Kansas City woman sentenced for COVID-19 scheme
Robin Brooks, 55, was sentenced by U.S. Chief District Judge Greg Kays to 15 months' imprisonment and ordered to pay $62,811.75 in restitution to the Small Business Administration (SBA) and to Jackson County, Missouri.
The Coronavirus Aid Relief, and Economy Security (CARES Act) was a federal law enacted in or around March of 2020 and designed to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
As part of the CARES Act, the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was created to provide forgivable loans to small businesses that were administered from the SBA through corresponding financial institution.
The purpose of the PPP was to provide support to small businesses and assist their payroll to their employees during the pandemic.
In her guilty plea, Brooks admitted that, in 2021 she submitted two fraudulent applications to the SBA for loans using fake businesses.
Brooks' businesses never actually existed and did not have any employees. In a related scheme, Brooks submitted approximately $30,345 in false invoices to Jackson County, Missouri, to receive CARES Act Funds for a non-profit organization she created to provide food to people negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Brooks now owes the SBA $32,466 and Jackson County $30,345 based on the false claims.
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Brent Venneman and was investigated by the United States Secret Service.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The MSNBC host described how pro-Trump AI bots are 'malfunctioning' over what to say about the Epstein files.
A network of MAGA bots has no idea what it's supposed to say about Jeffrey Epstein, much to the amusement of Rachel Maddow. The MSNBC host on Tuesday unpacked new reporting from NBC News about hundreds of X accounts that use artificial intelligence to send automated replies showing support for right-wing messaging. With Trumpworld deeply divided on the so-called 'Epstein files,' the bots, which are supposed to mimic MAGA talking points, have been glitching out. Some would post contradictory messages from the same account, calling for the release of the documents while also calling for the matter to be put to bed.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
Progressive DA who dismissed alleged sex offender's attempted kidnapping charges faces recall petition
A dispute over crime policies in Aurora, Colorado, has led to the recall attempt of a newly-elected district attorney. Aurora Councilwoman At Large Danielle Jurinsky is attempting to have Arapahoe County District Attorney Amy Padden removed from office after several high-profile instances of what she says are inadequate crime policies, including the recent dismissal of charges against Solomon Galligan, an alleged registered sex offender who is accused of trying to kidnap a child on video. "What has been going on over the past six months, several different things," said Jurinsky. "She has dismissed cases that absolutely should have been prosecuted. She has given out a lot of probation for felony crimes, misdemeanor crimes, crimes that should have warranted several years in prison." Galligan, 33, faced one count of attempted kidnapping after he allegedly tried to snatch an 11-year-old boy from a playground at a local elementary school. Aurora police previously reported that Galligan is a registered sex offender, with his registration tied to the Pueblo County Sheriff's Office. He was found incompetent to stand trial, which in the state of Colorado, means he must be released from custody, Padden's office told Fox News Digital earlier this month. "From what I understand is that I don't know how else to put it, but that Amy Padden went shrink shopping to find someone to make sure that they would say that Solomon Galligan was not fit to stand trial," Jurinsky, an Aurora native, military veteran and business owner told Fox News Digital. "My knowledge of this individual is they have been found mentally incompetent multiple times on previous criminal cases in different judicial districts outside [Arapahoe County]," Ross said. "So there is a history of documented mental illness. It's not like this is a one-and-done where this person has never been on anyone's radar, and they found somebody to write them a note to say that they're mentally incompetent." "And instead of coming out and saying that Amy Padden is at least going to hold this individual in the state mental health hospital, she just makes a statement that charges are going to be dismissed, and this individual is going to be released," said Jurinsky. "She is trying to now walk that back and say that Solomon is going to go to the state mental health hospital, but not giving a timeline, not giving any information." Eric Ross is the Public Information Officer for the Arapahoe County District Attorney's Office. "Regarding the Galligan case, we cannot take a case to trial when a defendant has been deemed mentally incompetent," he told Fox News Digital. "We are required to adhere to state law which requires charges be dismissed. With that said, the defendant is being permanently committed to a mental institution." However, Jurinsky said Galligan's release isn't the only issue, noting that she's been observing a pattern of soft-on-crime policies since Padden took office six months ago. "The situation with Kaitlyn Weaver, beautiful 24-year-old Aurora resident, was on her way home from work, broad daylight, was T-boned by a 15-year-old in this country illegally with two small children in the back of the van as well," Jurinsky noted as another example. "He stole the van from his mother. Kailtyn Weaver was killed instantly." The unnamed teen was offered a plea deal and given probation for the crime. "The original