Cape Town cashier alleges her Indian-origin boss fired her for buying a car, accused her of theft
Limelintaka took to Facebook to share her ordeal, saying she had saved for months and taken out a loan to buy the vehicle. In her viral post, which has now garnered over 14 thousand likes and a flood of supportive comments, she wrote, 'I went through my bank app and showed him. He said I started buying new furniture, now I'm buying a car. He's not comfortable with me being a cashier again.'
She further alleged that her employer accused her of stealing and said he was investigating whether any money was missing from his business. He then allegedly gave her an ultimatum to take a job as a petrol pump attendant or resign.
'I refused. I was hired as a cashier and have done nothing wrong,' she wrote. 'I had hoped the car would help me run a side hustle and keep working. Now it feels like I'm being punished for trying to improve my life.'
The story has resonated deeply with social media users, many of whom expressed outrage and offered words of encouragement.
One user commented, 'You lost your job because God wants you to focus on your business, God saw you deserve more. You were not born to limit yourself hence you were capable to buy yourself that car. God allowed your boss to fire you so that nothing stands in your way — he's protecting you. God loves you.'
Another wrote, 'Sue them my sister. You are used to people who work for their mouths, they are disrespecting you and they don't have the right to go through your finances. Arrest them.'
A third commenter questioned the legality of the alleged dismissal, 'Did you consider consulting your HR or relevant authorities about the issue? As much as you complied in his investigation there's no way he can fire you without proof of what he's accusing you of.'
However, the management of Berkley Motor, the company that runs the Shell Garage in Maitland where Limelintaka worked, denied the allegations in a statement to News24 in South Africa. The owner claimed that the situation had been misrepresented and that Limelintaka had not been dismissed.
'Nothing was done without consent, and discussions are ongoing. She has left out many facts that were stated. Nobody was accused of anything, and she has not been fired. Now that she has falsely accused the company of improper procedures, due diligence can be followed accordingly,' the company said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Govt says there's no directive to block Reuters X handle in India
The Government of India has clarified that it has not issued any order to withhold the X account of the international news agency Reuters in the country. "There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem," an official spokesperson said in a statement. This clarification comes after Reuters' X account was found to be withheld in India, prompting concerns over press freedom and censorship. Users attempting to access the handle were shown a notice stating that the account had been withheld "in response to a legal demand". Reuters confirmed the development earlier, saying it was seeking more information on why its handle was blocked in India. According to officials familiar with the matter, the only request for blocking Reuters' X account was issued on May 7, during Operation Sindoor launched against Pakistan following the massacre of 26 Indian tourists in Pahalgam in an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist attack. This was a part of a national security exercise. However, although several hundred accounts were blocked due to national security reasons, no action was implemented to block the Reuters handle on X despite the government order, the official said. It appears that X, owned by Elon Musk, may have mistakenly enforced the outdated order. "The issue is not relevant anymore. The government has reached out to X, asking them to explain the blocking and to lift the embargo," a senior official said. Reuters has not issued any public statement on the issue. Despite the block on Reuters' main and Reuters World handles, several affiliated accounts, including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, Reuters Asia, and Reuters China, remain accessible within India.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Nifty50 + Nifty Next50: The no-brainer formula for long-term wealth creation
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As the Indian market matures, we are seeing a number of new products, categories, and investment options. But has this created a 'problem of plenty'? Can passive investing help solve this? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads One common no-brainer strategy is investing in Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50 ETFs or funds. Is this effective for those looking for simplicity? Are we finally at a tipping point in India where passive investing becomes the default, not the alternative? While SIP is often called the wisest way to invest, is it especially relevant for passive funds? Does lump-sum investing make sense in passives? There have been reports of increased ETF buying during sharp market falls. Can ETFs serve as trading products during such times? We spoke about how passives can simplify investing, but the market is now flooded with thematic indices. How do you see this trend evolving? What's your outlook on new product launches — will we see more thematic or factor-based ETFs, or will broad indices still dominate? In a market flooded with countless investment options and complex strategies, sometimes the most effective approach is also the simplest. According to Anil Ghelani , CFA and Head of Passive Investments at DSP Mutual Fund , investors looking for long-term wealth creation need only consider a straightforward combination: Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50 funds."These two indices offer a good mix of stability and growth," explains Ghelani, highlighting how the Nifty 50 provides exposure to established sector leaders that have weathered multiple business cycles, while the Nifty Next 50 captures the next generation of potential market leaders across diverse economic most important financial goals are usually common — for most of us, they are aligned with the happiness of the family, a better life for children, or starting or expanding a business/profession. Yet, many of us often get preoccupied with the wrong priorities — like increasing the number of funds or chasing the next fancy investment a better approach could be to keep it simple and just aim to achieve our financial goals with a reasonable degree of certainty. So, with that approach in mind, yes — most certainly, passive investing can be considered a very effective solution to the potential confusion created by the growing number of investment products. Passive funds simplify the journey by providing low-cost, transparent, and relatively easy-to-understand exposure to markets, without the human bias of a fund manager. This reduces the need to constantly analyse sectors, stocks, or fund manager performance. So, passive investment funds like ETFs and index funds can offer a simpler and more disciplined approach that helps you stay invested without two indices offer a good mix of stability and growth. The companies in the Nifty 50 Index give exposure to sector-leading firms that have navigated multiple business cycles. On the other hand, companies in the Nifty Next 50 Index, while mainly large-cap stocks, often include the next generation of potential leaders from a wider range of sectors that are key economic drivers. So yes, if you are a long-term investor seeking simplicity and efficiency, I agree with the popular recommendation of combining Nifty 50 and Nifty Next 50. This can form the core of your portfolio, without the need for frequent changes or monitoring. Similarly, we could also consider the BSE Sensex Index and BSE Sensex Next 30 awareness of passive funds has surely reached a tipping point in India. But I strongly believe that in decision-making, 'AND' is always more powerful than 'OR.' So why should one be the default? In my view, a better outcome is to have passive funds as part of a core allocation and other products like active funds or AIFs as part of a satellite allocation. You may get better risk-adjusted returns by having a passive core portfolio delivering market returns, and a satellite portfolio attempting to generate excess returns beyond the broader and passive funds are a natural fit. Systematic investing helps manage volatility and builds discipline, while passive funds lower costs and avoid selection bias. That said, lump-sum investments in passive funds are also very useful — especially during market dips or for long-term goals. Another important use case is when you believe a certain market segment or sector is undervalued. For example, if you feel defensive sectors like healthcare or IT are relatively undervalued today and have growth potential, then lump-sum allocations to an index fund or ETF focused on that sector may be a good When markets fall sharply, ETF volumes on NSE and BSE often spike. This reflects long-term investors finding corrections to be attractive entry points. One of the key advantages of ETFs is that, rather than picking a few stocks which could go right or wrong, you can buy a broad-based ETF and participate in the market's recovery. So, if you're a well-informed investor comfortable trading on the exchange, ETFs can be effective trading tools during short-term afternoon I go to my cafeteria and have the standard thali — simple chapati, sabzi, dal, and chawal. But once a quarter, after our rebalance trades are done, I like to enjoy fancy Italian food with the team — maybe with some dessert too. In my view, it's always good to have options — both in the cafeteria and in investing. As our markets evolve, we'll see more index funds and ETFs that offer exposure to narrow segments, sectors, or niche themes. Many investors will still stick to simple core products, but such thematic products must be available for those who want we'll see both. Certain investors or advisors will want products targeting specific sectors or themes for portfolio allocation. There will also be packaged products for DIY investors. While broad-market funds will continue to dominate AUM, smart beta and sectoral funds will persist — albeit with smaller AUM. To offer context, in the U.S., as of December 2024, smart beta funds comprised about 13% of total equity passive fund AUM.
NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Centre Responds After News Agency Reuters' X Account Withheld In India
New Delhi: There has been no requirement from the Indian government to withhold Reuters' X handle, the Centre has said, denying any role in the international news agency's social media account going blank in the country. The Reuters' main handle is currently inaccessible to users in India, with a notice displayed on the platform showing that the action was taken "in response to a legal demand." A government spokesperson clarified this morning it did not ask for the account to be withheld and that it is continuously working with X to resolve the problem. "There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters, and we are continuously working with X to resolve the problem," said the spokesperson. Reports suggest the action could be due to an old request that was acted on too late, and that the handle is likely to be restored soon. The government had requested blocking hundreds of social media accounts, including that of Reuters, during 'Operation Sindoor', but Reuters' handle was not blocked that time while others faced the action, reported news agency PTI. Quoting an official source, it said the government had issued the order on May 7. It now appears that it has been acted on now, the report said, calling it a "mistake on their part". The government has also asked the platform to explain its action and lift the censorship since the issue is no longer relevant. Two official accounts, including the main and world handles, of Reuters are currently withheld in India while other handles of the news organisation, including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, and Reuters Asia, are accessible. The UK-based agency is yet to issue a statement. According to X, accounts or specific posts are withheld in events of legal demands like a court order or local laws.
