
Met chief calls racial disparities in London's justice system ‘shameful'
Sir Mark Rowley told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips that racial disparity among suspects and victims of crime in the capital remained a 'difficult' issue for the force.
The Met Police Commissioner said there was a history between policing and black communities 'where policing has got a lot wrong, and we get a lot more right today'.
'But we do still make mistakes. That's not in doubt,' Sir Mark added.
'I'm being as relentless in that as it can be.'
He continued: 'The vast majority of our people are good people.
'But that legacy, combined with the tragedy that some of this crime falls most heavily in black communities, that creates a real problem because the legacy creates concern.'
'It's not right that black boys growing up in London are more likely to be dead by the time they're 18, far more likely than white boys,' the commissioner said.
'That's, I think, shameful for the city.
'The challenge for us is, as we reach in to tackle those issues, that confrontation that comes from that reaching in, whether it's stop and search on the streets or the sort of operations you seek.
'The danger is that's landing in an environment with less trust.
'And that makes it even harder. But the people who win out of that, all of the criminals.'
He added: 'I'm so determined to find a way to get past this because if policing in black communities can find a way to confront these issues, together we can give black boys growing up in London equal life chances to white boys, which is not what we're seeing at the moment.'
'And it's not simply about policing, is it?' he added.
'I think black boys are several times more likely to be excluded from school, for example, than white boys.
'And there are multiple issues layered on top of each other that feed into disproportionality.'
The police chief said the Met is a 'stretched service', but that people who call 999 can expect an officer to attend.
'If you are in the middle of the crisis and something awful is happening and you dial 999, officers will get there really quickly,' Sir Mark said.
'I don't pretend we're not a stretched service.
'We are smaller than I think we ought to be, but I don't want to give a sort of message of a lack of hope or a lack of determination.'
'I've seen the mayor and the Home Secretary fighting hard for police resourcing,' he added.
'It's not what I'd want it to be, but it's better than it might be without their efforts.'
Sir Mark went on to say that the criminal justice system was 'close-to-broken' and can be 'frustrating' for officers.
He said: 'The thing that is frustrating is that the system – and no system can be perfect – but when the system hasn't managed to turn that person's life around and get them on the straight and narrow, and it just becomes a revolving door.
'When that happens, of course that's frustrating for officers.
'So the more successful prisons and probation can be in terms of getting people onto a law-abiding life from the path they're on, the better.
'But that is a real challenge. I mean, we're talking just after Sir Brian Leveson put his report out about the close-to-broken criminal justice system.
'And it's absolutely vital that those repairs and reforms that he's talking about happen really quickly, because the system is now so stressed.'
Sir Mark gave the example of Snaresbrook Crown Court in London, which he said had more than 100 cases listed for 2029.
'If it's someone on bail, then who might have stolen your phone or whatever and going in for a criminal court trial, that could be four years away.
