logo
Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves in tears after criticism over major welfare reform u-turn

Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves in tears after criticism over major welfare reform u-turn

The Journala day ago
LABOUR CHANCELLOR RACHEL Reeves appeared to cry in the Commons this afternoon as British prime minister Keir Starmer declined to guarantee she would remain in place until the election.
Starmer faced MPs at Prime Minister's Question after being forced to scrap key planks of his welfare reforms.
The welfare u-turn has left an almost £5 billion (€5.8b) black hole in Reeves's spending plans and has fuelled speculation she could be forced to hike taxes.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged Starmer to say whether the Chancellor would keep her job until the next election.
Watch as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sheds tears during Prime Minister's Questions 📽️
pic.twitter.com/yil4bo2UpC
— The National (@ScotNational)
July 2, 2025
Starmer dodged the question about whether Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the UK Parliament, saying Badenoch 'certainly won't'.
The Tory leader said: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.'
Despite Starmer not backing her in the Commons, Downing Street insisted she was 'going nowhere' and had the prime minister's 'full backing'.
Asked about Reeves's tears, a spokesman for the Chancellor said it was a 'personal matter'.
Welfare u-turn
Welfare spending in the UK stood at £40billion before the Covid pandemic but is projected to skyrocket to £100 billion by 2030.
In March, reforms to the UK's welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced.
The aim was to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30.
But yesterday, Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform package in the face of a Labour rebellion.
Advertisement
The climbdown came just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (Pip) Bill.
Universal Credit is a means-tested benefit that replaced and combined six 'legacy' benefits – it is paid to those looking for work, unable to work due to illness or disability, those on a low income or those with caring responsibilities.
Meanwhile, Pip is a payment for people who have extra care needs or mobility needs as a result of a disability.
With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day, the UK Government argued the current situation was unsustainable.
Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50% for most new claimants from April 2026 remains in place following yesterday's u-turn.
However, the UK Government shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the Pip and any changes will now only come after a review of the benefit, which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026.
The move caused a major headache for Reeves as the welfare squeeze was originally meant to save £4.8 billion a year, which was subsequently reduced to £2.3 billion when the Bill was first watered down last week.
But after another concession yesterday, it is uncertain how much the reforms will save from the soaring welfare bill, if anything.
Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by the end of the decade.
The Bill changed so much in the interim that MPs questioned if there was even any point in voting on it.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'.
She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.'
A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial u-turn on the legislation last week.
And in yesterday's vote, Starmer faced a revolt of almost 50 MPs despite the changes, with the legislation clearing its first parliamentary hurdle by 335 votes to 260, a majority of 75.
-With additional reporting by Diarmuid Pepper
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Occupied Territories Bill must not 'disadvantage Ireland unduly'
Occupied Territories Bill must not 'disadvantage Ireland unduly'

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Occupied Territories Bill must not 'disadvantage Ireland unduly'

Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said the aim of the Occupied Territories Bill must be to apply pressure on Israel to end the war in Gaza, rather than "disadvantage Ireland unduly". He said this meant the Government had to take into account, when framing its approach, anti-boycott legislation in the United States which was introduced to protect Israel. "We do have to factor in the presence of American legislation, the boycotting divestment legislation, which is already passed by numerous states in America, which would penalise any company that, from an American perspective, participates in boycotts," he said. Mr Martin made the comment when asked whether legislation currently before an Oireachtas Committee should be expanded to include services as well as goods. "There's no point in Ireland coming out worse if it has no impact on Israel. That's the only point I'm making, we have to be clear-eyed in terms of the impact. People should know about the impact."

