Ex-Fox News host, prosecutor and judge was nominated after Trump's first choice, podcaster Ed Martin was blocked
Republicans in the majority spent days negotiating with Democrats to allow the Senate to confirm more nominees before senators left town, but no deal came together.
'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country,' Trump wrote on social media.
'In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating,' Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (Democrat-New York) told reporters.
Pirro is one of a number of Fox hosts that Trump has recruited for the administration and fits the mould of many of his appointees: combative, camera-ready, and loyal enough to have sought to discredit the results of the 2020 election that he lost, the Washington Post reported previously.
In the days leading up to the January 6 insurrection, Pirro had cast doubt on the credibility of Joe Biden's election victory in statements that aired on Fox.
After Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, however, she walked back those comments, instead calling the attack 'deplorable, reprehensible, outright criminal'.
Pirro's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were included in the US$2.1 billion ($3.5b) defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, which led the broadcaster to settle the case for US$787.5 million in 2023.
She is also a defendant in a similar defamation lawsuit by voting software maker Smartmatic. That case is pending.
In a written response to senators' questions ahead of her confirmation that was obtained by the Washington Post, Pirro declined to offer thoughts on whether those convicted in the January 6 riot cases should have been pardoned.
She sidestepped several other questions, including whether there would ever be a legal basis for someone from the executive branch of government to defy a federal court order.
Pirro's confirmation to one of the nation's highest-profile prosecutor's offices was met with mixed reactions.
Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, described her record on issues including the January 6 riot, election denialism, and Trump's immigration policies as 'deeply troubling'.
'President Trump has been using the Justice Department to protect his allies and go after his enemies, and Ms Pirro has proven to be a willing accomplice in weaponizing the justice system,' Durbin said in a statement.
'She is not fit to be the US Attorney for our nation's capital, and I believe it's a grave mistake my Republican colleagues voted to confirm her.'
'She is simply a loyal political acolyte and sycophant of the President,' Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) said in a floor speech ahead of the confirmation vote.
Attorney-General Pam Bondi called Pirro 'a warrior for law and order' in a post on X. The DC Police Union congratulated Pirro and said it looked forward to working with her 'to hold criminals accountable and reduce crime'. Pirro thanked the union in response and promised to work with police to 'clean up DC'.
Deadlines are looming for dozens of Trump loyalists handpicked as interim US Attorneys, whose 120-day terms are set to expire in the coming months.
The Justice Department last month deployed a complex procedural manoeuvre to keep Alina Habba, a former personal lawyer for Trump, as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor, in a playbook it has used to extend the tenures of other polarising prosecutors that bypasses the Senate's role in confirming official nominees for the job.
During Pirro's time as interim US Attorney, she instituted a policy of scrutinising the immigration status of all criminal defendants in the district, as part of the Trump Administration's efforts to ramp up deportations.
She will also oversee a portfolio of major cases, including the shooting deaths of Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, a couple who had just left a reception at the Capital Jewish Museum. Pirro said her office intends to investigate the killings as an act of terrorism and a hate crime.
For decades, Trump and Pirro have fraternised in the same Republican circles in New York. On her Saturday Fox News show, Justice With Judge Jeanine, Pirro delivered strident defences of the President during his first term. In 2018, Pirro published a book titled Liars, Leakers and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy.
Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro, served as Trump's real estate lawyers before being convicted of federal tax evasion in 2000 when she was district attorney.
He was sentenced to 29 months and was released from federal custody in 2002, court records show. Trump pardoned him in 2021, during his first term.
In 2006, Pirro was investigated by federal prosecutors for seeking to bug the family's boat to determine whether her husband was having an affair.
Pirro called the investigation a 'political witch hunt and smear campaign', and said her marital discord was not the business of the prosecutors. No charges were filed.
