Colbert cancellation: Jay Leno blasts politics in late-night TV
"Why shoot for just half an audience, why not try to get the whole (audience)?" he posed.
Colbert's cancellation: A ratings crisis or a political bribe? We investigate
While the interview, published July 22, appears to have taken place prior to the cancellation of CBS' "Late Show" with Stephen Colbert, his comments venture into an ongoing debate about the salience of a late-night lineup amid the Trump administration.
Colbert, a frequent critic of President Donald Trump, announced the cancellation of not just his hosting gig, but also the network's late-night show, earlier this month. A successor to David Letterman, Colbert belongs to a class of comedians, including Jon Stewart and John Oliver, who've leaned heavily on political satire to draw laughs from their audience.
Notably, though, even less politically-minded comics like Jimmy Fallon, who replaced Leno, and Jimmy Kimmel have opted for sharper critiques of the current president. Leno was off the air before Trump's first successful run for president in 2016, and served as host during the Obama, Clinton and both Bush presidencies from 1992 to 2009 and then again from 2010 to 2014.
"I like to bring people into the big picture," Leno added in the interview. "I don't understand why you would alienate one particular group."
"I'm not saying you have to throw your support or whatever, but just do what's funny," he said. "I don't think anybody wants to hear a lecture."
Colbert's cancellation sent shock waves through the late-night comedy circuit and beyond, even drawing calls from some legislators for an investigation into CBS parent company Paramount's decision to axe the program.
Paramount has maintained that the reason for Colbert's cancellation was financial. In a statement sent to USA TODAY previously, executives lauded the comedy host for his tenure and insisted that he was irreplaceable.
Citing "a challenging backdrop in late night," the company said the cancellation was "not related in any way to the show's performance, content, or other matters happening at Paramount."
Piers Morgan blasts Colbert, politicization of late-night
Elsewhere, conservative commentator and British television host Piers Morgan in a post to X called Colbert's seeming left-wing tilt "damning."
"Most of America's biggest late-night hosts have become nothing more than hyper-partisan activist hacks for the Democrats - a party that's rarely been more unpopular," Morgan wrote alongside a photo of the New York Post front page announcing the show's cancellation.
"No wonder Colbert got canned," he added.
Ahead of Colbert's cancellation, Paramount settled a defamation lawsuit with the president, a move viewed by some as a peace offering meant to improve the chances of a merger with Skydance Media before the FCC. The merger has since been approved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
43 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party
Photo byandWhen Kemi Badenoch became leader of the Conservative Party, she very sensibly aimed not to rush into early statements of detailed policy. Unfortunately, her appointment of Priti Patel as shadow foreign secretary was its own statement. Following her unauthorised 2017 trip to Israel while secretary for international development, Patel has been a disgraced figure. While there, accompanied by the peer Stuart Polak of the Conservative Friends of Israel, she met the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu without UK government officials or the British ambassador. Afterwards, she advocated a change in UK policy which, in breach of long-established humanitarian practice, would have included the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) in its aid delivery. This episode could not have been a starker example of impropriety. It merited her dismissal but Theresa May was too weak to wield the axe. Instead, Patel was allowed to resign. And yet, Badenoch saw fit to appoint her to the shadow cabinet. Patel is now in a position to perpetuate her views at a critical moment in world events. Badenoch has shown no indication of knowing anything about Israel and Palestine, and has not made any profound statements on this, the one foreign issue, other than Ukraine, that has dominated global news since she was elected. All she utters is uncritical support for Israel. The Conservative Party used to have a world-view. It supported enlightened international cooperation, and institutions such as the UN along with its accompanying treaties, rules and conventions. More broadly, it was the UK that pledged to support a homeland for the Jewish people, and a future for the Palestinians next door. To their shame, while successive governments have forever delayed implementing that commitment, the Israelis each and every day have violently stolen ever more Palestinian land. Palestine is the only populous legally undisputed land in the world not allowed to call itself a state. It does not belong to Israel, and Israel's determination to annex it does not mean it is disputed. The illegality of Israeli encroachment is cast-iron in international law, a belief that has been the policy of Conservative and Labour governments for decades. Badenoch, however, seems to share the view of those like Patel who do not believe in their own policy. They can never bring themselves to say explicitly that settlements are illegal. The charge sheet against Israel is growing every day: disproportionate force, indiscriminate bombing, mass displacement, food deprivation, the replacement of the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA with mercenaries, the killing of tens of Palestinians each day as they desperately scramble for food, state-backed support for settler terrorists, and the banning of journalists from Gaza. Badenoch and her front bench have done nothing to condemn any of it. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Jonathan Sumption on Israel and Gaza: A question of intent] Amid all this, Priti Patel has refused in the Commons to condemn settler violence – all she would say was that settlers are a barrier to a two-state solution. And when extremist Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir were sanctioned in June, she declined in her response even to mention their names. The likes of Suella Braverman, meanwhile, have branded pro-Palestine demonstrations 'hate marches'. Contemptibly, any pro-Palestinian voice within the Conservative Party is almost systematically accused of anti-Semitism and put into its complaints procedure, which silences and bullies. And as Michael Gove increases his hold on appointments to the leader's office, what could be more warped than his recent recommendation that the IDF be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? It has now reached the point where Conservative comment has become so extreme it has discredited their entire foreign policy and is making them despised more widely. The party is increasingly becoming defined by its lack of humanity. The world is watching the extermination of an entire country. Palestine is being annihilated. Meanwhile the Conservative Party is covering itself in shame, and will stand no chance of re-election unless it states a clear policy based on international law, and promotes the UK's historic understanding of the region. This issue is and always has been about land. Israel's extremist government has only one objective, and that is to make all of Palestine theirs. All other talk, horrendous though the facts may be, is second to that. As leader, Kemi Badenoch could redeem herself speedily by stating loudly what all should be saying to Israel: 'Get out of Palestine, it isn't your country.' [See also: Keir Starmer alienates left and right on Gaza] Related
Time Out
an hour ago
- Time Out
One of Sydney's best rooftop bars is turning 10 – and they're celebrating with Vegemite-laced cocktails
A British-Australian engineer, Henry Deane was responsible for converting Sydney's original horse-drawn and steam-powered trams to electric power in the 1890s. It's also the name of the classy cocktail lounge perched above the Millers Point pub, Hotel Palisade – named in honour of Deane's whopping big contribution to Sydney. You can really appreciate the beauty of our Harbour City from the top floor of this rooftop bar. It's got the kind of views that make you feel proud as punch to live here – spanning the Harbour Bridge, city skyline, the beginnings of the Parramatta River and even Barangaroo below. And while Mr Deane lives on in the history books, we reckon this would've been one of his favourite spots for a cold one, too. As Time Out's Editor in Chief Alice Ellis said in her five-star review, 'Henry Deane cocktail lounge may just sit atop an old Sydney pub, but an afternoon spent there will have you feeling on top of the whole world.' This year, the swish cocktail bar turns ten – and to celebrate, the team has launched a fresh food and cocktail menu, complete with Vegemite-laced tipples. Classic cocktails are available – and they're done well, too. But why not try the Miss Marshie – made with Ketel One vodka, toasted marshmallow, fizz and pineapple foam – it's fancy and a little bit sweet. For something that tastes like a holiday, go for the Circa 1915, featuring Hotel Palisade Portside gin, coconut, mandarin and makrut lime. Feeling brave? Try the Home Slice, a grown-up riff on an Aussie breakfast staple, made with sourdough bread-soaked vodka, verjuice, charcoal-activated vanilla syrup and Vegemite. It's subtle, elegant and well-balanced. The share-style food menu changes with the seasons – but you can always count on it complementing the cocktails. Kick things off with a finger-like golden potato hash topped with a squiggle of abalone sauce and finished with smoked pork dust. Fresh chopped prawns come with a butter bean dip, fermented honey and a hint of chilli; and marinated grilled chicken is paired with a punchy green sauce and preserved lemon. Next time you've got a friend visiting from Melbourne, or you wanna score a brownie point or two on a first date, head up to the rooftop and order a cocktail at Henry Deane. Promise they're anything but watery. Find out more here. These are the best rooftop bars in Sydney.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Texas governor threatens arrest of Democrats absent at Monday redistricting vote
