logo
SA charges into Antarctic talks — ‘Not a pacifist' but definitely pro-penguin

SA charges into Antarctic talks — ‘Not a pacifist' but definitely pro-penguin

Daily Maverick6 days ago

Pretoria asserts leadership as Africa's only consultative state to South Pole pact, pushing for stronger science and protection
The 47th Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) kicks off in Milan, Italy, on Tuesday, and South Africa — still the only African country with decision-making status — has signalled a pivot in tone and substance.
Ashley Johnson of South Africa's Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), will lead the national delegation to the annual closed meeting of 29 states who make all the big decisions on Antarctica's present and future.
This will be Johnson's first ATCM.
In an interview with Daily Maverick, Johnson acknowledged criticisms of South Africa's underwhelming ATCM performance in recent years. Yet, he says his mandate now is to reestablish South Africa as a conservation-minded, science-driven actor — a credible voice for the African continent.
'I'm not a pacifist,' says Johnson, an oceanographer by training and acting director for research and specialist monitoring in DFFE's oceans and coasts division. 'I cannot attend a meeting and say nothing. I'm now surrounded by a competent team from DFFE, the science department and international relations, and a diplomat from South Africa's embassy in Italy.
'Our agenda for this meeting is to be the African voice.'
While new to the treaty system, Johnson says he is no stranger to diplomacy.
Among others, he stresses his role in establishing South Africa as a more prominent force at Unesco's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission in 2005.
'South Africa became the leader of the Africa group,' he says, 'and commission vice-chair.'
From observer to influencer
In 2024, South Africa failed to submit a single independent paper at the ATCM — a marked absence compared to the multiple submissions from other consultative parties. (For instance, Russia and Australia submitted 10 and 15, respectively.)
This year, Johnson's team is involved in no fewer than eight ATCM papers— five independent and three co-sponsored submissions on science, conservation, compliance and Antarctic gateway operations.
'I was asked by DFFE Minister Dion George to lead the delegation to turn things on their head,' he says. George, a member of the Democratic Alliance, had inherited the department's reins from the ANC with the establishment of the coalition government one year ago.
'I said I'm not going to a meeting where we will not submit anything.'
One proposal seeks area protection for emperor penguins — a bold statement given that Antarctica's most iconic flightless birds are a geopolitical minefield, with China and Russia habitually using the ATCM to block their protection.
Another paper, tabled with Australia as lead proponent, outlines a plan to 'create a network amongst the Antarctic gateway cities in Australia, New Zealand, Chile and Argentina to learn from each other'.
Johnson says his own plan includes working with the city of Cape Town to build a dedicated space — like a museum— to give the chart-topping tourist destination a more recognisable Antarctic identity.
'The team has really worked,' says Johnson. 'I want to break this mold.'
A voice for 'conservation'
South Africa's negotiating position at the ATCM, according to Johnson, is led by three lodestars: protection, conservation and 'responsible use'.
'The original idea behind the Antarctic Treaty System was to maintain the Antarctic as a peaceful environment not to be disturbed, not owned by anyone,' says Johnson, which represents a delegation that rejects the idea of colonial-style territorial claims.
'Conservation and protection were the premise for establishing it,' he argues.
Mining is banned in Antarctica, but one state concedes it has pursued the ' overwhelming majority ' of oil and gas resource prospecting there, citing both geopolitical intent and, when questioned by Daily Maverick, legal scientific research. That state is Russia, whose Rosgeo mineral explorer has actively searched for oil and gas in the Southern Ocean over decades — using Cape Town as a logistics port to announce in 2020 some 70 billion tons of hydrocarbons off East Antarctica. (It did not mention recoverability estimates.)
In a recent Daily Maverick webinar, experts argued that these operations are ' mineral resource activities '.
'The science we conduct in the Antarctic must be done in a responsible manner,' counters Johnson, thus suggesting an environmental negotiating position that opposes such activities. 'And we would always then expect that from the other treaty members.'
Revamping the South African National Antarctic Programme?
On a recent demonstration cruise aboard the country's national polar research vessel, the SA Agulhas II, Minister George described himself as the head of the South African National Antarctic Programme.
Every DFFE minister is, in fact, the head of the Antarctic division, but rarely have ministers in charge of this department since the advent of democracy in 1994 linked themselves to the polar portfolio in such direct terms.
