She got death threats after Harrison Butker post she didn't write. She's suing KC
A Kansas City communications staffer says her superiors ignored her requests when she asked that they clear her name after she was falsely accused of sending out a social media post last year that allegedly doxxed Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker and then faced online harassment, vitriol and racist death threats.
After she complained about their inaction, Andrea Watts said she was subjected to increasingly critical treatment at work in City Hall. She recently sued the city seeking monetary damages on the basis of those allegations.
The city declined comment on the lawsuit in Jackson County Circuit Court, as officials do not discuss pending litigation.
Watts said she felt threatened by the racist, sexist and violent posts directed toward her after she was falsely identified online as the person who posted a message on the city's X account in response to Butker's controversial speech at a college graduation ceremony last spring.
'Just a reminder that Harrison Butker lives in the City of Lee's Summit,' the May 15, 2024 posting on X said.
While it was no secret that Butker lived in that Kansas City suburb and that the tweet did not give out his address, online commenters accused Kansas City of exposing Butker to personal risk and harassment by posting the name of the city where he lived.
Many of the commenters accused the city of doxxing Butker after he gave a speech in which he expressed his conservative views on political and social issues, such as abortion and how be believes his wife is happier having sacrificed her career for becoming a homemaker.
City officials deleted the post 40 minutes after it went up. Both the city's account and Mayor Quinton Lucas issued online apologies that night, agreeing that the post was inappropriate.
The unnamed city employee who authored the post later lost their job.
But in the immediate hours after the post was taken down, online furor grew. Watts, a social media specialist, and another female city staffer, were soon singled out for scorn by the online mob, despite having nothing to do with posting the tweet.
Both are Black and were subjected to racist and misogynistic posts. They felt threatened when their own personal information was posted online. According to her lawsuit, Watts was identified through her Linked-In account. People posted messages that included her photo and photos of the entryway of one of her addresses 'and personal identifying information published for the purposes of threatening and harming' her.
She got death threats.
'There is no hole deep enough, no woods deep enough for you to hide in,' one post read, according to the lawsuit.
Another pictured a Black woman hanging from a tree in front of a photograph of the apartment building where Watts lived along with her full name and address.
That night, she asked that the city post a statement 'right away to clear her name,' but nothing was done, the suit says.
Two days later, on May 17, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey posted a letter to social media demanding records that would show who penned the Butker tweet.
That same day as the harassment directed at the two women, Watt's unnamed co-worker sent an email to Mayor Quinton Lucas, the City Council and city manager asking that steps be taken to clear their names, as they felt scared from being subjected to the vile harassment on line.
Lucas instead issued a general statement that day stating that some city employees were being falsely accused and harassed. But he did not mention Watts or the other woman by name and the harassment continued.
He also sent a letter to Bailey, alleging that his on-line statement had contributed to the climate that led to the ongoing threats towards Black women employed by the city.
The women were called the N word. Watts was singled out as 'a DEI hire' and a 'ghetto rat.'
The lawsuit claims that the city's 'refusal to end the harassment and discrimination by publicly clearing' Watts' name and that of her co-worker reflected 'a selfish desire to prevent negative media and public attention that would harm the City's reputation and more importantly City Manager Brian Platt's and Assistant City Manager Melissa Kozakiewicz's reputations.'
The names of Platt and Kozakiewicz are redacted in the public court record.
Platt was fired as city manager this spring after the city lost a lawsuit filed by former communications director Chris Hernandez. The latter claimed he was demoted because he and Platt disagreed on the importance of telling the truth to the news media and public. Platt was focused on the city's image, while Hernandez insisted on being truthful, the suit said.
Koazakiewicz oversees the city's communications office and remains a city employee.
Due to threats of harm and the release of her personal information, Watts said she asked that the city find her temporary lodging until the internet storm blew over, but claims her request was denied. The city also refused to make any attempt to scrub her personal information from the internet after she requested it, the lawsuit says.
She claims her worklife became hostile. She received increasing criticism about her job performance and other unfair treatment after complaining about how the city mishandled her situation.
Watts is still employed with the city. She is seeking lost pay and future wages, as well as punitive damages, attorneys fees and other costs associated with preparing the case.
She is represented by Erin Vernon and Lynne Bratcher, the lawyers who won the Hernandez whistleblower lawsuit. The City Council last month approved a $1.4 million final settlement that ends any further proceedings in that case.
