logo
China's Answer to Starbucks Launches First Stores in US

China's Answer to Starbucks Launches First Stores in US

Newsweek6 days ago
Produced [by our journalists] with financial support from an organization or individual that did not approve or review the work.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China's largest coffee chain, Luckin Coffee, opened its first two stores in the United States on Monday, marking its entry into the competitive American coffee market.
The new locations are situated in Manhattan's Greenwich Village and NoMad neighborhood. The launch was accompanied by digital promotions, as well as discounted drinks for customers using the Luckin app and giveaways for early in-store visitors.
Newsweek has reached out to Luckin via email for comment on the launch.
Why It Matters
Much of the hype surrounding Luckin's American launch has focused on the potential challenge the Chinese company poses to Starbucks.
The latter has long-dominated the U.S. coffee market, valued at over $90 billion in 2025 by Custom Market Insights, and expected to grow to $151 billion over the next decade. Starbucks' is estimated to account for between 30 and 40 percent of this market's total revenue, but should Luckin's popularity take off, and its unique offerings resonate with U.S. consumers, this could recalibrate competitive dynamics across the American beverage sector.
Newsweek has reached out to Starbucks for comment outside of regular business hours.
What To Know
Luckin Coffee was founded in 2017 and is based in Xiamen, China. Since its inception, the company has expanded to over 20,000 locations across Singapore, Malaysia and China, where it unseated Starbucks in 2023 to become the largest coffee chain brand in the country.
The company promotes its tech-driven, cashier-less stores and mobile-ordering systems to cater to a younger clientele, describing its strategy as "completely changing the traditional coffee business mode." In China, its drinks are often priced about 30 percent lower than Starbucks' offerings, per CNN. However, prices in its U.S. stores remain comparable to Starbucks—a 16-ounce Americano costing $4.45 at Luckin and $4.95 at Starbucks' Greenwich Village location before tax. The rest of Luckin's Manhattan menus feature a range of hot coffees, cold brews and fruit-flavored "refreshers," echoing its popular selections in China.
People stand outside a Luckin Coffee store in Manhattan, New York on June 30, 2025.
People stand outside a Luckin Coffee store in Manhattan, New York on June 30, 2025.
Anthony Behar/Sipa via AP Images
While one of the brand's unique selling points is its emphasis on a cashier-less experience, USA Today notes New York's 2020 prohibition on fully cashless businesses—also in place across other major cities like San Francisco and Philadelphia—means Luckin will be forced to adapt to local regulations.
While its modest U.S. launch has been framed by some as a challenge to Starbucks's American and global dominance, the former still vastly outsizes Luckin in financial terms. Both companies recently published results for their respective quarters which ended in March. Starbucks posted a slight increase in revenue to $8.8 billion for the period, though store sales were somewhat weaker across North American markets and globally. Luckin, meanwhile, brought in $1.2 billion, marking a 41-percent increase year-over year.
What People Are Saying
Luckin Coffee, in the first announcement of its U.S. launch last week, posted: "Drip level: International. The rumors are true, NYC. You're luckin now."
"YC, it's happening. Our doors are open and Luckin Coffee is taking over the city," another post read.
What Happens Next?
Luckin has not yet commented on when and how it will be expanding its U.S. presence beyond the two New York locations. However, if it is able to replicate its successes in East Asia, the company could test Starbucks' dominance and reshape the coffee landscape for American consumers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok to Launch New Version of U.S. App Amid Looming Sale
TikTok to Launch New Version of U.S. App Amid Looming Sale

