Fully use Kannada for administrative work or face action
Bengaluru: The Karnataka government has instructed officials to use Kannada extensively for administrative purposes across all state departments and district administrations, warning that disciplinary action will be taken against those who fail to comply. Chief Secretary Shalini Rajneesh issued a circular in this regard on Tuesday.
'Despite several circulars issued to administer in Kannada, the Kannada Development Authority has been reporting that the instructions are not being followed.
In this context, it has been reiterated that the instructions must be followed compulsorily, and disciplinary action will be taken against those who violate them,' the circular said.
It said Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, while pointing out that despite instructions for notings on files in government correspondence to be in Kannada, they are not being implemented effectively, has directed that 'if the notes and correspondence in the files are not in Kannada, such files should be returned and an explanation should be sought.' 'It is the duty of all officers and employees to implement the language policy in the administration to the fullest extent and at all levels.
Therefore, it is reiterated once again that all officers and employees of the government, corporations, boards, local bodies, universities, and aided organisations should strictly implement the instructions given in the already issued government orders,' it added.
The circular further pointed out that during recent Karnataka Development Programme (KDP) meetings, some Deputy Commissioners and Zilla Panchayat Chief Executive Officers issued agendas and presented departmental information in English, a violation reported by the Kannada Development Authority.It reminded officials that under the Karnataka Official Language Act, 1963, Kannada is the administrative language of the state. Applications and letters received in Kannada must be replied to in Kannada, and government office nameplates should be displayed in Kannada.
The circular reiterated that proceedings of the Legislative Assembly, official correspondence, calling attention notices, and government orders—including those related to appointments, transfers, and leave—must be issued
in Kannada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Escape Trump era: Why foreign students are flocking back to UK universities
For the past 15 years, Don McMillan, a college-admissions consultant, has worked just down the road from Harvard University, one of the most prestigious schools targeted by his clients from the US and around the globe. This month, he expanded his business 3,000 miles (4,800 kilometers) and an ocean away to tap into what's becoming a rapidly growing line of work: Advising the students who are souring on America and looking to go to college in the UK instead. 'There's more of an interest now for US students to study in the UK,' said McMillan. 'In the past our American students might only apply to Oxbridge and St. Andrews. Now they will look at a broader range.' The shift is an early indication that President Donald Trump's unprecedented effort to reshape higher education around his America-first politics may turn into a boon for UK universities, whose prestige and English-language curricula make them a natural alternative to those in the US. The main deadline for UK undergraduate admission was at the end of January, too early for the impact of Trump's recent policies to have had an effect. But interest has since surged as his administration started slashing funding, revoking the visas of foreign students and trying to block Harvard's overseas students from entering the US, escalating a clash with the university that's been playing out in court. Studyportals, a platform widely used to research colleges, said that foreign students' searches of British universities rose 10% in the year through May, with the number of those looking at American schools falling by a similar amount. Among Americans, the focus on UK schools was up 12%. An influx would be a welcome shift for UK universities whose finances have been squeezed in recent years as domestic tuition failed to keep pace with rising costs and international enrollment fell short of expectations. Over 40% had deficits in 2024, according to a report last month by the Office for Students, which warned that the pressure could continue if fees from foreign students don't rise as much as expected in the years ahead. The British Council, which promotes UK cultural institutions abroad, said earlier this year that Trump's return to the White House — along with heightened restrictions on studying in Canada and Australia — could increase the number of those opting to come the UK. At Bayes Business School in London, Andre Spicer, the executive dean, has already started trying to recruit them. His school recently hosted its first alumni networking event in Manhattan since the pandemic and he has been utilizing US-educated faculty members in a push to market the school to Americans. One selling point: It costs £50,400 ($69,200) to earn a Master of Business Administration degree in 12 months, less than the cost of the typical two-year programs in the US. 'And you can escape the Trump years,' he said. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government has stopped short of actively encouraging such efforts, in contrast to the European Union, which recently announced a €500 million ($586 million) plan to lure research scientists after the Trump administration started slashing such funding. In fact, facing political pressure from Nigel Farage's anti-immigration Reform UK party, whose popularity has surged in opinion polls to overtake his own Labour Party, Starmer has been weighing steps that could discourage international enrollment. His government is considering imposing a 6% levy on university income from tuition fees from such students, as well as cutting the amount of time that students can stay in the country after graduating to 18 months from two years. Yet those are fairly small disincentives compared with the steps taken by the Trump administration. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio — who earlier this year moved to expel some foreign students who were engaged in anti-Israel demonstrations — said last month that the government is planning to 'aggressively' rescind the visas of Chinese students who have ties to the Communist Party or are studying in 'critical fields.' He also instructed embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas ahead of the US government's decision to implement stricter reviews of applicants' social-media profiles. Amer Mourad, the London-based chief executive officer of Global Study UK, said that has been particularly worrisome to students in the Middle East. Last month, he was contacted by the mother of an Egyptian student who was trying to make fallback plans, worried the US would block his enrollment due to politically oriented social-media posts. Mourad has recently seen other prospective students from countries in the region switching their focus to UK universities instead of those in the US. 'Clearly there is fear,' he said. Ewen Nemeth, an 18-year-old from Chester, in northwest England, was accepted to Edinburgh and Warwick universities but had planned to take a gap year and apply to Harvard, Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania for the next year. Now, he's opting for a backup plan — taking an offer from Warwick to start this fall at the school in Coventry, about 95 miles northwest of London. He'll avoid the hassle of working on US applications, and skip the uncertainty of heightened visa scrutiny. 'I would have to devote my entire summer to it and then maybe be rejected because of my social media — that's insane to me,' he said. For Americans, interest in the UK had already been on the rise, with US undergraduate applications up 12% by the January deadline for the upcoming academic year. City St. George's, in London, has been among the beneficiaries. Mattias Frey, deputy dean and department head of media, culture and creative industries, said the number of US graduate students applying to its creative writing program more than tripled in 2025 and he's expanding staff to accommodate them. He said the students haven't been directly citing US politics as a driver of their decisions 'but there's something in the air about it.' 'I would call it a safe space that maybe they're not feeling right now in the United States,' he said. McMillan, the Boston admissions consultant, said he's been picking up on that, too. He said roughly half of the Middle Eastern students he has been advising are planning to apply to an English-speaking university outside the US in the next application cycle, a sharp in increase from just one in five in previous years. For his American clients — who were almost always focused on US schools — it has shot up to 15%. 'I expect this number to rise,' he said. Since Trump's return to the White House, McMillan has spent more time researching and visiting campuses in Europe, where his company already has consultants in Italy and France. This month, the 18-person firm hired someone in the UK for the first time, anticipating it will become a more prominent destination. 'There's a real gap between the administration and the vast majority of Americans who value and understand the importance of this intellectual richness that's coming to the US,' McMillan said. 'We're concerned about the brain drain.'
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
To promote Hindi, start with the ‘Hindi belt'
Amid an uproar, the Maharashtra government has withdrawn its decision to make Hindi the default third language in primary schools. Before this, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, West Bengal, and other states, had opposed Hindi imposition. In fact, the only place where Hindi does not seem to get much attention is in the 'Hindi belt'. Even outrage against opposition to Hindi, whether in mainstream media or on social media, is often expressed in bad grammar, terrible spelling, and poorly constructed sentences studded with English words. Hindi deserves to be nurtured. Hindi deserves love. Hindi deserves pride. Yet all it gets is shrill, insecure chauvinism that wants to shove it down other people's throats, instead of nourishing it for its native speakers. Any conversation about Hindi gets dragged into too many pitfalls. Who is a native speaker? Will advancing Hindi mean killing the many dialects that the heartland talks to itself in? And then there is English, whispering promises of mobility, holding the key to many desired doors. Looking at languages in an either/or binary in a country as blessed with diversity as India is bound to be a flawed approach. Hindi cannot be championed by positioning it as an adversary to other languages, or as yet, a competitor to English. Across the Hindi belt, there are far too many people who speak neither Hindi nor English well. Many people above 20 can't count till 100 in Hindi, fewer still can