yorkers tasked with deciding the music mogul's future will begin poring over thousands of phone, financial and other records along with the stories of 34 people who testified against him over seven painstaking, and at times excruciating, weeks. Combs faces upwards of life in prison if convicted on five federal charges that include racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation for purposes of prostitution. The producer and entrepreneur, once one of the most powerful people in the music industry, denies the charges. On Friday, his lawyer vied to skewer the credibility of his accusers -- namely, two women he dated for years -- saying they were out for money, while rejecting any notion he led a criminal ring. But in their final argument, prosecutors tore into the defence, saying Combs's team had "contorted the facts endlessly." Prosecutor Maurene Comey told jurors that by the time Combs had committed his clearest-cut offences, "he was so far past the line he couldn't even see it." "In his mind, he was untouchable," she told the court. "The defendant never thought that the women he abused would have the courage to speak out loud what he had done to them." "That ends in this courtroom," she said. "The defendant is not a god." Defense attorney Marc Agnifilo scoffed at the picture painted by prosecutors of a violent, domineering man who fostered "a climate of fear." Combs is a "self-made, successful Black entrepreneur" who had romantic relationships that were "complicated" but consensual, Agnifilo said. The defence has conceded that Combs at times beat his partners -- but insists the domestic violence does not amount to the sex trafficking or racketeering he's charged with. Key to the prosecution's case were witnesses Casandra Ventura and a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane, both of whom described abuse, threats and coercive sex in wrenching detail. In their closing arguments, the defence dissected their accounts and at times even mocked them, insisting the women were adults making choices that were best for them. On Monday, Judge Arun Subramanian will explain to them how apply the law to the evidence. Then, the eight men and four women will begin deliberating.