US job growth beats expectations in June, unemployment rate dips to 4.1%
US job growth beats expectations in June, unemployment rate dips to 4.1%

RTÉ News​

time9 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

US job growth beats expectations in June, unemployment rate dips to 4.1%

US job growth was solid in June while the unemployment rate unexpectedly fell to 4.1%, suggesting the labour market remained stable and potentially allowing the Federal Reserve to delay resuming cutting interest rates until September. Non-farm payrolls increased by 147,000 jobs last month after an upwardly revised 144,000 advance in May, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its closely watched employment report today. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls rising 110,000 following a previously reported 139,000 gain in May. Estimates ranged from an increase of 50,000 to 160,000 jobs. The report was published a day early because of the Independence Day holiday tomorrow. Despite the bigger-than-expected rise in payrolls, job growth is slowing, mostly reflecting tepid hiring. Layoffs remain fairly low, with employers generally hoarding workers following difficulties finding labor during and after the Covid-19 pandemic. Economists say President Donald Trump's focus on what they call anti-growth policies, including sweeping tariffs on imported goods, mass deportations of migrants and sharp government spending cuts, has changed the public's perceptions of the economy. Business and consumer sentiment surged in the wake of Trump's victory in the presidential election last November in anticipation of tax cuts and a less stringent regulatory environment before slumping about two months later. The US unemployment rate fell from 4.2% in May. Economists had expected the jobless rate to tick up to 4.3%. Indicators, including the number of people filing for state jobless benefits and receiving unemployment checks, have pointed to labour market fatigue after a strong performance that shielded the economy from recession as the US Fed aggressively tightened monetary policy to combat high inflation. Most economists expect the jobless rate will rise through the second half of this year, and potentially encourage the Fed to resume its monetary policy easing cycle in September. The Fed last month left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 4.25%-4.5% range, where it has been since December. Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week reiterated the bank's plans to "wait and learn more" about the impact of tariffs on inflation before lowering rates again.

United Ireland would cost €3bn in first year, report says
United Ireland would cost €3bn in first year, report says

RTÉ News​

time11 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

United Ireland would cost €3bn in first year, report says

New research has shown that a united Ireland would cost €3 billion in the first year, but that any financial burdens would disappear within a decade. The report published this morning by Dublin City University and Ulster University showed an initial investment of €1bn in public expenditure would reduce the cost of a united Ireland gradually. It said that a deficit in public finances would last between five and nine years, depending on economic growth. It is the first peer-reviewed report to calculate the cost of unity over its first ten years. The public spending deficit that the Republic of Ireland would inherit from Northern Ireland would be around €1.75bn, according to the report. Implementing a 48% increase in public pay gradually would bring wages in Northern Ireland in line with the Republic's. Equalising these wages would cost €152m per year, for 15 years. Meanwhile, balancing public sector pensions would cost around €115m a year for 40 years, according to the report. Looking at three different scenarios, the report said Northern Ireland would be able to reduce its deficit through economic growth. It said that previous projections have "grossly exaggerated the probable real cost of unity". One of the report's authors, Vice President for Research in Dublin City University Professor, John Doyle said: "There is no obvious reason why Northern Ireland would remain so much poorer and so much less economically productive that, for example Munster." Govt 'committed' to United Ireland as SF says reunification a 'huge' opportunity Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe earlier reiterated the Government's "commitment" to a united Ireland, after Sinn Féin TD Matt Carthy asked if the Government would commit to planning and preparing to deliver a united Ireland. Speaking in the Dáil, Mr Donohoe said the coalition and previous administrations have made clear their "commitment" to the cause. However, they have also made clear the steps that are needed to "bring us closer together and to unite this island," he added. "That's already happening," Mr Donohoe said, using the example of the Shared Island Fund and the work the Government has done to "deal with Brexit". He said those who point out "economic consequences" are not necessarily "opponents" of a united Ireland. "We should be able to have a fair and open debate regarding an issue that is so important," the minister said, and the Government will put forward practical steps to "bring us together". Mr Carthy had referred to the DCU and Ulster university report in questioning and said that it "highlights the reunification of Ireland is a huge opportunity for us all". "The cost of a united Ireland has been exaggerated partly because what is called the UK subvention has been misunderstood and misinterpreted," the report said. "At the same time, the potential for economic growth in an all-island economy, where Northern Ireland is once again inside the European Union, has not received sufficient attention." Mr Carthy said the report found that the costs of unity would be far lower than had previously been "put forward opponents of Irish unity". He said the research has delivered a "fatal blow to any economic arguments that might have been presented against a united Ireland". Mr Carthy said the Government needs to "step up and grasp the massive opportunities for all of the people of Ireland's 32 counties". "This generation in my view can reunite Ireland but the Government needs to come off the bench and get onto the pitch." he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store