British military Afghan data breach exposed: government cover-up risked 100,000 lives
The British military faces scrutiny after a catastrophic data breach exposed up to 100,000 Afghans to potential
Taliban
retaliation, prompting successive governments to deploy an unprecedented legal cover-up lasting nearly two years.
In February 2022, a British soldier accidentally transmitted a database containing 33,000 Afghan records to unauthorized recipients while attempting to verify sanctuary applications. The breach remained secret until August 2023, when an anonymous Afghan threatened to publish the information on Facebook.
Also read:
UK defence ministry fined for Afghan data breach during ...
Taliban kill list threatens Afghan lives
The leaked database included sensitive personal information about Afghans who had applied for the UK's Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap), along with family members' details, phone numbers, and email addresses of British government officials.
Government lawyers warned that if the Taliban obtained the dataset, as many as 100,000 Afghans would face "risk of death, torture, intimidation or harassment." The figure encompassed primary applicants and their family members, some of whom were specifically named in the compromised records.
"The fact that the Taliban may be in possession of 33,000 Arap applications, including the primary applicants' phone numbers and all the case evidence, is simply bone-chilling," wrote Person A, an activist helping Afghan refugees, in an email to then-Armed Forces Minister James Heappey.
Operation Rubific: secret evacuation mission
Following the breach discovery, the Ministry of
Defence
launched Operation Rubific, a covert mission to evacuate affected Afghans while preventing public disclosure. The operation included the largest peacetime covert evacuation in British history.
Live Events
Defence Secretary John Healey revealed Tuesday that 18,500 Afghans affected by the breach have already been relocated to the UK, with an additional 5,400 scheduled for evacuation. The total cost of addressing the breach reached £850 million for 6,900 individuals, according to
MoD
figures.
Also read:
UK launched secret scheme to relocate Afghans after data leak, documents show
Government superinjunction prevents media coverage
The Conservative government secured a superinjunction from the High Court on September 1, 2023, preventing any public disclosure of the breach or the court order's existence. The order remained in place for 683 days, making it the longest superinjunction in British legal history and the first sought by a government.
Labour continued advocating for the superinjunction after taking power in July 2024. Mr Justice Chamberlain criticized the order as a "wholly novel use" of superinjunctions, stating it was "fundamentally objectionable for decisions that affect the lives and safety of thousands of human beings, and involve the commitment of billions of pounds of public money, to be taken in circumstances where they are completely insulated from public debate."
£7 billion Afghan response plan approved in secret
While the superinjunction remained active, the government approved spending up to £7 billion over five years to relocate 25,000 affected Afghans under the secret Afghan Response Route (ARR) scheme. Chancellor Rachel Reeves signed off on the plan in October 2024, with the cabinet's home and economic affairs committee deeming it "appropriate."
The policy was subsequently expanded in June 2025 to include more than 42,500 individuals before an independent review questioned its necessity. Defence Secretary Healey announced Tuesday the closure of the ARR scheme, leaving thousands of affected Afghans behind.
Data breach timeline reveals government delays
The breach originated when a soldier working under General Sir Gwyn Jenkins at Regent's Park Barracks sent the database to Afghan contacts twice in February 2022. The recipients passed the information to other Afghans, with at least one copy reaching individuals in Pakistan.
The MoD remained unaware of the breach until August 14, 2023, when an anonymous Afghan posted details on a Facebook group, threatening to publish the complete dataset. Government officials immediately alerted approximately 1,800 Afghans in Pakistan about potential data compromise.
Also read:
Largest population purge this decade? Iran expels half a million Afghans in rapid crackdown post-Israel wa
Independent review questions superinjunction justification
Retired civil servant Paul Rimmer's independent review, ordered by Defence Secretary Healey, concluded that early Taliban targeting concerns had "diminished" and the superinjunction may have worsened the situation by increasing the dataset's value to hostile actors.
The review noted that given existing Taliban intelligence capabilities, the dataset was "unlikely to provide considerably new or highly pertinent information." It also warned that publicity surrounding the breach revelation would "clearly be likely to attract Taliban interest in obtaining it."
Legal action threatens £250 million government payout
Manchester-based Barings Law represents approximately 1,000 breach victims preparing legal action that could cost taxpayers more than £250 million. The firm criticized the MoD's response as "wholly inadequate," particularly an email apology sent to affected individuals Tuesday morning.
"Through its careless handling of such sensitive information, the MoD has put multiple lives at risk, damaged its own reputation, and put the success of future operations in jeopardy by eroding trust in its data security measures," Barings Law stated.
Parliamentary accountability demands government transparency
Defence Secretary Healey apologized to
Parliament
Tuesday for the "serious departmental error," acknowledging that "full accountability to parliament and freedom of the press matter deeply to me — they're fundamental to our British way of life."
Defence Committee Chairman Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi called the situation "a mess and wholly unacceptable," indicating potential parliamentary investigation into the breach's circumstances and government response.
The superinjunction's lifting enables public scrutiny of government decisions that affected thousands of lives and committed billions in public expenditure without democratic oversight. Many affected Afghans only learned of their exposure through government emails sent Tuesday, nearly three years after the initial breach.
Also read:
Pakistan in no rush to recognise Taliban government in Afghanistan, say officials
Ongoing security concerns for Afghan refugees
Individuals in the UK and Pakistan reportedly still possess copies of the compromised database, with at least one case involving monetary exchange for the information. The MoD has implemented new security software and appointed a chief information officer to prevent future breaches.
Former British Ambassador to Afghanistan Sir William Patey described the incident as a "spectacular data breach," noting that the Taliban were already targeting individuals associated with western forces. "Providing the Taliban with a list would have made their job that much easier," he told
Times Radio
.
