AOC Ridicules Hegseth After Being Congratulated for 'Not a Single Leak' From Iran Bombing: 'Not a Vote of Confidence'
Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez mocked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after a conservative political pundit congratulated him for managing the U.S. attack on Iran without any leaks.
The New York representative took to X (formerly Twitter) to respond to conservative columnist amd Newsmax host Todd Starnes who had commended Hegseth on the same platform earlier.
"Not a single leak. Well done, @SecDef," Starnes wrote, appearing to refer to the Signalgate scandal from earlier this year after it was revealed that a journalist was added to a private Signal chat of Trump officials discussing strikes on Yemen.
"This is like applauding a grown man for being able to wipe their behind. Not exactly a vote of confidence," AOC responded.
Social media users quickly took to the replies of Ocasio-Cortez's post to further ridicule Hegseth, with some expressing frustrations at the fact that the Trump administration had become involved in another foreign war.
"The cowardice displayed here, by not seeking the Congress' declaration of war, is astounding," said one.
"All day I've been seeing house MAGA applauding @SecDef for not leaking out anything about the bombings. I WANT TO KNOW why is this deemed normal? We shouldn't have to be praising a grown man let alone the @SecDef for not drunk texting military secrets," said another.
"Like why are we congratulating someone who's supposed to be doing their jobs," another user wrote.
President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. had successfully bombed three Iranian nuclear sites in a national address delivered from the White House on Saturday evening.
Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, a close ally to AOC, also commented on the attack, drawing parallels between this attack to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
"No weapons of mass destruction were ever found," Sanders said, referencing the Iraq invasion. "That war was based on a lie. A lie that cost us 4,500 young Americans, 32,000 wounded and trillions of dollars."
"We cannot let history repeat itself," he continued.
Originally published on Latin Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
36 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
What The $3.3 Trillion Bill Means For Your Wallet And The Country
After months of political wrangling, the U.S. Senate is gearing up for a final round of debate and amendments on one of the most sweeping legislative packages in years. Branded by President Donald Trump as the "Big Beautiful Bill," the $3.3 trillion proposal has drawn strong reactions across the political and economic spectrum — from celebration to concern. The plan, set for final Senate votes this week, covers a lot of ground: major tax cuts, deep changes to health and retirement programs, looser rules for energy and infrastructure development, and significant shifts in federal spending. Backers say it's a long-overdue push to revive growth and reduce federal interference. Critics call it a sharp tilt toward the wealthy that leaves many Americans behind. What's in the Bill? At its core, the legislation would cut taxes sharply for businesses — dropping the corporate rate to 15% — while also offering new credits to companies that manufacture in the U.S. It would restructure income tax brackets, delivering the biggest gains to top earners. And one of its most controversial pieces: it repeals the estate tax, which currently applies only to the largest inheritances. The bill also makes significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid, the public health insurance programs that serve seniors, low-income families, and people with disabilities. Medicaid funding would shift to state control through block grants — a move ABC News notes could mean fewer benefits or tighter eligibility in many areas. Meanwhile, Medicare would introduce new income-based premiums, and the Social Security retirement age would rise gradually over the next decade. In the energy and infrastructure space, the bill would make it easier to approve oil, gas, and nuclear projects by speeding up federal permitting. Environmental reporting requirements for companies would also be rolled back. At the same time, federal funds for new roads and bridges would lean heavily on public-private partnerships, instead of direct government investment. Finally, the plan realigns federal spending, boosting budgets for the military and border enforcement, while cutting back on public education, housing assistance, and some transportation programs. It also includes privatization efforts, including proposals to transfer operations of Amtrak and the U.S. Postal Service to the private sector. How Would It Affect Everyday Americans? For middle-class families, the impact could be a mixed bag. Modest tax relief might be welcome, but many would feel the loss of services — especially if Medicaid coverage is reduced or public school funding shrinks. Analysts warn that lower-income households stand to lose the most, especially those relying on subsidized health care, food assistance, or