logo
India has world's highest number of slum clusters in flood-prone areas

India has world's highest number of slum clusters in flood-prone areas

The Hindu4 days ago
Flooding events are a major hazard worldwide. According to a 2024 Moody's report, more than 2.3 billion people are exposed to flooding every year. In India, more than 600 million people are at risk of coastal or inland flooding. However, there is a lack of comprehensive data on vulnerable communities' flood exposure risk, especially in the Global South.
A new study has attempted to bridge exactly this gap by analysing satellite images of informal settlements or slum dwellings in 129 low- and middle-income countries and comparing them with maps of 343 well-documented large-scale floods.
The study found that India has the world's largest number of slum dwellers living in vulnerable settlements in floodplains — over 158 million, more than the population of Russia — with most of them concentrated in the naturally flood-prone delta of the Ganga river.
The largest concentrations and largest numbers of such people are in South Asian countries; northern India leads in absolute numbers, followed by Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Other notable 'hotspots' include Rwanda and its neighborhood, northern Morocco, and the coastal regions of Rio de Janeiro.
Overall, in the Global South, 33% of informal settlements, making up around 445 million people living in 908,077 households within 67,568 clusters, lie in areas that have already been exposed to floods. Countries like India and Brazil also have a disproportionately high number of floodplain settlements despite also having suffered many large floods.
The study, published in Nature Cities in July, highlights the lack of risk management strategies that prioritise vulnerable communities, including those that have already experienced floods, beyond population-level approaches.
Risk and settlement
The researchers classified human settlements as rural, suburban, and urban, and found that Latin America and the Caribbean had high rates of urbanisation (80%), and thus more than 60% of settlements were in urban areas. In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa had the lowest rates of urbanisation and nearly 63% of informal settlements were rural. In Sierra Leone and Liberia, informal settlements hosted most of the population.
In India, at the time of the study, 40% of slum dwellers resided in urban and suburban areas.
People settle in, or are forced to settle in, floodplains due to a combination of factors including access to jobs, social vulnerability, and financial constraints. In India and Bangladesh, the low lying Gangetic delta and the large national population contribute to the numbers.
The study also highlighted inequities in access to resources and thus local responses to flooding. These vulnerable residents also suffer the loss of jobs and access to services among the indirect consequences of floods.
Exposed populations' vulnerability was found to depend on socioeconomic factors like education level and institutional factors like flood insurance.
The authors of the study wrote that both slum-dwellers and non-slum residents live in floodplains around the world, but for different reasons. In wealthier regions like Europe, subsidised flood insurance premiums in high risk areas promotes the desirability of floodplain areas like beachfronts and water views.
Infrastructure like levies also exist to protect people and houses. However, in the Global South, flood zones offer cheaper land and housing, pushing low income households into more vulnerable areas.
Data reveal that patterns of informal settlements also have a distinct bias towards settling in floodplains, with slum dwellers being 32% more likely to settle in a floodplain than outside due to lower costs, as evidenced in cities like Mumbai and Jakarta. In fact, the higher the risk of flood, the higher the chance of people settling there.
'In cities like Bengaluru, there definitely is a very strong correlation between informal settlements and their vulnerability to flood,' Aysha Jennath, climate mobility researcher and post-doctoral fellow at the Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Bengaluru, said.
'Flood prone localities are not preferred by large builders for gated communities or IT parks, so those areas are available for migrant workers and informal settlements as they are cheaper.'
Informal settlements in such urban areas are typically tin-sheet, tent or tarp housing, with rent paid to owners through land contractors ('thekedars').
SDG deadline looms
The researchers specified the need to act on flood vulnerability risk for poorer populations as the 2030 deadline for the United Nations' Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) nears. The goals number 17, including eliminating poverty and hunger, availing clean water and sanitation, and taking climate action. They apply to all the UN's member countries and focus on vulnerable communities.
The study also articulated the importance of taking a human-centric approach (instead of location-focused) to improve inadequate infrastructure.
Data show large concentrations of settlements in smaller areas, indicating gaps in housing, infrastructure, and basic services. Often, even gated communities gentrify flood-prone areas, pushing vulnerable communities to areas of higher risk exacerbated by failing infrastructure and lack of drainage, Jennath said.
'Real estate plays a huge role in how these informal settlements come up.'
Finally, the researchers also discussed the need for the government to collaborate with communities instead of banking only on traditional disaster preparedness. Skill improvement in areas like sanitation, waste management, and installing drainage systems could enhance the resilience to not just floods but also other risks like infectious disease, while providing jobs.
'These data-driven insights highlight the disproportionate flood exposure faced by slum dwellers in the Global South and underscore the need for just and equitable flood adaptation management,' they wrote.
The findings are also a proof-of-concept for using machine learning, which can process large quantities of data, to analyse satellite imagery and extract nuanced insights, like socioeconomic data embedded in population densities. As a follow-up, the authors have said they plan to study timewise processes such as slum expansion, climate change, and human migration to effectively predict future flood risk.
Sandhya Ramesh is a freelance science journalist.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world: China tops list, Japan at 4, US at…; where do India and Pakistan stand?
10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world: China tops list, Japan at 4, US at…; where do India and Pakistan stand?