And so it is Johnson's job to report to George and sort out the infrastructure humdingers Daily Maverick flagged at South Africa's sub-Antarctic research station in March. Among others, we uncovered failing diesel generators at the Marion Island base, since replaced, and fears among scientists that fragmented management would be the death knell of the entire programme.
When asked, Johnson says a streamlined approach for South Africa's operational and research interests is both practical and symbolic of a new chapter.
'The interdependencies are too big for them to be separated,' he says. 'The last few months have been used to create a process that is inculcated into the memory of the system, rather than being dependent on any one individual.'
South Africa's ace: A top icebreaker and the Southern Ocean
The thing that gets Johnson waxing lyrical more than any other is oceanography.
Beneath the tip of the African continent churns one of the most scientifically prized ocean systems on Earth. It's here that warm and cold currents from the Indian and Atlantic Oceans collide, and massive eddies spin off into global circulation patterns.
'To deconstruct all that scientifically takes a lot of effort,' says Johnson.
At the centre of this footprint is the SA Agulhas II, the country's icebreaking research and logistics vessel. Johnson says he wants to reposition the ship as a high-performance scientific platform and a diplomatic asset.
In 2022, she was used to track down Sir Ernest Shackleton's Endurance wreck.
New collaborations are being discussed, including joint research with French and Norwegian scientists during upcoming voyages.
'I want the vessel to be used as optimally as possible,' Johnson says, citing student training as a national priority.
South Africa steps ahead, the US steps back
In June, the South African anti-apartheid activist and lawyer Cormac Cullinan netted the Royal Geographical Society's Shackleton medal for a campaign to transform the Antarctic environment into a legal person who can be defended in court.
That makes this South African the first-ever Antarctic winner of the prestigious polar medal that has traditionally focused on the Arctic.
The Pretoria University-educated Professor Steven Chown, based at Australia's Monash University since 2012, is one of the world's most cited Antarctic scientists with an H-Index of 112.
But while South Africa, despite tectonic social problems, continues to invest in its polar footprint, the US — the treaty's architect — has proposed a 71% budget cut for polar research in the 2026 financial year.
Given Trump's obsession with expanding the US icebreaker fleet, most puzzling is the decision to end the lease of the Nathaniel B Palmer — the sole back-up to the aging US Polar Star icebreaker.
Usually cautious experts have suggested that the US may even withdraw from the treaty to claim and mine the continent.
Asked about the US withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, Johnson says: 'Irrespective of what the Trump administration thinks about climate change, South Africa's management regime is built on reliable science.
'I don't see why — together with all other member states who believe in what the science is telling us — we need to change our position on climate change.'
Authoritarian allies in Milan
The treaty is the only existing legal dam holding back a neocolonial land grab. On the other hand, the ATCM's insistence on holding its annual talks behind closed doors, and preventing the press from observing the substance of those talks, are reliable indicators of this system's insecurities.
Make no mistake: the 'frozen' territories claimed by seven states may seem out of sight at the bottom of the planet, but to the claimants they are massively important. Canberra's wedge is almost three times larger than Greenland. The overlapping slice counterclaimed by Buenos Aires, London and Santiago? It also eclipses Greenland by about three times.
It may be within the interest of these influential states, then, to keep critics outside the room. As the second country after the UK to ratify the treaty on 21 June 1960, Pretoria may be one such possible insider critic, as it takes a dim view of neocolonial ambitions in the southern regions. So, can it adopt a more assertive position in Milan — one that mirrors its tough stance on Israel's incursions into Gaza?
Or does it remain compromised as long as it refuses to condemn Moscow's illegal actions in Ukraine, a fellow consultative party?
President Cyril Ramaphosa received President Volodymyr Zelensky in April and Cape Town has served as the refuge for Ukraine's polar vessel, the Noosfera, since February 2022.
For Johnson, South Africa's 'non-aligned' stance is a negotiating strength with the most obstructive actors at the negotiating table.
'We want a much more active engagement with the Russian and Chinese delegations,' Johnson notes. 'Perhaps we can edge them closer to a conservationist approach.'
He is adamant: 'It's not going to change our position …
'We have always been peace brokers as a country — so what I'd like to do this year is find out what are those things they are prepared to give up in order to gain something else? And then see if South Africa is comfortable with it.' DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rwanda, DRC sign peace deal in US to end fighting, attract investment
Rwanda, DRC sign peace deal in US to end fighting, attract investment