'And that's pretty unacceptable, isn't it?' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump says US will send 'sophisticated' equipment to Ukraine as he criticises Putin
Update: Date: 07:35 BST Title: Ukraine attacks Zaporizhzhia site with drones, says Russia Content: Ukrainian drones attacked a training centre at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant on Sunday evening, according to the Russian-installed administration of the Russia-held plant in south-eastern Ukraine. It says "no critical" damage was recorded. The BBC has not been able to verify the report which was published by the administration on Telegram this morning. The report comes a day after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said that it had heard hundreds of rounds of small arms fire late on Saturday at the plant. Update: Date: 07:18 BST Title: US envoy Kellogg salutes Zelensky's chief of staff as he arrives in Kyiv Content: Volodymyr Zelensky's chief of staff has just posted a video on X showing Donald Trump's special envoy Gen Keith Kellogg arriving in Ukraine. He got off a train in Kyiv and greeted Andriy Yermak with a salute followed by a big hug. During his visit, Kellogg is expected to discuss security for Ukraine and sanctions against Russia. Later today Donald Trump is set to meet Nato Secretary General Mark Rutte in Washington DC. Rutte's 10:00 local time (14:00 GMT) Oval Office meeting will be closed to media, and the Nato chief is also slated to meet with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth as well. We will be keeping an eye on both and be bringing you the latest as it happens. Update: Date: 07:17 BST Title: Trump pledges come as Russia increases strikes on Ukraine Content: Lviv, in the far west of Ukraine, close to the Polish border, was recently hit by Russian missiles Donald Trump's pledge of support comes at a critical time in the war in Ukraine. Last week, Ukraine suffered its heaviest aerial attack, when 728 Russian drones and 13 cruise or ballistic missiles struck cities around the country. The city of Lutsk - which lies 90km (56 miles) from the Polish border in western Ukraine and is a transit hub for military and humanitarian aid - suffered the brunt of the overnight attack. Attacks were also reported in the western cities of Lviv and Rivne. The night after, capital Kyiv was hit by a massive attack, killing at least two people and injuring 16. This led Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to declare that "Russia is obviously stepping up terror" and urged partners to "act faster investing in weapons production and developing tech". Last month, Ukraine recorded the highest monthly civilian casualties in three years, with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured, according to the UN. Update: Date: 07:08 BST Title: 'He talks nice and then he bombs everybody' Content: Donald Trump teased today's announcement last night, when he spoke to reporters ahead of his Washington DC meeting with Nato chief Mark Rutte. "We basically are going to send them [Ukraine] various pieces of very sophisticated military," he told media gathered on the tarmac outside Air Force One. He went on to say "they" are "going to pay us 100%" - it's unclear if that means Ukraine, the European Union, Nato members, or a combination. The US president refused to go into specifics on the number of weapons Ukraine would receive, but said "we will send them Patriots, which they desperately need". The decision to back Ukraine comes after Trump appeared to grow frustrated at talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin. "Putin really surprised a lot of people," Trump explained. "He talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening. So there's a little bit of a problem there. I don't like it." Update: Date: 07:05 BST Title: Trump pledges 'sophisticated' equipment to Ukraine amid Putin frustration Content: Jenna MoonLive editor US President Donald Trump has signalled a "major" statement on Ukraine today, amid what appears to be his increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin. On Sunday night, Trump said that "sophisticated" military equipment will be heading to Ukraine, including Patriot air defence missiles. And the US president seemed irritated by Moscow's lack of action towards a ceasefire in Ukraine, telling reporters that "Putin … talks nice and then he bombs everybody in the evening". His comments follow an interview on Thursday, in which he promised a "major statement" today. US news outlet Axios reported last night that the president is considering sending offensive weapons to Ukraine. So far, Trump has only offered the nation defensive weaponry - such as the Patriot system. Trump will meet Nato chief Mark Rutte today at the White House, and US special envoy to Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, is in Kyiv this week for talks. We'll be following all the major developments here, so stick with us.


Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer accused of ‘downplaying' Troubles veterans' plight
Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of 'downplaying' the plight of Troubles' veterans who face prosecution under Labour's proposals to change the law. The Government plans to axe legislation that stopped fresh historical inquests into deaths that occurred in Northern Ireland during The Troubles, as well as civil actions. Labour has said that the 2023 Legacy Act is unpopular with Irish political parties and victims' groups, and judged incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Tim Collins, an ex-British Army colonel who gave a famously stirring eve-of-battle speech on the eve of the Iraq War, said that Sir Keir was 'on the wrong side of the argument'. Col Collins, who is from Northern Ireland, attended Parliament on Wednesday to hear the Prime Minister respond to concerns raised in the Commons about the plans. Sir David Davis said that if the plans are not reversed, the Government will 'sacrifice' veterans to 'politically-motivated lawyers trying to rewrite history with a pack of lies'. Sir Keir in turn accused Sir David of 'cheapening the debate' and 'political point-scoring' with his remarks. Writing for The Telegraph, Col Collins said that the Prime Minister had been 'frivolous and even disdainful' when responding to Sir David's concerns. He said: 'The Prime Minister resorted to downplaying an issue that will confront every Labour MP during the upcoming recess. 'As they return to their constituencies, they will face a wave of furious constituents, incensed by the Government's harsh and unwarranted treatment of veterans while seemingly rewarding those who waged a 30-year campaign against the British people.' It comes ahead of a debate in Parliament on Monday about the proposed changes to the Legacy Act, with several hundred veterans expected to descend on Whitehall to protest. The Prime Minister said on Wednesday that Sir David 'knows this is a serious issue' but that the phrasing of his question 'did not really reflect that seriousness'. He told MPs: 'We have to tread carefully and we have to get this right, and I'll work with him on that, but we don't get there by cheapening the debate. 'It's not about political point-scoring. I've worked in Northern Ireland, I've spoken to many of the people affected and I know that we must get this right.' He added: 'We have to do that in a serious way to address the issues of the past, of course, in a way that has support of victims and survivors. 'That is a key test for me because without the support of victims and survivors I think it's very hard in Northern Ireland to come up with something that will have the confidence of everybody in Northern Ireland, which is why we have to work in the way we do'. The Northern Ireland veterans' tsar told The Telegraph last month that up to 70 former soldiers could end up 'in the dock' over their actions against the IRA on behalf of the British government. Col Collins said: 'Families across the UK sent their sons to keep the peace in Northern Ireland. Many never came home. 'As summer recess nears, constituents should ask their MPs a simple question: Whose side are you on? 'Will they support costly historical revisionism that diverts funds from the NHS and welfare, or will they stand with the majority of British citizens and reject baseless prosecutions?' The shameful betrayal by the PM over our Northern Ireland veterans Watching on from the Special Gallery in the House of Commons during Prime Minister's Questions, I was dumbstruck by the Prime Minister's response to a detailed question from Sir David Davis MP regarding the protection of Northern Ireland Veterans. The PM was frankly frivolous and even disdainful to even be questioned on this very important issue, didn't you know he worked in Northern Ireland? Here, I thought, is a man who needs to play to the benches behind him, a man who knows he is on the wrong side of an argument that may well contribute to his downfall. Feeling the intense scrutiny of his own Labour MPs, the Prime Minister resorted to downplaying an issue that will confront every Labour MP during the upcoming recess. As they return to their constituencies, they will face a wave of furious constituents, incensed by the Government's harsh and unwarranted treatment of veterans while seemingly rewarding those who waged a 30-year campaign against the British people. Before Labour MPs face this reality, a Parliamentary debate is set for Monday, prompted by a petition titled 'Protect Northern Ireland Veterans from Prosecution,' which has amassed over 167,000 signatures in just over two months. In my view, this is fundamentally about stopping the politically-driven harassment of our veterans, which seeks to distort and rewrite history. This Labour Government has already stated that they plan to repeal the Northern Ireland Legacy Act, making it again possible to mount criminal cases against armed forces Veterans whilst simultaneously making it easier for those who waged war against the state and their political