The breach highlights systemic data security failures within the Ministry of Defence, with legal experts noting it represents "just the latest in a long line of data breaches by the MoD of personal data of Afghan citizens who had previously worked with UK armed forces."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Britain to lower voting age to 16 in bid to increase democratic participation
Britain will lower the voting age from 18 to 16 before the next national election as part of measures to increase democratic participation, the government announced Thursday (July 17, 2025). The centre-left Labour Party pledged before it was elected in July 2024 to lower the voting age for elections to Britain's Parliament. Scotland and Wales already let 16 and 17-year-olds vote in local and regional elections. Britain will join the short list of countries where the voting age is 16, alongside the likes of Ecuador, Austria and Brazil. The move comes alongside wider reforms that include tightening campaign financing rules to stop shell companies with murky ownership from donating to political parties. Democracy Minister Rushanara Ali said the change would strengthen safeguards against foreign interference in British politics. The government also said it will introduce automatic voter registration and allow voters to use bank cards as a form of identification at polling stations. The previous Conservative government introduced a requirement for voters to show photo identification in 2022, a measure it said would combat fraud. Critics argued it could disenfranchise millions of voters, particularly the young, the poor and members of ethnic minorities. Elections watchdog the Electoral Commission has estimated that about 750,000 people did not vote in last year's election because they lacked ID. Turnout in the 2024 election was 59.7%, the lowest level in more than two decades. Harry Quilter-Pinner, head of left-leaning think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the changes were 'the biggest reform to our electoral system since 1969," when the voting age was lowered to 18 from 21. The changes must be approved by Parliament. The next national election must be held by 2029. 'For too long public trust in our democracy has been damaged and faith in our institutions has been allowed to decline,' Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said. 'We are taking action to break down barriers to participation that will ensure more people have the opportunity to engage in UK democracy.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
UK to lower voting age to 16 in landmark electoral reform
The British government said on Thursday it planned to give 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote in all UK elections in a major overhaul of the country's democratic system. The government said the proposed changes were part of an effort to boost public trust in democracy and would align voting rights across Britain, where younger voters already participate in devolved elections in Scotland and Wales. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category "They're old enough to go out to work, they're old enough to pay taxes ... and I think if you pay in, you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on, which way the government should go," Prime Minister Keir Starmer told ITV News. The change will require parliamentary approval, but that is unlikely to present an obstacle because the policy was part of Starmer's election campaign last year which gave him a large majority. Despite that win, Starmer's popularity has fallen sharply in government after a series of missteps set against a difficult economic backdrop. His party sits second in most opinion polls behind Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK Party. Live Events A poll of 500 16 and 17 year-olds conducted by Merlin Strategy for ITV News showed 33% said they would vote Labour, 20% would vote Reform, 18% would vote Green, 12% Liberal Democrats and 10% Conservative. There are about 1.6 million 16 and 17 year-olds in the UK, according to official data. Just over 48 million people were eligible to vote at the last election, in which turnout fell to its lowest since 2001. The next election is due in 2029. Research from other countries has shown lowering the voting age had no impact on election outcomes, but that 16-year-olds were more likely to vote than those first eligible at 18. "Voting at 16 will also help more young people to cast that all-important, habit-forming vote at a point when they can be supported with civic education," said Darren Hughes, Chief Executive of the Electoral Reform Society . The reforms would also expand acceptable voter ID to include UK-issued bank cards and digital formats of existing IDs, such as driving licences and Veteran Cards. A more automated system will also be introduced to simplify the process of registering to vote. To tackle foreign interference, the government plans to tighten rules on political donations, including checks on contributions over 500 pounds ($670) from unincorporated associations and closing loopholes used by shell companies. "By reinforcing safeguards against foreign interference, we will strengthen our democratic institutions and protect them for future generations," democracy minister Rushanara Ali said in a statement.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
JLR to cut up to 500 management jobs amid US tariff impact
Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) is set to cut up to 500 management-level jobs in the UK, as the company grapples with the impact of US trade tariffs and a decline in sales, BBC reports. The job reductions, amounting to roughly 1.5 per cent of its British workforce, will be implemented through a voluntary redundancy scheme, the company said, describing the move as 'normal business practice.' The announcement comes days after the carmaker reported a fall in sales during the April–June quarter, citing disruptions from paused exports to the United States due to tariffs, as well as the phased withdrawal of older Jaguar models. JLR had temporarily halted US-bound shipments after tariffs on UK-made vehicles were raised by the Trump administration. Although tariffs have since been reduced from 27.5 per cent to 10 per cent following a trade deal between the UK and US, they still mark a significant increase from the previous 2.5 per cent rate. Tariffs to blame Professor David Bailey of Birmingham Business School said the tariffs have played a 'big role' in the company's decision. 'JLR had been reporting record profits — £2.5 billion in the year to March, its best in a decade — and was hiring in preparation for increased electric vehicle production,' Bailey said. 'The sudden tariff hike has clearly disrupted plans.' He also noted that JLR's popular Defender model, manufactured in Slovakia, continues to face the full 27.5 per cent tariff in the US, adding further pressure. Labour MP Preet Kaur Gill, representing Birmingham Edgbaston, acknowledged the importance of the UK-US trade deal in easing the tariff burden. 'It helped save 12,000 jobs,' she said on BBC Politics Live. 'Our focus remains on sustaining this relationship to support key employers like JLR.' JLR employs more than 30,000 people in the UK and operates major facilities in Solihull, Wolverhampton, and Halewood. The company builds several Range Rover SUV models in the country and has been increasingly shifting toward electric vehicle production.