Business Insider

time24 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

TikTok to Launch New Version of U.S. App Amid Looming Sale

China's social media giant TikTok is reportedly developing a new version of its U.S. app amid the looming threat of a potential ban or sale in the country. The news was first reported by The Information on Sunday, citing sources familiar with the matter. TikTok parent ByteDance is planning to launch the new app version in the U.S. on September 5, ahead of the extended deadline of September 17. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. U.S. President Donald Trump has extended the deadline for TikTok's ban or sale in the U.S. for the third time in order to find suitable 'non-Chinese' buyers for its U.S. operations. Last week, Trump noted that he has found a group of very wealthy buyers for the app, but that China's approval would be required for the potential sale. He is expected to start talks with China on Monday or Tuesday and is confident that Beijing will approve the sale. TikTok Aims to Stay in the U.S. Market TikTok boasts approximately 170 million American users and seeks to continue operations in the lucrative U.S. market through these strategic negotiations. According to available information, TikTok plans to launch the new app on U.S. app stores on September 5. Users will eventually need to download the new app to continue using the service. However, the existing app will also remain functional until March 2026, subject to the completion of a sale. An earlier deal for the sale of TikTok's U.S. operations to American buyers was in progress but was set aside following the imposition of stringent reciprocal U.S. tariffs on China. TikTok's problem came into focus last year after former President Joe Biden signed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACA), which requires TikTok to sell its U.S. operations to non-Chinese owners. The White House is concerned about the potential leakage of Americans' private data to Chinese officials through the app. However, TikTok and ByteDance have repeatedly denied any such wrongdoing. Currently, TikTok continues to operate in the U.S. under its original version but faces intense scrutiny and must find a resolution quickly to avoid a nationwide ban. We used the TipRanks Stock Comparison Tool for Top Social Media Stocks to determine which stocks are currently favored by analysts. Investors can choose to invest in any of these stocks after thorough research. Currently, Pinterest (PINS) and Meta Platforms (META) have earned Wall Street's Strong Buy consensus rating, with PINS stock reflecting a higher upside potential in the next 12 months.

Jerome Powell is competing to be the worst Fed chair in history
Jerome Powell is competing to be the worst Fed chair in history

The Hill

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Jerome Powell is competing to be the worst Fed chair in history

