logo
Italy's MPS focused on Mediobanca deal, CEO says after UniCredit drops BPM bid

Italy's MPS focused on Mediobanca deal, CEO says after UniCredit drops BPM bid

Reuters6 days ago
MILAN, July 24 (Reuters) - Italy's Monte dei Paschi (BMPS.MI), opens new tab is focused on its takeover offer for Mediobanca (MDBI.MI), opens new tab, its chief executive said on Thursday, adding further deals would be something the state-backed bank could consider only in the future.
In a television interview with Class CNBC, Monte dei Paschi (MPS) CEO Luigi Lovaglio was asked about the implications for MPS of UniCredit (CRDI.MI), opens new tab ditching its buyout offer for Banco BPM (BAMI.MI), opens new tab.
Banco BPM acquired a stake in MPS in November, just before UniCredit's swoop. It has long been seen as the government's favourite merger partner for MPS.
UniCredit's withdrawal has revived speculation about a BPM-MPS tie-up becoming a possibility.
"We are focused on the Mediobanca deal," Lovaglio said when asked if he had spoken to Banco BPM CEO Giuseppe Castagna after UniCredit's decision to abandon the bid.
Lovaglio reiterated his view that the combination with Mediobanca would give MPS a scale that would allow the Tuscan bank to take part in a second round of consolidation that Lovaglio sees taking place in a couple of years.
"Once we close this deal we'll have excess capital which one can use either for a deal or to give it back to shareholders, we'll assess it then," he said.
He also ruled out an improvement of the price of the Mediobanca bid.
"The price offered is fair if you take into account the current valuation of the two companies and the fact that after the deal there will certainly be a major re-rating," Lovaglio said.
He expressed confidence that take-up of the bid would reach the targeted threshold of 66.7%, even though MPS set the minimum threshold at 35%, which it considers sufficient to control the rival.
Mediobanca this month renewed its opposition to the takeover offer, saying the price was "totally inadequate" and around a third lower than what the bank's board deemed fair.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Made in Italy under scrutiny: A call for transparency and credibility
Made in Italy under scrutiny: A call for transparency and credibility

Fashion United

time17 hours ago

  • Fashion United

Made in Italy under scrutiny: A call for transparency and credibility

"Made in Italy" has recently come under intense scrutiny, not only due to tariffs that continue to penalise many sectors despite recent trade agreements, but primarily because of persistent issues surrounding illegal labor exploitation. Companies are also grappling with significant difficulties in effectively monitoring their entire supply chains, encompassing both direct suppliers and sub-suppliers. These incidents of exploitation, the latest of which involves the prestigious Loro Piana brand, consistently highlight a critical theme for FashionUnited: the paramount importance of transparency and clear communication. Businesses must sincerely, simply, and carefully explain what "Made in Italy" truly signifies and how its standards are upheld throughout the production process. Saying "Made in Italy" without concrete explanation is no longer enough Simply stating that a product is "Made in Italy" without a concrete explanation is no longer sufficient to entice customers. This is particularly true in light of revelations concerning exploitation and unsafe working conditions, even involving highly prestigious brands. The knowledge that a designer handbag or luxury garment, retailing for thousands of euros, is sometimes paid to the supplier for a mere few tens of euros, as uncovered by various investigations, exacerbates the problem and alienates consumers from designer labels. Less than a week ago, Giusy Bettoni, founder and CEO of CLASS, an international eco-hub based in Milan, spoke with FashionUnited. She warned that claiming to be "Made in Italy" without a precise, clear, simple, concrete, and concise explanation of the concept is unhelpful, benefiting neither fashion nor the supply chain. A few months prior, Renzo Rosso, owner of OTB, the holding company behind brands such as Diesel, Jil Sander, Maison Margiela, Marni, and Viktor&Rolf, also urged brands to speak up. He encouraged them to explain and demonstrate what "Made in Italy" genuinely represents. "We have unique qualities, good taste, we must assert ourselves for who we are and for what we have to offer," explained the founder of OTB. "Italy produces around 80 percent of the world's luxury goods and is considered the number one country for the production chain. This is why our artisans are sought after all over the world, we must not let them escape," Rosso emphasized to RaiNews24 during the programme Pomeriggio 24, on Made in Italy Day. Among the prominent supporters of a concrete approach to "Made in Italy" is the Minister of Enterprise and Made in Italy, Adolfo Urso. Last week, he announced that the introduction of a certification system was under consideration. This announcement followed the placement of the Loro Piana brand under judicial administration for alleged violation of workers' rights. Urso told trade associations during a fashion roundtable that some illegal businesses in the fashion supply chain have tarnished the image of "Made in Italy." A statement from the Ministry of Enterprise and Made in Italy clarified, "To counter the illegal behaviour of a few regarding labour, which can damage the reputation of the entire sector, Urso highlighted that the government is working on legislation to certify the sustainability and legality of companies in the sector, with the aim of offering a structural solution to the problem." This proposed legislation seeks to certify the supply chain belonging to the brand owner, based on specific preliminary checks. The goal is to prevent the brand owner from being held responsible for illegal or opaque behavior attributable to suppliers or sub-suppliers along the chain. What truly defines "Made in Italy" However, the fundamental questions remain: what truly defines "Made in Italy," and can certification genuinely provide a comprehensive solution? Experience with certifications for gender equality indicates that such measures, while useful, have not fundamentally altered corporate approaches or fully equalized treatment in the workplace. Similarly, the introduction of increasingly stringent regulations, while necessary, is often insufficient on its own. Therefore, this issue is complex and deeply cultural, encompassing numerous facets. In some instances, it may be necessary to move beyond the "Made in Italy" label and instead focus directly on the credibility of the brand, its people, and the company itself. Patrizio Bertelli, owner of Prada, was an early proponent of this view, decades ago advocating for "Made in Prada" to de-stigmatize offshoring to China. His philosophy was that if a product bore the brand's logo, it inherently guaranteed quality production, sustainable practices, and social responsibility. Adriano Goldschmied, widely known as "the godfather of denim," echoes this sentiment. He has consistently maintained that a product must be "made anywhere" but ultimately a winner. As far back as 2017, he told FashionUnited that "Made in Italy" could be seen as a "sin of presumption." He argued that consumers trust the brand, not merely the "made in" label. "I'll give you an example: this phone I have in my hand is an Apple; the consumer doesn't care whether it's made in Taiwan or the US, but they care that it works well, which is guaranteed by the brand. This philosophy of 'Made in Italy', in many cases, has taken the Italian market out of reality. It is also true that in Italy there are excellent companies that know how to do their job, examples of great skill and quality," Goldschmied explained. "The consumer is informed, they know how to recognise quality and that's what counts, not the 'made in' label. You have to be 'made anywhere but a winner'," Goldschmied concluded. This reflection holds more relevance now than ever. To successfully navigate this complex situation, the industry must regain credibility through storytelling that communicates impeccable, real, and concrete story-making. The consumer is informed, they know how to recognise quality Credits: FashionUnited, image generated with the help of Artificial Intelligence This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

