logo
Paris 'concerned' about Michael Jackson estate payments

Paris 'concerned' about Michael Jackson estate payments

The Advertiser12-07-2025
Singer Paris Jackson is "concerned" about payments being made by her father Michael Jackson's estate.
The 27-year-old Jackson has objected to a request for court approval of the estate executors' "premium payments" to three law firms in her position as a beneficiary of the Thriller hit-maker's estate.
In documents filed on June 24 and obtained by People magazine, Jackson expressed her concern over an alleged "practice of granting so-called 'premium payments' for unrecorded attorney time, much less paying 100 per cent of any such extraordinary amounts".
The paperwork named six months in 2018 when executors requested approval for $US625,000 ($A950,137) in payments for "uncaptured time" without explaining "as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment".
Two of the firms had received their prospective payments, in breach of the "court's order allowing only partial payment of attorneys' fees until court approval is obtained".
"Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel," the document said.
"(The payments) raise serious and substantial questions about Executors' ability to effectively supervise counsel, by, at minimum, requiring that counsel record their time in a manner susceptible to at least superficial review and oversight, namely by means of task-billed time entries, and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues."
Jackson is also said to be "concerned" about the executors' alleged "gross lack of diligence in seeking the required court approval for extraordinary fees and costs" for the 2018 payments and lack of explanation for the delays.
Her lawyer Craig Peters claimed there was "no written agreement" authorising executors to seek approval for fees in six-month increments and requested a "schedule for all of the outstanding approvals, both the accountings and the legal fees".
Lawyers for the estate insisted nothing untoward had happened.
"The executors' approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this estate over $US3 billion," Jonathan Steinsapir told People.
"We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court."
Insiders said the "premium payments" were connected to the sale of Michael Jackson's stake in EMI to Sony.
"They are objecting to relatively minor bonuses to three firms for work on the EMI catalogue sale in 2018," the source said.
"The estate, assisted by these lawyers and others, bought a 10 per cent stake in EMI for $US50,000 ($A76,011) in 2012 due to a contractual right we had with Sony.
"In 2018, the stake sold for almost $US300 million ($A456 million). Any business in this position would reward those who worked on that matter through the years.
"They also claim that the estate had to withhold 30 per cent of all fees pending court approval. On that, they are simply mistaken and do not understand the court's orders.
"The estate has paid bonuses like this to attorneys for years and they've all been approved without any objections."
At the time of his death in 2009, Jackson - whose sons Prince and Bigi are also beneficiaries of his estate - was more than $US500 million ($A760 million) in debt to more than 65 creditors.
A hearing regarding the matter is scheduled for Wednesday.
Singer Paris Jackson is "concerned" about payments being made by her father Michael Jackson's estate.
The 27-year-old Jackson has objected to a request for court approval of the estate executors' "premium payments" to three law firms in her position as a beneficiary of the Thriller hit-maker's estate.
In documents filed on June 24 and obtained by People magazine, Jackson expressed her concern over an alleged "practice of granting so-called 'premium payments' for unrecorded attorney time, much less paying 100 per cent of any such extraordinary amounts".
The paperwork named six months in 2018 when executors requested approval for $US625,000 ($A950,137) in payments for "uncaptured time" without explaining "as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment".
Two of the firms had received their prospective payments, in breach of the "court's order allowing only partial payment of attorneys' fees until court approval is obtained".
"Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel," the document said.
"(The payments) raise serious and substantial questions about Executors' ability to effectively supervise counsel, by, at minimum, requiring that counsel record their time in a manner susceptible to at least superficial review and oversight, namely by means of task-billed time entries, and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues."
Jackson is also said to be "concerned" about the executors' alleged "gross lack of diligence in seeking the required court approval for extraordinary fees and costs" for the 2018 payments and lack of explanation for the delays.
Her lawyer Craig Peters claimed there was "no written agreement" authorising executors to seek approval for fees in six-month increments and requested a "schedule for all of the outstanding approvals, both the accountings and the legal fees".
Lawyers for the estate insisted nothing untoward had happened.
"The executors' approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this estate over $US3 billion," Jonathan Steinsapir told People.
"We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court."
Insiders said the "premium payments" were connected to the sale of Michael Jackson's stake in EMI to Sony.
"They are objecting to relatively minor bonuses to three firms for work on the EMI catalogue sale in 2018," the source said.
"The estate, assisted by these lawyers and others, bought a 10 per cent stake in EMI for $US50,000 ($A76,011) in 2012 due to a contractual right we had with Sony.
"In 2018, the stake sold for almost $US300 million ($A456 million). Any business in this position would reward those who worked on that matter through the years.
"They also claim that the estate had to withhold 30 per cent of all fees pending court approval. On that, they are simply mistaken and do not understand the court's orders.
"The estate has paid bonuses like this to attorneys for years and they've all been approved without any objections."
At the time of his death in 2009, Jackson - whose sons Prince and Bigi are also beneficiaries of his estate - was more than $US500 million ($A760 million) in debt to more than 65 creditors.
A hearing regarding the matter is scheduled for Wednesday.
Singer Paris Jackson is "concerned" about payments being made by her father Michael Jackson's estate.
