Torry Raac campaigners react after SNP minister talks in Aberdeen
Paul McLennan met members of the Torry Community Raac Campaign in Balnagask on Friday for the first time since the crisis unfolded more than a year ago.
Affected homeowners handed him around 40 letters penned by local residents and shared their stories in emotional testimony during the one-hour meeting.
The potentially dangerous Raac material was discovered in 500 council and private homes in the Balnagask area.
Resident Lynn Winstanley, who took part in the meeting, said she felt the minister did listen to their concerns even if it did take him too long to visit.
But she said homeowners are caught in the middle of a blame game taking place between the city council, Scottish Government and UK Government over funding.
Aberdeen City Council plans to demolish the affected properties by 2028 – despite an ongoing wrangle where some owners are refusing to sell.
The Balnagask resident would like to see the Scottish Government set up a fund to ensure homeowners are compensated for the full value of their home.
Currently the city council is offering only current market value, with residents facing losses of between £35,000 and £55,000 on average.
She said: 'In the middle of all this is human beings here whose lives are being affected morning, noon and night. Their families are being affected.
'For me, I don't care who is to blame, I don't know if anyone is to blame, but they all need to finally come together and sort the problem out.'
Ian Lippe, chair of the Torry Community Raac Campaign, said campaigners are being 'pushed from pillar to post' in their fight for funding.
He received the valuation from the council for his house in the week leading up to Christmas and looks set to lose about £50,000.
The campaigner said: 'There doesn't seem to be any urgency in trying to get a solution for us. It's still very much 'ah we'll see'.'
He added: 'What we've always said is give us full value for our houses and you can have our keys tomorrow.'
The P&J asked Mr McLennan why it had taken him so long to visit the community when it was well documented that hundreds of families were in crisis.
Failing to apologise for his absence, he said he had 'engaged extensively' with the local council, holding around eight to 10 meetings with officials in the past year.
The housing minister said building safety is the responsibility of local authorities and said it is for the UK Government to set up a UK-wide fund.
But the UK Government claims it is for devolved administrations – such as Holyrood – and relevant local councils.
He said Aberdeen City Council had yet to submit any 'detailed proposals' on funding.
Aberdeen City Council co-leader Christian Allard, who also met Mr McLennan on Friday, said the council has pushed for funding and funding flexibility 'from the outset'.
The SNP councillor added: 'We do need to have a plan from both governments about how we can support local authorities to better support our own tenants and owner occupiers as well.'
The P&J last week launched its campaign.
It builds on our continuing work to highlight the plight of ordinary people facing ruin through no fault of their own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
I shouldn't have gone to PMQs, says Reeves
Rachel Reeves has admitted she regrets attending prime minister's questions after she was seen in tears on the Government front bench. The Chancellor said she had been dealing with a 'personal issue' when her bottom lip shook and tears ran down her face during a moment of distress in Parliament on Wednesday. Ms Reeves was speaking after she made a surprise appearance alongside Sir Keir Starmer to unveil the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS. In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said she regretted going into PMQs after a 'tough day at the office', but hoped people 'could relate' to her distress. She said: 'In retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in... But you know, it is what it is.' The Leeds West and Pudsey MP said she never thought about resigning despite backbench anger over the way she had handled the economy, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' A backbench rebellion saw the government forced to drop key welfare cuts, which has left the Chancellor with a £5 billion black hole to fill. She has insisted she is 'totally' up for the job of Chancellor and asserted that she and the Prime Minister remain united. Ms Reeves said: 'People can see that Keir and me are a team.' Sir Keir stood by his Chancellor in the aftermath, telling BBC Radio 4 Today's Nick Robinson: 'She is going to be Chancellor into the next election and for many years afterwards.' He was quick to deny any political link to her tears, insisting it was a personal matter, saying: 'I'm not going to go into the personal matter of a colleague.' Labour insiders have claimed that the Chancellor has made herself 'unsackable' after the public tears. A government source said that Sir Keir 'seems to have tied himself to her' after her tears, which triggered a £3 billion market sell-off and crash in the pound's value. 'I thought at the beginning of Wednesday she would go, then thought it was confirmed when I saw her crying at PMQs but then she didn't,' said the source. Another source said Ms Reeves had enjoyed an 'outpouring of sympathy' over an incident that was still 'inescapably linked to the political facts' of the welfare rebellion. A third added that being pictured distraught on television had 'shored up her position'. In a turbulent week for the government, Ms Reeves refused to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget, saying: 'I'm not going to, because it would be irresponsible to do that. 'We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement. 'So we'll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened.'
