
Inside Trump's 20-hour play to win over stubborn Republicans on Big Beautiful Bill including signed MAGA swag
Joe Wilson (R-S.C.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee, was sporting a custom ring on the big day with a golden image of the president's face as he cast his vote for the mega-bill that extended Trump's 2017 tax cuts.
With Wilson's help, the massive bill passed 218-214 after a pressure campaign by Trump and congressional leaders kept lawmakers working overnight.
'It's gold Donald Trump on silver. You don't see it every day,' Wilson told the Daily Mail about the special jewelry he wore for the occasion. 'One of my staff was kind enough to get it for me,' he explained.
Wilson's vote wasn't considered up for grabs, which may be why his staff came up with its own special Trump swag.
For the about a dozen of other lawmakers who were wavering, the president applied his famous fear tactics – as well as a charm and even an array of signed swag – to get Republicans to push the mammoth bill across the finish line.
That came despite polls showing the underwater and even some people who voted for it warning about steep cuts to Medicaid or fretting about the estimated $3 trillion it's estimated to tack onto the national debt.
Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) testified to Trump's salesmanship in a video he posted of himself leaving the White House after conservative House Freedom Caucus members who were wavering met with the president.
'The president was wonderful, as always,' Burchett gushed. 'Informative, funny, he told me he likes seeing me on TV, which was kind of cool.'
Then Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, a Trump loyalist who was walking with him, asked: 'Did you show them what he signed for you?'
'Yeah, he signed a bunch of stuff,' Burchett responded, downplaying it. 'It's cool.'
Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins also poured on the charm when she ran into Burchett outside the White House, offering a hug and asking: 'Are we getting it done?'
'Yes m'am,' he replied, before adding, 'I'm a happily married man.' The video also shows Burchett gripping a gold challenge coins of the kind Trump doles out, as he did to an African reporter he called 'beautiful.'
'Donald Trump absolutely was our closer, and Donald Trump never stopped,' said House Majority Whip Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), whose own role is to line up support for legislation on the Floor. 'Every day [he] was there in the fight [asking] "Who do I need to call? What do I need to do?"'
Scalise said no president was 'more directly engaged.'
'President Trump was in the Oval Office making phone calls to just about everybody in the House,' said Trump's economic advisor Kevin Hassett.
There were also threats, including some delivered in public.
'For Republicans, this should be an easy yes vote. Ridiculous!!!' Trump wrote in all-caps on his Truth Social site. 'MAGA is not happy, and it's costing you votes!!!' he wrote in another.
Not all of his persuasive tactics resulted in votes. Trump golfed this past weekend with ally Sen. Lindsey Graham but also Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, one of three Senate Republicans who voted against the bill.
(Victory came in the Senate after leaders offered a series of concessions to Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who nevertheless wrote that 'This bill needs more work' and 'this has been an awful process' with a 'frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline.')
Trump has notably avoided railing against Paul, even while vowing to primary Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who Trump rips as a 'grandstander' and who also opposed the bill.
Just two House Republicans, Massie and Pennsylvania Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, voted against the bill.
That comes even as fellow Republicans who had wavered ultimately got behind it.
That includes New Jersey GOP Rep. Jeff Van Drew, who had raised concerns that limits on health care provider taxes in his state could and up sapping critical resources for Medicaid.
'I couldn't vote for it that way,' he said, because it would have devastated how the state operates. He said he worked with President Trump directly and got a change incorporated in a final 'wrap-around' amendment.
He said he was trying to persuade some of his own colleagues with the misguided view that 'Medicaid was for lazy people.'
'We addressed that, okay? But the bottom line is it's working people, it's disabled people, it's nursing homes, senior citizens, a whole array of people.'
Now that the bill is through Congress, Van Drew acknowledged that the fight now becomes a PR battle – with pre-vote polls showing support for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is underwater, and a potential risk for Republicans in the 2026 elections. A nonpartisan Congressional Budget estimate said the bill would cut Medicaid by $1 trillion and could cause nearly 12 million people to lose health insurance coverage.