public housing. Seniors, especially those not yet retired, could be hit hard. The plan to gradually raise the Social Security age means workers in their 50s may need to work longer or save more. And the Medicare changes could raise monthly costs for many. "[The structure] shifts financial risk from the government to individual families," said Henry Walters, a policy researcher at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in an interview with Politico. On the other hand, wealthier Americans and large corporations would see major advantages. The estate tax repeal, in particular, would benefit only a small slice of the population — roughly the top 0.1%, according to a 2024 Treasury Department estimate. For multinational companies, especially those in oil and finance, the tax cuts and regulatory rollback are likely to boost profits in the short term. Which Industries Stand to Gain? Energy companies, especially in oil, gas, and coal, are likely to see a surge in activity. The bill removes environmental hurdles and shortens approval timelines for new projects. "[This bill could be the biggest break for fossil fuels in over a decade]," one analyst told Bloomberg. Meanwhile, manufacturers that build products in the U.S. would benefit from targeted tax credits and lower operating costs. Defense contractors and border security firms are also expected to gain, with billions in additional federal funding earmarked for military upgrades and immigration enforcement. But renewable energy developers, education nonprofits, and public sector agencies may lose ground. With fewer federal grants and more pressure to rely on private capital, some projects may stall or shrink. Likewise, cities and states that depend on federal transportation dollars may struggle to maintain services. The Price Tag — and the Risks The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill could add roughly $3.3 trillion to the national deficit over the next decade. Supporters argue the economic growth unleashed by lower taxes and deregulation will offset the cost. But others, including some within the GOP, have expressed concern about long-term fiscal stability. "Even pro-growth policies have limits," said Sarah Mitchell, a former Treasury official, in a piece for the Wall Street Journal. "There's a point where borrowing becomes a threat to interest rates, inflation, and household budgets." Inflation remains a particular worry. While price increases have cooled since the pandemic highs, a new round of deficit spending—combined with looser regulations on energy and markets—could reignite upward pressure. What Happens Next? The Senate's "vote-a-rama" began at 9 a.m. Monday, giving senators the chance to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments before a final up-or-down vote. If it passes with a simple majority, the bill will move to the House, where debate is expected to be just as fierce. For now, Americans are left to weigh the potential rewards against the real risks. Supporters say it's a long-needed reset that favors personal freedom, business growth, and national strength. Opponents warn it could widen inequality, erode protections for the most vulnerable, and saddle future generations with debt. Regardless of the outcome, the "Big Beautiful Bill" signals something deeper than a policy shift — it marks a return to a bold, top-down economic experiment that could reshape the American landscape for decades to come.
Int'l Business Times
36 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
Texas Lawmaker Urges Trump to Ease Immigration Crackdown Citing Harm to Small Businesses
Amid mass immigration raids across the United States, a Texas congressman is calling on President Donald Trump to support struggling businesses he says are suffering under the administration's immigration enforcement policies. According to Border Report , U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Democrat from Texas, sent a letter to Trump urging executive action to help small businesses stay afloat. He argues that raids—like those recently seen in Los Angeles—are leaving sectors such as agriculture, construction, and hospitality without enough workers to operate. "Like you, I am a strong supporter of legal migration and the apprehension of criminals, which is why I voted in support of legislation like the Laken Riley Act," Gonzalez wrote. "However, American businesses are being harmed by what you described as a 'very aggressive policy.' This country is heavily reliant on an undocumented workforce in industries like construction, agriculture, and hospitality." In the letter, Gonzalez asked Trump to issue an executive order allowing small businesses to sponsor undocumented migrants who have lived in the United States for at least three years and have no criminal record. "This executive order would provide migrants temporary lawful status on a yearly basis and allow them to continue working without fear of deportation," he wrote. Gonzalez warned that continued aggressive enforcement could result in the removal of an estimated 1.5 million construction workers, 1 million hospitality workers, and hundreds of thousands more across the manufacturing, transportation, and