AUSTIN, Texas, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Texas Governor Greg Abbott threatened on Monday to arrest Democratic lawmakers who are using their collective absence from the state capital to prevent the legislature from adopting a Republican-backed plan for redrawing Texas congressional districts. The exodus of more than 50 Democrats from the Texas legislature staging a kind of temporary political exile in Democratic-led states was intended to deny Republicans in Austin the quorum necessary to vote on the redistricting plan, championed by President Donald Trump. By redrawing district lines in hopes of flipping some seats in the U.S. House of Representatives currently held by Democrats, the Republican Party aims to protect its narrow majority in next year's congressional midterm elections. Trump has told reporters he expects the effort to yield as many as five additional House Republicans. During Monday's statehouse session in Austin, the Republican speaker of the Texas House of Representatives issued civil warrants for the wayward Democrats - most of whom have gone to Illinois, New York or Massachusetts - to be brought back to Austin. "To ensure compliance, I ordered the Texas Department of Public Safety to locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans," Abbott said in a statement. But the warrants apply only within the state, and breaking quorum is not a crime that would allow Texas authorities to pursue extradition from other states. On Sunday, Abbott cited an opinion by the state's attorney general that Texas district courts may determine whether legislators have forfeited their offices "due to abandonment," saying that would empower him to "swiftly fill vacancies." But even if Abbott succeeded in ousting the absent Democrats, it would take time to hold new elections. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told Fox News on Monday that he expected the Texas Supreme Court to ultimately weigh in on any abandonment cases he files. "And they're obviously a Republican court," he added. In another possible tactic, Abbott said any lawmaker who solicited funds to pay the $500-per-day fine that Texas House rules impose on absent legislators could violate bribery laws. He vowed to try extraditing any "potential out-of-state felons." Adding to the dynamics of the standoff, California Governor Gavin Newsom said he and his state's Democratic-led legislature were ready to "fight fire with fire" against Trump's Texas redistricting maneuver. He said California Democrats were preparing a rare mid-decade congressional redistricting plan of their own that he said could offset any gains Republicans might hope to achieve by redrawing Texas maps. But Newsom said the California plan, assuming it musters the required support of two-thirds of the state legislature, would carry a "trigger" to place it on the November 2026 ballot for voter approval only if Texas moves forward with its plan. Countering Abbott's assertions that Texas Democrats were shirking their duties, Newsom accused Trump and the Republicans of gaming the political system. "These folks don't play by the rules. If they can't win playing the game with the existing set of rules, they'll change the rules. That's what Donald Trump has done," Newsom said. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House, with four vacancies. A stronger Republican majority in the U.S. House would enable Trump to further advance his agenda. The special session in Texas - also called to address flood prevention and relief - was due to reconvene on Tuesday afternoon. Democrats have threatened to stay out of state until the end of the 30-day special session, which began July 21. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas House Democratic Caucus, said the current congressional districts in Texas already dilute the voting power of racial minorities in the state, and the new redistricting plan represented "turbocharged racism." Abbott in a Monday morning appearance on Fox News, called Wu's accusation "bogus," saying redistricting would create more Hispanic-majority districts. He argued it also was necessary to give Trump voters in Democrat-majority districts the ability to elect Republicans. A White House official told Reuters that Trump supports Abbott's threat to remove absent Democratic lawmakers and wants "whatever is necessary" done to get the new map passed. States are required to redistrict every 10 years based on the U.S. Census, but the current Texas map was passed just four years ago by the Republican-led legislature. Mid-cycle redistricting is usually prompted by a change of party control. Under Texas' current lines, Republicans control 25 out of 38 congressional seats, nearly two-thirds of the districts in a state that went for Trump last year by a 56% to 42% margin. Texas Democratic lawmakers have previously tried the strategy of leaving the state to block a redistricting plan. Some fled in 2021 in a bid to deny Abbott the quorum needed to pass a voting restriction measure. That bill passed after three lawmakers returned, saying they had achieved their goal of bringing national attention to the issue.
