Why the new Jeremy Corbyn party is a problem for the SNP
Jeremy Corbyn is going to formalise his "Independent Alliance" of MPs and, alongside Zarah Sultana, work on a new party on the left of British politics.
It's a big move. Polling tells us that such a party could cost Labour up to 10% of their vote. Corbyn, nearly six years after announcing he'd quit as Labour leader, still has significant influence over and pull among UK leftists.
With widespread anger over how the Labour Government has handled issues like Gaza, disability cuts, the two-child cap, Waspi women, and NHS England reform – all part of the party's general move rightwards under Keir Starmer and Morgan McSweeney – it seems likely that disenfranchised left-leaning folks could be won over by a new outfit.
But what it means for Scotland is especially interesting.
Recent polling tells us that Scottish independence is supported by at least half of the population. At the same time, the link between independence support and SNP voting intention is broken. The SNP are polling in the low 30s, struggling to regain the highs of three years ago despite this shambolic Labour Government limping along from week to week.
We've seen from a number of elections now that the SNP voters are just not that motivated to get out and vote. Different people I speak to inside the party and out offer various explanations. Operation Branchform removed trust, John Swinney isn't enthusing the electorate, there's a lack of vision being put forward, disappointment over the SNP going quiet on Gaza, and, most commonly, independence isn't on the agenda.
We know basically nothing about Corbyn and Sultana's new party. We don't know its name or who it will entice into its fold. However, thanks to Govanhill-based poet and writer Jim Monaghan, we know there is a "Scottish secretariat" – basically a working group looking at how to set up this new project north of the Border. According to Jim, Corbyn's policy will be that he wouldn't stand in the way of independence, and members and representatives would be free to advocate for a Yes vote should they wish.
READ MORE: LIVE: Palestine Action in court to challenge UK Government's terrorist ban
Looking ahead, I think this poses a new challenge for the SNP – and the Scottish Greens – particularly with young Scots who are outraged by what they have seen play out in Palestine.
I am 27. I have friends and peers from various backgrounds, but many of them not really political. They care deeply about Gaza and are, to say the least, absolutely infuriated that the UK establishment hasn't done more to stop Israel's actions. The message from Corbyn and Sultana is one that resonates. Angus Robertson's meeting with the Israeli ambassador (which we still don't have meeting notes for) does not.
Young Scots are also extremely concerned about climate change and how it will impact their futures. Seeing the SNP move increasingly towards a pro-oil position, after years of Nicola Sturgeon pledging no new drilling, does not impress.
The SNP have lost some support to the Greens, while other supporters have given up on the whole democratic system altogether. While I wouldn't want to predict the fortunes of a new party I'm currently fairly in the dark about, it wouldn't be unreasonable to think Corbyn and Sultana's apparently indyref-friendly, pro-Palestine, climate-conscious outfit could pose a new threat to Swinney's ailing team. Especially when they don't have concrete proposals for delivering independence for Scotland.
READ MORE: Reform UK lose two council by-elections in England
As Labour leader, Corbyn's plans for England always sounded familiar. Free tuition fees, free prescriptions, nationalised water and rail, etc ... that's just SNP policy. What was presented in the English tabloids as radical, extreme, 1970s socialism, is already in place north of the Border. The long-serving MP has been criticised for failing to acknowledge that – and like most London-based leftists is often accused of "not understanding Scotland". With those in charge of Corbyn's project largely within the confines of the M25, this could be a major hurdle for them to overcome in courting Scottish voters.