agriculture sectors. He also condemned ongoing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Texas—particularly in the Rio Grande Valley—as "disgraceful and inhumane." "I am shocked by some of the visuals I see on TV and social media—it's a very aggressive enforcement," Gonzalez said. "I don't think anybody has ever seen anything like this in our lifetime. It's shameful for this administration to conduct itself in this way." Gonzalez added that the raids are instilling fear in undocumented communities, causing many not to show up for work and further straining local economies. "It's hurting our agriculture sector, our construction sector in Texas," he said. "People aren't showing up to jobs. This is putting pressure on banks that have made construction loans with deadlines, on projects that now can't be completed." Gonzalez's concerns are echoed in a recent study by the University of California, Merced, which warned that mass deportations could severely damage California's economy. The report estimated that removing the state's undocumented population would lead to a $275 billion economic hit and a $23 billion annual loss in local, state and federal tax revenue. As the second-largest immigrant labor force in the country behind California, Texas would face a similar economic impact. A analysis released earlier this year found that immigrants make up nearly a quarter of Texas's labor force—more than 3.7 million workers. Originally published on Latin Times Donald trump Immigration United States
Int'l Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Int'l Business Times
TikTok 'Safe for Now,' Trump Claims, But Refuses to Reveal Mystery Buyer for Two Weeks
The popular social media platform TikTok finds itself in an ongoing state of uncertainty following President Donald Trump's assertions. While he claims the app is 'safe for now' and has identified a group of 'very wealthy people' as potential buyers, he has opted to keep their identities under wraps for the next two weeks. This latest development comes amidst continued pressure for TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest its US operations or face a ban, raising questions about the app's future in the American market. The President's Promise: A Buyer Revealed Speaking to Fox News on Sunday, President Donald Trump announced that a buyer for TikTok has been found. He stated the purchasers are 'a group of very wealthy people', whose identities he intends to reveal in 'about two weeks' – a timeframe he often favours for such disclosures. US President Donald Trump said in a Fox News interview broadcast on Sunday that he had found a buyer for the TikTok short-video app, which he described as a group of "very wealthy people" whose identities he will reveal in "about two weeks." — Forbes India (@ForbesIndia) June 30, 2025 Trump indicated that Chinese approval would 'probably' be necessary for the sale to proceed. Despite this, he appeared to hold firm in his belief that Chinese leader Xi Jinping would lend his support to the acquisition. Thus far, President Trump has intervened three times to postpone the deadline for TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to secure a new buyer, a failure which would effectively lead to the app ceasing operations in the United States. His executive order, issued on 19 June, pushed the latest deadline to 17 September. Administration's Goal: Safe and Secure TikTok for Americans At the time, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the administration's objective was to ensure that American users would continue to have access to the application. 'As he has said many times, President Trump does not want TikTok to go dark,' Leavitt said. 'This extension will last 90 days, which the Administration will spend working to ensure this deal is closed so that the American people can continue to use TikTok with the assurance that their data is safe and secure,' she added. TikTok initially missed its 19 January deadline and was briefly inaccessible for millions of Americans before President Trump intervened. For those affected, a message on the app read: ' law banning TikTok has been enacted in the US. Unfortunately, that means you can't use TikTok for now.' Potential Buyers and Past Interest Several prominent figures have previously indicated an interest in acquiring the platform, such as 'Shark Tank' personality Kevin O'Leary and former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, AP News reported last year. Previously, Trump also indicated his support for Elon Musk, a former staunch ally, if he wished to acquire the application. In January, Musk stated his long-standing opposition to a TikTok ban, believing it 'goes against freedom of speech.' Yet, later that month, the Tesla CEO informed the WELT Economic Summit that he hadn't made an offer for the app. He added, 'I don't have any plans for what would I do if I had TikTok.' As TikTok's future in the US hangs in the balance, the coming weeks will reveal whether President Trump's promised 'very wealthy' buyers will step forward. For now, millions of American users await the outcome, hoping their beloved app remains 'safe' and accessible. Originally published on IBTimes UK
