Building Industry Leaders Issue an Open Letter to Prime Minister Carney on GST Rebate Commitments
Toronto, May 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Greater Toronto Area, May 28, 2025 – Yesterday at 2:30PM EST, key leaders from the building and development industry issued an open letter to Prime Minister Carney regarding the urgent need for federal action on the GST rebate and Canada's housing crisis broadly.
The letter calls on the federal government to move with speed to combat market uncertainty and asks that:
The GST rebate thresholds are adequate to deal with high value jurisdictions like the Greater Toronto Area and the Lower Mainland of BC;
The GST exemption apply to all new home purchasers, not simply first-time buyers;
The government update the existing GST rebate mechanism and simply adjust the dollar thresholds rather than come up with a completely new framework; and
The government commits to regularly index the GST rebate thresholds.
Later that afternoon, the federal government tabled a proposal to introduce a new GST rebate for first-time home buyers. While we are pleased that the federal government is moving quickly, the measures will provide limited, if any, benefit for buyers in large urban centres such as the GTA and Lower Mainland BC. We strongly encourage the government to incorporate the recommendations in the open letter, particularly the recommendation to retain the existing GST New Housing Rebate structure and eligibility criteria without adding a first-time homebuyer restriction.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The letter was signed by leaders from: BILD (Building Industry and Land Development Association), Canmore Community Housing, Canadian Home Builders' Association, Habitat For Humanity Canada, Missing Middle Initiative, Options for Homes, Polygon Homes Ltd. and Wesgroup Properties.
Read the entire letter:
Dear Prime Minister Carney,
We want to congratulate you on your election as Prime Minister of Canada and on the appointment of your new Cabinet. We are looking forward to working with your government towards the common goal of increasing annual housing starts to 500,000 units and supporting a sustainable housing market.
We write to you today to propose that the federal government immediately follow through with a revised version of the campaign promise of enhancing the existing GST new housing rebate, which was referenced as a priority in today's Speech from the Throne. An enhanced rebate would help lower the cost of ownership, increase housing supply, enable residents to live in right-sized homes, and move the nation closer to its goal of starting construction on 500,000 new homes annually.
Canadians welcomed and embraced the focus on housing affordability during the election in the interest of housing availability, affordability, and job creation. Yet, housing starts for owner-oriented homes continue to fall. In 2024, Canada recorded just 132,000 such starts, the second-lowest since 2001, and down over 20% from 2021. The outlook is worsening: first-quarter 2025 starts are down over 25% year-over-year, hitting their lowest point since the Financial Crisis. Pre-construction condo sales have nearly disappeared in Greater Vancouver and Greater Toronto, indicating further declines ahead.
Canada faces a cost-of-delivery crisis in new home construction. The Liberal platform rightly identified 'lowering the cost of homebuilding' as a key priority. While many cost drivers lie outside federal control, the GST is a notable exception. Applied only to new homes, the GST undermines affordability. When introduced in 1991, the federal government provided a rebate that covered over 95% of new homes for all new home buyers. But because the thresholds were never indexed to inflation, most new homes no longer qualify, especially in high-cost regions, where affordability is most strained. This impacts not only new home prices but also resale and rental markets by reducing housing options.
There is an opportunity and need to ensure the GST rebate will address the affordability crisis for all buyers, not just those purchasing new homes for the first time. If an adjustment to GST exemptions applies only to first-time buyers, it excludes key groups like seniors looking to downsize, transactions that free up family-sized homes. Perversely, it could reduce the construction of new affordable supply, as potential first-time homebuyers may be reluctant to use their eligibility on a smaller unit, instead saving it up for a more expensive, family-sized home down the road. This also reduces the incentive for those who purchase pre-construction condos, which are essential for developers to move forward with projects and provide much-needed privately-owned rental homes at completion. We urge your government to redesign its proposed enhanced GST new housing rebate with four key principles in mind: speed, simplicity, supply, and sufficiency.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Speed: The rebate should be implemented immediately to counter the ongoing decline in non-rental housing starts and prevent buyers from delaying purchases. We urge you to announce an effective date, as soon as possible, with the rebate applied retroactively to that date.
Simplicity: The design should align with existing business practices and avoid complex, time-consuming changes for governments and industry.
Supply: New condo supply will not be created in some regions until the market absorbs the existing inventory of under-construction and complete but unsold units.
Sufficiency: The rebate must be large enough to support the federal goal of 500,000 housing starts per year, with thresholds high enough to ensure no region is excluded.
