Ken Paxton goes after New York Clerk for refusing to enforce abortion pill judgement
On Monday, Paxton announced he filed legal action against New York Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck for refusing to enforce a $100,000 penalty against Dr. Margaret Carpenter. In February, a Texas district court ruled in favor of the state of Texas over Carpenter after she failed to file a response to Paxton's complaint. However, Bruck refused to enforce the judgement against the Ulster County resident.
'In accordance with the New York State Shield Law, I have refused this filing and will refuse any similar filings that may come to our office. Since this decision is likely to result in further litigation, I must refrain from discussing specific details about the situation,' Bruck said in a prepared statement at the time.
'Dr. Carpenter is a radical abortionist who must face justice, not get legal protection from New York liberals intent on ending the lives of as many unborn children as they can,' said Attorney General Paxton in a press release. 'No matter where they reside, pro-abortion extremists who send drugs designed to kill the unborn into Texas will face the full force of our state's pro-life laws.'
New York vs. Texas
In 2023, New York passed a 'Shield Law' to protect their medical providers providing gender-affirming and reproductive care.
'The Shield Law broadly prohibits law enforcement and other state officials from cooperating with investigations into reproductive or gender-affirming health care ('protected health care') so long as the care was lawfully provided in New York,' the New York Attorney General's Office says.
According to court filings, Carpenter is 'not a resident of the State of Texas, but is a resident of the State of New York that has done business in Texas,' and 'has not and does not maintain a regular place of business in Texas.'
'It's going to get us answers about the Shield Law and Shield Laws nationwide,' Bruck said over the phone on Monday. 'There's a lot of unknowns in this whole process right now, I'm mostly curious as to how it will all shake out.'
Earlier this month, Bruck released another prepared statement after Paxton tried to enforce the judgement again.
'We have received your letter regarding the Dr. Margaret Carpenter judgment originally
submitted for filing on March 17th, 2025. The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same
materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck wrote on July 14. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed. Have a good day. Excelsior.'
KXAN reached out to the Texas Attorney General's office via email.
New abortion proposals in special session
On July 9, Texas Governor Greg Abbott added 'Protect Unborn Children' to an expansive special session call sheet, allowing new anti-abortion legislation to be taken up in the 30-day special session.
As of Monday, eight anti-abortion bills had been filed in the Texas House:
House Bill 37 by State Rep. Jared Patterson, R-Frisco, House Bill 65 by State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, and House Bill 66 would allow parents of an aborted fetus to take civil action against the provider of an abortion pill. The bills are partial refilings of Senate Bill 2880 from the regular session, which failed to get out of the House State Affairs Committee after passing the Texas Senate.
House Bill 58 by State Rep. Mike Schofield, R-Katy, would create a special prosecutor to enforce abortion laws — along with election and human trafficking laws.
House Bill 69 by State Rep. Ellen Troxclair, R-Marble Falls, would prevent a physician from giving an abortion-inducing drug to a woman not physically present at a physician's appointment.
House Bill 70 by Troxclair would prevent the transportation or the funding of transportation for minors.
House Bill 95 by State Rep. Nate Schatzline, R-Fort Worth, would prevent selling abortion-inducing drugs online
House Bill 163 by State Rep. Brent Money, R-Canton, would treat unborn children as full citizens for certain felony offenses.