The other woman who was doxxed has also hired an attorney who specializes in employment discrimination, who says she will file a lawsuit in the next couple of weeks.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
New York, San Francisco and other cities cap Pride month with a mix of party and protest
NEW YORK — The monthlong celebration of LGBTQ+ Pride reached its crescendo as New York and other major cities in the U.S. and around the world hosted parades and marches Sunday. Pride celebrations are typically a daylong mix of jubilant street parties and political protest, but this year's iterations took a more defiant stance as Republicans, led by President Trump, have sought to roll back LGBTQ+ rights. The theme of the festivities in Manhattan was 'Rise Up: Pride in Protest.' San Francisco's Pride theme was 'Queer Joy Is Resistance,' while Seattle's was simply 'Louder.' Lance Brammer, a 56-year-old teacher from Ohio attending his first Pride parade in New York, said he felt 'validated' as he marveled at the size of the city's celebration, the nation's oldest and largest. 'With the climate that we have politically, it just seems like they're trying to do away with the whole LGBTQ community, especially the trans community,' he said, wearing a vivid, multicolored shirt. 'And it just shows that they've got a fight ahead of them if they think that they're going to do that with all of these people here and all of the support.' Doriana Feliciano, who described herself as an LGBTQ+ ally, held up a sign saying, 'Please don't lose hope,' in support of friends she said couldn't attend Sunday. 'We're in a very progressive time, but there's still hate out there, and I feel like this is a great way to raise awareness,' she said. Manhattan's parade wound its way down Fifth Avenue with more than 700 participating groups greeted by huge crowds. The rolling celebration will pass the Stonewall Inn, the famed Greenwich Village gay bar where a 1969 police raid triggered protests and energized the LGBTQ+ rights movement. The site is now a national monument. The first Pride march was held in New York City in 1970 to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the Stonewall uprising. Later Sunday, marchers in San Francisco, host to another of the world's largest Pride events, planned to head down Market Street to concert stages set up at the Civic Center Plaza. San Francisco's mammoth City Hall is among the venues hosting a post-march party. Denver, Chicago, Seattle, Minneapolis and Toronto were among the other major North American cities hosting Pride parades on Sunday. Several global cities including Tokyo, Paris and São Paulo held their events earlier this month, and others come later in the year, including London in July and Rio de Janeiro in November. Since taking office in January, Trump has issued orders and implemented policies targeting transgender people, removing them from the military, preventing federal insurance programs from paying for gender-affirmation surgeries for young people and attempting to keep transgender athletes out of girls' and women's sports. Peter McLaughlin said he's lived in New York for years but had never attended the Pride parade. The 34-year-old Brooklyn resident said he felt compelled this year as a transgender man. 'A lot of people just don't understand that letting people live doesn't take away from their own experience, and right now it's just important to show that we're just people,' McLaughlin said. Gabrielle Meighan, 23, of New Jersey, said she felt it was important to come out to this year's celebrations because they come days after the 10th anniversary of the Supreme Court's landmark June 26, 2015, ruling in Obergefell vs. Hodges that recognized same-sex marriage nationwide. 'It's really important to vocalize our rights and state why it's important for us to be included,' she said. Manhattan on Sunday also hosted the Queer Liberation March, an activism-centered event launched in recent years amid criticism that the more mainstream parade had become too corporate. Marchers holding signs that included 'Gender affirming care saves lives' and 'No Pride in apartheid' headed north from the city's AIDS Memorial to Columbus Circle near Central Park. Among the other headwinds faced by gay rights groups this year is the loss of corporate sponsorship. American companies have pulled back support of Pride events, reflecting a broader walking back of diversity and inclusion efforts amid shifting public sentiment. NYC Pride said this month that about 20% of its corporate sponsors dropped or reduced support, including PepsiCo and Nissan. Organizers of San Francisco Pride said they lost the support of five major corporate donors, including Comcast and Anheuser-Busch. Marcelo and Shaffrey write for the Associated Press.


