logo
Catherine, Princess of Wales, misses Royal Ascot as she balances cancer recovery

Catherine, Princess of Wales, misses Royal Ascot as she balances cancer recovery

CBC18-06-2025
Catherine, Princess of Wales, was not at Royal Ascot on Wednesday, with a royal source citing her need for balance as she returns to public engagements after being treated for cancer last year.
Her husband, Prince William, heir to the throne, was part of the royal procession at the horse-racing event in southern England later on Wednesday, alongside his father, King Charles, and Queen Camilla.
The royal source said Catherine was disappointed not to be attending.
The princess has gradually been returning to her public royal role after completing a course of preventative chemotherapy last year to address the presence of an unspecified form of cancer.
Royal Ascot, a five-day series of horse races, is the centrepiece of the summer social season in Britain, with members of the Royal Family attending throughout the meeting.
Racegoers had hoped to see Catherine on Wednesday, as Prince William was scheduled to award race prizes.
200th anniversary of royal procession
On Tuesday, Charles and Camilla arrived at the course at the head of the traditional carriage procession in front of tens of thousands of racegoers.
The royal procession is celebrating its 200th anniversary, with the tradition beginning during the reign of King George IV in 1825 when the monarch was accompanied by the Duke of Wellington.
Writing in Royal Ascot's official program, the King and Queen said: "Having experienced the thrill of victory at Royal Ascot ourselves in 2023, we can only wish all those competing this week the very best of luck and that everyone watching has a most enjoyable five days."
The late Queen Elizabeth was a passionate owner and breeder of thoroughbreds and had more than 20 Royal Ascot winners during her 70-year reign.
Charles and Camilla have taken on her stable of horses and enjoyed their first Royal Ascot winner in 2023, when Desert Hero triumphed in the King George V Stakes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI officiating gives us a grim look into our future
AI officiating gives us a grim look into our future

Globe and Mail

time2 days ago

  • Globe and Mail

AI officiating gives us a grim look into our future

Every once in a while, as you're watching a match at Wimbledon, the new robot umps will pipe up out of nowhere. The players will be milling about at the baseline getting ready for the next point and a voice will shout, 'OUT.' The crowd titters, and one is left wondering if that was a test or a bug in the system. Whatever it is, it deepens most people's conviction that this technology, like all technology, is right 100 per cent of the time – except the times it isn't. Britain's two biggest stars – Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper – have that same feeling. Both claimed the AI line judges did them dirty in their losses. 'Hopefully, they can kind of fix that,' Raducanu said. Wimbledon parts with tradition as line judges go digital Wimbledon took that criticism under advisement and decided that, no, it kind of won't be fixing anything. 'It's funny, because when we did have linesman, we were constantly asked why we didn't have electronic line calling because it's more accurate than the rest of the tour,' All England Club chair Debbie Jevans sniffed to the BBC – a great place to do some sniffing. On Sunday, the problem deepened when a ball hit by local favourite Sonay Kartal clearly sailed long, but was not called out. Apparently, the system wasn't on. The umpire decided to replay the point. 'They stole a game from me,' Kartal's opponent, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, told the umpire later. Luckily for Wimbledon, Pavlyuchenkova went on to win the match. It's nice when athletes have the same problems as the rest of us. You wanted robots? Well, we just put the robots in charge, and they're assigning their own breaks. Best of luck. Often, sports show us our future. Many of us now dress like athletes, and talk like them, and are interested in the things they are interested in. Athletes embraced political activism, mental health and looking 25 until you're 70, and now those are the things our society obsesses about. If it's attention economy, no one gets more aggregate attention than sports does. So whether or not you agree that Emma Raducanu is able to perceive the precise location of a sphere relative to a white chalk line when the ball is moving at 110 kilometres per hour, listen to her. This is your future. Eventually, all sports will be officiated by AI. It's inevitable because it's a cheaper alternative. It was tennis that made this movement palatable, through its Hawk Eye system. Its brilliance was replacing one sort of entertainment (John McEnroe screaming 'ARE YOU SERIOUS?' at some poor linesman) with another, equally entertaining one (big-screen computer simulations of balls bouncing a micrometer outside the fault line). Crucially, one is full of human vigour and interaction, while the other has none. It was pretty close to an optimal human/computer hybrid, but the players wanted something nearer to perfection. In this analogy, they are us, five or 10 years ahead of the curve. Now that they have the AI assistance they demanded, they're having regrets. The new system is no different than the old one – possibly wrong occasionally – but it is impossible to argue with. If you say it's blowing calls, people think you're either loopy, a sore loser or both. Anybody who's spent an hour arguing with an AI chatbot because you were fleeced by a car rental company who insist you rented a shrimpy electric car, when you know to an absolute certainty that you did not, forcing you to pay an extra 500 bucks at the counter, and now there is no way to get a human on the phone, will know this pain. AI doesn't make things better. At this point in its development, it's mostly a way of ending arguments. That the computer is often wrong is beside the point. The face of AI, Sam Altman, is out there telling people this, but they don't want to hear him. 'People have a very high degree of trust in ChatGPT, which is interesting because, like, AI hallucinates,' Altman said on a recent in-house podcast. 'It should be the tech you don't trust that much.' Altman is hinting around one of the great shifts in modern society. People used to want the right answer. Now they want the fastest and most convenient one. This is the most common complaint with any sort of instant replay-based system in sports – that it doesn't result in quick enough decisions. Why are these idiots looking at this a hundred times? Just let a computer do it. So here you go. It's not always right, and sometimes it's not on, but it's quick. So what do we do? Nothing. There can be no backsliding from progress. Everybody's out here telling you that social media fries the brains of children, but even its loudest critics will not suggest ridding ourselves of it. Their advice is to act as if it doesn't exist. It's a bad answer, but it's the simplest thing to do. Once AI gets into the guts of sports, it won't be possible to remove it. Eventually, it will be robot baseball umpires, robot football referees and robot judging. The trick is simulating human involvement so that people are not too jarred by the absence of humanity. Tennis has managed it because the AI voices are so true, and because there are still so many bodies on the court that you don't miss the ones that have been eliminated. The upshot is that sports are being used to soften everyone else up. First, it claimed the linesman. Now it's coming for you. If the athletic supermen and women who are our thought leaders (God help us) can be compelled to accept robot oversight, what use is it if someone in your office pipes up about the numbers being wrong? I don't know who Fatima in finance thinks she is. She's no Jack Draper. And look how much good he was able to do. In the end, we are left with a zombie facsimile of the old system. It will still be wrong, but without recourse because there is no person to argue with. In this way, we become more efficient, allowing for more growth and less life.