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Supreme Court called it right on what makes a woman, says Judy Murray, as she welcomes 'common sense' ruling
Judy Murray has expressed support for the Supreme Court 's ruling that the legal definition of a woman is based on biological sex, saying 'welcome back, common sense'. The tennis coach and mother of Wimbledon champions Sir Andy and Jamie is well known for advocating 'fairness and safety' for women in sport. But in 2022 she faced a backlash when she criticised the prospect of professional golfer Hailey Davidson, of Ayrshire, becoming the first transgender woman to earn a Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) tour card. Reacting to an article about the 32-year-old's attempt, Mrs Murray tweeted: 'No. Not fair at all. Protect women's sport. Listen to the facts, the scientists and the medics. This is wrong.' She defended her comments, saying her point was 'purely from a perspective of women's sport and protecting the fairness of competition for girls and women'. The 65-year-old has now hailed April's ruling on what defines a woman under equalities laws. In an interview with The Scotsman, she said: 'The ruling for me was just common sense. And welcome back, common sense.' Mrs Murray said: 'There have always been categories in sport and they're there to ensure fairness and safety.' Her comments come a year after she backed JK Rowling by urging her to 'preach' following a series of savage social media posts against Scotland's hate crime law as the Harry Potter author warned against 'dismantling' women's rights. Mrs Murray, who is celebrating the release of her new book, Game, Set and Murder, about the mysterious death of a tennis coach, established the Judy Murray Foundation in 2018 to improve accessibility to sports, particularly for young and female athletes. Meanwhile, gender critical campaigners have sent a further 'letter before action' to the Scottish Government, about access to toilets in government properties. Sex Matters want action by next Wednesday. The group calls on the government to state that 'all facilities designated as male or female within the Scottish Government estate are to be interpreted as meaning biological sex, and that gender-neutral options are widely available'. Tory MSP Tess White said: 'The SNP Government must stop dragging its heels. The Supreme Court ruling was crystal clear.' The Scottish Government has previously said it accepts the Supreme Court ruling.
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Special forces chiefs unite to demand an end to Labour's legal witch hunts against veterans
Special Forces leaders have united in an unprecedented move to stop legal witch hunts against veterans. The heads of the UK's three most elite military units have said 'enough is enough' after Labour seeks to leave troops exposed. The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act was introduced by then veterans minister Johnny Mercer in 2023 and established an independent commission, away from criminal and legal proceedings, to promote reconciliation. Sir Keir Starmer 's government has promised to dismantle the Legacy Act, in fact including a pledge to amend it in their election manifesto last year. The Mail's Stop the SAS Betrayal campaign has demanded a U-turn to stop former soldiers being hounded in their old age. The Government's failure to fight their corner has led to a joint move by veterans from the Special Air Service (SAS), the Special Boat Service (SBS) and the Special Reconnaissance Regiment (SRR) associations. They have written to Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS), Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, demanding action now to stop the 'lawfare'. At the centre of the campaign are 12 SAS soldiers who could face murder charges after a coroner ruled their shooting of four IRA terrorists in 1992 was unlawful. The men were cleared after an extensive investigation into events at Clonoe, County Tyrone. But campaigners have claimed their relatives' human rights were ignored. That night the terrorists had been equipped with a Russian-made heavy machine gun and three assault rifles. Remarkably, this February coroner Mr Justice Humphreys ruled the SAS's use of force excessive. The Mail understands this is the first time in the history of the SAS, SBS and SRR they have challenged the head of the UK's Armed Forces together. Their letter reads: 'This unified communication makes clear our collective position. A line must be drawn under the legacy matters arising from the conflict and that the time has come to bring closure to events that may never reach a just or conclusive end. 