MKP, EFF Unity: Is It Time for Another Cup of Tea?
Image: EFF/Twitter
Kim Heller
The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) and uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) dare not betray their revolutionary mission as the ANC has done. The EFF and MK, together with smaller black progressive parties, could well be the last hope for economic liberation and historical justice in South Africa.
The ANC government, once the dream catcher for black South Africans, has failed to end the dark nightmare of structural racism, inequality and economic exclusion. The majority of South Africa's people are desperate. The dream of liberation and justice cannot be deferred yet again, lest it is lost forever.
The ever-uncertain gambit of politics saw the ANC lose its majority in the 2024 elections. It was a well-deserved loss, for the ruling party has failed and forsaken the masses. In The Art of War, Sun Tzu writes about the need to seize the moment and teaches that amid chaos lies opportunities. EFF and MK have yet to seize the moment.
If they do not do so, the cries of ordinary people seeking salvation from their daily battles against joblessness, landlessness, and poverty will remain unanswered, and the country could tumble furiously towards total collapse.
The electoral defeat was no wake-up call for the ANC. In its political slumber, it has been desperate to market the GNU as a win for democracy rather than as an unprecedented loss for the ANC and economic liberation. Progressive black parties need to find a common cause and expose the fatal fault lines of the GNU, its uneasy mesh of irreconcilable ideological contradictions and backward agenda.
But instead of challenging the dominance of the GNU, the EFF and the MK have become entangled in a web of personal and political rivalry, mistrust, and internal strife. This damages prospects for tactical and strategic unity. There is nothing revolutionary in personal and political upmanship. Both the EFF and the MK are astute enough to know that liberation is not a competitive sport, the exclusive trademark of political leaders, or the province of any political party.
In his book, One Azania, One Nation, Black consciousness scholar Neville Alexander emphasises how joint tactical campaigns and collaboration do not constitute ideological surrender, fusion, or compromise. The EFF demonstrated this in their compact with the DA in Gauteng in 2015. It utilised this tactical relationship to advance pro-black, pro-poor budgets and outcomes, as well as insourcing and service delivery to underserviced areas.
It is not too late for tactical engagement and programmes between the EFF, MK and other progressive forces. The PAC may be tempted to reevaluate whether its easy acquiescence with right-wing partners within the GNU is not irrevocably tarnishing the impeccable legacy of Robert Sobukwe or damaging its future revolutionary wingspan.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The willingness of progressive forces to work in unison at this moment, irrespective of longer-term strategic differences, will determine a new matrix of political power in South Africa for years to come. It will also impact on their fates and fortunes.
The EFF is still a work in progress. The EFF's electoral blow, which saw the party dip to just 9.5% of the national vote has prompted introspection. The departure of Deputy President, Floyd Shivambu cannot continue to overshadow or cloud the EFF's focus on organisational recalibration. Hackneyed parliamentary objections and walkouts are obscuring the solid and steady work executed by the party in Parliaments and legislatures across the country.
This includes EFF's potent challenge of the paralysing VAT increases and the party's legal challenge to the fuel increase which represent material wins for ordinary South Africans. Similarly, the recent insourcing of public service workers in Tshwane is a meaningful victory. It is on the crest of its ability to deliver a better life for ordinary people that the EFF will recover from its electoral and leadership losses.
The fortunes of the MK are difficult to predict. The Zuma factor was completely underestimated. Great expectations for the MK party after its strong birth cry and outstanding electoral performance have tempered due to a lack of organisational cohesion and a disruptive gamble of musical chairs.
The party needs to stabilise and showcase its leadership pedigree and mettle in Parliament and solidify its vision for the future if it wants to be a party of gravitas rather than grievance. The ambiguity of its dual ANC-MK membership provision creates confusion and uncertainty and may scare off progressive alliances and voters.
Time is running out. Political leaders must never forget that the revolution belongs to the people and that political parties and leaders are merely servants. Petty party-political rivalries must never be placed ahead of the grand mission for economic justice and transformation.
A new era of politics is upon us. Whether the progressive forces can seize this moment and boldly influence the future trajectory of power relations in South Africa is in their hands. To join hands on critical tactical projects which will strengthen democracy, raise the voice for the voiceless in Parliament and benefit the people of South Africa is the very least we should expect of progressive politicians.