Ozzy Osbourne reunites with original Black Sabbath band members during farewell performance
Ozzy Osbourne reunites with original Black Sabbath band members during farewell performance

CTV News

time2 days ago

  • CTV News

Ozzy Osbourne reunites with original Black Sabbath band members during farewell performance

Ozzy Osbourne is pictured at the 2024 Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame Induction Ceremon in Cleveland. Jeff Kravitz/FilmMagic, Inc/Getty Images via CNN Newsource Ozzy Osbourne is saying goodbye to the stage after performing what has been billed as his final show with the original members of Black Sabbath. Osbourne, along with original Black Sabbath bassist Geezer Butler, drummer Bill Ward and guitarist Tony Iommi, appeared on stage together for the first time in two decades in Birmingham, England on Saturday during a concert event called Back to the Beginning, which was said to be Osbourne's 'farewell performance,' according to Black Sabbath's official website. Osbourne – who performed while sitting in a black, throne-like chair with a bat on top – revealed in 2020 that he was diagnosed with Parkinson's Disease. 'Your support over the years has made it all possible for us to live the lifestyle we live,' Osbourne told the audience before playing their final song 'Paranoid,' according to footage of the performance. 'Thank you from the bottom of my heart. I love you. We love you.' Osbourne and the band also performed 'Iron Man', 'N.I.B.' and 'War Pigs' during their set. During his earlier set, Osbourne performed 'Crazy Train,' 'Mr. Crowley,' and 'Mama, I'm Coming Home,' among others, according to footage posted to social media. Actor Jason Momoa hosted the mega-concert. All proceeds from the live event and the livestream benefited several foundations including Cure Parkinson's, Birmingham Children's hospital and Acorn Children's Hospice, according to Billboard. The concert also featured performances by several other rock and metal legends, including Metallica, Guns N' Roses, Slayer and Alice in Chains, among others. Smashing Pumpkins frontman Billy Corrigan, Rage Against the Machine's Tom Morello and Blink-182 drummer Travis Barker also made special appearances on stage throughout the hours-long concert event. Aerosmith's Steven Tyler also appeared on stage to sing 'Whole Lotta Love' by Led Zeppelin with Morello. Black Sabbath was first formed in 1968 in Birmingham with Osbourne, Butler, Ward and Iommi. The band, widely considered pioneers in the metal genre, was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2006 and have won two Grammys. It has been somewhat of a long goodbye for the band, whose The End Tour was billed as the farewell tour. It culminated in a 2017 concert film. The band has since gone back and forth about reunion possibilities. The Back to the Beginning show was announced in February. After opening up about his Parkinson's, Osbourne told ABC's Robin Roberts: 'I feel better now that I've owned up to the fact that I have a case of Parkinson's.' 'And I just hope (my fans) hang on and they're there for me because I need them,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store