'So the bottom line is, yes, so now this changes from the bureaucratic public policy process into a policy of who's going to be a better mouthpiece? Who's going to articulate the political sense of the ramifications of this bill better? Are you going to be able to emphasize the tax cuts .. So if we articulate that well, if we sell it well, if we talk about we're still maintaining the safety net, then I think we'll be okay.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Stock markets shrug off tariff letters after Trump says August 1 tariff deadline ‘not 100% firm'
Update: Date: 2025-07-08T06:11:27.000Z Title: Donald Trump's new tariff rates Content: If you missed it last night, here are the new tariffs which Donald Trump announced in a flurry of letters to world leaders: Goods from Bangladesh: 35% US tariff Bosnia and Herzegovina: 30% Cambodia: 36% Indonesia: 32% Japan: 25% Kazakhstan: 25% Laos: 40% Malaysia: 25% Myanmar: 40% Serbia: 35% South Africa: 30% South Korea: 25% Thailand: 36% Tunisia: 25% Reminder: These rates will be charged on imports into the US from these countries, and paid by the importer. Update: Date: 2025-07-08T06:09:01.000Z Title: Introduction: Asia-Pacific shrug off new Trump tariff threats Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. The TACO trade is back! Many Asia-Pacific stock markets are rising today, despite Donald Trump's decision to ramp up his trade war by announcing new tariffs on 14 US trading partners. There's relief that Trump has announced a new pause before these new levies kick in – a new three-week reprieve kicks the can down the road to 1 August, rather than tomorrow. This delay will give countries to negotiate trade deals with the US. Asked if 1 August deadline was firm, Trump indicated it wasn't exactly concrete, saying last night: 'I would say firm, but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say we'd like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that.' That has encouraged traders to conclude that Trump Always Chickens Out (TACO). So while there were losses on Wall Street last night after the first tariff letters were released, markets across Asia are taking the news in their stride. In Tokyo, the Nikkei 2225 has risen by 0.3%, up 118 points to 39,705 points, even though Japan has been threatened with a new 25% tariff from 1 August (slightly higher than the 24% rate announced back in April, before Trump's 90-day pause which expires tomorrow). South Korea's KOSPI has gained nearly 2%, even though Seoul has also received a letter announcing a new 25% tariff. China's CSI300 index has climbed by 0.8%. European markets are expected to open flat. More letters are expected to be sent later this week. Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management, says traders are pricing in 'delay, maybe even dysfunction', rather than a resolution of the trade war. But that's enough to keep them bidding. Innes writes: Markets didn't lurch because they've seen this show before. Tariff hike, rhetoric spikes, and then—like clockwork—comes the sudden pivot: 'We're still open to talks.' This is policy by poker tell. And by now, investors are familiar enough with the bluff to call it and fade the fear. However…Ipek Ozkardeskaya, senior analyst at Swissquote Bank, fears there is too much 'unexplained optimism', adding: The deadline extension is not good news, per se. It simply adds to the uncertainty. It's yet another sign that the deadline won't be a line in the sand, and that tariffs set in the coming days and weeks won't be carved in stone, either. They will be constantly changed — raised, lowered — and used as a go-to threat in every situation. 9.30am BST: UK's Office for Budget Responsibility to release its latest Fiscal risks and sustainability report 10am BST: Marks & Spencer chair Archie Norman to face business and trade committee to discuss M&S's cyber attack 11am BST: Office for Budget Responsibility press conference 12pm BST: Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry to release Volume 1 of its Final Report


Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
India ready for trade deals but not to meet deadlines, minister says
NEW DELHI, July 4 (Reuters) - India is ready to make trade deals in the national interest, but not just to meet deadlines, Trade Minister Piyush Goyal said on Friday when asked whether a deal could be reached with the U.S. in time for a July 9 deadline set by Washington. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 26% tariff on all imported Indian goods, among the tariffs due to take effect next week on countries around the world who fail to reach agreements before a deadline he set in April. "Free trade agreements are possible only when there is two-way benefit, it should be a win-win agreement," Goyal told reporters. "National interest will always be supreme. Keeping that in mind, if a good deal can be made, then India is always ready to make a deal with developed countries," he said. "India never does any trade deal on the basis of deadline or time frame…we will accept it only when it is completely finalised and in the national interest." Indian officials returned from Washington this week after an extended visit to iron out lingering concerns on both sides. Trade talks between India and the U.S. have hit roadblocks over disagreements on import duties for auto components, steel, and farm goods. India is resisting opening up its agriculture and dairy sectors while asking for a favourable tariff for its goods entering the U.S. compared to countries like Vietnam and China. Separately, India proposed retaliatory duties against the U.S. at the World Trade Organization, saying Washington's 25% tariff on automobiles and some auto parts would affect $2.89 billion of India's exports, according to an official notification. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Trump had earlier agreed to sign a bilateral trade agreement to expand trade to $500 billion by 2030, up from $191 billion in 2024.


Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Spectator
Europe must prepare to support Ukraine without America
It is unquestionably the case that people who should have known better were blinded by the Capri-Sun King's glare when they reassured us that Donald Trump would not abandon Ukraine, that a second Trump administration would not really cut off military aid to Kyiv or effectively offer a free pass to Vladimir Putin. Yet that is what is happening. Last week the US Department of Defense halted a planned delivery of air defence missiles and precision munitions to Ukraine, the third time this year that such a stoppage has been put in place. The weaponry was part of a supply programme agreed under President Biden, but was halted as the Pentagon undertakes a 'capability review' to assess stockpiles currently held by the United States. A spokesman explained: We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world. Part of our job is to give the President a framework that he can use to evaluate how many munitions we have and where we're sending them. And that review process is happening right now and is ongoing. However, the motivation behind the sudden decision, reportedly taken personally by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and without coordination or consultation either within the administration or with Congress, is suspect. Democrat Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, said his staff had 'seen the numbers' and 'we are not at any lower point, stockpile-wise, than we've been in the three-and-a-half years of the Ukraine conflict'. President Trump has made no secret of his attitude towards Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelensky or his scepticism of their cause. It is no surprise that a partisan as zealously loyal and conceptually unfit for office as Hegseth should mirror the commander-in-chief's instincts. For Ukraine, and for European security, this is serious. It is no coincidence that at the end of last week Russia launched its biggest air strikes on Kyiv since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in 2022, using more than 500 drones. Ukraine is believed to be running dangerously low on stocks of interceptor missiles for its US-supplied MIM-104 Patriot air defence systems, which made up part of the anticipated deliveries, as did FIM-92 Stinger man-portable surface-to-air missiles. There are reports that Ukrainian forces were reduced to using machine guns to try to bring down drones in the recent air strikes. It must now be clear to any observer – as it is certainly clear to a gleeful Kremlin – that the United States is not a reliable ally to Ukraine, unpredictable even in its reliability (some of the munitions to be transferred last week had already been loaded onto lorries in Poland before their delivery was stopped by the Pentagon). What is the solution? How do Ukraine's allies in Europe respond? Germany has already sent three of its own Patriot batteries to Ukraine, but last week it emerged that Chancellor Friedrich Merz has also discussed purchasing further missiles from the United States and sending them on to Ukraine. Merz and his SPD defence minister, Boris Pistorius, are keen for Germany to take a stronger leadership role on Ukraine. Major General Christian Freuding, who oversees the Special Staff for Ukraine at the Federal Defence Ministry in Berlin, noted that Nato's European members plus Canada had exceeded the estimated $20 billion (£14.7 billion) of military assistance from Washington last year. 'If the political will is there, then the means will also be there to largely compensate for the American support,' Freuding added. There are two parts to assistance to Ukraine. The first is the obvious support for defensive measures like Patriot missiles to protect the country from Russian air strikes. Germany's apparent intentions are welcome in that regard, and will make a real difference so long as President Trump does not also prove reluctant to countenance even the sale of weapons to third parties for shipment to Ukraine. The second part has to be assisting Ukraine in more active measures against Russia. If Ukrainian forces can take the fight to Russian bases and installations, and particularly if they can force Russia to pull forces further back from the border for safety, they will make themselves all the safer. We saw last November the effect that long-range strikes could have when the United States finally agreed to remove restrictions on the use of MGM-140 ATACMS tactical ballistic missiles and the UK followed suit on Storm Shadow cruise missiles. Olaf Scholz had vetoed the supply of Taurus long-range missiles when chancellor of Germany. Merz has shifted Berlin's position, saying such a supply is 'within the realms of possibility' and agreeing a deal to help manufacture new precision strike weapons in Ukraine. America has been the biggest bilateral donor to Ukraine but it is not irreplaceable. If supplies from the United States are beginning to falter, however, European nations need to act quickly and decisively. Germany is doing so, and the UK, especially after lifting restrictions on Storm Shadow, has been generally reliable. We should not see assistance to Ukraine as separate from each country's national security: the threat from Russia is here, now, and it is being unleashed on the cities and armies of Ukraine. The West cannot and should not wait to respond.