Was Pedro Hernandez innocent? Convicted killer with 70 IQ may walk free as court cites critical trial error in Etan Patz case

Time of India

18 hours ago

Live Events
New trial ordered
How did Pedro Hernandez become a suspect decades later?
A trial without a body or forensic evidence
Was the wrong man convicted?
What happens next?
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
A case that haunted New York for decades and helped launch the missing children's movement is now facing a dramatic legal reversal. A federal appeals court has overturned the conviction of Pedro Hernandez , the man found guilty in 2017 for the 1979 abduction and murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz The court ruled that the trial judge gave flawed instructions to the jury about how to evaluate Hernandez's confession. Hernandez, who has a low IQ and a history of mental illness, had confessed after nearly seven hours of police interrogation, before being read his Miranda rights That confession, which was repeated on tape but unsupported by physical evidence, was the cornerstone of the prosecution's case. Etan vanished while walking alone to his school bus stop for the first time, an event that shocked the nation and led to widespread changes in how missing children's cases were handled.Despite earlier focus on another suspect, a convicted child molester, the case shifted in 2012 when Hernandez's brother-in-law told police that Hernandez had spoken for years about harming a child.But defense lawyers have long argued that his statements were coerced and rooted in delusion, raising troubling questions about whether the wrong man has spent nearly a decade behind bars.The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Hernandez's 2017 conviction, citing a critical error by the trial judge regarding jury instructions. The court found that the judge gave misleading guidance when jurors asked how to evaluate Hernandez's confessions, especially the first one, made before Miranda rights were read.The court concluded the instruction was 'clearly wrong' and 'manifestly prejudicial,' significantly affecting the fairness of the trial. The ruling states Hernandez must be retried or freed 'within a reasonable time.'Etan Patz vanished on May 25, 1979, the first day he was allowed to walk alone to his school bus stop in Manhattan's SoHo neighborhood.But Pedro Hernandez, then an 18-year-old stock clerk at a nearby convenience store, didn't become a suspect until 2012, over 30 years later, when a relative called police. Hernandez had allegedly told people at church and in his family that he had harmed a boy in New York.He confessed after seven hours of police interrogation, saying he lured Etan into the basement of the store with a soda, then choked him and disposed of his body. That confession was later repeated on video after police read him his rights.Despite having very little physical evidence, forensic links, or a clear motive, prosecutors relied entirely on Hernandez's confession.The first trial ended in a hung jury in 2015. A second trial in 2017 led to a conviction and a sentence of 25 years to life.Hernandez's attorney, Harvey Fishbein, has long argued that his client's confession was false and coerced. Hernandez suffers from schizotypal personality disorder, has an IQ of around 70, and was described as mentally vulnerable.Fishbein claims Hernandez was suggestible and may have internalized a fantasy or delusion during hours of questioning.Hernandez had no prior criminal record, and many still question why he would confess to a crime he didn't commit. Critics of the case highlight José Ramos, a convicted child molester who remained the prime suspect in Etan Patz's disappearance for decades.Ramos had ties to Etan's babysitter and, according to former federal prosecutor Stuart GraBois, once claimed he was '90 percent sure' he had brought the boy (Etan) to his apartment the day he vanished.He also admitted to meeting a child matching Etan's description in Washington Square Park, and investigators later found photographs of blond boys resembling Etan in a drainpipe at Ramos's former residence.Yet, despite these suspicious findings, Ramos was never criminally charged due to a lack of direct evidence, no body, no eyewitnesses, no forensic link, and ambiguity in his statement.However, Etan's family did win a symbolic civil judgment against him in 2004, and the case remained unresolved until Hernandez's confession in 2012.The Manhattan District Attorney's Office said it is 'reviewing the decision.'Unless prosecutors decide to retry the case soon, Hernandez could walk free for the first time in over a decade.