Union Pacific announces bid for Norfolk Southern to create transcontinental railroad
Union Pacific announces bid for Norfolk Southern to create transcontinental railroad

The Independent

time19 hours ago

  • The Independent

Union Pacific announces bid for Norfolk Southern to create transcontinental railroad

Union Pacific is seeking to buy Norfolk Southern in a deal valued at $85 billion in a merger that could trigger the final wave of railroad mergers across the country. The merger would create the first transcontinental railroad in the United States worth more than $200 billion. The railroads said the tie-up would streamline deliveries of raw materials and goods across the country. Any deal would be closely scrutinized by antitrust regulators that have set a very high bar for railroad deals after previous consolidation in the industry led to massive backups and snarled traffic. But if the deal is approved, the two remaining major American railroads — BNSF and CSX — will face tremendous pressure to merge so they can compete. The continent's two other major railroads — Canadian National and CPKC — may also get involved. Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena, who has been championing the potential benefits of a rail merger, said this deal could make it possible for lumber from the Pacific Northwest and plastics produced on the Gulf Coast and steel made in Pittsburgh to all reach their destinations more seamlessly. 'Railroads have been an integral part of building America since the Industrial Revolution, and this transaction is the next step in advancing the industry,' Vena said.

Vespa maker Piaggio's profit falls 42% in first half of 2025
Vespa maker Piaggio's profit falls 42% in first half of 2025

Reuters

time19 hours ago

  • Reuters

Vespa maker Piaggio's profit falls 42% in first half of 2025

July 29 (Reuters) - Italy's Piaggio ( opens new tab said on Tuesday its net profit fell 42.2% to 30.1 million euros ($34.84 million) in the first half of 2025 in a contracting market for motor vehicles. Piaggio, known for its iconic Vespa scooters, sold 238,400 vehicles between January and June this year, compared to 270,100 in the first half of 2024. "In historical moments like these, with international trade disputes and increased geopolitical tensions, being able to remain flexible, controlling liquidity and financial management, is essential," CEO Michele Colaninno said in a statement. The manufacturer said its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) fell 15.3% year-on-year to 147.1 million euros, with an EBITDA margin of 17.3%. The group also pledged to distribute an interim dividend of 4 euro cents per share on its 2025 results. ($1 = 0.8639 euros)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store