Black America Web
7 hours ago
- Black America Web
Kyrie Irving Donates $50K For Tamir Rice Youth Center
Source: David Berding / Getty NBA star and activist Kyrie Irving has donated $50,000 to a fundraiser launched to support the creation of a youth center honoring the legacy of Tamir Rice. Nearly a decade after 12-year-old Tamir Rice was killed by Cleveland police, his name continues to echo, not as a headline but rather a call to action. This week, NBA star point guard Kyrie Irving answered that call with a powerful donation of $50,000 to the Tamir Rice Foundation, bringing a grassroots fundraiser to over $85,000, a huge step closer to its $110,000 goal. The campaign, launched on June 9 by Tamir's mother, Samaria Rice, was created to honor what would have been Tamir's 23rd birthday. The GoFundMe campaign was designed to help further develop a building she purchased in Cleveland as a space for youth enrichment, asking donors to give $23 in honor of the 23 years her son would have lived had he not been gunned down by police. 'I miss my son so much each and every day,' Samaria wrote on the fundraiser page. 'As our family approaches Tamir's 23rd birthday, I'm asking for 23 dollars for 23 years without him. I purchased a building in the city of Cleveland to give back to our inner-city youth with art and cultural developments.' Tamir Rice was just 12 years old when he was tragically shot and killed by Cleveland police officer Timothy Loehmann while playing in a park with a toy gun in 2014. The killing sparked national outrage and became a heartbreaking symbol of police brutality against Black children. Now, a little over a decade later, Samaria Rice is working to turn that pain into purpose through the Tamir Rice Foundation. Source: Andrew Burton / Getty 'I have already invested into this beautiful historical building with [all your] support,' Rice continued. 'The help you all already have given Tamir's legacy we are forever appreciative. We now have a new team to help us follow this through. I'm almost finished. I will not let my community down or anyone who believes in the vision. Trust me—you will see the results.' Irving's donation, made on June 25, is the largest received to date, but it's not unusual for Irving, who's been putting his money where his mouth is for years. From standing in solidarity with Eric Garner's family by wearing an 'I Can't Breathe' shirt back in 2014, to supporting Indigenous communities, HBCUs, and social justice movements, giving back is who he is. Kyrie Irving's latest act of generosity follows news that the New Jersey-bred point guard opted out of his previous deal and is expected to sign a three-year, $119 million contract extension with the Dallas Mavericks, a team he helped lead to the NBA Finals last season before falling to the Boston Celtics. The new deal will keep the point guard in Dallas for an additional three years when he can activate a player option for the 2027-28 season, according to sources. Irving is currently nursing an ACL injury suffered during the last NBA season. Kyrie may be sidelined with an ACL injury, but clearly, the work hasn't stopped. And neither has Samaria Rice. With just under $25,000 left to raise, this campaign is more than a fundraiser; it's a community call to action to honor Tamir by building something for the next generation that lasts, and thanks to Kyrie Irving, that vision is one step closer to becoming real. Source: Cleveland Police Department / Cleveland Police Department SEE ALSO: 10 Years Later: Remembering Tamir Rice Remembering Tamir Rice On His Birthday SEE ALSO Kyrie Irving Donates $50K For Tamir Rice Youth Center was originally published on


San Francisco Chronicle
8 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: The federal government once stood up for what was right. What's changed?
As a Black teenager growing up in Detroit in the 1960s, I was horrified after seeing news coverage of the peaceful demonstrators, marchers and children being attacked and brutalized. The demonstrators, mostly Black Americans, were simply asking for the same rights that were afforded to the majority of Americans. Today's demonstrations against the Trump administration's immigration roundups in Los Angeles and elsewhere remind me of the Civil Rights Movement. The National Guard is deployed in Los Angeles, purportedly to protect federal property. The last time the guard was used in a disputed manner was 1957. Nine Black high school students attempted to enroll at the all-white Little Rock Central High School in 1957. The Democratic Arkansas Gov. Orval Faubus called in the National Guard to prevent it. In response, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent the Army to protect the students. The irony is self-evident. The cause of the peaceful demonstrators in Los Angeles and beyond is righteous. It is a shame that the federal government under President Donald Trump no longer protects the disenfranchised and marginalized. Clarence Boyd, Oakland Maintain health care I was relieved when Sen. John McCain voted against repealing the Affordable Care Act in 2017. As a breast cancer survivor with two pre-existing conditions, the thought of losing my health care was terrifying. I recently overcame another bout of breast cancer, and I'm grateful a second mastectomy was avoided. Medicare's follow-up care has been superb. Now we're facing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, which threatens the health care coverage of 16 million Americans by 2034. The proposed bill includes substantial cuts to Medicaid and changes to the Affordable Care Act that will affect low-income individuals and families. What kind of society are we if we fail to support our sick, elderly and disabled? We need to pressure Congress to refuse a huge deficit increase while simultaneously denying health care to vulnerable populations. It's not crazy You might think that I am a Republican. I believe in fiscal responsibility. I support a balanced federal budget. I support a strong immigration policy. I support a strong national defense. I support a rational and fair tariff policy. I believe in fair and honest elections. But I am not a Republican. I am a Democrat. And just because I have empathy for the most vulnerable and defenseless among us, that also does not make me 'a radical left lunatic.' Bill Schrupp, Lafayette