The 27-year-old Jackson has objected to a request for court approval of the estate executors' "premium payments" to three law firms in her position as a beneficiary of the Thriller hit-maker's estate.
In documents filed on June 24 and obtained by People magazine, Jackson expressed her concern over an alleged "practice of granting so-called 'premium payments' for unrecorded attorney time, much less paying 100 per cent of any such extraordinary amounts".
The paperwork named six months in 2018 when executors requested approval for $US625,000 ($A950,137) in payments for "uncaptured time" without explaining "as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment".
Two of the firms had received their prospective payments, in breach of the "court's order allowing only partial payment of attorneys' fees until court approval is obtained".
"Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel," the document said.
"(The payments) raise serious and substantial questions about Executors' ability to effectively supervise counsel, by, at minimum, requiring that counsel record their time in a manner susceptible to at least superficial review and oversight, namely by means of task-billed time entries, and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues."
Jackson is also said to be "concerned" about the executors' alleged "gross lack of diligence in seeking the required court approval for extraordinary fees and costs" for the 2018 payments and lack of explanation for the delays.
Her lawyer Craig Peters claimed there was "no written agreement" authorising executors to seek approval for fees in six-month increments and requested a "schedule for all of the outstanding approvals, both the accountings and the legal fees".
Lawyers for the estate insisted nothing untoward had happened.
"The executors' approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this estate over $US3 billion," Jonathan Steinsapir told People.
"We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court."
Insiders said the "premium payments" were connected to the sale of Michael Jackson's stake in EMI to Sony.
"They are objecting to relatively minor bonuses to three firms for work on the EMI catalogue sale in 2018," the source said.
"The estate, assisted by these lawyers and others, bought a 10 per cent stake in EMI for $US50,000 ($A76,011) in 2012 due to a contractual right we had with Sony.
"In 2018, the stake sold for almost $US300 million ($A456 million). Any business in this position would reward those who worked on that matter through the years.
"They also claim that the estate had to withhold 30 per cent of all fees pending court approval. On that, they are simply mistaken and do not understand the court's orders.
"The estate has paid bonuses like this to attorneys for years and they've all been approved without any objections."
At the time of his death in 2009, Jackson - whose sons Prince and Bigi are also beneficiaries of his estate - was more than $US500 million ($A760 million) in debt to more than 65 creditors.
A hearing regarding the matter is scheduled for Wednesday.
Singer Paris Jackson is "concerned" about payments being made by her father Michael Jackson's estate.
The 27-year-old Jackson has objected to a request for court approval of the estate executors' "premium payments" to three law firms in her position as a beneficiary of the Thriller hit-maker's estate.
In documents filed on June 24 and obtained by People magazine, Jackson expressed her concern over an alleged "practice of granting so-called 'premium payments' for unrecorded attorney time, much less paying 100 per cent of any such extraordinary amounts".
The paperwork named six months in 2018 when executors requested approval for $US625,000 ($A950,137) in payments for "uncaptured time" without explaining "as to why counsel was incapable of recording unbilled time, or why such a failure should not preclude payment".
Two of the firms had received their prospective payments, in breach of the "court's order allowing only partial payment of attorneys' fees until court approval is obtained".
"Even worse, these payments appear, at least in part, to consist of lavish gratuities bestowed upon already well-compensated counsel," the document said.
"(The payments) raise serious and substantial questions about Executors' ability to effectively supervise counsel, by, at minimum, requiring that counsel record their time in a manner susceptible to at least superficial review and oversight, namely by means of task-billed time entries, and refraining from wasteful, six-figure gift-giving to themselves and their colleagues."
Jackson is also said to be "concerned" about the executors' alleged "gross lack of diligence in seeking the required court approval for extraordinary fees and costs" for the 2018 payments and lack of explanation for the delays.
Her lawyer Craig Peters claimed there was "no written agreement" authorising executors to seek approval for fees in six-month increments and requested a "schedule for all of the outstanding approvals, both the accountings and the legal fees".
Lawyers for the estate insisted nothing untoward had happened.
"The executors' approval of payments to attorneys have been made with the same business judgment that has earned this estate over $US3 billion," Jonathan Steinsapir told People.
"We are confident that the objected-to payments are appropriate as, indeed they are fully consistent with payments made in the decade prior, all of which have been approved by the Probate Court."
Insiders said the "premium payments" were connected to the sale of Michael Jackson's stake in EMI to Sony.
"They are objecting to relatively minor bonuses to three firms for work on the EMI catalogue sale in 2018," the source said.
"The estate, assisted by these lawyers and others, bought a 10 per cent stake in EMI for $US50,000 ($A76,011) in 2012 due to a contractual right we had with Sony.
"In 2018, the stake sold for almost $US300 million ($A456 million). Any business in this position would reward those who worked on that matter through the years.
"They also claim that the estate had to withhold 30 per cent of all fees pending court approval. On that, they are simply mistaken and do not understand the court's orders.
"The estate has paid bonuses like this to attorneys for years and they've all been approved without any objections."
At the time of his death in 2009, Jackson - whose sons Prince and Bigi are also beneficiaries of his estate - was more than $US500 million ($A760 million) in debt to more than 65 creditors.
A hearing regarding the matter is scheduled for Wednesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?
Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?