None of these bills have been referred to a committee yet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
Republican states press Congress to ban abortion shield laws
More than a dozen Republican-led states are urging Congress to ban abortion shield laws, pieces of legislation passed in states where abortion is legal that protect abortion providers from liability for violating anti-abortion laws in other states. A total of 15 GOP attorneys general signed and sent a letter to congressional leadership this week requesting that federal action be taken to preempt abortion shield laws, arguing that they interfere with states' ability to enforce criminal laws. The attorneys general also argue in their letter that the laws conflict with the constitution's 'full faith and credit clause' as well as its extradition clause. 'Congress should consider stepping in to remedy this problem,' their letter reads. 'Instead of allowing pro-abortion States to disrespect the decisions of other States regarding abortion and trample the Constitution, Congress should assess whether it should tackle this issue head on with legislation that preempts state shield laws.' Signees include Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) and Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill (R), who both have taken legal action against a New York doctor for allegedly prescribing and mailing abortion pills to women in their respective states. Texas and Louisiana have almost entirely banned abortion with some exceptions to save the life of the pregnant person or prevent 'permanent impairment' of a life-sustaining organ. Paxton sued the doctor—Margaret Carpenter—in December for allegedly sending abortion pills to a 20-year-old Texan woman last year. A Texas judge ordered Carpenter to pay more than $100,000 in penalties for violating Texas's abortion law but neither she nor her attorney appeared at the court hearing or responded to Paxton's lawsuit. A grand jury in Louisiana indicted Carpenter for allegedly mailing abortion pills via telehealth into the state shortly after lawmakers passed a law classifying the drugs mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled substances. A few months later, Murrill announced that her office was launching an investigation into the doctor after Carpenter allegedly provided abortion medication to a woman who then needed to visit a hospital afterward. New York's abortion shield law has prevented Texas and Louisiana from extraditing or fining Carpenter. Paxton has tried twice to pressure a New York county clerk to enforce a Texas civil judgment to no success. The governor has taken legal action against the clerk and is seeking a writ of mandamus to enforce the judgment and make sure Carpenter pays the Texas penalties.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Advocates for transgender Texans hold rally against private spaces ban bill
AUSTIN (KXAN) — Representatives of several activist groups held a press conference Wednesday to oppose a special session bill, which they say would create an 'unenforceable' ban on transgender women's use of restrooms and shelters. 'Women and survivors of violence have been repeatedly used as justification to exclude trans women from public restrooms. Now, women from all walks of life are coming together to say, 'not in my name,'' reads a Tuesday press release from liberal advocacy group Equality Texas. Previous: Texas' special session on floods, taxes, THC, redistricting could also spend time targeting transgender life The rally included speakers from Texas AFL-CIO, Black Freedom Factory, Austin LGBTQ Chamber, Human Rights Campaign, Democrasexy, the Transgender Education Network of Texas, Texas Freedom Network and Equality Texas. Former candidate for Texas governor Wendy Davis is also scheduled to speak. 'We know that trans women are four times more likely than cisgender women to be the victims of violent crimes,' the release reads. 'There is no way to police bathrooms without subjecting women and girls to invasive investigations demanding 'proof' of gender.' The press conference was livestreamed. What's in the bill House Bill 32, filed by Rep. Valoree Swanson, R-Spring, is titled the 'Texas Women's Privacy Act.' It would require the state's political subdivisions to prevent people from using sex-segregated 'multiple-occupancy private spaces' that don't align with their sex assigned at birth. The law would apply to restrooms in government buildings and public schools, as well as jails and prisons. Gender definition bill passes in Texas Senate, heads to governor 'A political subdivision or state agency shall ensure each multiple-occupancy private space in a building the political subdivision or state agency owns, operates, or controls is designated for and used only by individuals of the same biological sex,' HB 32 reads. 'A political subdivision or state agency shall take every reasonable step to ensure an individual whose biological sex isopposite to the biological sex designated … does not enter the private space.' The bill would allow Texas's Attorney General to investigate and fine any political subdivision for violations. As introduced, HB 32 wouldn't allow for fines or legal actions against individual persons. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick announced this week that Senate Bill 7, authored by Sen. Mayes Middleton, R-Galveston, will be his chamber's companion to the bill. 'This is about safety,' Middleton said. 'This is about privacy.' It hasn't been filed yet. Both bills fall under Gov. Greg Abbott's special session topic of 'legislation protecting women's privacy in sex-segregated spaces.' 'It's ridiculous, [opponents of this type of legislation] are literally arguing that we need to put the rights of men pretending to be women above those of women themselves,' Middleton said. 