By stubbornly refusing to lower interest rates despite ample data urging him to do so, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is committing his third major policy blunder in six years. If he continues this tight-money path through the July 29 Fed meeting, 'Too Late' Powell will go down as the worst Fed chair in history. It's not like Powell lacks stiff competition. In the 1970s, to boost Richard Nixon's re-election run, uber‑partisan Arthur Burns kept rates too low for too long, triggering a dizzying inflation spiral and a decade-long stagflation. In the 1990s, Alan Greenspan severely underestimated productivity gains from the tech boom, over-estimated inflationary pressures, and needlessly hiked rates — six times between June 1999 and May 2000. This spiked the federal funds rate to 6.5 percent, triggering the dot-com market crash and 2001 recession. A whiplashed Greenspan then slashed rates to rock-bottom levels and held them at 1 percent for a full year — from June 2003 to June 2004 — well beyond what the recovery warranted. This ultra-cheap money fueled reckless lending, a massive housing bubble, and ultimately detonated the 2007–2008 financial collapse. Greenspan's successor, Ben Bernanke, should have seen it coming. But the Princeton don failed to grasp rising systemic risk in mortgage markets. His paralysis turned what might have been a contained correction into a full-blown global financial crisis — only intervening after Lehman Brothers fell, when it was already too late. Now enters Jay Powell. Even though he leads the world's largest economy, he is a lawyer, not an economist — an anomaly among Fed chairs. Since Arthur Burns, every Fed chair has held an economics degree, except for G. William Miller and Powell. Miller was similarly unqualified and endured one of the most disastrous Fed tenures in recent memory spanning just 517 days before being replaced by the esteemed Paul Volcker on August 6, 1979. Powell's audition for 'worst Fed chair' began shortly after his February 2018 appointment. Promising President Trump in the Oval Office a supportive posture to secure his nomination, Powell instead aggressively raised rates into the low-inflation, high-growth Trump economy. Powell wrongly believed Trump's tax cuts and tariffs would spark inflation — they didn't. Nor did Powell understand that Trump's efforts to deregulate the economy and reach energy independence — positive 'supply shocks' in the macroeconomics vernacular — would provide positive deflationary benefits. As Powell's Fed hiked interest rates four times in 2018—despite muted inflation and strong labor market gains — economic momentum slowed sharply. According to the Fed's own September Tealbook, most of the expected GDP slowdown — from over 3 percent to 1.5 percent — was due to Powell's blunder. Trump was justifiably outraged over Powell's first blunder. It would cost the American economy hundreds of thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in lost economic output and tax revenues. After Trump left the White House in January 2021, Powell successfully lobbied Joe Biden for a second term. Throughout that year, the Powell-led Fed kept interest rates near zero, even as inflation surged past 5 percent by mid-year. Embracing the Biden-Yellen line that inflation was merely 'transitory,' the pandering Powell refused to act. Despite growing warnings from economists and business leaders, Powell waited until March 2022 — more than a year after inflation had begun accelerating — before implementing the first interest rate hike since 2018. By then, the damage was done. The Fed was forced into one of the most aggressive tightening cycles in history — 11 hikes in 12 months — all to combat the inflation that Powell's inaction had helped unleash. Powell's second major blunder here wasn't just his late policy; it was his silent permissiveness. While a Democrat-controlled Congress passed over $2 trillion in unneeded and wasteful spending bills — in no small part to boost the Biden reelection campaign — Powell failed in his ethical duty to warn the White House and Democrat-controlled Congress that this spending would worsen inflation. Instead, he let loose monetary policy and partisan fiscal profligacy collide, accelerating the very inflation he would soon be forced to chase. Today, with inflation returning to target and disinflation gaining traction, Powell is well on his way to his third blunder with his stubborn refusal to lower interest rates now. Powell seems incapable of recognizing that Trumponomics — driven by pro-growth deregulation, productivity-enhancing tax cuts, strategic tariffs, and America First supply chain policies — is again delivering strong GDP growth and low unemployment without fueling inflation, just as in Trump's prosperous first term. Powell's misguided fixation on so-called tariff 'uncertainties' as a rationale for 'prudently' holding rates steady is particularly imprudent. Let's remember clearly: during President Trump's first term, we imposed tariffs strategically and aggressively — and the predicted inflation never materialized. Powell's hesitation reflects a failure to learn from recent economic history, needlessly stifling growth, undermining American competitiveness, and harming millions of Americans. At its next meeting July 29-30, the Fed must immediately begin cutting rates. If Powell won't adjust course, he will indeed have earned the sobriquet of worst Fed chair. Peter Navarro is White House senior counselor for trade and manufacturing.

US TikTok users may soon have to switch to a new version of the app
US TikTok users may soon have to switch to a new version of the app

Engadget

time39 minutes ago

  • Engadget

US TikTok users may soon have to switch to a new version of the app

ByteDance is said to be building a new, US-only version of the TikTok app that it will release on September 5. According to The Information , the company is moving ahead with this plan to comply with legislation requiring it to sell its TikTok business in the US or face a nationwide ban . The report suggests that folks in the US will have to switch to the new app (dubbed "M2") in order to keep using TikTok. It's said that ByteDance will remove the existing TikTok app (which the company internally calls "M") from US app stores when the new one debuts. It's believed that the current version of the app will stop working in the US next March, though that timeline may shift. This is the latest development in a long-running saga over the future of TikTok in the US. A law that former President Joe Biden signed last year gave ByteDance a deadline of January 19 to sell its US TikTok business or face a ban in the country. President Donald Trump took office on January 20 and swiftly paused enforcement of the law — he has delayed it twice more since then. As things stand, the ban is set to take effect on September 17. In late June, Trump said there was a buyer in place for TikTok's US operations. He claimed that a "group of very wealthy people" is set to buy the app and that the identity of the collective would become clear in "about two weeks" — so around June 13. Trump added that the deal would likely need approval from the Chinese government since ByteDance is based in China, but said on Friday that he was "not confident" of getting it rubber stamped. On Monday, a Chinese government spokesperson dodged a question related to Trump's claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store