India.com

time2 days ago

  • India.com

10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world: China tops list, Japan at 4, US at…; where do India and Pakistan stand?

Home News 10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world: China tops list, Japan at 4, US at…; where do India and Pakistan stand? 10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world: China tops list, Japan at 4, US at…; where do India and Pakistan stand? Based on seismic records and NOAA data, here is a list of top 10 most earthquake-prone countries in the world. File/Representational A recent wave of powerful earthquakes, such as the magnitude 7.7 that killed over 5,000 people in Myanmar's Sagaing in March this year, and recent 8.8 magnitude quake that struck the Kamchatka Peninsula in Russia, triggering tsunami alerts across as many as 44 countries in the Pacific Ocean region, has raised fears of a major cataclysm earthquake-prone countries. But have you wondered whether India and Pakistan are listed among most earthquake-prone countries in the world? Based on seismic records and data from NOAA, here is a list of top 10 countries which have been frequently affected by major earthquakes in the last three decades: China: India's neighbor China tops the list, having suffered at total of 186 powerful earthquakes since 1990. China's western and southwestern regions, especially along the Longmenshan and Himalayan fault lines, are categorized as highly-active seismic zones. Recent quakes which caused massive loss of life and damage in the South Asian country include the 2008 Sichuan earthquake and the 1976 Tangshan earthquake Indonesia: Regarded as the most seismically-active country on the planet, Indonesia lies in one of the most earthquake-prone zones in the Pacific Ocean, and has witnessed about 1000 tremors, including 166 major earthquakes since 1990. Notably, one of the deadliest natural disaster in modern history, the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami, occurred in Indonesia, killing more than 200,000 people in the region and leaving millions homeless. Iran: The Islamic Republic is located in the middle of the collision zone between the Arabian and Eurasian tectonic plates, making it highly vulnerable to major earthquakes due to tectonic activity in the region. Japan: Perhaps no other country has witnessed the level of devastation due to earthquakes more than Japan, primarily because of it being located in the Ring of Fire– one of the most seismically active zones on earth. Japan has witnessed a total of 98 major earthquakes since 1990, including 2011 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, that claimed the lives of at least 20,000 people. United States: The United States has a large landmass and experienced a total of 78 powerful earthquakes from 1990 to 2024. Powerful seismic activity is mostly seen in California and Alaska, especially along the San Andreas Fault. Turkey: Located along the North Anatolian Fault, a major east-west fault line that has caused several deadly earthquakes, Turkey has recorded some of the devastating quakes in history, including the 1999 Izmit earthquake killed at least 18,373 people and injured 48,901 and the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake that left more than 50,000 dead. India: India witnesses significant seismic activity in the Northeast and Himalayan region and the tectonic collision with the Eurasian plate, resulting in destructive earthquakes such as the 2001 Gujarat earthquake, which claimed over 20,000 lives. Philippines: The tectonic interaction between the Philippine Sea Plate and the Eurasian Plate results in heightened seismic activity and earthquakes in Philippines. The country has recorded 55 major earthquakes since 1990, including the magnitude 7.7 Luzon island quake that killed 2,412 people in 1990. Mexico: This North American nation is located within the boundary of shifting tectonic plates, resulting in frequent earthquakes in the region. Afghanistan: Due its location the seismically active Hindu Kush region, Afghanistan often witnesses powerful earthquakes because of the tectonic activity caused by the collision of Indian and Eurasian plates. For breaking news and live news updates, like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram. Read more on Latest World News on

How a Travancore Maharaja thwarted Dutch colonial ambitions in India
How a Travancore Maharaja thwarted Dutch colonial ambitions in India

