
UN Ocean Conference drums up signatories to key High Seas Treaty
Eighteen countries ratified the High Seas Treaty on Monday, bringing the total to 49 – just 11 short of the 60 needed for the ocean agreement to enter into force. The surge in support, occurring during the UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, adds momentum to what could become a historic shift in how the world governs the open ocean.
Here's what the treaty is, why it matters and what happens next.
Formally known as the Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction, the High Seas Treaty is the first legally binding agreement focused on protecting marine biodiversity in international waters. These waters, which are beyond the jurisdiction of any single country, make up nearly two-thirds of the ocean and almost half the surface of the planet.
Until now, there has been no comprehensive legal framework to create marine protected areas or enforce conservation on the high seas.
Despite their remoteness, the high seas are under growing pressure from overfishing, climate change and the threat of deep-sea mining. Environmental advocates warn that without proper protections, marine ecosystems in international waters face irreversible harm.
'Until now, it has been the wild west on the high seas," said Megan Randles, global political lead for oceans at Greenpeace. "Now we have a chance to properly put protections in place.'
The treaty is also essential to achieving the global '30x30' target – an international pledge to protect 30% of the planet's land and sea by 2030.
The treaty creates a legal process for countries to establish marine protected areas in the high seas, including rules for destructive activities like deep-sea mining and geo-engineering. It also establishes a framework for technology-sharing, funding mechanisms and scientific collaboration among countries.
Crucially, decisions under the treaty will be made multilaterally through conferences of parties (COPs) rather than by individual countries acting alone.
Once 60 countries ratify the treaty, a 120-day countdown begins before it officially enters into force. That would unlock the ability to begin designating protected areas in the high seas and put oversight mechanisms into motion.
As of Monday evening, 49 countries and the EU had ratified, meaning 11 more are needed to trigger that countdown.
The first Conference of the Parties (COP1) must take place within one year of the treaty's entry into force. That meeting will lay the groundwork for implementation, including decisions on governance, financing and the creation of key bodies to evaluate marine protection proposals.
Environmental groups are pushing to surpass the required 60 ratifications, and to do so quickly – the more countries that ratify, the stronger and more representative the treaty's implementation will be. There's also a deadline: only countries that ratify by COP1 will be eligible to vote on critical decisions that determine how the treaty will operate.
'To reach 60 ratifications would be an absolutely enormous achievement, but for the treaty to be as effective as possible, we need countries from all over the world to engage in its implementation,' said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance. 'So the next step will be to go from 60 to global.'
The surge in support on Monday has raised hopes that 2025 could mark a turning point for high seas protection.
'We're on the brink of making high seas history,' Hubbard said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU Commission working on concerns about Anglo-French migration pact
The European Commission is working to resolve concerns that Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Malta and Spain - the so-called 'Med 5' - have flagged in a letter related to an Anglo-French migration pact under negotiation, an EU spokesperson said today. The letter from the Med 5 to the Commission cites 'serious concerns about the potential consequences [of the deal] for other EU countries, especially those on the frontline', EU sources told Euronews. The letter flagged issues with the fact that the agreement is being negotiated outside the EU framework, and that it might increase migratory pressure on the EU's southern border, according to the sources. An EU official said that Italy and Spain are the chief orchestrators of the letter, while Cyprus and Greece supported it primarily out of solidarity with their fellow Mediterranean countries. What the deal involves The British and French governments are discussing a "one-for-one" pilot scheme, allowing the UK to return irregular migrants who cross the Channel in small boats to France. In exchange, the UK would accept migrants currently in France who are seeking family reunification in Britain. The French Interior Ministry has told several media outlets that the scheme aims to discourage smuggling networks. Although no official timeline has been provided, French and British authorities are reportedly in the final stages of negotiations, according to EU sources. A Franco-British summit expected to take place during French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK from 8 to 10 July is considered a likely occasion. The partnership is intended to ease pressure on the UK's asylum system while providing France with a legal pathway to relocate migrants who are already on its territory. However, other EU countries worry that migrants returned to France from the UK could eventually be transferred further south. Under EU law, irregular migrants must apply for asylum in the first EU country they enter. Many of those who reach the UK after crossing the Mediterranean or following the Balkan route have passed through several EU countries before arriving in France. Those returned to the European mainland who decide to seek asylum within the EU would be required to apply in their first country of entry - likely one of the Med 5 - meaning migrants rejected by the UK could end up being relocated by France to southern European states. According to the UK government, there were 44,125 irregular Channel crossings in the year ending March 2025 - a 14% increase compared to the previous year. The Migration Observatory at Oxford University reported that from January to May 2025, there were approximately 14,800 small boat crossings, marking the highest number ever recorded during that period. Central and Western Mediterranean routes for irregular migration - leading to Italy and Spain respectively - saw slight increases in the first months of 2025 compared to the previous year (7% and 6%, respectively), according to Frontex. Greece, by contrast, experienced a significant 30% decrease in irregular crossings from the Eastern Mediterranean route compared to 2024 over the same period.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Which European countries have laws against deepfakes?
