logo
US once again selects strategic nuclear base for talks with Japan

US once again selects strategic nuclear base for talks with Japan

Nikkei Asia10-06-2025
WASHINGTON -- In an annual display of nuclear muscle, U.S. government officials showed their Japanese counterparts a fleet of B-52 strategic bombers on an Air Force base in Louisiana.
The first Extended Deterrence Dialogue of President Donald Trump's second administration was held last Thursday and Friday at Barksdale Air Force Base, home of Air Force Global Strike Command. Photos of the visit were released on Monday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mongolia's WWII Legacy: Asset or Liability in 2025?
Mongolia's WWII Legacy: Asset or Liability in 2025?

The Diplomat

time3 hours ago

  • The Diplomat

Mongolia's WWII Legacy: Asset or Liability in 2025?

The stories of Mongolia's WWII heroes are deeply ingrained in the nation's cultural fabric. But in an age of great power competition, remembrance is increasingly seen as a geopolitical signal. Mongolian President Khurelsukh Ukhnaa presents a wreath to the War Horses memorial, honoring Mongolia's contributions to the Allied war effort, on May 8, 2025, during a visit to Moscow, Russia, to mark the 80th anniversary of Victory Day, As Mongolia commemorates the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II this year, the nation finds itself at a crossroads, where its historical legacy from that global conflict intersects with contemporary geopolitical realities. This creates a complex tapestry, woven with threads of military contributions, strategic alliances, and national identity. In the current geopolitical landscape, is Mongolia's WWII heritage an asset or a liability? Mongolia's Indelible Mark on World War II – and Vice Versa During WWII, Mongolia played a role that, while often overshadowed by the actions of larger powers, was significant in the context of the Asian theater. In 1939, the Battles of Khalkhin Gol (also known as the Nomonhan Incident) saw Mongolian cavalry units fight alongside Soviet forces. Their coordinated efforts disrupted Japanese supply lines, effectively halting Tokyo's ambitious northward expansion. This victory not only safeguarded Mongolia's borders but also had far-reaching implications for the broader war effort. It forced Japan to divert resources from its campaigns in China, thus altering the strategic balance in East Asia. In 1945, Mongolia's military prowess was again on display during the Zhangbei Offensive (also called the Langwogou campaign). Mongolian armored units, in cooperation with Soviet troops, broke through Japanese defenses in northern China. Their actions hastened the collapse of Japan's Northern Defense Line, contributing to the overall weakening of the Japanese Empire in the final stages of the war. Beyond direct combat, Mongolia provided substantial logistical support. A few million head of livestock and essential supplies were sent to the Soviet Union, serving as a crucial lifeline for the Allied war machinery. This assistance was not only a testament to Mongolia's commitment but also a practical demonstration of its value as an ally. The stories of Mongolia's WWII heroes, from the fearless cavalrymen at Khalkhin Gol to the strategic minds behind battles, have been deeply ingrained in the nation's cultural fabric. This history is recounted in schools, celebrated in state ceremonies, and forms an integral part of Mongolia's national narrative. These tales reinforce a sense of resilience and sovereignty, portraying Mongolia as a nation that could stand its ground and make sacrifices in the face of global conflict. This narrative unity serves as a powerful internal cohesive force. It binds the Mongolian people together, fostering a shared sense of purpose and pride. At the same time, it is a strategic asset in the international arena. In diplomatic discourse, Mongolia can draw on this legacy to assert its independent identity and historical significance, positioning itself as a nation with a rich and storied past that has actively shaped the course of history. Yet when it comes to WWII, historical memory increasingly has to navigate geopolitical tensions. Russia: Honoring the Past, Planning for the Future Mongolia's relationship with Russia has deep historical roots, and this is nowhere more evident than in their shared WWII history. Mongolia's participation