Indian Express

time2 days ago

  • Indian Express

How a Travancore Maharaja thwarted Dutch colonial ambitions in India

In 1729, when a 23-year-old Marthanda Varma ascended the throne of Travancore, the kingdom was embattled on every front. From feudatories to rival kingdoms and European colonial powers seeking to establish a foothold in the South Asian region, Varma had to contend with several issues in the princely state. Varma is best remembered for defeating the Dutch in the Battle of Colachel in 1741. The Dutch never managed to recover from the defeat, and thereafter never resumed their colonial ambitions in India. In their new book, God's Own Empire: The extraordinary life of Marthanda Varma of Travancore, published by Penguin, authors Raghu Palat and Pushpa Palat describe in vivid detail the life and legacy of Marthanda Varma. The following excerpt from the book is an action-packed account of the Battle of Colachel and describes how Varma could emerge as the only raja in Indian history to destroy a significant European power. Excerpt from the book: The Travancore army did not have any siege equipment. Hence, Marthanda strategized that by cutting off all supplies to the Dutch garrison—he would starve them into army, which considerably outnumbered the Dutch force at Colachel, encircled the Dutch entrenchments from all Dutch troops at Colachel numbered around 400 (of which only around 150 were European), while the Travancore army had about 20,000 soldiers. Although Marthanda Verma suffered loss of men and money, he did not withdraw from the siege. Apart from the blockade imposed by the Travancore forces, the adverse wind, floods and rough sea also prevented the Dutch from supplying ammunition and provisions to Colachel. The heavy rains made it hard for them to keep their gunpowder dry, which made their weapons unusable. According to a report on 31 July of the English factory at Anjengo, two Dutch sloops had been trying to land at Colachel for several days but had failed to do so because of continuous firing from the Travancore forces. However, the Travancore troops, whenever they approached the fort, were beaten back. On the other hand, Marthanda had batteries set up on the beach so that it was impossible for the Dutch to supply the fort with provisions and Travancore artillery advanced to threaten the men within the fort should they venture out. The Dutch commented with amazement at the speed with which the enemy had set up these coastal batteries. Marthanda had the artillery in such positions that the Dutch were surrounded from both the southern and eastern fronts of the fortress. In this manner, Colachel was surrounded by a force of approximately 20,000Travancore troops. In July, the Travancore army blew up two mines they had placed under the Colachel fort but the attack that followed was repulsed by the Dutch. As the situation was critical, the Dutch tried to send a corporal, along with an interpreter, to Cape Comorin to seek help, but they were captured by Marthanda'smen. Later that month, a Dutch army, consisting of 420 men,including 150 Europeans, marched from Cape Comorin towards Colachel to relieve and reinforce the garrison soon as the Travancore army discovered this, they beat the drums and sounded the horns continuously, threatening an attack on them. The Dutch troops withdrew. The Travancore army, seeing the desperation of the forces within the Colachel fort, launched a heavy attack on the fortress. It was repulsed once more. The Travancore army then began to use mines and send paper rockets with burning fuses to set the fortress on fire. The repeated repulsions did discourage the Travancore troops. At the end of July, Marthanda told his troops to withdraw to a nearby village, leaving only a few soldiers behind. When the Dutch heard this, they thought they would be able to relieve the garrison by sending troops from CapeComorin. However, because of the monsoons, this was not possible. On 2 August, de Lannoy deserted the Dutch army during one of the efforts to relieve Colachel. After deflecting, he tried to negotiate for Dutch surrender. In early August, the commander of the Colachel fort, Rijtel, was severely wounded and died shortly afterwards. The