charge was for vehicular homicide and the guilty plea was for Vehicular Homicide," Ross said. "Contrary to what the general public may think, vehicular homicide charges do not carry the same penalties as first or second-degree murder." He said citizens can petition their elected leaders if they want "stricter penalties for these types of cases." As for the recall, which will be formally announced Tuesday, Padden says everything is in place. "We have formed our committee. We have registered it with the secretary of state. It has been approved with the county clerk," she said. "And then at that moment, we will begin raising money. We don't need a lot of money for this effort, but we will need some to print the petition packets and probably hire some signature gatherers. And then we will be well underway. I will be the first signature on that petition, and we will be underway to getting 75,000 [signatures] out of Arapahoe County." The 75,000 mark is the threshold for officially recalling Padden. Jurinsky and her supporters have 60 days to acquire the signatures. If they succeed, Padden will have five days to decide whether she will resign, or whether she will run for her seat again. Jurinsky said she doesn't think garnering the signatures will be a challenge, and plans on hosting events and even going door-to-door as part of the effort. "If you hurt somebody in the city of Aurora, I'm an Aurora City Council member," she said. "I need to be standing up for the people of Aurora. And that means protecting them. That means focusing on public safety. So I take on a lot of extra duties, if you will. And sometimes that's alone. I'm OK with that." Ross says he's reached out twice to Jurinsky seeking other examples of cases she believes were not handled properly, but has not heard back. In 2024, Aurora was also subject to a suspected Tren de Aragua gang takeover of an apartment complex, which became a rallying point for then-candidate Donald Trump's reelection bid. A spokesperson for the city of Aurora said neither the city nor its Mayor Mike Coffman, a former Republican congressman, have anything to do with the recall, and declined to comment further. Padden did not return a comment request.
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Why did he kill them? Allocution could allow Bryan Kohberger a chance to give families of murdered Idaho students an answer
Bryan Kohberger has one last chance Wednesday to give the grieving parents of four University of Idaho students he admitted to killing the answers they've desperately sought for nearly three years. Why did he do it? Kohberger will have an opportunity to reveal those details before his sentencing Wednesday, following a remarkable change-of-plea hearing on July 2 that spared him the death penalty and his highly anticipated murder trial by admitting guilt to burglary and first-degree murder in the November 2022 killings of Ethan Chapin, Xana Kernodle, Kaylee Goncalves and Madison Mogen. Kohberger will be granted an allocution — the formal opportunity defendants are given to speak directly to the court before they are sentenced by the judge. Traditionally, defendants use allocution to humanize themselves and express remorse, or offer an apology, or even an explanation for their actions — anything that could be taken into account during sentencing, according to the American Bar Association. But legal experts think it's unlikely he'll say a thing. 'What we can expect in sentencing would first be the victim impact statements by the families. We already know that there are several that are going to speak, which should be horrendous,' legal analyst and trial attorney Mercedes Colwin told CNN. 'I'm sure it's going to be gut-wrenching, and then he will be given the opportunity to address the court before the judge sentences him. That's where he can say, 'I'm sorry for what I've done,' which I don't expect any of that to take place,' Colwin said. The question of whether Kohberger will speak about his crimes even invited a comment from President Donald Trump, who said in a post on Truth Social on Monday the judge should make the 30-year-old 'explain why he did these horrible murders' before the sentencing. In every previous court appearance, Kohberger has remained expressionless, silent and unmoved as prosecutors recounted the chilling details of the late-night killings — how he entered a home through a sliding door and savagely stabbed four young students to death while two survivors, terrified, texted each other about a masked figure moving through the hallway. Despite Kohberger admitting to the crimes, the July 2 change-of-plea hearing left one giant hole in the story: why he targeted the residents of the King Road house. It's unclear whether the public will ever get an answer, as it's not required by the plea deal. Allocution may offer one final chance for him to address it in court. Here's what to expect. During the change-of-plea hearing, Judge Steven Hippler formally questioned Kohberger to ensure he fully understood the charges, the consequences of pleading guilty, and his rights before accepting the plea. 'Are you pleading guilty because you are guilty?' the judge asked. 'Yes,' Kohberger said. 'Did you on November 13, 2022, enter the residence at 1122 King Road in Moscow, Idaho, with the intent to commit the felony crime of murder?' Hippler asked. 'Yes,' Kohberger again responded, as one of the victims' family members silently wept while other loved ones listened intently. But that was all. The judge asked Kohberger only basic confirmation questions. There was no inquiry into why he committed the crimes or whether he felt any remorse. The plea agreement and the written factual basis offer little insight into Kohberger's motive. Several key concerns were left unaddressed, including what drove Kohberger to carry out the killings, why he targeted the students specifically and why two roommates were spared. The plea agreement doesn't necessitate that Kohberger disclose any details about the murders at his sentencing. 