In a statement on her confirmation, Pirro said: 'The confidence placed in me by the President and affirmed by the Senate will not be in vain. I am committed to ensuring that the nation's capital once again reflects the quality, safety, and promise of the citizens and our great country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Lawyers confirm Sean 'Diddy' Combs is seeking pardon from Donald Trump
Photo: ROBYN BECK Sean "Diddy" Combs is seeking a pardon from US President Donald Trump, one of his lawyers has confirmed. "It's my understanding that we've reached out and had conversations in reference to a pardon," Nicole Westmoreland told CNN in an interview on Tuesday, local time. Trump has indicated that he is unlikely to grant a pardon to the disgraced media mogul. "I was very friendly with him. I got along with him great and he seemed like a nice guy," Trump said in an interview on Friday with conservative American news channel Newsmax. "I didn't know him well, but when I ran for office, he was very hostile," he added. Asked if that meant he was not inclined to pardon Combs, Trump said: "I would say so, yeah." Trump has indicated that he is unlikely to grant a pardon to the disgraced media mogul. Photo: AFP A New York jury found Combs guilty last month of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, each of which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. He was acquitted of racketeering and sex trafficking charges after a marathon trial in which he was accused of harrowing abuse. Since the verdict, his lawyers have repeatedly renewed their efforts to get him out on bail until his sentencing . His lawyers had asked US District Judge Arun Subramanian on July 29 to release Combs on a $US50 million ($77.2 million) bond. They argued conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where Combs was being held, were dangerous and that defendants convicted of prostitution-related charges in the past were usually released ahead of their sentencing. Combs is due to be sentenced on October 3 for his conviction on prostitution-related charges. - ABC
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Gone By Lunchtime: Three Gen Xers assess the expulsion of NCEA
Plus: Everything is fine for Luxon apart from the butter, Trump, unemployment, netball, etc. Twenty-three years after its introduction, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement is headed for the shredder, with an overhaul of the qualification system laid out by Erica Stanford, the minister for education, on Monday. The changes include a greater emphasis on external assessment and core subjects of maths and English, a pair of new certificate programmes for years 12 and 13, and the resurgence of an A-E letter grade system. In a new episode of the Spinoff politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime, Annabelle Lee-Mather, Ben Thomas and Toby Manhire discuss what looks like a return to something more like the system they experienced back in the olden times. Does this look like the right balance between loosey-goosey and rigid one-size-fits-all-ness? Is six weeks really sufficient time to get feedback from the sector, students and parents? And why not bring back third to seventh form, while we're at it? Also on the podcast this week: is the removal of voting rights for those who enrol in the fortnight before an election a necessary measure to limit the 'strain on the system', a welcome kick up the backside for the dropkicks, dipshits and deadbeats of New Zealand (eg Ben Thomas) or a troubling disenfranchisement of a particular group of people. Plus: Christopher Luxon took a short and sharp mindset into the National Party conference on the weekend. He arrived in Christchurch amid a blur of bleak headlines, focused mostly on an economic mood epitomised by butter, netball crowds, abrupt Trump tariffs, unemployment numbers, and all that. On the cost of living and the economy more broadly, just how is the getting back on track going? Follow Gone By Lunchtime on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake
Want Donald Trump to lower the tariffs on your exports to US markets? Easy. Offer him money. Lots of it. As the New York Times explained yesterday (in a story headlined 'Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs) South Korea bought its way to a 10% reduction in its tariff rate by offering to spend $350 billion on US investments, and to purchase $100 billion of liquified natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Mr. Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. One can only hope that the New Zealand diplomats and corporate leaders heading to Washington to beg for leniency on our 15% tariff rate do realise that paying Trump off with large amounts of protection money is the only way to grease the tariff wheel. Think of those billions we recently set aside for new defence spending. Perhaps a few billions committed to Lockheed Martin or Raytheon or General Dynamics might knock a few points off the tariff rate? Keep this scam in mind if, by some miracle, our tariff rate does get reduced. It won't be because of Winston Peters' diplomatic wizardry, or Christopher Luxon's innate will be because we succumbed to a shakedown by the Mafioso-in-Chief, and paid him off. Makes one high would be we willing to bid for a tariff cut? New Movie, Same Actors Previously on AUKUS, Death From Below... back in 2021, Joe Biden, Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison hatched a secret defence pact. The core narrative involved the deployment of a fleet of nuclear submarines to negate the threat he inscrutable Chinese allegedly pose to everything that Australia holds dear: everything from shrimps on the barbie to the rightful dominance of Euro-American civilisation over the heathen hordes of Asia, a threat that's as old as Fu Manchu himself. In this week's episode... in a surprising story twist, it looks as if the fabled Second Pillar of AUKUS (consisting of quantum technology, hypersonics, underwater drones and other James Bond stuff) might have more chance of becoming a reality than the Pillar One that begat it. Basically, AUKUS is/was a reward to the nation of little Aussie battlers for faithful services