Jury deliberating in case of man accused of DUI, killing US Air Force lieutenant colonel
The store is located on East Plum Creek Parkway. A police affidavit states a pickup truck crashed into the gas pumps on Aug. 4, 2024, at 2:22 p.m.
FOX31 Newsletters: Sign up to get breaking news sent to your inbox
That truck hit another vehicle and a man who had just parked at a pump and was putting gasoline in his Sequoia SUV. Court records show 56-year-old Paul Stephenson was driving the truck that went out of control.
The Douglas County District Attorney's office says 38-year-old Air Force Lt. Col. Matthew Anderson from Centennial was killed. His family was inside the SUV at the time.
Records show Stephenson had stated he had been drinking beer and a pint of Fireball Whisky before the crash. Police said video cameras captured the truck moving recklessly and at a high rate of speed.
Stephenson took the stand at the Douglas County Courthouse Thursday, testifying that he did not remember the crash and that he knew it was wrong to drink and drive.
Closing arguments started late Thursday afternoon, where both state prosecutors and Stephenson's defense attorney spoke about what happened on the day of the crash.
'And that conduct begins from the moment this guy climbs into that truck having drank a pint of whiskey and two Bud Lights and puts himself on those roads. And then at the perfect moment, for him and the worst moment for everyone else, he turns, accelerates and plows right into that crowded gas station,' 23rd Judicial District DA George Brauchler said.
12-year-old girl dies a week after deadly Thornton motorcycle crash
'Something happened to him to make that vehicle go into that 7-Eleven parking lot. There's no indoor camera there, so we don't know exactly how, but something did. That's not the way he drives,' Defense Attorney Mike Mitchell said.
Several members of the Air Force dressed in blue military uniforms were in the courtroom for the closing arguments. Anderson's wife, father and other family members were also present.
The jury deliberated for an hour and a half and is scheduled to resume deliberations on Monday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Orange County man gets 26-years-to-life sentence for murder of estranged girlfriend
Craig J. Charron, who broke into his estranged girlfriend's Huntington Beach apartment and fatally stabbed her on the day she changed the locks to keep him out, was sentenced Friday to 26 years to life in prison. Laura Sardinha, 25, had been pursuing an online psychology degree with the hope of counseling women in abusive relationships. She had been trying to escape her relationship with Charron, who had perforated her eardrum in an earlier attack, and she had taken out a restraining order against him. On Friday, three months after a jury convicted Charron of first-degree murder for her September 2020 death, Orange County Superior Court Judge Michael Cassidy called it a 'senseless and brutal' crime and gave him the maximum sentence allowed by law. 'All Laura wanted was to be free of the abuse and the torment,' the victim's mother, Marie Sardinha, told the judge. 'This man should not be out in society. He should never be let out.' The victim's brother, Shawn Sardinha, said he had struggled to find reasons to live after his sister's death. 'I now give updates of my life to a blue vase,' he said. At trial, Charron, 39, described himself as an Air Force veteran and former combat medic with a 100% disability rating. He was receiving psychiatric treatment at the VA. At the sentencing, Charron wore the green camouflage scrubs afforded to inmates who served in the military, and his lawyer said Charron had been participating in veterans programs at the county jail. The victim's father said he was a Vietnam veteran himself and hated any suggestion that Charron might get any leniency as a vet. 'It just makes me sick,' Manuel Sardinha told the judge. He recalled how she would play 'The Twelve Days of Christmas' on the piano at the family home during the holidays. He said injuries from a 2019 motorcycle accident had derailed her ambition of culinary school, but she was planning to use the financial settlement to open a therapy practice. Charron had been dating Sardinha just a few months. She had given him nearly $100,000 of the $750,000 she won in the accident settlement. Two weeks before he killed her, she texted him to say that she could not hear because he had broken her eardrum. She complained that he kept hitting her. He told police her injuries were the result of 'rough sex' and pressured her into dropping charges. On the morning of her death, she recorded herself begging him to get out of her apartment, saying, 'You terrify me, because you don't leave.' When he finally left, he bombarded her with calls and texts, which she ignored. Early that afternoon, at her request, a maintenance worker changed her locks, to keep him out. Nevertheless, Charron somehow slipped back inside around 1:15 p.m. — it is not clear how — while she was on a three-way call with her mom and her best friend. They heard her cry, 'Oh my God, he's here.' The friend hung up to call 911. Sardinha called her back and left a chilling 37-second voicemail, screaming, 'He's gonna kill me!' His voice was eerily absent from the voicemail, which the prosecutor suggested was a function of his calculated, unhurried mindset in killing her. She was dead when police arrived, with stab wounds to the chest and head. He had nearly sliced off her nose. Police found Charron with knife wounds to his chest and neck, which authorities suggested he inflicted on himself to create the fiction that she had attacked him. Deputy District. Atty. Janine Madera said it did not matter whether he faked the wounds or she inflicted them on him in self-defense, since he was the clear aggressor, muscular and towering over her by 9 inches. Three of Charron's ex-girlfriends, who took out restraining orders against him, testified that he had assaulted them. One said he had choked her, a second that he slapped her, a third that he pinned her to a wall. Charron claimed that his confrontation with Sardinha was 'hazy' in his memory but that he acted in self-defense. Defense attorney Michael Guisti said his client's violent history consisted of 'non-murderous violence,' and that he may have acted in the heat of passion when he killed Sardinha. Charron made no statement at Friday's sentencing, and gave no apology.