in Moscow's May 9, 2025 Victory Day parade was a poignant reminder of their long-standing military bond. President Khurelsukh Ukhnaa's emphasis on the logistical cooperation during WWII, including a visit to the War Horses memorial, further solidified this connection. Their shared history has led to increased joint military exercises and enhanced intelligence sharing in the post-war era. Russia and Mongolia's annual military exercise, Selenge, has been held since 2008, including the latest edition in June 2025. As Russia's Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu put it in a meeting with his Mongolian counterpart, 'the Russian and Mongolian people still inherit and carry forward the tradition of combat friendship formed during World War II.' Amid the Ukraine conflict, Russia is in search of reliable partners, and Mongolia's willingness to engage is seen as a positive sign. However, Mongolia is also acutely aware of the need for strategic diversification. Its 'third neighbor' policy reflects Ulaanbaatar's understanding that over-reliance on any single power can be a double-edged sword. By maintaining strong ties with Russia while simultaneously seeking other partnerships, Mongolia aims to protect its sovereignty and security interests in an ever-changing geopolitical landscape. China: Substantial Engagement Without Presidential Summits Despite the prominence of Russia in Mongolia's WWII commemorations, Mongolia's relationship with China has been steadily advancing. From 2023 to 2025 a series of high-level interactions took place – even in the absence of presidential summits. Then-Prime Minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai's visits to China for events like the Summer Davos Forum and his meetings with Chinese Premier Li Qiang at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summits in 2023 and 2024 were significant steps in maintaining diplomatic momentum. In 2024, Chinese Vice President Han Zheng's visit to Mongolia was quickly follow by Oyun-Erdene's attendance at the China International Import Expo. These exchanges were not just diplomatic niceties; they were part of a larger strategy to align Mongolia's economic interests with China's Belt and Road Initiative. In 2025, Oyun-Erdene's participation in the Asian Winter Games in Harbin and Parliament Speaker Amarbayasgalan Dashzevge's talks with Chinese legislative leaders further underscored Mongolia's 'balanced diplomacy' approach. As China approaches its September 3 commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, Mongolia stands to benefit. By leveraging their shared WWII history, Mongolia can promote projects such as the China-Mongolia-Russia Economic Corridor. This approach allows Mongolia to secure Chinese investment, which is crucial for its economic development, while still maintaining its strategic independence. Third Neighbors: Expanding Horizons and Leveraging Resources Mongolia's engagement with third neighbors – countries beyond China and Russia – has taken on new significance in recent years, driven by both strategic and economic imperatives. India, for example, has shown a keen interest in Mongolia, particularly in relation to the latter's vast rare earth reserves, which account for approximately 10 percent of the global total. The Nomadic Elephant 2025 joint military exercises, which focused on urban warfare and cyber operations, were not just a display of military cooperation but also a means for India to gain access to Mongolia's valuable resources. Multilateral engagements have also become a cornerstone of Mongolia's foreign policy. The Khaan Quest 2025 peacekeeping drills, which invited participation from China, the United States, South Korea, and others, are a prime example. By hosting such events, Mongolia can balance its military trust with Beijing while simultaneously strengthening partnerships with other nations. The United States, through initiatives like the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework talks in 2024, and South Korea, with its pledge of smart city investments in 2025, are both vying for influence in Mongolia, seeking to counterbalance Sino-Russian dominance. Mongolia, in turn, deftly uses these overtures to enhance its bargaining power on the global stage, using its WWII legacy as a unifying narrative to engage with diverse partners. Japan's Forthcoming Visit: A Diplomatic Tightrope