rendered to Washington. In return, the US agreed to equip Australia with a fleet of super silent Virginia-class nuclear subs to update Canberra's ageing submarine fleet. Keen as mustard, Scott Morrison cancelled an existing submarine contract with France, at great expense. Alas, the story hasn't worked out the way the US had promised in the trailer. Due to the low annual rates of productivity in American shipyards, the US Navy and Australia can't both get these new submarines in a timely fashion. The key risk to AUKUS is that the Americans fail to manufacture enough new Virginia-class boats to enable them to transfer up to five vessels to Australia. The required production rate for that to happen is 2.3 Virginia-class subs per year. Last year, the production rate was below 1.2, and it has never exceeded 2 at any stage in the life of the programme. How come? There are many things to blame: Admiral Jonathan Rucker, the programme executive for the Virginia-class boats, [has] told Congress that workforce was the main issue. 'Our 2024 annual production rate of Virginia-class submarines per year was 1.13 compared to our need of 2.0. The main causes for this are workforce challenges, material and supplier delays, and shipbuilder facilities and infrastructure issues, all of which are driving cost increases and schedule delays.' Under Donald Trump, America's needs always come first. Therefore, it will now be many years (at best) beyond the initial 2034 delivery dates before Australia finally gets its hot new mega-expensive submarine deterrent, long after any Chinese threat to Taiwan has been done and dusted. Oh, and Taiwan is a key reason why Elbridge Colby, Trump's defence policy mastermind has been stalling on AUKUS: After taking the post [at the Pentagon] Colby told his British counterparts that the Royal Navy should focus on threats from Russia and leave the U.S. Navy to lead in the western also helped trigger a review of former President Joe Biden's multibillion-dollar U.S.-U.K.-Australia submarine pact, out of concern that the Australians might not deploy U.S.-provided submarines during a U.S.-led campaign on Chinese forces in the event of an assault on Taiwan. In effect, Colby was saying that Australia (with New Zealand tagging along behind) can't be relied on to go to war with China over Taiwan when expected to do so by Washington. Plainly, if New Zealand is to be allowed into AUKUS, we will similarly need to demonstrate our willingness to take orders from further up the operational chain of command.. and ultimately, that means from Generalissimo Donald Trump, the AUKUS commander in chief. Are we really going to spend billions of taxpayer dollars on defence, in order to be marched into WW3 by Donald Trump? Looks that way. Footnote: Reportedly, we are still very, very annoyed at the Cook Islands for not telling us about the deals with China they announced in February. So much so that we skipped attending their 60th birthday celebrations this week. Talk about a double standard. AUKUS is/was a secret deal struck with the US ,whereby nuclear submarines would pass through Pacific waters en route to intimidating China – but we never told Pacific leaders beforehand, let alone sought their feedback. They only found out about AUKUS on the news. You get the picture. The Cook Islands and Vanuatu are supposed to notify us ahead of time and get our stamp of approval before signing up to any deals with China. Yet at the same time, the neo-colonial powers can do whatever secret military deals they like with the US that affect the region, and tell Pacific nations about it only after the fact. Footnote Two: There is a further story twist in the AUKUS saga. The original band of brothers (Biden, Johnson, Morrison) have all left the political scene. Vladimir Putin though, has changed things for Britain. In the UK's Integrated Defence Review back in 2021, Boris Johnson had happily embraced Biden's 'Indo-Pacific tilt' as being the UK's strategic priority as well. Not any more. As Keir Starmer recently stressed, the UK's defence spending priority is now a 'NATO first' strategy aimed at countering the threat posed by Russia to Ukraine, and to the rest of Europe. Meaning: the 'UK' part of AUKUS has virtually left the building. What is left behind? An old story line is being revived. The former team of the US, Australia and New Zealand are back in combat fatigues, and preparing to kick China's ass. To all intents, AUKUS is an ANZUS reboot, but one that's been shorn of New Zealand's old anti-nuclear misgivings. Luxon, Peters, and Defence Minister Judith Collins now seem more than happy for New Zealand to be actively engaged with a nuclear deterrent that projects its force far beyond our shores. Oh, we'll say we're in it only for the high-tech spin-offs. But you can bet that our access to those good things will be conditional on us agreeing to the rest of it. No doubt, some woke generals will want Japan on board for diversity reasons, to give the pact more credibility in the capitals of Asia. But to repeat: there should be no doubt about would be the boss. In the new JANZUS War Room, there will be no room for 'independent' foreign policy. All of the key operational decisions will be made in Washington. USA, USA! We've all seen that movie. Luther Reborn ( again and again) Talking of the early to mid 1970s, the sweet and soulful lover man Luther Vandross (1951-2005) was an inescapable presence. The recent mega-hit 'Luther' tribute track by Kendrick Lamar and SZA drew creatively on the classic 1973'If This World Were Mine' duet by Vandross and Cheryl Lynn, a song that Marvin Gaye had originally written for the doomed love of his life, Tammi Terrell. OK. So we have the Gaye/Terrell duet as radically re-interpreted by Lynn and Vandross, a version that in turn was sampled and lovingly re-imagined by Kendrick Lamar and SZA. Here's the Vandross/Lynn version : And here's the long version of the Kendrick Lamar/SZA revamp, which ends with a lengthy Vandross/Lynn sample : It doesn't end there. Last week, the alt-folk musicians Sam Beam (aka Iron & Wine) and Ben Bidwell of Band of Horses released an Americana version of 'Luther.' At the very least, they deserve some points for trying:
