
What Happens When Washington Cuts Workforce Development? Ask New York
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Though the FY2026 budget isn't final, the newly signed One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has already triggered devastating disinvestment in New York's workforce and economic stability.
Rather than supporting cities in their efforts to build inclusive economic growth, Congress and President Donald Trump have advanced sweeping cuts through OBBBA, eliminating Job Corps (temporarily blocked by the courts), slashing the Department of Labor's budget by 35 percent, and gutting Medicaid.
The timing could not be more harmful. Our city and state are making investments in green infrastructure, clean energy, life sciences, and housing. But Washington is pulling critical support from under us. The policies enacted in OBBBA undermine our ability to train workers, support economic mobility, and care for vulnerable communities.
President Donald Trump answers questions while departing the White House on July 11, 2025, in Washington, D.C.
President Donald Trump answers questions while departing the White House on July 11, 2025, in Washington, D.C.Nationally, the law cuts $715 billion from Medicaid and ACA programs. In New York, over 6.9 million residents rely on Medicaid, including 2.1 million adults through ACA expansion. Hospital reimbursements will shrink. Safety-net providers already operating on razor-thin margins will be pushed to the brink. In New York City, over 1.5 million residents could see a drop in access to care, just as our health care system is still recovering from the pandemic.
OBBBA also strips federal support from New York's Essential Plan, which covers 725,000 lawfully present immigrants. Unless New York finds $4 billion annually, coverage losses will follow, disproportionately affecting working adults who keep the city running.
And then there's Job Corps. For decades, Job Corps has helped out-of-school youth—especially youth of color—enter the workforce. In New York City, where income inequality remains among the highest in the nation, it's been a pillar of inclusive opportunity. Its elimination would leave thousands of young New Yorkers without a foothold in the economy.
New Medicaid work requirements would add red tape with little benefit. Adults aged 18–64 must repeatedly verify employment or exemptions. Up to 1.5 million New Yorkers risk losing coverage, not for failing to work, but for failing to navigate bureaucracy.
This provision will overwhelm a municipal workforce that has seen hiring freezes and attrition, particularly in frontline human services and child care administration. Who will support these recipients when the system demands more documentation but offers no added staff? New York City's public assistance infrastructure—especially TANF and subsidized child care—is already strained by backlogs and delays. These new mandates will push it to the breaking point.
Families are losing access to both income support and the services that make work possible, like child care, job placement, and case management. This is disinvestment in America's future, and in New York's.
SNAP, Medicaid, and workforce development are economic drivers. SNAP alone injects $7.8 billion into New York's economy annually. Workforce training reduces dependency on public benefits, strengthens small business growth, and boosts tax revenue. In New York City, Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA)-funded career centers, youth employment contracts, and pre-apprenticeship pipelines are already being destabilized by the cuts enacted in OBBBA.
New York has long been a model for inclusive economic growth and smart workforce investments. But no amount of local innovation can offset a $715 billion federal retreat from health care or the gutting of job training infrastructure.
What's equally alarming is the absence of a coordinated, targeted response from City Hall and Albany. There has been no unified strategy to protect the infrastructure of opportunity that so many New Yorkers rely on. A hollowed-out municipal workforce cannot respond effectively. Meanwhile, community-based organizations are once again left to absorb the shock, expected to do more with less, even as they face chronic delays in city payments and no assurances of sustained funding. Instead of mobilizing to mitigate the damage, local leadership has offered silence, short-term patches, or fragmented efforts that fail to meet the moment.
At the same time, we find ourselves jousting over mayoral frontrunners and watching the early moves of gubernatorial politicking, while too many New Yorkers are reeling from the dismantling of the middle class, the disappearance of middle-wage jobs, and the erosion of public systems. The disconnect between political theater and lived reality is widening. Debates over who wins the next election will mean little if there's no workforce left to train, no safety net left to rebuild, and no path forward for the people who keep our city running.
Congress must be held accountable, and New York's delegation must be unified, visible, and vocal. These cuts are direct threats to job seekers in East New York, to immigrant families in Queens, to union apprentices in the South Bronx, and to working parents in Buffalo and Rochester who rely on Medicaid to stay healthy enough to work.
Let us not confuse austerity with a strategic approach. Investing in people is not charity. It is how economies grow.
Gregory J. Morris is CEO of the NYC Employment and Training Coalition.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Brace Yourself': Stephen Colbert Spots Trump Moment That Quickly 'Went Off The Rails'
'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert on Wednesday said President Donald Trump's event a day earlier 'went off the rails pretty darn quick.' Trump was supposed to discuss new investments in AI and energy, but then derailed himself with a long, strange ramble about his uncle, John Trump, who was a professor at MIT. The president boasted that his uncle was 'one of the great professors, 51 years, whatever, longest-serving professor in the history of MIT, three degrees in nuclear, chemical, and math.' 'Brace yourself,' Colbert warned his audience after playing the clip. 'None of that was true.' Trump's uncle was not the longest-serving professor at MIT. He had one degree, not three, and it was in electrical engineering not 'nuclear, chemical, and math.' Trump also said his uncle taught Ted Kaczynski, the 'Unabomber' terrorist who killed people via mail bombs. The president told a whole story about asking his uncle what kind of student Kaczynski was. His uncle, Trump claimed, told him that the future Unabomber was 'seriously good' and would correct the other students' work. 'None of that is true either,' Colbert said. Kaczynski went to Harvard, not MIT. 'Even more insane,' Colbert said, Trump's uncle died more than a decade before Kaczynski was ID'ed and arrested. 'So why on Earth would Trump have asked his uncle about him?' Colbert wondered, then broke out his impression of the president to envision how it might have happened. 'Hey, Uncle John, Uncle Professor Dr. John Trump, professor, sir, uncle. You know that random guy who isn't famous at all and lives in the woods and machines his own screws?' Colbert asked in his Trump voice. 'What was it like when you didn't teach him?' See more in his Wednesday night monologue:

13 minutes ago
Trump administration pulls $4B in federal funding for California's bullet train project
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The Trump administration revoked federal funding for California's high-speed rail project on Wednesday, intensifying uncertainty about how the state will make good on its long-delayed promise of building a bullet train to shuttle riders between San Francisco and Los Angeles. The U.S. Transportation Department announced it was pulling back $4 billion in funding for the project, weeks after signaling it would do so. Overall, a little less than a quarter of the project's funding has come from the federal government. The rest has come from the state, mainly through a voter-approved bond and money from its cap-and-trade program. President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy both have slammed the project as a 'train to nowhere." 'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.' The loss marks the latest blow to California by the Trump administration, which has blocked a first-in-the-nation rule to phase out the sale of new gas-powered cars, launched investigations into university admission policies and threatened to pull funding over transgender girls being allowed to compete in girls sports. It also comes as rail project leaders are seeking private investment to help pay for its estimated price tag of more than $100 billion. Voters first approved the project in 2008 and it was supposed to be operating this decade. But cost estimates have consistently grown and its timeline pushed back. State officials are now focused on building a 119-mile (192-kilometer) stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced that is set to be operating by 2033. The California High Speed Rail Authority is slated to release a report this summer to state lawmakers with an updated funding plan and timeline for the project. Authority officials wrote in a letter earlier this month that the Trump administration made up its mind about revoking funding before thoroughly reviewing the project. They noted that more than 50 structures have already been built, including underpasses, viaducts and bridges to separate the rail line from roadways for safety. 'Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong — it's illegal,' authority CEO Ian Choudri said in a statement Wednesday. 'These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025." The authority has asked potential private investors to express their interest by the end of the month. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will keep 'all options on the table' to fight the revocation of federal funds. 'Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him," he said in a statement. The state has 'no viable plan' to complete even the Central Valley segment, said Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the transportation department's Federal Railroad Administration, in a report released last month. He called the project a 'story of broken promises' and a waste of taxpayer dollars. California Democrats also have criticized project spending. Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan said at a budget hearing earlier this year that her constituents 'overwhelmingly believe' high-speed rail spending 'has been irresponsible.' Newsom plans to extend the state's cap-and-trade program, a key funding source for the project which is set to expire at the end of 2030, through 2045. The program sets a declining limit on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions large emitters can release. Those polluters can buy allowances from the state needed to pollute, and about 45% of that money goes into what's known as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, according to the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, a group of experts that reviews the program. The fund helps pay for climate and transportation projects, including high-speed rail. The bullet train project receives 25% of the money from the fund, which ends up being a little less or a little more than $1 billion annually, depending on the year. Newsom in May proposed guaranteeing $1 billion a year for the project from the fund, but lawmakers have not agreed to that.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump slams ‘past supporters' over fixation on Epstein
President Trump on Wednesday admonished and sought to distance himself from supporters who have pressed for more information about documents related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. In a lengthy Truth Social post, Trump dismissed the uproar over the Epstein files as a 'scam' perpetuated by Democrats and suggested he no longer welcomed his backers who have called for more transparency around the documents. 'Their new SCAM is what we will forever call the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax, and my PAST supporters have bought into this 'bulls‑‑‑,' hook, line, and sinker,' Trump posted. 'They haven't learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years. 'I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax,' Trump continued. 'Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats work, don't even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don't want their support anymore!' A number of prominent Trump supporters, including members of Congress, have called for the administration to release more information around the Epstein files. Far-right activist Laura Loomer and Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), two staunch Trump allies, are among those who have called for a special counsel to look into the matter. Trump supporters, including some now serving in his administration, have for years espoused conspiracy theories around Epstein's death and suggested the government was covering up information for nefarious reasons. But Trump has in recent days appeared exasperated by the fixation on Epstein. 'I don't understand it, why they would be so interested,' Trump said Tuesday. 'He's been dead for a long time. He was never a big factor in terms of life. I don't understand what the interest and what the fascination is. I really don't. And the credible information has been given.' The Justice Department and FBI issued a joint memo last week that stated Epstein did not have a client list and confirmed he died by suicide in his New York City jail cell in 2019. The findings incensed members of the MAGA movement, who have for years pushed conspiracy theories about Epstein's death and claims that prominent Democrats would be named on a client list. Epstein, accused in several cases of sex trafficking young girls, ran in high-powered circles with figures that included Trump, former President Clinton, Britain's Prince Andrew and a number of other celebrities and ultrawealthy individuals. Epstein's associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, has been convicted of sex trafficking. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.