Sydney Morning Herald

time3 days ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?

For nearly 10 years, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert ruled the late-night ratings roost, delighting audiences with biting satire, especially that aimed at US President Donald Trump. But last week, US network CBS announced the program would end in May, finishing a three-decade run, which began with David Letterman in 1993. Wild speculation swirled. Talk of Trump, Paramount and mergers mounted, as fans protested outside New York's Ed Sullivan Theatre – where The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is filmed – with signs reading, 'Colbert Stays! Trump Must Go!' On Friday the Trump administration approved a merger between Paramount Global and Skydance Media, with Skydance taking control of the entertainment giant. So, why do people think Trump had something to do with The Late Show 's cancellation, and what could it potentially mean for Australia's media landscape? Why was the show cancelled? According to CBS' parent company Paramount, the program's cancellation was 'purely a financial decision'. 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' the network's executives said in a statement. Anonymous reports later claimed the show cost the network between $US40 million and $US50 million ($61 million to $76 million) a year. However, Colbert has long delivered critical takes on Trump and his administration. He has spoken about the president's past connections with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. And during an interview with one of his first guests in 2015, Jeb Bush – who was running his presidential primary campaign against Trump at the time – Colbert implied Trump was an 'orange and crazy' person.

Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?
Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?

The Age

time3 days ago

  • The Age

Stephen Colbert's Late Show has been axed. But what did a $12b merger have to do with it?