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

Rwanda, DRC sign peace deal in US to end fighting, attract investment

Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) signed a US-brokered peace agreement on Friday, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands this year. The agreement marks a breakthrough in talks held by US President Donald Trump's administration and aims to attract billions of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. At a ceremony with US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Washington, the two African countries' foreign ministers signed the agreement pledging to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern DRC within 90 days, according to a copy seen by Reuters. Kinshasa and Kigali will also launch a regional economic integration framework within 90 days, the agreement said. 'They were going at it for many years, and with machetes. It is one of the worst, one of the worst wars anyone has ever seen. I just happened to have somebody who was able to get it settled,' Trump said on Friday ahead of the signing of the deal in Washington. 'We're getting, for the US, a lot of the mineral rights from the DRC as part of it. They're so honoured to be here. They never thought they'd be coming.' Rwandan foreign minister Olivier Nduhungirehe called the agreement a turning point. Congo foreign minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner said it must be followed by disengagement. Trump later met both officials in the Oval Office, where he presented them with letters inviting DRC President Felix Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame to Washington to sign a package of agreements that Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, called the 'Washington Accord'. Nduhungirehe told Trump past deals had not been implemented and urged him to stay engaged. Trump warned of 'very severe penalties, financial and otherwise', if the agreement is violated. Rwanda has sent at least 7,000 soldiers over the border, according to analysts and diplomats, in support of the M23 rebels who seized eastern DRC's two largest cities and lucrative mining areas in a lightning advance earlier this year. The gains by M23, the latest cycle in a decades-old conflict with roots in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, sparked fears that a wider war could draw in the DRC's neighbours. Boulos told Reuters in May Washington wanted the peace agreement and accompanying minerals deals to be signed simultaneously this summer. Rubio said on Friday heads of state would be 'in Washington in a few weeks to finalise the complete protocol and agreement'. However, the agreement signed on Friday gives the DRC and Rwanda three months to launch a framework 'to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains'. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday another agreement on the framework would be signed by the heads of state at a separate White House event at an unspecified time. There is an understanding that progress in ongoing talks in Doha, a separate but parallel mediation effort with delegations from the DRC government and M23, is essential before the signing of the economic framework, the source said. The agreement signed on Friday voiced 'full support' for the Qatar-hosted talks. It also said the DRC and Rwanda will form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. DRC military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a DRC-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same time frame. Reuters reported on Thursday that DRC negotiators had dropped an earlier demand that Rwandan troops immediately leave eastern DRC, paving the way for the signing ceremony on Friday. The DRC, UN and Western powers said Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces are acting in self-defence against the DRC's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, including the FDLR. 'This is the best chance we have at a peace process for the moment despite all the challenges and flaws,' said Jason Stearns, a political scientist at Simon Fraser University in Canada who specialises in Africa's Great Lakes region. Similar formulas have been attempted before, Stearns said, and 'it will be up to the US, as they are the godfather of the deal, to make sure both sides abide by the terms'. The agreement signed on Friday said Rwanda and the DRC will de-risk mineral supply chains and establish value chains 'that link the countries, in partnership, as appropriate, with the US and US investors'. The terms carry 'a strategic message: securing the east also means securing investments', said Tresor Kibangula, a political analyst at the DRC's Ebuteli research institute. He said 'it remains to be seen whether this economic logic will suffice' to end the fighting.