'It's not right. It's not common sense.' HB 32 was one of the first bills filed ahead of the session. Prior attempts ended in failure, lacked evidence The text is near-identical to SB 240, which Middleton filed during the regular session of the legislature. It passed in the Texas Senate but died in the Texas House. During floor debate, Democratic senators asked for evidence supporting his bill's necessity. Middleton didn't provide any and instead repeatedly called it 'common sense.' He also pushed back against the idea of commissioning a study related to the topic. State Sen. Mayes Middleton running for Texas Attorney General Back in the 2017 regular session of the state legislature, bill with a similar goal failed. Abbott called a special session in 2017 that included the topic; it also failed to pass. 2017 | Transgender veteran fears for safety if forced to use men's bathroom The 2017 bill was filed by Sen. Lois Kolkhorst, R-Brenham. It was also met with requests for her to provide data or evidence of a problem. 'In the crimes that I've looked at, in the most intimate settings, none have identified as a transgender,' Kolkorst said during a 2017 committee hearing on her bill. A more narrowed focus during special legislative sessions Research and data nonpartisan nonprofit Texas 2036 said it's not uncommon for similar legislation to be filed. 'There are a number of reasons why a bill may not pass during a regular session,' Jordan Wat, director of government affairs at Texas 2036 said. 'Maybe time ran out on that bill while it was being considered in one of the chambers. Perhaps there were some procedural issues related to it. Maybe the political winds were just not there.' Watt said similar legislation filed that previously failed, can be more successful in special sessions, depending on the topic. 'Because there's a bit more focus,' Wat said. 'In comparison to 140 day regular session, [Abbott] has laid out an 18-item agenda for members to consider and cover over the course of these next 28 days.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Ken Paxton goes after New York Clerk for refusing to enforce abortion pill judgement
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton escalated a brewing conflict between Texas and New York's abortion laws. On Monday, Paxton announced he filed legal action against New York Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck for refusing to enforce a $100,000 penalty against Dr. Margaret Carpenter. In February, a Texas district court ruled in favor of the state of Texas over Carpenter after she failed to file a response to Paxton's complaint. However, Bruck refused to enforce the judgement against the Ulster County resident. 'In accordance with the New York State Shield Law, I have refused this filing and will refuse any similar filings that may come to our office. Since this decision is likely to result in further litigation, I must refrain from discussing specific details about the situation,' Bruck said in a prepared statement at the time. 'Dr. Carpenter is a radical abortionist who must face justice, not get legal protection from New York liberals intent on ending the lives of as many unborn children as they can,' said Attorney General Paxton in a press release. 'No matter where they reside, pro-abortion extremists who send drugs designed to kill the unborn into Texas will face the full force of our state's pro-life laws.' New York vs. Texas In 2023, New York passed a 'Shield Law' to protect their medical providers providing gender-affirming and reproductive care. 'The Shield Law broadly prohibits law enforcement and other state officials from cooperating with investigations into reproductive or gender-affirming health care ('protected health care') so long as the care was lawfully provided in New York,' the New York Attorney General's Office says. According to court filings, Carpenter is 'not a resident of the State of Texas, but is a resident of the State of New York that has done business in Texas,' and 'has not and does not maintain a regular place of business in Texas.' 'It's going to get us answers about the Shield Law and Shield Laws nationwide,' Bruck said over the phone on Monday. 'There's a lot of unknowns in this whole process right now, I'm mostly curious as to how it will all shake out.' Earlier this month, Bruck released another prepared statement after Paxton tried to enforce the judgement again. 'We have received your letter regarding the Dr. Margaret Carpenter judgment originally submitted for filing on March 17th, 2025. The rejection stands. Resubmitting the same materials does not alter the outcome,' Bruck wrote on July 14. 'While I'm not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed. Have a good day. Excelsior.' KXAN reached out to the Texas Attorney General's office via email. New abortion proposals in special session On July 9, Texas Governor Greg Abbott added 'Protect Unborn Children' to an expansive special session call sheet, allowing new anti-abortion legislation to be taken up in the 30-day special session. As of Monday, eight anti-abortion bills had been filed in the Texas House: House Bill 37 by State Rep. Jared Patterson, R-Frisco, House Bill 65 by State Rep. Briscoe Cain, R-Deer Park, and House Bill 66 would allow parents of an aborted fetus to take civil action against the provider of an abortion pill. The bills are partial refilings of Senate Bill 2880 from the regular session, which failed to get out of the House State Affairs Committee after passing the Texas Senate. House Bill 58 by State Rep. Mike Schofield, R-Katy, would create a special prosecutor to enforce abortion laws — along with election and human trafficking laws. House Bill 69 by State Rep. Ellen Troxclair, R-Marble Falls, would prevent a physician from giving an abortion-inducing drug to a woman not physically present at a physician's appointment. House Bill 70 by Troxclair would prevent the transportation or the funding of transportation for minors. House Bill 95 by State Rep. Nate Schatzline, R-Fort Worth, would prevent selling abortion-inducing drugs online House Bill 163 by State Rep. Brent Money, R-Canton, would treat unborn children as full citizens for certain felony offenses. None of these bills have been referred to a committee yet.