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
US military investigating whether its new pistol can malfunction and fire ‘uncommanded' after death of Air Force guard
The US military is investigating its new service pistol after the fatal shooting of an Air Force guard — following claims that the gun can fire without the trigger being pulled. The Sig Sauer M18, the military version of the popular Sig P320 handgun, has been at the forefront of multiple lawsuits alleging that the weapon can fire unprompted. It's now been pulled from standard use at several facilities after a security service member was killed on Sunday at the FE Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, when the gun discharged, officials said. Advertisement Air Force Global Strike Command issued the 'stand down' order to all of its units until officials at their bases can investigate all of their M18s for any 'safety concerns.' 4 Air Force Global Strike Command pulled the SIG Sauer M18 pistols from all their bases after one of the guns discharged and killed a security forces member on Sunday. U.S. Air National Guard/Staff Sgt. Jesse Hanson 'We want to make sure there's nothing wrong with the weapon,' an Air Force official told the Washington Post. The exact circumstances of the weapon firing were not released. Advertisement The Army, Navy and Marine Corps have said they were reviewing the incident as well. Following the deadly incident, SIG Sauer, the manufacturer of the pistol, expressed its condolences to the service members and families impacted by the shooting. 'We have absolute confidence in the military's ability to conduct a thorough investigation and are working with the Air Force and Army to answer any of their questions,' the company said in a statement. Advertisement 4 The M18 has served as the Air Force's primary pistol since 2019, but the gun is at the center of dozens of lawsuits alleging that the weapon fires without its trigger ever being pulled. U.S. Air Force photo by Vicki Stein The M18 became the standard use pistol in the Air Force in 2019, replacing the M9 (Beretta 92) that the military had been using for more than 30 years. The shooting comes just weeks after an FBI report echoed years-long concerns about the Sig P320-series pistols. The FBI's Ballistic Research Facility opened a probe into the firearm series at the behest of Michigan State Police when a trooper pistol discharged 'uncommanded' last year. Advertisement 4 The deadly shooting took place at the FE Warren Air Force Base, in Wyoming, U.S. Air Force/Airman Nicholas Rowe 'According to the MSP motor officer's statement and the statements of others present, at no time was the trigger pressed intentionally or inadvertently,' the report stated. Days after the FBI report became public, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials issued a ban on the use of the Sig P320 pistols for its agents. The Sig pistols were also at the center of a 2023 investigation by the WaPo and The Trace, a group that monitors gun violence, finding that more than 100 people have reported their handgun's suddenly firing without anyone ever pulling the trigger. 4 SIG Sauer denies all allegations regarding its P320 series pistols, of which the M18 is a member of. U.S. Navy/Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Sade Anita Wallace Sig Sauer has faced a mountain of lawsuits over such cases in the US, with at least 77 filed in New Hampshire alone. The company has long refuted the allegations, asserting that its brand is being attacked by anti-gun groups and 'the mainstream media.' 'The P320 CANNOT, under any circumstances, discharge without a trigger pull — that is a fact,' the company said in a statement back in March. Advertisement 'Claims that unintended discharges are anything more than negligent handling and/or manufactured lies to support anti-gun, anti-SIG agenda are false,' the manufacturer added, claiming that several lawsuits have been dismissed around the nation. It also say that investigators have never been able to replicate 'uncommanded fire' incidents with the weapons. With the M18 temporarily pulled from the Air Force Global Strike Command bases, officials have ordered its units to use the M4 rifle in the meantime.
New York Times
3 days ago
- New York Times
New Judge Assigned to 9/11 Case Ahead of 24th Anniversary of Attacks
An Air Force judge who was in college at the time of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks has been named as the new judge in the long-running terrorism case at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Lt. Col. Michael Schrama is the fifth judge in the case against five men who are accused of conspiring in the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people. The case has been stuck in pretrial hearings since 2012. Prosecutors made a deal last summer with three of the defendants, including the man accused of being the mastermind of the plot, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, to plead guilty in exchange for life sentences. That would have averted their death-penalty the agreement has been revoked twice, including this month by an appeals court in Washington, potentially returning the case to the question of whether the defendants' torture from 2002 to 2006 while they were in C.I.A. detention has rendered their confessions inadmissible. Colonel Schrama was assigned to the case on Wednesday. Prosecutors have indicated that they would like to see him on the bench the week of Sept. 1 for an examination of his qualifications. If no disqualifying conflicts emerge, it will be Colonel Schrama's job to manage the pretrial proceedings at a time when the case has splintered into three parts. Mr. Mohammed and two other defendants who had the plea deal are in one camp. The previous judge, Col. Matthew N. McCall, had ruled that their pretrial agreements were valid contracts before he retired in May. Their lawyers are preparing an appeal to seek the deals' reinstatement, and have shunned any case-moving litigation at the Guantánamo court as a potential breach of the contract. Another defendant, Ramzi bin al-Shibh, was found mentally incompetent to go to trial and his case was severed. Prosecutors have asked the court to revisit that fifth defendant, Ammar al Baluchi, was litigating on a separate track. The last judge wrapped up his four years on the case by suppressing Mr. Baluchi's interrogations by the F.B.I. at Guantánamo in 2007 as having been obtained through his C.I.A. torture. Prosecutors are seeking to reinstate his confessions. Colonel Schrama, who is in his 40s, graduated from Roger Williams University School of Law in 2008, around the time the defendants were first brought to court. He then joined in the Air Force and has served as a military prosecutor and defense counsel on appeal cases. This is his second stint as a military judge. He handled court-martial cases at Joint Base Langley-Eustis in Virginia from 2021 to 2023, and returned to the bench last month. Colonel Schrama was an English student at Georgetown University and a starting defensive end on the school's football team at the time of the attacks. Before he went to law school, he taught high school English in New online personal and professional biography said he suffered a 'season-ending injury' in his third year at Georgetown. According to his Air Force biography, he has specialized in environmental law while serving in the military. He also earned a Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, possibly from a nine-month stint as the staff attorney for an air wing in Kuwait in 2019.