With speed, simplicity, supply, and sufficiency in mind, we propose the following recommendations to the federal government:
Implement immediate reforms to the existing GST/New Housing Rebate. Retain the current structure and eligibility criteria, without adding a first-time homebuyer restriction. Raise the lower threshold from $350,000 to $1,000,000 and the upper threshold from $450,000 to $1,500,000. Increase the maximum rebate from 36% to 100% for homes where possession and ownership transfer on or after July 1, 2025. The rebate must apply to homes that are currently under construction and those that are complete and unsold, to ensure the next round of construction can occur as quickly as possible.
Commit to further enhancements. Recognize that even these thresholds may not fully address affordability in high-cost regions or future price growth. Implement threshold increases now and launch consultations on inflation indexing and regional adjustments.
Encourage provincial action. Urge provinces to adopt or expand similar rebates, including relief from sales taxes and land transfer taxes on new homes.
GST relief was a central part of the Liberal platform, your post-election commitments and addressing the housing affordability crisis facing our country. Acting quickly will complement your middle-class tax cut and show your government's practical, results-driven approach to one of Canada's most urgent challenges.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
We welcome the opportunity to support your team on implementation and look forward to working together to increase housing starts and improve affordability nationwide.
We would request the opportunity to meet with you at your earliest convenience to further discuss the impact of these proposals and the need to act with urgency.
Sincerely,
Dave Wilkes, President & CEO, Building Industry and Land Development Association
Kristopher Mathieu, AT., PMP., Executive Director, Canmore Community Housing
Kevin Lee, P.ENG., M.ARCH, CEO, Canadian Home Builders' Association
Pedro Barata, President & CEO, Habitat For Humanity Canada
Dr. Mike Moffatt, Founding Director, Missing Middle Initiative
Daniel Ger, CEO, Options for Homes
Robert Bruno, Executive Vice President, Polygon Homes Ltd.
Beau Jarvis, President & CEO, Wesgroup Properties
-30-
With more than 1,000 member companies, BILD is the voice of the home building, residential and non-residential land development and professional renovation industries in the Greater Toronto Area. The building and renovation industry provides 256,000 jobs in the region and $39.3 billion in investment value. BILD is affiliated with the Ontario and Canadian Home Builders' Associations.
For additional information or to schedule an interview, contact Janis McCulloch at jmcculloch@bildgta.ca (416-617-7994)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Tasha Kheiriddin: Carney will have no choice but to kill supply management
Article content For a while there, things were going so well. Prime Minister Mark Carney — aka 'the Trump whisperer' — had morphed from critic to texting buddy of the U.S. President. Over the past three months, Carney had been chatting with Donald Trump, building backchannel goodwill. After the successful G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., hopes were high that Ottawa would strike a deal with Washington in 30 days, and that the rhetoric of making us the '51st state' had finally been retired. Article content Article content Until last Friday, when everything fell apart. Article content Article content Article content That's when President Trump abruptly cut off trade negotiations with Canada over our three per cent digital services tax, set to take effect June 30. Aimed at U.S. tech giants Amazon, Meta, Google and AirBNB, the tax was retroactive to 2022 and would have cost them an estimated $2 billion in back payments. The tech bros howled, the president barked, and Carney blinked. Sunday night, he backed down and cancelled the tax: Monday morning, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick thanked him for the climbdown, as did the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. Negotiations were back on. Article content But if you thought that was the last bump in the road, you couldn't be more wrong. In an interview broadcast Sunday morning on Fox, Trump mentioned a veritable mountain: supply management. That's the system that protects Canadian dairy, poultry and egg industries from foreign competition through quotas and tariffs, including Trump's favourite bugaboo, a 200-plus per cent markup on U.S. dairy products. Article content Article content It's true that the tariff only kicks in after the U.S. exports 50,000 zero-tariff metric tons of milk and 12,500 metric tons of cheese per year — levels it is nowhere near approaching. But supply management was already a sticking point with Trump in the CUSMA negotiations under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and Republican lawmakers and U.S. dairy producers continue to demand its elimination. Article content Article content In our country, unfortunately, it has become a hill on which political careers go to die. Case in point: People's Party Leader Maxime Bernier, whose ambition to lead the Conservative party in 2017 was thwarted by the Quebec dairy lobby after he promised to ditch the policy. And the sacred cow lives on: in June, the House of Commons and Senate passed a Bloc Québécois bill with all-party support to prevent bargaining supply management away. Article content Carney knows that he owes his recent election victory in large part to Quebec voters — and with a minority, needs the support of opposition parties like the Bloc to stay in power. But if Canada wants a serious trade deal with a Trump White House, supply management will have to go. Not just for the sake of negotiations, but because it's a cartel policy that has had its day.