soldiers were very demoralized. To boost their morale, they were given arrack. The drunk soldiers climbed the walls, shouting and waving their hats. Hearing of the strange behaviour of the Dutch, Marthanda came to the fortress and asked the Dutch to climb down so that he could talk to them. Thirty-one Dutch soldiers swung down the walls with ropes and came to theTravancore camp. They informed Marthanda of their willingness to surrender in exchange for safe passage to Cape Comorin With the surrender of the thirty-one Dutchmen, Travancore redoubled its efforts to capture the fort. On the western side,the Travancore army filled the moat, created outside the walls,with coconut shells, gourds and soil. They built watchtowers that were higher than the walls, enabling them to shoot at anyone within the fortress. Marthanda was aided in his efforts by Pokku Musa Marikkar, the merchant prince of Puvar. Marikkar's fleet of ships patrolled the sea, making it impossible for the Dutch to send in provisions to the fort by sea. On 6 August, Marthanda's forces, under Duijven shot,made a new attempt to undermine the eastern side of the intent was to place mines under the fort and blow it up. On the morning of 7 August 1741, the Battle of Colachel commenced. The ships of Pokku Musa Marikkar surrounded the solitary Dutch ship anchored in the Colachel waters and prevented the landing of men and arms to assist the Dutch detachment engaged in the battle. Ramayyan's men charged the Dutch line that had ventured out of the fort. As the Dutch had no cavalry, the Travancore cavalry swept through the Dutch forces. Retreating into the fort, the Dutch left behind a significant number of casualties, injured individuals, and prisoners. During the melee, a red-hot ball fired by theTravancore troops fell into a barrel of gunpowder and caused an explosion within the fort. Six hundred pounds of gunpowder,nearly all the artillery and grenades the Dutch possessed were blown up. The wooden housing of the soldiers and all the food supplies were destroyed. After that, the Maraver cavalry,commanded by Ramayyan, attacked the fort. Ramayyan'scharge threw the Dutch in disorder. Following the explosion and the death of the Dutch commander, Rijtel, the Dutch garrison was in despair. The Colachel war council sent Sergeant Hartman as a negotiator. Soon, it was evident that there was only one option—total,unconditional surrender. De Lannoy, who had deserted theDutch a few days earlier, met Hartman and told him that the Travancore army had succeeded in placing mines under the fortress a second time and that should the Dutch refuse to capitulate, they would be blown up. Initially, the Dutch had insisted that they would negotiate only with they capitulated. On 10 August 1741, the 190 surviving soldiers marched out of the fortress with full colours and arms, as they had no alternative. De Lannoy, as the negotiator, approached Marthanda, who was sitting on a chair, and knelt before with his head bent down, he extended his arms holding his sword and offered it to Marthanda. Authorized to speak on behalf of the Dutch, de Lannoy, with complete humility,said, 'We surrender to your mercy. The field is yours.' The keys to the fort were also handed over to Marthanda by the Dutch book keeper Karel Hendrix. Marthanda's army seized the spoils of war, comprising 899 muskets, a handful of cannons and a substantial quantity of swords. Twenty-four European prisoners, comprising both officers and privates, were sent to Udayagherry. The battle was won before the ratification of the treaty with the French, and the stipulations of the treaty were never met. The Battle of Colachel shattered the Dutch dream of colonizing Malabar. The Dutch never recovered from this unqualified defeat. They however, did not desist from meddling in the affairs of Marthanda's kingdom. As far as Marthanda was concerned, the Dutch were no longer an impediment in his expansion plans. He stood unchallenged, his ambitions unhindered by any force capable of withstanding his unstoppable march. Nothing could stop Marthanda's expansion plans. Marthanda is the only raja in Indian history whose forces,under his leadership, resoundingly vanquished a significant European power.