Putin's oil and gas man joins secretive Antarctic Treaty meeting in Milan
Putin's oil and gas man joins secretive Antarctic Treaty meeting in Milan

Daily Maverick

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Putin's oil and gas man joins secretive Antarctic Treaty meeting in Milan

The Russian official — until recently in charge of the firm that has stitched together vast maps of South Pole hydrocarbons — is helping negotiate Putin's 'scientific' interests at the prestigious diplomatic gathering in Milan. It may not be insignificant that Russia's delegation at the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting (ATCM) in the Italian fashion capital includes Pavel Lunev. Until April 2023, Lunev had been head of the Russian state firm responsible for mapping Antarctica's oil, gas and other minerals — at least since the region's mining ban entered into force in 1998. That firm is owned by Rosgeo — the Kremlin's mineral explorer. Indeed, Lunev would land a weighty promotion after Rosgeo's seismic survey ship had once more headed via Cape Town to the Antarctic seabed in the austral summer of 2023 for another season of 'scientific research'. That event sparked environmental protests at the port city's V&A Waterfront — one of South Africa's most popular tourist destinations — and a letter of demand by 29 South African groups, which called on Pretoria to intervene. Pretoria's answer at the time? The Russian state mineral explorer was free to pursue its interests under the treaty's 'freedom of scientific investigation' principle — also allowed by the region's mining ban. Moscow's response? Giving Lunev a top job in Antarctica: that is, heading the Russian Antarctic Expedition, the state agency that executes Moscow's operational interests in the frigid southern frontier. Who is Pavel Lunev? A trained palaeontologist with tousled hair and a smile fit for the cover of Outside magazine, Lunev now appears in a suit and tie in a Russian press statement on the delegation's work in Milan — wearing a look that says, 'I'm not outside right now.' Lunev previously told Daily Maverick that geological and geophysical surveys by Rosgeo's Polar Marine Geosurvey Expedition (PMGE) was 'no different from the work conducted by other members' signed up to Antarctica's environmental laws. Indeed, some of PMGE's work includes standard sciences such as glacial evolution. The Rosgeo subsidiary had also probed 'the glacial processes, dynamics and evolution of the ice sheet, and the stages of Antarctic glaciation' and 'the nature and foundation of the Earth's crust', said Lunev. However, recent developments also involve: A July 2024 Russian-Chinese Antarctic geology paper that suggests nothing about prospecting, but appears in the state mining journal. Paper author Professor German Leitchenkov, a PMGE collaborator who has extensively researched Antarctica's mineral 'potential', presented his research on sub-ice sampling at an international Antarctic science conference held in Chile in August 2024; PMGE's stated goals up to at least 2030, which include identifying the Southern Ocean's 'mineral raw material potential'; A 2022 PMGE petroleum geology paper, which describes the 'high oil and gas potential' in the D'Urville Sea off East Antarctica; A February 2020 Rosgeo statement, which used Cape Town port to announce 70 billion tons of hydrocarbons off East Antarctica (500 billion barrels or 15 times global annual oil consumption); and … Documented claims betraying the Russian state's geopolitical motivations: 'The works of the PMGE aimed at studying the geological structure and mineral resources of the Antarctic are of geopolitical nature. They ensure guarantees of Russia's full participation in any form of possible future development of the Antarctic mineral resources — from designing the mechanisms for regulating such activities up to their direct implementation,' PMGE revealed in 2017. Leitchenkov's joint paper in a July 2024 edition of the Russian state journal, the 'Exploration and Protection of Mineral Resources'. (Image: Screenshot) Westminster releases findings on Russian hydrocarbon surveys Meanwhile, Westminster's newly released findings on the UK's Antarctic interests, issued this month, devote a section to 'commercial mining' and the Russian activities uncovered by Daily Maverick. According to the report, 'the Russian state-owned vessel [Akademik] Alexander Karpinsky has conducted seismic surveys in Antarctic waters, identifying potential hydrocarbon reserves estimated at 70 billion tonnes' — an activity that 'raised serious concerns' during the inquiry. In addition to findings published in October 2021 and May 2022, in May 2024 Daily Maverick also revealed that the Karpinsky had spent six summers since 2011 surveying for oil and gas in an area counterclaimed by Argentina, Chile and the UK. Asked to explain the Russian activities during Westminster's May 2024 inquiry, UK Polar Regions head Jane Rumble claimed that 'Russia has been tackled on this before and, in fact, has assured the ATCM on multiple occasions that this is a science programme, so we'll keep it under review'. Just, in fact, two 'assurances' The June 2025 