Denmark will give people copyright over their own likenesses as a way to fight back against generated 'deepfake' videos, as countries around the world grapple with the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). In a statement, the Danish government said the bill, which has been agreed upon by all major parties, will make it illegal to share deepfakes and other 'digital imitations' of a person's characteristics. 'We are now sending an unequivocal signal to all citizens that you have the right to your own body, your own voice and your own facial features,' Denmark's culture minister Jakob Engel-Schmidt said in a statement. Deepfakes are videos or other online content generated by AI that alter a person, often in a way to spread false information or to embarrass them. 'Technology is developing rapidly, and in the future it will be even more difficult to distinguish reality from fiction in the digital world,' Engel-Schmidt said, adding that the new law will be a 'safeguard against misinformation' and will also 'send a clear signal to the tech giants'. Denmark is not the only country tackling deepfakes through new laws. Here's where else in Europe is taking action. European Union The EU's AI Act classifies anything created by generative AI in one of four categories: minimal risk, limited risk, high-risk, and unacceptable risk. Deepfakes are considered 'limited risk' and are therefore subject to some transparency rules. That means there is no outright ban on deepfakes, but it forces companies to label AI-generated content on their platforms by putting watermarks on the videos, and to disclose which training sets are being used to develop their models. If an AI company is found in breach of transparency rules, it could face a fine of up to €15 million or 3 per cent of its global turnover from the past year. That fine goes up to €35 million or 7 per cent of global turnover for banned practices. Another article of the AI Act also bans manipulative AI, which could include systems that use subliminal or deceptive techniques to 'impair informed decision-making'. Some legal action focuses on pornography and other sexual content. For example, the EU's directive on violence against women criminalises the 'non-consensual production, manipulation or altering… of material that makes it appear as though a person is engaged in sexual activities'. The directive includes the production of deepfakes or any materials created using AI. It doesn't specify what the penalty should be if an individual or company is found in violation of the directive, leaving it up to each EU member state to decide. EU member states have until June 2027 to implement the rule. France's digital spaces law In 2024, France passed an update to its criminal code to prohibit people from sharing any AI-created visual or audio content, such as deepfakes, without the consent of the person portrayed in it. Any reshared content must be clearly disclosed as AI-generated. Distributors of these videos or audio could face up to a year in prison and a €15,000 fine; the penalty goes up to two years in prison and a €45,000 fine if the deepfake is shared through an 'online service'. The changes to the criminal code also include a specific ban on pornographic deepfakes – even if it has clear markings that indicate it is fake. Anyone caught distributing this content in France could face up to three years in prison and a €75,000 fine. The law also gives Arcom, France's audiovisual regulator, the power to force platforms to remove illicit content and improve their reporting systems. Two-year sentence in the UK for deepfake porn The UK has several laws that deal with the creation of deepfake pornography, including the recent amendments to the Data (Use and Access) Bill. The law targets 'heinous abusers' that create fake images for 'sexual gratification or to cause alarm, distress or humiliation'. Violators could face an 'unlimited fine'. Another recent addition is a possible two-year prison sentence under the UK's Sexual Offenses Act for those who create sexual deepfakes. The UK's Online Safety Act makes it illegal to share or threaten to share non-consensual sexual images on social media. The act will also force platforms to 'take steps to proactively remove this material' and prevent it from appearing in the first place. If they breach the law, companies could face fines of up to 10 per cent of their worldwide revenue from UK internet regulator Ofcom. However, Julia Hörnle, a professor at the Queen Mary University School of Law, said the Online Safety Act doesn't outright make the creation of deepfake images illegal, which 'leaves victims vulnerable to harm even if the content is never shared publicly'. She said the UK government should also address the 'availability' of AI tools to create deepfakes by finding a way to criminalise 'the development, distribution, and promotion of these tools'.


Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets
The battle to reach Europe's 2040 climate targets has begun. On 2 July, the European Commission is due to present its proposals for reducing CO2 emissions. It is expected to announce a 90% reduction to take the EU towards carbon neutrality by 2050. This proposal comes at a time when the European Green Deal is being called into question and the EU's competitiveness is being strengthened in the face of international competition. Member states are preparing their political arguments for the debate. France has already taken the first offensive at last week's European summit, setting out its framework. "I'm in favour of having these targets in 2040, but basically I said some very simple things. Firstly, if we want these targets by 2040, we have to give ourselves the means to do so and make them compatible with our competitiveness. What does that mean? Technological neutrality, flexibility, investment," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the end of the meeting of the 27 EU leaders. Flexibility: the word has been thrown around and is used repeatedly in Europe's corridors of power. The Commission has also adopted the same term. The Vice-President of the institution responsible for the Clean, Fair and Competitive Transition seems ready to grant flexibility to convince capitals. "Reducing our emissions by 90% by 2040 is a clear objective. We then need to discuss how we can combine the different elements, the possible flexibilities," Teresa Ribera told Euronews. The grey area of flexibility For environmental NGOs, the figure of 90% reduction in emissions is an important marker, but they do not wish to limit the debate to this numerical assessment. Several organisations are warning of the flexibility and possible flaws in the Commission's proposal. Flexibility could take the form of international credits. "Essentially, the EU and its member states could pay other countries outside the EU to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This amount would then be included in the 90% of greenhouse gas emissions within the EU's borders," explains Michael Sicaud-Clyet, Climate Governance Officer at WWF EU. For him, this political sleight of hand is "a major problem, because it will divert investment to industry, or to people and municipalities outside the EU and it will cost more and have less positive impact on people and industry in the EU." Other forms of flexibility could involve absorbing carbon through carbon sinks, which are natural carbon absorbers, and permanent absorbers, which are technologies whose large-scale development has not yet been proven", warns Michael Sicaud-Clyet. Time for negotiations France says it does not want to rush the negotiations. The 2040 targets "cannot be a technical debate that takes place in a few weeks. It must be a democratic debate," Macron warned. "It's not a target for Belém (the Brazilian city will host COP30, the UN climate conference, this year). If we have it for Belém, great. If it's going to take longer, let's take longer to do it right." The President repeated his mantra of "flexibility, investment, technological neutrality and trade coherence, meaning that if we set targets for 2040, we want a trade policy that protects us." In this debate, Paris should be able to count on the support of Budapest and Warsaw. However, other member states such as Germany, Spain, Finland and Denmark (which holds the six-month EU presidency from 1 July) fully support the 90% emissions reduction target . The WWF EU also mentions a number of "swing states," countries that are keeping their final position vague. For the European Commission, it is vital that the EU does not miss the turning point represented by the 2040 target. "I think this could be a mistake. I think that this year (2025) marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement (on climate), and we want to determine how we can continue to make progress in an area that we consider essential for the economic and social well-being of Europeans," says Teresa Ribera. The Spanish official also opened the door to debate. "We will have to identify the challenges that lie ahead, while trying to reach an agreement between all the European countries."