Tracing the route of King Rajendra Chola's 1000-year-old Gangetic expedition
Tracing the route of King Rajendra Chola's 1000-year-old Gangetic expedition

The Hindu

time3 days ago

  • The Hindu

Tracing the route of King Rajendra Chola's 1000-year-old Gangetic expedition

The gala celebrations of the millenary of Rajendra Chola - I's Gangetic expedition has turned the spotlight on how his might army traversed vast swathes of eastern and northern India in the 11th Century CE, overcoming several powerful kingdoms along the way to reach the Ganges and fetch water for the monarch's glory. Contrary to the popular belief that Rajendra Chola personally marched towards the Gangetic plains, inscriptions on the Tiruvalangadu copper plates reveal that one of the ablest generals of the king had commanded the military expedition towards the Ganges. The monarch had stayed back on the banks of the Godavari. With the help of voluminous historical works such as The Colas by K.A. Nilakanta Sastri, Pirkaala Sozhar Sarithiram (History of Later Cholas) by T.V. Sadasiva Pandarathar, and The Palas of Bengal by R.D. Banerji, The Hindu attempts to reconstruct the path traced by Rajendra Chola's army. These accounts reveal the Chola forces defeated kingdoms in the eastern Deccan, coastal Odisha, and eventually clashed with the Pala dynasty in Bengal. Venginadu The actual campaign began not from the Chola's capital in the South, but from the northeast of Venginadu that spread across the Godavari and Krishna rivers. Venginadu at that time was ruled by kings (Eastern Chalukyas or Chalukyas of Vengi) loyal to the Cholas. Due to Vengi's close ties with the Cholas, and since all the regions to its south were already under Rajendra Chola's empire, the expedition began north of Vengi, with the first conquest in that campaign being Chakrakottam. Chakrakottam is situated eight miles from Rajapura, on the southern bank of the Indravati River. In modern times, the place is known as Chitrakootam (Bastar region in present-day Chhattisgarh). After the fall of Chakrakottam, the Chola army marched towards the green fields of 'Masuna Desam' or 'Masuni Desam' under the control of brave rulers of the Chindaka family who identified themselves as belonging to the Naga lineage. Nilakanta Sastri, while citing a Tamil Prasasti, says the region of Maduramandalam, Namanaikkonam and Panchappalli, all fell under the 'Masuni Desam'. He said Maduramandalam was destroyed in a trice by the Chola army. Namanaikkonam with dense groves and Panchappalli, whose warriors bore cruel bows, were also conquered by Rajendra's commander. Indraratha's defeat Following that, the Chola commander marched further northeast, defeated Indraratha at Adinagara, and captured the regions of Odda (Odisha). His campaign took a westward turn with the capture of the Kosala kingdom. The region of Kosala referred to here is Dakshina (southern) Kosala, also known as Mahakosala. Having consolidated control over central-eastern India, the next target was Dandabhukti to the east, ruled by Dharmapala. Dandabhukti comprised the southern and southwestern parts of the Midnapore district in Bengal. Therefore, it likely stretched along both banks of the Subarnarekha River. Bengal From there, the Chola forces advanced towards Bengal. After defeating Dharmapala, Rajendra's army marched towards Dakshinaradha (Takkana Ladam in Tamil), ruled by Ranasura. 'Radha' (also spelt as Ratta or Lada) was the ancient name of a part of Bengal, which was bounded on the north by the Ganges. Dakshinaradha refers to the area comprising today's Hooghly and Howrah districts in Bengal, while Uttararadha (Uttara Ladam in Tamil) refers to the regions comprising Murshidabad and Birbhum districts. The Ganges With southern Bengal subdued, the commander passed eastwards, crossed the Ganges, and reached Vangala Desam (Eastern Bengal), which was then ruled by Govindachandra. Following the conquest of Eastern Bengal, Rajendra Chola's army turned westward and defeated Mahipala. The commander reached the Ganges, fetched water from the river, and brought it to his sovereign lord, Rajendra, whom he met on the banks of the Godavari during the army's retreat. Though the fetching of the Ganges water was perhaps part of the original objective, the true motive was undoubtedly an exhibition of the Chola empire's power and a demonstration of its strength to the rulers of northern India, says Nilakanta Sastri. Rajendra then returned to his kingdom with his victorious general. In great joy, the emperor accepted the sacred objects brought back. During his return journey, he visited various temples and made offerings, as mentioned in several inscriptions. One such inscription was found in Thriloki (modern-day Thirulogi near Thiruppanandal in the Thanjavur district), located about ten miles southeast of Gangaikonda Cholapuram, notes Sadasiva Pandarathar. According to the Annual Report on South Indian Epigraphy for the year ending March 31, 1932, 'A fragmentary record engraved in Tiruloki makes an interesting reference to the incident of the king worshipping the sacred feet of the Lord at this village, which is only about 10 miles from Gangaikonda Cholapuram, while returning with the waters of the Ganges. (Rajendra-Choladevar Gangaikondu elundarulukinra idattu tiruvadi tolu[du]).' The ancient name of this place was given as Trailokyamahadevi-chaturvedimangalam. According to Sastri, such expeditions were undertaken by all powerful monarchs in India and were enjoined upon them by the political code of the country. The aim of the expedition was not merely to bring down the water of the Ganges to the Chola capital, but to do so after establishing a right of way across territories outside the empire by a strong show of force. This becomes clear from the statement that at the end of the expedition, Rajendra erected a 'liquid pillar of victory' (jalamayam jayastambham) in his capital with the waters of the Ganges, in the form of the tank Cholagangam. Banerji says the invasion of the Chola king did not change the political divisions of the country, but it left one permanent mark in the shape of a body of settlers, who occupied the thrones of Bengal and Mithila as the Sena and Karnata dynasties during the latter days of the Palas.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store