'I had hoped the agreement would include conditions that required the defendant to explain his actions and provide answers to the many questions that still remain, especially where evidence is missing or unclear,' Xana Kernodle's father, Jeff Kernodle, said in a statement following the guilty plea. At Wednesday's sentencing, allocution will offer Kohberger a confronting choice: stay silent or face the families of his four victims and attempt to explain the horror he inflicted. Allocution rights can be traced to 1689, when English courts recorded that, in cases in which defendants faced possible death sentences, the failure to ask defendants directly whether they had anything to say prior to sentencing constituted a basis for reversal, according to the American Bar Association. Numerous historic allocution statements have been delivered over the years, including John Brown's address to the court after his death sentence in 1859, and Susan B. Anthony's defiant speech following her arrest for voting in 1873. Several convicted murderers have also given allocution statements, including serial killer Ted Bundy; Timothy McVeigh, convicted for the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing; and John Wayne Gacy, known as the 'Killer Clown.' Allocution rights appear at the state level, though they vary across jurisdictions. But according to Idaho law, the defendant has the 'right of allocution,' or the right to personally address the judge, if they choose to. 'Before imposing sentence the court must give counsel an opportunity to speak on behalf of the defendant and must ask the defendant personally if the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of punishment,' Idaho's Criminal Rule 33 states. Allocutions are not made under oath and and Kohberger will not be subjected to cross-examination, according to the state law. 'Their families may never hear why he targeted this house and their children, what made him do it. He's not required to answer the 'why,' although we know he killed them because he's already taken this plea,' Colwin said. 'They may never get true closure.' A pile of questions over the killer's method and motive have haunted the case since the four students were discovered stabbed to death in their off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho, with no signs of forced entry. But even if Kohberger remains silent now and does not exercise his right to allocution, there's still a possibility he will speak out later. There is no stipulation in Kohberger's plea agreement to prevent him from doing interviews with media or writing a book. A trove of documents and discovery that could also shine more light on the case remains sealed by the court and is expected to stay that way until after his sentencing on July 23. But it's unclear how the court will handle the large volume of material. 'The families who want an explanation believe the ultimate closure is understanding why,' Colwin said. 'Even if he someday explains his motivations, I shudder to think of what he might say.' After the victims' families were informed of the plea deal, fathers Jeff Kernodle and Steve Goncalves harshly criticized prosecutors for not consulting the victims' families before agreeing to conditions of the deal. The Goncalves family members said in a statement earlier this month they had expected more answers from the change-of-plea hearing when Judge Hippler questioned Kohberger before accepting his guilty plea. 'Today was the day, the day for answers, the day to find out what happened, to find out really anything about what the Defendant did that night and why he took the lives of 4 beautiful people. At least that's what we hoped for but hope is really all we had today,' the Goncalves family's July 2 statement read. 'We'll never see this as justice,' Steve Goncalves told CNN's Jim Sciutto. Others voiced acceptance, saying that despite a lack of answers, they were relieved to avoid a drawn-out trial and the possibility of a yearslong appeals process. Mogen's father, Ben Mogen, told the Idaho Statesman he viewed the deal as an opportunity to avoid the pain and spectacle of a trial and focus on healing. 'We support the plea agreement 100%. While we know there are some who do not support it, we ask that they respect our belief that this is the best outcome possible for victims, their families and the state of Idaho,' said Leander James, who represents Mogen's mother and stepfather, Karen and Scott Laramie. The Chapin family's 'initial response was, 'an eye for an eye,'' Stacy Chapin, Ethan Chapin's mother, told NBC's 'Today.' 'But we've spent a ton of time talking about it with prosecutors, and for us, we always felt like this was a better deal,' she said. Had Kohberger gone to trial, a death sentence was not guaranteed. And even if he had received one, it likely would have taken years, possibly decades, to carry out, with no certainty it would ever happen. Kohberger will be sentenced this week to life in prison without parole, and he'll forfeit his right to appeal. He will no longer be allowed to appear in the civilian shirt and tie he usually wears for hearings, according to Hippler. The next time he sets foot in the courtroom, he will be dressed in prison garb. 'To the families of Kaylee, Madison, Xana and Ethan – we will never forget the beautiful light your precious children shone brightly in the world,' Colwin said. 'No evil will ever take that away.' CNN's Taylor Romine, Jean Casarez, Elizabeth Wolfe, Rebekah Riess, Dakin Andone, and Kit Maher contributed to this report.