inquiry findings quote Rumble's claim. However, the ATCM database contains no record of any government, including Rumble's, 'tackling' Russia 'on this' matter. As for 'multiple assurances', Russia had offered just one by the time Rumble made her claim. It was offered nearly a quarter of a century before at the 2002 Warsaw ATCM — where the Russian delegation did argue scientific intent in a draft document published by Daily Maverick. Yet, this draft also refuses to rule out 'utilisation of the Antarctic mineral wealth' which may only occur 'in the indefinitely remote future'. Russia delivered one additional 'assurance' — on 24 May 2024, but only after Rumble had delivered her testimony on 8 May. A media firestorm erupted after Rumble's testimony, capped by Chilean president Gabriel Boric twice tweeting that Santiago would defend its claimed territory against oil exploitation. So, not everyone has approached Russia's self-declared interests in Antarctic oil and gas like a geopolitical wet-floor sign. In February 2024, Washington — the treaty depositary — placed the Karpinsky under energy sanctions. And the US delegation had led an initiative reaffirming Antarctica's mining ban at the 2023 ATCM in Helsinki, Finland. Ukraine, immediately after the 2024 ATCM in Kochi, India, said Russia was blocking environmental initiatives, which 'once again confirms that the true intentions of its presence in Antarctica is mining'. Russia also reaffirmed the ban in Helsinki and Rumble, in her inquiry defence, said that 'there isn't any evidence that would point to a breach of the treaty. You would need different equipment between surveying and actual exploitation. There is not a shift to it, but, yes, we are watching it very closely.' Rumble has not responded to queries sent since last year. This is 'manifestly prospecting … what the Russians are doing' Some experts disagree that the act of putting a symbolic signature on the reaffirmation of the mining ban refutes the documented reality of Rosgeo's activities. Westminster's inquiry findings, in fact, point out that the 'Article 7' mining ban 'prohibits 'any activity relating to mineral resources, other than scientific research''. While the ban does not define a 'mineral resource' activity, the inquiry findings do. 'Any activity relating to mineral resources,' the findings say, 'includes prospecting, exploration and exploitation for commercial purposes'. And it is Antarctic governance expert Professor Alan Hemmings, of New Zealand's University of Canterbury, who told Daily Maverick in a recent webinar that the 'Karpinsky has been engaged in what is manifestly mineral prospecting'. Hemmings explains: 'Article 7 prohibits mineral resource activities, and mineral resource activities were defined in an earlier treaty that didn't enter into force quite carefully. And among the things that constitute mineral resource activities was prospecting. 'That's what the Russians are doing.' Why is Russia in Milan? It is unclear what submissions the Russian delegation will be making at this year's ATCM, which concludes on Thursday, 3 July. Yet, since the details of these 'prospecting' activities have not been tabled at any ATCM, it is highly unlikely that Moscow's envoys are now in Milan to formally discuss that contentious matter. The agenda remains opaque because the meeting has been a closed-door event since the treaty was signed in 1959 and that is why the press is stopped from reporting on the live substance of the 10-day talks. This year, the Russian statement from Milan says, the discussions are expected to focus on matters such as science and tourism. Lucia Sala Simeon, the only journalist reportedly at 30 minutes of the 'public' opening plenary, noted that she was briefly allowed into the venue. 'I was accompanied by a member of staff — who kept a close eye on me,' notes the Milan-based reporter. 'I was the only journalist there.' She added: 'I had to leave the room and was escorted out; in the next few days, I would no longer be allowed inside the venue, not even in the lounge. So, I'll be staying outside in the garden, like a homeless [person].' Italy, South Africa — reactions, non-reactions Italy's foreign ministry has not responded to Daily Maverick's multiple queries first sent August 2024. Treaty party South Africa, under a revamped 'conservation'-focused delegation, in an interview said Pretoria's 'non-aligned' stance was an advantage in negotiating with the most obstructive actors at the consultative table. Thus, Russia and China, which have — among others — used their vetoes to block an emperor penguin rescue plan at recent ATCMs. South Africa says it supports emperor penguin protection. 'We want a much more active engagement with the Russian and Chinese delegations,' said South Africa's lead negotiator, Ashley Johnson. 'Perhaps we can edge them closer to a conservationist approach.' Rosgeo's defence of its activities, shared with Daily Maverick in October 2021, can be read here. However, Russian authorities have not responded to our repeated attempts to reach them since Lunev's most recent response in May 2022. The Russian delegation did not respond to queries on Sunday. DM