representatives, including Gerry Adams, to gain compensation for 30 years of malice and terrorism. After three decades of violence, the Provisional IRA and Sinn Féin, widely seen as its political wing, entered a peace process led by the Government. As part of this, the Blair administration issued over 200 'comfort letters' to individuals suspected of serious crimes, providing them with written assurances that they would not face prosecution. No such guarantees were given to the MoD, nor were they considered necessary at the time. Over 90 per cent of killings during the Troubles were perpetuated by illegal paramilitary groups, with the IRA responsible for the vast majority, including most murders within their own Catholic community. In contrast, the police and armed forces accounted for less than 10 per cent of killings, with nearly all of these, lawful, under clear and established rules of engagement. In the rare instances of wrongdoing, charges were brought, and cases were adjudicated. The state acted to protect civilians from sectarian violence. Through the immense service and bravery of soldiers and police officers, full-scale civil war was averted. Tragically, 800 soldiers and over 300 police officers killed, with thousands more left permanently injured. Now, in an effort to rewrite history for a new generation, malevolent forces are seeking prosecutions for events, often over 50 years ago, in the knowledge that many, if not all, have no chance of achieving a prosecution. But the goal isn't justice, it's creating a new narrative. A revised version of history, funded by UK taxpayers, designed to suit the agenda of our former enemies. While Sinn Féin has mobilised a cadre of republican-sympathising lawyers, bankrolled by public funds, the Ministry of Defence and Northern Ireland Office are locked in negotiation. Indeed, one Northern Ireland MP told me the Irish Government is effectively driving the Northern Ireland Office's approach. The process now resembles a Dutch auction. The Irish Government wants up to 14 cases, possibly involving multiple veterans, while the MoD argues for none. A compromise looms, with several weak cases likely proceeding, despite the passage of time and scant evidence. What do the respective governments gain? For Starmer, it's the prestige of appearing progressive on the global stage, earning praise from left-leaning circles for confronting history, even if that history is distorted or fabricated. Additionally, some also have a very close personal interest. Notably, the Attorney General, Lord Hermer, previously represented former Sinn Féin President Gerry Adams against claims made against him. For the Irish Government, a historic coalition of two parties once divided by the Irish Civil War, the stakes are nearly existential. With Sinn Féin resurgent and poised to potentially seize power in the next election, the coalition must outshine Sinn Féin's republican credentials to secure their political survival. Targeting British veterans offers a convenient way to do so, especially when the British taxpayer foots the bill. This issue extends far beyond Ireland. Families across the UK sent their sons to keep the peace in Northern Ireland. Many never came home. As summer recess nears, constituents should ask their MPs a simple question: Whose side are you on? Will they support costly historical revisionism that diverts funds from of the NHS and welfare, or will they stand with the majority of British citizens and reject baseless prosecutions? Following last week's contentious Welfare Bill vote and its chaotic whipping process, MPs' responses could shape the Prime Minister's future. Perhaps that explains his decision to play the man and not the issue in his dismissive response to David Davis MP. Our nation expects better.


Daily Mail
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside the misunderstood relationship between Queen Elizabeth II and Margaret Thatcher
Claims that the former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and the late Queen had a strained relationship were 'nonsense,' a royal insider has revealed. On paper, Queen Elizabeth II and Margaret Thatcher should have had one of the best working relationships of any monarch and Prime Minister. They were both a similar age - with Thatcher just months older than Elizabeth - and both grew up during the Second World War where they did their part to help the war effort. And, perhaps crucially, they were also both powerful women in a world that was still very much dominated by men. However, despite this, their relationship during Thatcher's 11 years as prime minister was instead defined by rumours that the pair did not get along. This burst on to the front pages of the papers in 1986 when it was revealed that Elizabeth was said to be 'dismayed' by the 'uncaring' PM's refusal to impose sanctions on apartheid South Africa, fearing that Mrs Thatcher's decision would split the Commonwealth. It was the most apparent public falling out between the Queen and her prime minister of her reign. And the rift was even a prominent plotline in the hit Netflix series The