'We believe it is time to bring certainty, closure and fairness to this issue, not only for those who served but also for their families. Our joint letter reflects the deep concern held across the military community and urges decisive leadership to resolve this matter once and for all.' The Mail understands the current Director of Special Forces, who is responsible for SAS, SBS and SRR operations around the world, has also penned a furious letter on the same issue. Last night these unprecedented moves received emphatic support from former Commanding Officers (COs) of the SAS, leading defence voices and shadow ministers. Speaking exclusively to this newspaper, former SAS CO Lieutenant Colonel Richard Williams criticised the Ministry of Defence's position. He said: 'The whole country should reflect on the contents of this important letter by the combined Special Forces Associations and the total lack of official response extremely seriously. 'It outlines clearly a critical crisis of trust in the military and political chain of command by those special forces engaged today in the most dangerous and sensitive of national security operations. I remain utterly dumbfounded by the lack of overt support shown by the current or past leadership of the MoD for these brave and skilled British soldiers. 'The consistent, sweaty-palmed silence by those appointed to lead and resource our forces cannot be justified in any way and smacks of moral cowardice.' Since the Mail's campaign began last month, tens of thousands of signatures have been added to a petition backing veterans. Last night more than 165,000 people had signed the UK Government and Parliament petition. A further surge is expected in the build up to a major parliamentary debate on the issue on July 14. The political side of the campaign is being led by David Davis MP, former SAS reservist, and Tory defence spokesman Mark Francois. Last night, Mr Francois said: 'I welcome this well-informed intervention by these highly experienced personnel. 'Both the outgoing CDS, Admiral Sir Tony and his successor, Air Chief Marshal Richard Knighton, have acknowledged the recruitment challenges facing the Armed Forces. But who would sign up to serve a government that plainly doesn't have the back of troops?' Labour's manifesto included a pledge to repeal the act after a Belfast court last February ruled the amnesties were unlawful. The Act was found to breach the European Convention on Human Rights which places an investigative duty on the state where its agents may have caused death or injury. The government intends to use a Remedial Act to remove key provisions within the Legacy Act. Mr Mercer, who is backing the Mail's campaign, has described military veterans who left the forces to become Labour MPs as 'useful idiots'. Former Army commander Colonel Hamish de Bretton-Gordon said: 'Special Forces are the brightest jewel in the military crown who must be protected and supported. To lose any of their mercurial capabilities would make us less safe at home and abroad.' The Ministry of Defence said: 'We consider that the findings and verdict [of the Clonoe incident] do not properly reflect the context of the incident nor the challenging circumstances in which members of the Armed Forces served in Northern Ireland. 'We inherited a mess of a Legacy Act that was not supported by a number of Veterans groups and would have also meant immunity from prosecution for those who committed the most appalling terrorist crimes – such as those who took part in the IRA's bombing campaign.' 'Soldiers don't want to be deployed after our bogus murder charges' An SAS soldier cleared of murder after shooting a jihadist in Syria has accused top brass of throwing soldiers 'under the bus'. The Mail revealed he was one of five SAS troopers who went through a three-year legal hell. The soldiers were accused of unlawfully killing two terrorists in Syria via excessive force despite the enemy fighters vowing to use suicide vests to blow up 'infidels'. The jihadists were eventually shot dead by an SAS assault team in a raid in hostile territory in July 2022. They were only cleared of wrongdoing last month. In a remarkable interview on a US podcast 'Jay Cal' - as he called himself - said SAS operations are being compromised by red tape. He also accused General Sir Gwyn Jenkins, former Special Forces director of triggering the investigation despite knowing there was no wrongdoing. Jay told the Shawn Ryan Show: 'These guys like Sir Gwyn sit in their ivory towers in Westminster making these decisions which are destroying people's lives. SAS soldiers are saying they don't want to deploy on operations because what happened to us will happen to them. It is a disgrace. They are spineless, they have no moral courage. This has got to stop.' Jay, or Soldier C as he was known in the military police investigation, suggested Sir Gwyn wanted to 'look transparent' to boost his career. He described how Sir Gwyn's decision to launch the probe came after he was accused of ignoring war crimes. He added: 'We were thrown under the bus despite there being no wrongdoing.'Jay said his colleagues who also faced murder charges suffered emotional trauma. Despite their ordeal, the 'Syria Five' have not received any apology. They claim the Ministry of Defence failed to support them through the legal process. Their case provoked fury within the regiment, with troops demanding their officers provide more support.