Whatever happens, we've already seen how the British media is going to treat this new party. On social media last night you could hear the guffawing of the Westminster reporters as rumours emerged that Corbyn wasn't happy with how Sultana announced the move. This out-of-touch, smug attitude from those at the top of the media food chain is exactly what will propel people towards an alternative party like this.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
8 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Laura Anne Jones MS on defecting from Tories to Reform UK
Even when things have gone on too long, it's hard to leave, because there are still nice moments. When I decided to leave the Conservative Party, it was a plaster I knew I had to rip off. I had been a loyal member for 31 years. I had stuck by it through all its ups and downs. I'd won seats, helped win seats, lost seats, lost elections, but not for a moment did I consider leaving. Even when it became a party that I no longer recognised, I held onto my love for the members and the activists, and some brilliant colleagues whom I will always admire greatly. Many of them are steadfast in their traditional values and formed my political family that had given me the honour to represent them and where I live. But the fact is, many now feel that the Conservative Party has left them, much in the same way as it left me. It was time to face facts. The party that I had fallen in love with had changed beyond recognition, in thought, in word and deed. It was no longer listening to or respecting its members. Reform is the only party that now represents decent, hard-working people, with traditional, patriotic values. People who love their country and are as devastated as I am at the erosion of our beautiful country and its values, faith and traditions. Now, many in Wales and the UK are now turning to Reform. In Wales, the Labour Welsh Government can't define a woman and has refused to act on the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. They have wasted taxpayers' money on the most egregious ideological projects like 20mph speed limits, tree-planting schemes in Africa, and a collection of unused overseas Welsh Government offices across the globe, despite foreign affairs not being devolved. With a cost-of-living crisis biting and with people in abject poverty in some of our communities, this is unjustifiable. I believe Reform is the only party committed to driving that waste out of government, putting the cash back into our frontline services, into health, education and into opening Wales back up for business. Our farmers are being sold down the river by a Welsh Government who are obsessed with tree-planting targets, instead of supporting our agricultural food-producing sector to create a sustainable Wales. They have been failed, and they need to once again be listened to and valued, for the invaluable role that they play in our country's fabric. In Wales, we have the worst educational outcomes, the worst health statistics, with the longest waits in the UK - with waiting lists under Welsh Labour on the rise again! Our economy, our pensioners, our farmers, and our most vulnerable keep getting a battering and immigration is out of control. Things cannot carry on in this direction. Real change in Wales is long overdue. There is so much to undo and put right, and Reform is the only party able to stop Labour and Plaid getting into bed together once again, which is inevitable, and taking our beautiful country into decline again. It's time to not be restrained by party politics, to find the real solutions to our problems here in Wales. I cannot wait to play my small part in that, in Reform, fighting for my constituents, my region and for my beloved Wales, and take people along with me. With Reform, I truly feel that I am now part of the solution, not the problem. Come and join us. It's time to make the Welsh Dragon roar again! Laura Anne Jones is Senedd member of Wales South East.
The Herald Scotland
9 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Colbert cancellation: Jay Leno blasts politics in late-night TV
"I like to think that people come to a comedy show to kind of get away from the things, the pressures of life, wherever it might be," Leno said. "And I love political humor, don't get me wrong, but what happens (is) people wind up cozying too much to one side or the other. "Why shoot for just half an audience, why not try to get the whole (audience)?" he posed. Colbert's cancellation: A ratings crisis or a political bribe? We investigate While the interview, published July 22, appears to have taken place prior to the cancellation of CBS' "Late Show" with Stephen Colbert, his comments venture into an ongoing debate about the salience of a late-night lineup amid the Trump administration. Colbert, a frequent critic of President Donald Trump, announced the cancellation of not just his hosting gig, but also the network's late-night show, earlier this month. A successor to David Letterman, Colbert belongs to a class of comedians, including Jon Stewart and John Oliver, who've leaned heavily on political satire to draw laughs from their audience. Notably, though, even less politically-minded comics like Jimmy Fallon, who replaced Leno, and Jimmy Kimmel have opted for sharper critiques of the current president. Leno was off the air before Trump's first successful run for president in 2016, and served as host during the Obama, Clinton and both Bush presidencies from 1992 to 2009 and then again from 2010 to 2014. "I like to bring people into the big picture," Leno added in the interview. "I don't understand why you would alienate one particular group." "I'm not saying you have to throw your support or whatever, but just do what's funny," he said. "I don't think anybody wants to hear a lecture." Colbert's cancellation sent shock waves through the late-night comedy circuit and beyond, even drawing calls from some legislators for an investigation into CBS parent company Paramount's decision to axe the program. Paramount has maintained that the reason for Colbert's cancellation was financial. In a statement sent to USA TODAY previously, executives lauded the comedy host for his tenure and insisted that he was irreplaceable. Citing "a challenging backdrop in late night," the company said the cancellation was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount." Piers Morgan blasts Colbert, politicization of late-night Elsewhere, conservative commentator and British television host Piers Morgan in a post to X called Colbert's seeming left-wing tilt "damning." "Most of America's biggest late-night hosts have become nothing more than hyper-partisan activist hacks for the Democrats - a party that's rarely been more unpopular," Morgan wrote alongside a photo of the New York Post front page announcing the show's cancellation. "No wonder Colbert got canned," he added. Ahead of Colbert's cancellation, Paramount settled a defamation lawsuit with the president, a move viewed by some as a peace offering meant to improve the chances of a merger with Skydance Media before the FCC. The merger has since been approved.