The planned state visit by Japanese Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako in July 2025 signals Japan's bid to deepen its engagement with Central Asia, with Mongolia in its sights. Japan views Mongolia's rich uranium, coal, and rare earth reserves as vital for its technological and industrial sectors. Additionally, infrastructure projects, such as the expansion of the Chinggis Khaan International Airport, are on Tokyo's agenda. For Mongolia, this visit presents an economic opportunity, potentially bringing in much-needed investment and expertise. However, the visit also comes with historical baggage. Mongolia's official WWII narrative is centered around its efforts to defeat Japanese expansionism, most notably at the Battles of Khalkhin Gol. Hosting the Japanese imperial family thus requires careful diplomatic choreography. Ulaanbaatar must decide whether to emphasize 'reconciliation through economic partnership' or risk undermining its own historical anti-fascist narrative. Moreover, geopolitically, the visit is part of broader Japan-U.S. efforts to counter China's influence in Central Asia. While this may offer Mongolia an alternative source of investment, mismanaging the historical aspect of the visit could alienate Russia and China, both of which have their own historical grievances with Japan and emphasize its wartime aggression in their respective narratives. Economic Promise and Geopolitical Peril Mongolia's WWII heritage offers significant economic potential. Historical tourism, centered around battle sites like Khalkhin Gol, has the capacity to attract international visitors, injecting much-needed revenue into the economy. Cultural diplomacy, through the promotion of Mongolia's WWII-era stories and artifacts, can enhance the nation's soft power and open doors for further economic cooperation. Foreign investment in heritage-related projects, such as the development of museums or the restoration of historical sites, is another avenue for growth. Japan's potential infrastructure funding, if managed strategically, could also complement ongoing projects like the China-Mongolia-Russia corridor. However, the geopolitical landscape is fraught with risks. The ongoing China-U.S. rivalry, for instance, could potentially weaponize Mongolia's historical narrative. Depending on how Mongolia navigates its relationships with these two superpowers, its WWII legacy could be used against it. Fluctuations in Russia's global standing also pose a threat. If Russia's influence wanes significantly, Mongolia may find itself in a more vulnerable position, especially if Ulaanbaatar has over-emphasized its historical alliance with Moscow. Conversely, missteps in framing the engagement with Japan could erode Mongolia's credibility as a custodian of anti-fascist history, affecting its relations with Russia and China. The delicate balance between economic pragmatism and historical integrity is a tightrope that Mongolia must walk carefully. Conclusion Mongolia's WWII legacy is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it is a source of national pride, a unifying force, and a strategic asset that can be leveraged to enhance the nation's standing in the international community. It provides a foundation for strong relationships with Russia and China, while also opening doors to partnerships with third neighbors. The upcoming visit from Japan, despite its complexities, also holds economic promise. On the other hand, in an era of great power competition, this legacy exposes Mongolia to potential vulnerabilities. The risk of being caught in the crossfire of China-U.S. rivalry, the uncertainty of Russia's future role, and the challenges of reconciling historical narratives with new diplomatic overtures are all significant hurdles. The key for Mongolia lies in its ability to balance historical symbolism with pragmatic diplomacy. As it commemorates the 80th anniversary of the end of WWII in 2025, Mongolia must use this occasion to strengthen its alliances, promote economic development, and safeguard its sovereignty. The coming decade will be a test of Mongolia's diplomatic acumen, as it determines whether its WWII legacy will be a catalyst for progress or a geopolitical liability. By carefully navigating the complex web of international relations, Mongolia can ensure that its past serves as a springboard for a prosperous and secure future.