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
How Canadian nationalism is evolving with the times - and will continue to do so
Tariffs imposed on Canada by the United States have fuelled a surge in nationalist sentiment that played a significant role in the outcome of April's federal election. Mark Carney's new Liberal government has signalled an interest in pursuing nation-building projects that hearken back to an earlier period in Canadian history. Economic, cultural and social policy in Canada has often served the purpose of building national unity to facilitate cohesion and collective action. But some commentators have cautioned Canadians to dampen their reinvigorated sense of pride in their nation. Read more: Canadians are more patriotic than ever amid Trump's trade war - but it's important not to take national pride too far Those on the right view Canadian nationalism as an obstacle to neo-liberal economic policies while the left perceives it as irredeemably flawed. For people on the right, free trade and globalization are thought to produce the best economic outcomes, and nationalism obstructs those outcomes. But those on the progressive left argue that Canada was founded on racist policies and settler colonialism, so nationalism should be rejected because of this original sin. Read more: This Canada Day, settler Canadians should think about 'land back' Both perspectives - and the public discussion of Canada's national identity more generally - remain mired in confusion over the nature of nations. As a political philosopher, I have worked to clear up this confusion by determining what nations are and how they evolve. In the 19th century, French scholar Ernest Renan outlined a definition of nation that has yet to be improved upon. For Renan, a nation consists of two things: the daily commitment of a people to continue to live and work together and a collective memory of a shared past together. In contemporary times, Irish social scientist Benedict Anderson described nations as "imagined communities," since the character of the nation is determined by the limits of the collective imagination of its citizens. These are subjective definitions of nations because they define national communities in terms of the identification of their members with the community. There are other, more common objective definitions of a nation involving identity, including shared ethnicity, religion or culture. But these definitions have long been criticized since many national identities transcend ethnicity, religion, culture or any other identity markers. A national community is distinct from a state. The state constitutes the formal political institutions of a society, while the nation is the community of people within that society who view each other as compatriots. This is why the phrase "the people" is often used as a synonym for the national community. While some nations are stateless, in other cases, multiple nations co-exist within a single state. In Canada, there is the Quebecois nation and many Indigenous nations within the Canadian nation. Although they are distinct, states and their governments will often build national identities around themselves to enable cohesion and collective action. Canada's national identity was systematically shaped by successive governments - from Confederation onward - to build the society that Canadians live in today. The character of a particular nation is not fixed. The beliefs, practices and culture of the people who choose to live and work together can be shaped into anything they collectively decide on. A nation can adopt new values, redefine its membership or have one of its definitive characteristics fade from prominence. Accordingly, there is no reason to think that moral failings of a national community's past must compromise it forever. A nation can, and sometimes does, recognize its past failures and become something better. A distinction is sometimes drawn between "patriotism" and "nationalism," with the most famous being made by English social critic and novelist George Orwell. For Orwell, patriotism is devotion to a particular way of life without the desire to force it on other people, while nationalism denotes an impulse to seek power for one's nation. Patriotism, then, is a benign, ethical form of partiality to one's nation. Other thinkers have sought to explain how national identities and communities can be cultivated in an ethical way, described by Israeli philosopher Yael Tamir as "liberal nationalism." The liberal nationalist, according to Tamir, seeks to construct a national identity that adopts the correct ethical values. They hope to harness the energy of nationalism to build a nation committed to liberty, inclusivity and progress. In 1867, George-Etienne Cartier described the Canadian identity that he and the other Fathers of Confederation sought to create as a "political nationality." He viewed Canadian identity as being defined by shared principles rather than language or ethnicity. More than 150 years later, political theorist Michael Ignatieff made a similar distinction between ethnic and civic nationalism. In an ethnic nation, citizens identify with each other because they belong to the same ethnic, religious or cultural community. Meanwhile, in a civic nation, the people unite behind certain civic principles, like a commitment to democracy. Cartier's concept of a political nationality was crucial to making sense of the political experiment that was Confederation. Having mostly abandoned their efforts to assimilate the French-Canadians, the British settlers in North America would now join with them to build a new national identity instead. In his recent book, historian Raymond Blake explains how Canada's post-Second World War prime ministers, through their speeches and public statements, reshaped Canada's national identity. Read more: 40 years later: A look back at the Pierre Trudeau speech that defined Canada Up through Louis St-Laurent, various prime ministers would refer to the "deux nations" origin of Canada as inspirational. British and French settlers had come together despite their differences to build a new society together, they pointed out. As time went on, it became clear this definition of Canada's national identity wasn't nearly inclusive enough, making no mention of Indigenous Peoples. The multicultural character of Canadian society was increasingly acknowledged by the government and Canadians at large until it was central to Canada's identity. Canada's national narrative has been reframed in recent years to recognize Indigenous Peoples as one of the three founding pillars of Canadian society. This evolution exemplifies exactly the change citizens should expect in a national community. This transformation in Canadian national identity shows that national communities can change over time - including, perhaps, in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's threats against Canada. In the end, Canadians decide what sort of nation they want to inhabit. Canada's political nationality has proven more resilient than even some of its founders might have anticipated, but not for lack of effort. There will always remain the work of building a better nation - and it's work worth doing.