The Herald Scotland
9 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotland trip shows Trump's mental decline in real time
Trump's head, based on his overseas babbling, is 90% conspiracy theories and 10% brain cells. Coverage of Trump's Scotland trip doesn't show the extent of his rambling The trip was largely a taxpayer-funded chance for the grifter in chief to promote his Scottish golf properties, which in the realm of "things Trump can do that no other president would ever get away with" barely registers as a blip. It was also a chance for him to talk "deals" with the European Union and the United Kingdom, with a "deal" being something resulting in trade tariffs that will negatively impact American consumers. Or as Trump likes to call it, "Winning." Opinion: MAGA is realizing Trump lies. How can they trust anything he says on Epstein? News coverage tends to trim Trump's voluminous prattling into digestible sound bites that sound vaguely sane. But if we care about a president's lack of mental acuity - and I've been told by many that we do - it's worth sticking your head in the high-pressure stream of nonsense that shoots out every time Trump opens his face hole. Trump shows he's laser-focused on the scourge of windmills On July 25, Trump deplaned in Scotland and immediately showed reporters he was armed with weapons-grade non sequiturs. "This immigration is killing Europe," he said, racistly. "And the other thing, stop the windmills killing the beauty of your countries." Two days later, he sat with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, who looked like she would love to be elsewhere, and uncorked this: "And the other thing I say to Europe, we will not allow a windmill to be built in the United States, they're killing us. They're killing the beauty of our scenery, our valleys, our beautiful plains. And I'm not talking about airplanes, I'm talking about beautiful plains, beautiful areas of the United States, and you look up and you see windmills all over the place, it's a horrible thing. It's the most expensive form of energy; it's no good. They're made in China, almost all of them. When they start to rust and rot in eight years, you can't really turn them off, you can't bury them, they won't let you. But the propellers, the props, because they're a certain type of fiber that doesn't go well with the land, that's what they say. The environmentalists say you can't bury them because the fiber doesn't go well with the land; in other words, if you bury it, it will harm our soil. The whole thing is a con job." OK. That was a thing nobody asked for. It's also filled with lies - wind isn't the most expensive form of energy, and windmills last far longer than eight years. But who would expect honesty from someone rambling like that? Again with the windmills? Heck, just let the old man cook. And Trump wasn't done with windmills. On July 28, during his meeting with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the president said: "It destroys the beauty of your fields, your plains, and your waterways, and look out there - there's no windmills. But if you look in another direction, you see windmills." Are the windmills in the room with us right now, Mr. President? Propose prosecuting Beyonce? Check! Babble incoherently? Check! Trump did take a break from talking crazy over the weekend to post something crazy on social media, writing July 26 that pop star Beyonce should be prosecuted for a nonexistent $11 million payment from Kamala Harris' presidential campaign. So that happened. And it's not ideal. On July 27, alongside von der Leyen, Trump was asked how he feels about the images of starving children in Gaza, to which he said: "That whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know, was given many years ago, said that they could have peace. That didn't work out too well. When Israel gave that up, whoever was the prime minister at the time, who I know, who it was, but it was not exactly a very clever thing to do. Because that was given so that they finally have peace, but it's actually made the situation worse. But we'll see what happens. I think Iran is acting up. We have a lot of people acting, we have Venezuela acting up in a different way. They continue to send people that we rebuff to our border. They continue to send drugs into our country, Venezuela. They've been very nasty." Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So when shown images of starving children in Gaza, Trump feels the place is a mess because an Israeli prime minister whose name he DEFINITELY knows but isn't going to say gave up the Gaza Strip so there could be peace but that made things worse and Iran is acting up and, hey, let me tell you about Venezuela, which is about 7,000 miles away from Gaza. Opinion: Trump is unpopular, polls show, and he's building an America most Americans hate Republicans would have impeached Biden if he talked like Trump Had Joe Biden said something like that when he was president, Republicans would have either impeached him or ordered him locked in a room at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. It got worse when Trump was asked if Israel should be doing more to allow food into Gaza to help the aforementioned starving children. The president's few remaining brain cells decided to focus on how ungrateful all those starving people are: "We gave $60 million two weeks ago, and nobody even acknowledged it, for food. It's terrible, you know, you really at least want to have somebody say thank you. No other country gave anything; we gave $60 million two weeks ago for food for Gaza. Nobody acknowledged it, nobody talks about it. And it makes you feel a little bad when you do that, and you have other countries not giving anything, none of the European countries, by the way, nobody gave but us, and nobody said, 'Gee, thank you very much,' and it would be nice to have at least a thank you." During his meeting with Starmer, Trump apparently forgot he had been talking about the Gaza Strip the day before and said: "We do have to take care of the humanitarian needs on what they used to call the Gaza Strip. You don't hear that line too much anymore. You don't hear the Gaza Strip. But it is the Gaza Strip. Amazing." Yes. Amazing. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein. Trump can't stop talking about the scandal. Trump's mental dullness led him to keep talking about the Epstein scandal he wants everyone to stop talking about, effectively telling the world the Epstein stuff is "not a big thing," but probably involves former Democratic President Bill Clinton and a former president of Harvard University and "hedge fund guys" and was probably made up by Democrats who probably put fake stuff in the Epstein files but then, I guess, didn't use any damning information against Trump before the election. He also gave a third explanation for why he stopped being friends with Epstein and said of the convicted sex offender's notorious island: "I never had the privilege of going to his island." The privilege? Spoken like a man whose mind has turned to mush. So nice of Trump to share his cognitive decline with the world. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