NATO's Donald Trump dilemma
NATO's Donald Trump dilemma

Japan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Japan Times

NATO's Donald Trump dilemma

NATO's just-completed summit in The Hague came at a time of extraordinary tension. Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has repeatedly accused Europe of free riding on U.S. defense spending, raising serious concerns about the health of the Atlantic alliance. His decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities just three days before the summit — in coordination with Israel and without informing America's NATO allies — has only intensified those fears. Trump's strikes against Iran evoked memories of the post-9/11 interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, when NATO expanded its role beyond addressing conventional military threats to include counter-terrorism operations. While the alliance supported the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq was far more divisive, owing to the lack of convincing evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and the absence of an explicit United Nations Security Council mandate. The resulting rift prompted then-U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to draw a controversial distinction between 'Old Europe' and 'New Europe.' But the current situation is even more alarming. Unlike in 2003, when the United States at least made an effort to consult its allies, Trump now keeps them in the dark. He provided no credible evidence to justify the attack on Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi contradicted his claims of an imminent nuclear threat, stating just days earlier that there was no proof of a 'systematic' Iranian effort to develop nuclear weapons. Strikingly, many NATO leaders were informed of the attack only after it had been carried out. By sidelining NATO, Trump has effectively reduced the alliance to a passive observer, undermining its core principles and signaling a dangerous shift in global diplomacy. Imagine if Iran had retaliated by targeting U.S. bases in Turkey, potentially dragging my country into war. And if a nuclear leak had occurred, endangering Turkish civilians, who would have borne responsibility? Although Israel and Iran accepted Trump's announcement of a ceasefire, NATO members had been thrust into a dangerous situation without warning. This was particularly worrisome for Turkey, which shares a border with Iran and is highly vulnerable to the consequences of regional escalation. Trump's behavior has jeopardized NATO's collective security. After all, there is no guarantee that Israel will not violate the ceasefire, as it did in Gaza in March. NATO members must now confront a fundamental question: Can the alliance survive if member states may launch unilateral military action that puts others at risk? The U.S. may have legitimate evidence that Iran violated the Non-Proliferation Treaty or was just about to do so. But if that were the case, the proper course would have been to present the evidence to the IAEA and pursue a coordinated response through the U.N. Security Council. Alternatively, the U.S. may have assumed that Iran would not retaliate and saw the attack as a way to force the Iranians back to the negotiating table. But talks between the two countries were already set to resume before Israel's intervention derailed them. A third explanation is more cynical but may be true: the attack was meant to divert attention from Israel's brutal war in Gaza. Whichever explanation proves true, Trump's actions could have far-reaching consequences for NATO and the alliance's future could depend on how its leaders respond. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for example, must clearly outline the risks that regional instability poses to NATO's collective defense posture — especially given Turkey's proximity to Iran. As leaders of countries with permanent seats on the U.N. Security Council, French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer could play a vital role in strengthening coordination between NATO and the U.N. Likewise, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will be instrumental in shaping NATO-EU relations, while Norwegian President Jonas Gahr Store and his Finnish counterpart, Alexander Stubb, could help reinvigorate diplomacy and restore the alliance's moral compass. Ultimately, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's effectiveness will largely depend on leaders' commitment to pursuing rational, law-abiding security policies. Even beyond the immediate Iran crisis, NATO finds itself at a crossroads. The Hague summit may ultimately be seen as a defining moment — one that will determine whether the alliance can remain the world's most powerful defense organization, grounded in its members' shared concerns and contributions, or is destined to become a mere instrument of U.S.-Israeli strategic interests. If I were in office today, I would use the summit to highlight Israel's growing aggression and the security risks facing Turkey as the only NATO member in the region. I would ask Trump whether, in his 'America First' hierarchy, NATO allies now rank below nonmember Israel. Any leader willing to pose that question would take a principled stand against reckless military adventurism — and might just help save the alliance itself. Before the Iraq War, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder were dismissed as representatives of 'Old Europe' for opposing U.S. intervention. Had their warnings been heeded, the catastrophic costs of the war might have been avoided and Iran's regional influence would likely not be as significant as it is now. History has shown that wars launched before exhausting every diplomatic avenue lead to ruin for all involved. Russia's miscalculations in Ukraine serve as a grim reminder that while starting a war is easy, ending one is far more difficult. Today, as Trump's actions threaten further erosion of hard-won international laws, European leaders must push back. If NATO fails to uphold the rule of law, it risks forfeiting its role as the cornerstone of global security. The alliance's fate — and the future of global stability — will hinge on whether its leaders insist on pursuing peace rather than confrontation. Ahmet Davutoglu is a former prime minister (2014-2016) and foreign minister (2009-2014) of Turkey. © Project Syndicate, 2025

Rubio postpones Japan, South Korean trip to focus on Mideast conflict
Rubio postpones Japan, South Korean trip to focus on Mideast conflict

Nikkei Asia

time4 hours ago

  • Nikkei Asia

Rubio postpones Japan, South Korean trip to focus on Mideast conflict

Marco Rubio was set to visit Japan and South Korea next week in his first visit to those countries as U.S. secretary of state. © Reuters KEN MORIYASU and KANA BABA WASHINGTON/TOKYO -- U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called off his first visit to Japan and South Korea to focus on Middle East issues, Nikkei has learned. Rubio was expected land in Tokyo on Monday to kick off his first Asian tour. But Rubio has informed the Japanese and South Korean governments his schedule will be pushed back.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store