Andrew Whitfield returns to Nelson Mandela Bay to coordinate an outright win in the 2026 elections
Andrew Whitfield returns to Nelson Mandela Bay to coordinate an outright win in the 2026 elections

Daily Maverick

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Andrew Whitfield returns to Nelson Mandela Bay to coordinate an outright win in the 2026 elections

Axed deputy minister of trade and industry, Andrew Whitfield, says he is returning to Nelson Mandela Bay to coordinate the Democratic Alliance's campaign for the local government elections in 2026 with the aim of winning an outright majority in the metro. He headed a historic campaign in the city in 2016, which saw the DA for the first time winning outright control of the metro, with Athol Trollip as mayoral candidate. Former deputy trade and industry minister, Andrew Whitfield, has described the timing of his axing by President Cyril Ramaphosa on 25 June as 'very curious'. In an interview with Daily Maverick over the weekend, Whitfield said that while he respects the President's sanction, he still has many questions about his dismissal. Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber CEO, Denise van Huyssteen, said Whitfield's sudden axeing caused political instability in the metro at a time the economy is under immense strain and business confidence is needed. Whitfield, who serves as the DA leader in the Eastern Cape, was due to hold talks with the Chamber on Monday, 30 June. According to a statement issued by Ramaphosa on Friday, 27 June: '[Whitfield] was removed as a Deputy Minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the President.' Ramaphosa added that there is precedent for this sanction. 'His travel to the United States was a clear violation of the rules and established practices governing the conduct of members of the executive. This requirement is known to all ministers and deputy ministers,' Ramaphosa said. Extensive travel Whitfield told Daily Maverick his first question about his dismissal is why Ramaphosa waited for four months before saying or doing anything about the visit to the US. Whitfield said he had travelled extensively over the past year; and he had always received an answer for a travel request from Ramaphosa's office within days. Whitfield said he didn't always like the answers – one decision, for example, declined him an opportunity to take part in a course at Harvard University in the US, funded by himself. However, he pointed out, he always respected the President's decisions and had complied with them to the letter. 'Going to Harvard would have been an extraordinary opportunity for me. I however decided not to go when the President declined this trip.' He said he had asked for permission to go on a DA-funded trip to Washington in the United States, scheduled for four months ago. 'I am a senior leader in the party and I understand the local trade agreement,' he said. For the first time, however, he received no answer from the office of the President when he requested permission to go on the trip. He said he made several requests and follow-ups for 10 days preceding the trip. He then went on the trip treating Ramaphosa's silence 'as consent'. Whitfield added that Ramaphosa's sanction was disproportionate if compared to other ministers whose unauthorised travel was met with the sanction of having their salaries docked. He added that several of the ANC ministers currently face much more serious allegations but are still serving in the Cabinet. 'I am not disputing the President's legal authority to discipline me,' he said. 