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Symbols take centre stage in debates about Canadian nationalism
The recent resurgence of Canadian nationalism is a response to explicit threats made by United States President Donald Trump, who has repeatedly expressed his desire to make Canada the 51st American state. Canadian flag sales have skyrocketed, informal and formal boycotts of American goods are continuing and Canadians are being urged to stay home and spend their vacation dollars domestically. Even in Quebec, pro-Canadian sentiments are evident. Canadian nationalism is back. Read more: Is Trump's assault on Canada bringing Quebec and the rest of the country closer together? Yet only a decade ago, the newly elected Justin Trudeau labelled Canada the first "post-national nation" in an interview with The New York Times . In essence, the prime minister suggested, Canada was moving beyond nationalism to some new phase of social identity. Nationalism, like a step in the launch of a spacecraft, would be jettisoned now that it was a vestigial and outdated feature of Canadian society. As we argue in a recently presented paper to be published soon, Canadians are nowhere near either a homogeneous, popularly held identity, nor are they "beyond nationalism" as if it were an outdated hairstyle. Instead, Canadian steps toward a united, widely held nationalism continue to be stymied by both substantial constitutional issues (Quebec, western alienation, Indigenous aspirations to self-determination) but also by battles over banal symbols of national identity. Canadians are, in the words of journalist Ian Brown, "a unity of contradictions." In his influential book, Banal Nationalism , British social science scholar Michael Billig highlighted the role of symbols like stamps, currency and flags to identify barely noticed transmitters of national consciousness. Writing in 1995, at a time of ethnic nationalist resurgence in the former Yugoslavia, Billig contrasted the understated, reserved nationalism of citizens of established states like Canada with the dangerous, passionate expressions of nationalism in the Balkans. This genteel nationalism is barely noticed much of the time, but proposals to alter national symbols arouse debate - like during the great Canadian flag debate of the mid-1960s - and expose deep emotional attachments. Canadians, too, are nationalists. But they're also citizens of a liberal democracy where nationalistic narratives compete to define and unite the nation. Societies evolve and generational change can lead to new symbols reflecting changing values. The historical episodes of discontent pertaining to national symbols show how Canadian society has evolved since its drift away from Britain after the Second World War. During the flag debate, Liberal Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson said Canada needed a new flag that would present a united nation rather than a confusing amalgamation of different people. Conservative Leader John Diefenbaker, on the other hand, argued Canada should be "all Canadian and all British" during the debate, adding that any Canadian who disagreed should "be denounced." The leaders could not agree, with Diefenbaker opting for something like the status quo and Pearson for a complete redesign that would represent all Canadians, regardless of national heritage. In a 1964 La Presse article on the debate, columnist Guy Cormier crudely voiced Quebec's concerns that Pearson's handling of the flag debate was an attempt to "artificially inseminate" his agenda on the province. The Philadelphia Evening Bulletin reported on the debate, declaring that "tinkering with a nation's flag is sort of like playing volleyball with a hornets nest." As Canada became increasingly more multicultural in the 1980s, another symbol became the centre of controversy. A Sikh entering the RCMP wanted to be able to wear a turban instead of the traditional Stetson. Despite government and RCMP support, public opinion was mixed. Racist lapel pins were sold with the message "Keep the RCMP Canadian" as some argued the old uniform should remain and that new recruits should adapt to it. While few Canadians knew much about the design and history of the RCMP uniform, almost all Canadians consider it an iconic representation of Canada. Changes to it represent a threat to some, inclusion for others. Changes to O Canada , the national anthem, have been proposed over the past decades. Recently, a more inclusive version was drafted, changing "in all thy sons command" to "all of us command." Conservative MPs and some television pundits argued the change wasn't necessary and the anthem doesn't belong to a political party. Opponents argued that most people aren't offended by the anthem's lyrics, the anthem wasn't broken and was not in need of fixing. Ultimately, the change was made, with great praise from some and vexation from others. Removing images of the late Terry Fox in 2023 from the Canadian passport, a document few think about until checking its expiry date before a vacation, caused significant uproar. Other images from Canadian history were also removed, but Fox's removal was most notable since he was someone most Canadians consider the embodiment of a Canadian hero. The response to these changes ranged from mild - with those arguing that Canada needs more Terry Fox, not less, - to furious, as some accused Trudeau of being out of touch with Canadians and a "fault finder-in-chief." Far from trivial, these arguments over national symbols reveal how deeply some Canadians are attached to them. The nature of Canadian identity and nationalism will continue to be dated and contested. In that respect, Canadians are no different than the citizens of any other country.