Crown. However, royal author and broadcaster Gyles Brandreth has claimed that their relationship was not as icy as the press at the time claimed but instead was misunderstood. Writing in his royal biography Elizabeth, An Intimate Portrait, Brandreth said that Thatcher told him that talk of the pair having a strained relationship was 'a lot of nonsense' and the Queen described the late Tory Prime Minister as 'simply marvellous' highlighting her commitment to the Commonwealth and the Armed Forces. Brandreth claims that while the Queen and Thatcher might not have seen eye-to-eye on policies - with the Queen having been known to be a small-c conservative compared to Thatchers more right-wing views - there is no evidence to suggest Elizabeth actively disliked Thatcher. The broadcaster highlights that the Queen showed the first female PM 'considerable respect' during her long period in office. For example, she dined at No.10 in 1985, appointed Thatcher the Order of Merit within a fortnight of her resignation in 1990 and honoured her with the Order of the Garter five years later. On top of this, Elizabeth was a guest at both Thatcher's 70th and 80th birthday celebrations and she attended Thatcher's funeral in 2013. The only other funeral that she attended was Winston Churchill. This however does not mean there is no evidence that their personalities clashed on more than one occasion. According to former royal butler Paul Burrell, Elizabeth II started washing up once in front of then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher after a picnic. Thatcher was adamant that the monarch should not be cleaning kitchenware. But Paul claims a compromise was found when Elizabeth told Thatcher: "Well I'll wash, will you dry?"' The Queen and Baroness Thatcher at her 80th birthday party. Brandreth claims that while the Queen and Thatcher might not have seen eye-to-eye on policies there is no evidence to suggest Elizabeth actively disliked Thatcher In another instance at Balmoral in the eighties, Susannah Constantine claimed that Thatcher once 'booted the Queen out for the way' in order to make tea for herself. The fashion guru, who dated the Queen's nephew David Linley for eight years, said that the former Prime Minister 'just wanted control' and was 'incredibly bossy'. Susannah said that the royal party were in a fishing hut on the grounds of the Scottish castle when Her Majesty was trying to serve her guests tea. 'The Queen would want to pour everyone's tea and I remember Margaret Thatcher almost booting her out of the way to pour the tea herself for everyone,' she said. As a staunch royalist, Thatcher had huge admiration for the Queen and - according to Brandreth - 'never failed to show her respect for the Queen'. This included arriving on time for her weekly meetings with Her Majesty but in some cases the Iron Lady would take her punctuality to the extreme. 'Whenever it [her weekly meeting] was scheduled to take place at Windsor Castle, she would get her driver to arrive on the outskirts of Windsor at least half an hour early for the appointment and they would sit in a lay-by,' Brandreth wrote. During their very first meeting in 1979, a nervous Thatcher reportedly went into the 'deepest curtsy the equerry had ever seen'. Brandreth wrote that the newly elected Thatcher was very nervous ahead of the meeting and the equerry guiding her to the Queen in the palace sensed her nervousness and reminded her to curtsy. Once in the room, Thatcher's curtsied so far down that she couldn't get back up. The equerry told Brandreth: 'We had to help her up. I took one side and the Queen took the other. We brought her to her feet and said no more about it. 'After the audience, when I collected Thatcher to take her back to her car, I said "Shall we just pause in this anteroom for a little curtsy practice?" We did.' Over 25 years later, at her 80th birthday party Thatcher performed another noticeably deep curtsy when greeting the Queen and Prince Philip at her 80th birthday party. Daily Mail columnist Andrew Pierce witnessed the curtsy firsthand and recalled the moment on an episode of the Mail's Reaction podcast. Pierce said Her Majesty's presence at the glitzy party at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Knightsbridge betrayed the 'nonsense' that the Queen did not like Britain's first female PM. 'The helicopter landed in Hyde Park, the Queen and Prince Philip arrived,' he added. 'Mrs. Thatcher did the deepest curtsy you've ever seen... at the age of 80. I didn't think she was ever gonna get up again.' It came a decade after Mrs Thatcher appeared to curtsey even lower to the Queen at her 70th birthday party. And on several occasions while in Downing Street between 1979 and 1990, Mrs Thatcher was pictured curtseying to the monarch - who she saw regularly at their weekly audiences. On the episode of The Reaction, Mr Pierce also described the touching moment when the Queen held Baroness Thatcher's hand at her 80th. The former PM was then both physically frail and had a failing memory. 'It was so lovely,' he told co-presenter and fellow Mail writer Sarah Vine.