'I accept my sanction.' However, he said, the time lapse, the lack of consultation on the side of the President and the severity of the sanction baffled him as to what the motive could be. Whitfield said he would now turn his attention to coordinating the DA's local government campaign in Nelson Mandela Bay to win the metro with an outright majority for the party. In 2016 when the DA succeeded in winning a majority in the metro, he headed the campaign of Athol Trollip, then the DA leader in the region, but who has subsequently joined Action SA.. He joined Trollip's team running the city in 2016 as mayoral committee member for economic development, tourism and agriculture and, after Trollip was removed as mayor by a motion of no confidence, Whitfield returned to the Parliament in 2019. The motion of no confidence against Trollip is currently the subject of a criminal court case involving the Nelson Mandela Bay ANC secretary-general Luyolo Nqakula. Nqakula is among those accused of manipulating a tender and using kickbacks to pay bribes promised to former DA councillors Mbulelo Manyathi, Trevor Louw and Neville Higgins, to vote for a motion of no confidence in Trollip. Whitfield said he believed the party had an extraordinary candidate in former mayor Retief Odendaal and a strong foundation that would help the DA win next year's local government elections. Local government 'Eventually everything does come back to the local government level,' he said. 'If you can fix the economy of Nelson Mandela Bay, you can fix the economy of the Eastern Cape.' 'To serve in the executive branch of our Government of National Unity [GNU] has been a unique honour with many ups and downs,' he said. During his tenure Whitfield was praised by the manufacturing industry in Nelson Mandela Bay for his work on a regulatory review to cut down red tape, with new legislation in the pipeline. He played a key role in ensuring that block exemption on ports and rail be extended to a minimum of 15 years in order to enable private-sector investment. Whitfield has a long track record in the metro where he served as the youth leader for the DA in 2010, an elected councillor in 2010 and a member of Parliament in 2014. He currently serves as the DA's leader in the Eastern Cape. Whitfield added that he had a fruitful time as deputy minister and had a strong working relationship with Minister Parks Tau whose work ethic he admired. He said he doubted his axing was prompted by his asking questions about the new Lotto contract as his involvement there 'ended over six months ago. I was being excluded.' Metro instability The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber CEO, Denise van Huyssteen, said Whitfield's sudden axeing caused political instability in the metro at a time when the economy is under immense strain and business confidence is needed. 'We were very concerned about the sudden termination of Whitfield,' she said. 'It is understood that Whitfield and his team were due in Nelson Mandela Bay today for an urgent meeting with the Business Chamber.' The meeting was due to be held on Monday, 30 June. 'This has prompted concerns around the stability of the political environment. This also comes at a time when the country's economy is already under immense strain due to geo-political shifts, global manufacturing footprint re-allocations, logistics inefficiencies and service delivery challenges at a municipal level. 'A stable political environment is fundamental in stimulating business confidence and economic stability in the country. 'It is absolutely vital that the Government of National Unity remains intact in order to drive the retention and attraction of much needed investment and employment to South Africa,' she said. DA's response to dismissal On Thursday, 26 June, DA leader John Steenhuisen said in Parliament that he was informed by Ramaphosa of his decision to dismiss Whitfield a mere three hours before a letter was sent to the former deputy minister. Steenhuisen added that Whitfield subsequently wrote to the President to apologize if his going on the USA trip without authorisation caused offence. He added that the 'drastic unilateral action' against Whitfield is a 'product of a flagrant double standard'. Steenhuisen then gave Ramaphosa 48 hours to dismiss these ministers as well. Ramaphosa did not. On Saturday, 28 June, the DA announced that it was withdrawing from Ramaphosa's national dialogue and also said it will vote against the budgets of departments headed up by ministers they believe Ramaphosa should remove from his Cabinet. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store