narrate the Hindi alphabet without stuttering. Asked to name the most popular Hindi author in the last 30 years, the most vociferous of the rashtrabhasha brigade would scratch their heads. A good step towards 'restoring Hindi's glory' would be to honestly examine the causes behind the problem, make a reckoning of its effects, and then take non-jingoistic steps to solve it. Not being able to speak any language well is an issue that runs deeper than poor spelling or bad grammar. Language is the muscle of the intellect. Without this tool for articulation, you can neither think nor feel coherently. A lack of comfort in your language cuts you off from the wisdom produced and recorded in it over generations, leaving you adrift. You are robbed of clarity, connection, pride, the essential context that gives you your place in history and the present. And a muddled, insecure head takes readily to chauvinism. The result? Confusion turns easily into rage. Hindi has produced a wealth of literature worth reading, quoting, taking pride in. What organised efforts are made to popularise them in rural and small town schools? The Hindi belt is brimming with stories it wants to tell. Which government is making attempts at recognising and nurturing young talent? In fact, most Hindi speakers would be hard-pressed to name a high-quality translation of even the Ramayana or the Mahabharata in Hindi, which, religious beliefs aside, are superlative works of literature. T-shirts are sold with quotes by Shakespeare or Bob Marley or Descartes. Why has no one had the bright idea to do the same with quotes by Mahadevi Varma, Ramdhari Singh Dinkar, Harivansh Rai Bachchan, made beautifully, universally accessible? So what has led to Hindi's less-than-felicitous position in its heartland? Blaming English alone is the lazy way out. The deeper problem is the lack of secure pride in the language. This could be because for too long, the Hindi-speaker has had to migrate for jobs. It could be because all policies to boost Hindi are misguided, treating some other language — English, Urdu — as the enemy, rather than focusing on Hindi itself. It could be because even today, with all the noise about honouring Hindi, a Hindi or a Hindi-medium graduate would find herself shut out of most jobs. It could be because not enough honest efforts have been made to promote an intellectual discourse in Hindi. Raining death wishes upon English will not help anyone. The Hindi heartland needs jobs and mobility. What needs to be done is acknowledging English as a necessary tool of self-advancement, but delinking it from ideas of superiority or 'coolness'. Policy decisions like making Hindi the primary mode of education, before creating an ecosystem where Hindi speakers will be employable, put the cart before the horse and are bound to fail. Authorities need to work to make Hindi a road to profit, or pride, or ideally both. And start with the Hindi heartland for this. yashee@
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Maharashtra scraps 3-language policy in schools, to form new panel amid backlash over Hindi 'imposition'
Facing strong public backlash, the Maharashtra government has cancelled its order making Hindi the third language in primary schools and will set up a new committee to review the policy. read more Amid public backlash for 'imposing' Hindi, the Maharashtra government on Sunday cancelled its revised order on the three-language policy and announced it will form a new committee to review and rework the plan. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis said the decision was taken at a cabinet meeting after strong opposition to the government's move to introduce Hindi as a third language in primary schools. 'In the cabinet today, we decided to form a committee led by Dr Narendra Jadhav to study how the three-language policy should be implemented. We will act based on the committee's report,' Fadnavis told reporters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'So, we are cancelling both previous orders on the three-language policy. This committee will consult all stakeholders. For us, Marathi remains central,' he added. The controversy began when the Mahayuti government issued an order in April stating that Hindi would be the default third language for Classes 1 to 5 in Marathi and English-medium schools. This was part of implementing the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 at the primary level. Political parties, social groups, and cultural organisations strongly criticised the move. Facing pressure, Fadnavis clarified that Hindi would not be mandatory and that students could choose any regional language as the third language. Earlier this month, the government issued a revised order saying Hindi would 'generally' be taught as the third language. However, the order allowed schools to offer another Indian language if at least 20 students in a class opted for it. Schools could appoint a teacher or provide online classes for those subjects. Despite the changes, criticism continued, with opposition parties and activists accusing the government of favouring Hindi at the expense of regional languages and cultural diversity. The Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), led by Raj Thackeray, led protests against the policy, urging Marathi speakers to take to the streets. The opposition grew so strong that Raj Thackeray decided to join forces with his cousin, Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray, to lead a joint protest in Mumbai against the 'imposition of Hindi.'