For nearly 10 years, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert ruled the late-night ratings roost, delighting audiences with biting satire, especially that aimed at US President Donald Trump. But last week, US network CBS announced the program would end in May, finishing a three-decade run, which began with David Letterman in 1993. Wild speculation swirled. Talk of Trump, Paramount and mergers mounted, as fans protested outside New York's Ed Sullivan Theatre – where The Late Show with Stephen Colbert is filmed – with signs reading, 'Colbert Stays! Trump Must Go!' On Friday the Trump administration approved a merger between Paramount Global and Skydance Media, with Skydance taking control of the entertainment giant. So, why do people think Trump had something to do with The Late Show 's cancellation, and what could it potentially mean for Australia's media landscape? Why was the show cancelled? According to CBS' parent company Paramount, the program's cancellation was 'purely a financial decision'. 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' the network's executives said in a statement. Anonymous reports later claimed the show cost the network between $US40 million and $US50 million ($61 million to $76 million) a year. However, Colbert has long delivered critical takes on Trump and his administration. He has spoken about the president's past connections with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. And during an interview with one of his first guests in 2015, Jeb Bush – who was running his presidential primary campaign against Trump at the time – Colbert implied Trump was an 'orange and crazy' person.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's ‘Meet Me at the Lake' movie still has no director or cast
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's ‘Meet Me at the Lake' movie still has no director or cast

News.com.au

time3 days ago

  • News.com.au

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's ‘Meet Me at the Lake' movie still has no director or cast

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's remaining Netflix projects may be on ice as their exclusive multimillion-dollar deal comes to an end. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced back in August 2023 that they were producing a film adaptation of Carley Fortune's hit romance novel, Meet Me at the Lake for the streamer. But Page Six reports Archewell productions has yet to hire a director or come anywhere close to picking a cast. Netflix is believed to have paid out around $US3 million for the rights to the book for the duo to produce, though it's understood little has been done to get the project moving. 'By this point, you would have thought they would have got a director on board and a cast. So what is the delay?' asked a Hollywood source. 'And when you make something for Netflix, it takes a long time for it to actually hit the streamer — there is so much to do in post production, to make sure it's ready for every country. If the deal is up this year, then when is this film going to be made?' The couple were also working on a documentary set in Africa — albeit without Harry, 40, or Markle, 43, appearing. This, too, may be on the back burner. 'What's the betting that neither of these projects will see the light of day?' said a source in the know. It was revealed this week the Sussexes' Netflix deal will end this year, and the couple may move to a first-look contract, like President Barack Obama and his wife Michelle's production company, Higher Ground, has. This week, sources were quick to tell us, however, that there will be more TV shows from the renegade royals. We have reached out to Sussex reps. Netflix has also been working with Markle on her As Ever range which includes her rosé wine, jams, tea and honey. Her show, With Love, Meghan, will return for season 2 in September, so that production partnership doesn't seem to be going anywhere. The Netflix cash has been reported to be $100 million, although it's believed to be closer to $20 million. It was, indeed, a big chunk of the Sussexes' fortune. So far, their biggest Netflix success has been Harry & Meghan, which debuted in December 2022 with 81.55 million hours viewed — making it the highest viewed documentary premiere for the streaming platform. 'Let's be honest … Netflix got what they really wanted out of the Sussexes — their documentary,' said the source in the know. Meanwhile, the docu-series Polo, which was released last December and executive-produced by Harry and Markle, was watched by 500,000 viewers and ranked at 3,436 on the Netflix ratings chart. Last week, the streamer announced that Markle's lifestyle show, With Love, Meghan, was at No. 383 in its semi-annual report, 'What We Watched', with a total of 5.3 million views since its March 4 debut. It was even beaten by re-runs of Markle's old show, Suits. Despite this, an insider pointed out that With Love, Meghan was actually in the top 5 per cent of Netflix shows — and had outperformed other leading 'lifestyle' shows such as The Great British Baking Show, two seasons of Chef's Table and Season 9 of Queer Eye. However, the Hollywood insider noted that Netflix likely expected the show to fare better given the amount of promotion put into it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store