Both the EFF and the MK have been game-changers and kingmakers in South African politics. They must now lead the charge in reviving hope and radical focus, disrupting neoliberal hegemony and stopping the master plan of the DA to entrench its structural power over the plains of South Africa.
For now, a tactical pact is necessary to help address the unfinished business of Black liberation. When the love of the people trumps personal or political hatred or dispute, everyone wins.
* Kim Heller is a political analyst and author of No White Lies: Black Politics and White Power in South Africa.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Nelson Mandela Bay mayor Babalwa Lobishe pulls mayoral committee members into line with gag order
Nelson Mandela Bay mayor Babalwa Lobishe has issued a gag order on members of her mayoral committee, instructing that all media inquiries go through her office as the 'official spokesperson' of the municipality. In the correspondence sent to all members of the mayoral committee on Monday, Lobishe told them she had taken the decision to ensure there was no contradictory messaging going to the media and public. 'As mayco, we each play a pivotal role in advancing the collective vision and strategic priorities of the Nelson Mandela Bay municipality. 'In line with this collective leadership, it's important that our communication to the public, media and stakeholders reflects one clear, united and consistent message. 'In my capacity as executive mayor and in accordance with established governance protocols, [I] serve as the chief spokesperson of the municipality,' Lobishe wrote in the letter. The ANC governs in the coalition with the EFF, DOP, UDM, NA, AIC, PAC and AIM. Lobishe said as the spokesperson of the city, she was responsible for safeguarding the institutional voice of the council and ensuring that the metro's public communication was accurate, co-ordinated and aligned with their shared agenda. 'To this end, we are implementing a streamlined communication and media management process that will [ensure] all official media engagements, press briefings and public statements issued on behalf of the municipality are centralised through the office of the executive mayor,' she said. According to Lobishe, the process was intended to ensure message coherence across all mayoral committee portfolios, prevent mixed or contradictory messaging in the public domain and enhance public trust and confidence through clear, co-ordinated leadership communication. Moving forward, Lobishe said all media briefings and interviews had to be approved and co-ordinated through her office. She wrote that media statements, including from mayoral committee members, had to be submitted to her office for review and alignment before release and inquiries received directly by MMCs should be redirected to the office of the mayor for a co-ordinated response. Lobishe said public engagements with a media presence must be communicated in advance to her office to ensure alignment and support. DOP president Ruphus Mphahlele said as a party with its own mandate, they would not be told what to do. 'That partisan mayor is not well upstairs," Mphahlele said . 'We did not agree on this, let alone being told about it. 'Unfortunately for her, we won't be dictated to on what to do or say. 'As members of the government of local unity we come from different parties which have their own mandates given to its councillors. 'It's not going to happen, we don't take instructions from her," Mphahlele said. NA president Gary van Niekerk said mayco members were not happy with the decision. 'The general feeling from other members is that the matter should've been discussed in the government of local unity (GLU) first which it wasn't. 'I have called for calm and requested that we discuss this further in the GLU and we are meeting tomorrow morning [Tuesday] for this purpose." AIC councillor Thsonono Buyeye declined to comment saying the matter was still being discussed internally. UDM councillor Luxolo Namette said it was strange for Lobishe to take the decision unilaterally without consulting members of the GLU. 'As a party we feel as though the mayor is trying to kill the identity of the individual parties represented in the GLU. 'We are not an extension of the ANC and therefore we should be consulted before such decisions are taken. 'Members have called for a GLU meeting but there's no confirmation yet if it will actually convene," Namette said. The Herald

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Image: ImsoGabriel Stock via Pixabay The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries. Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action. How has climate litigation evolved? Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts. "When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP. These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more. Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year. And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations. Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies. "This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said. Why have recent cases been deemed historic? Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities. Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans. The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations. Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions. Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature. But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said. In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction. All eyes are now on the ICJ. What could be the impact? Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions. But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages. "These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions. While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight. "They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said. "It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed." AFP

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
IFP stands firm on KwaZulu-Natal's controversial decision to place ANC-led municipality under administration
IFP president Velenkosini Hlabisa has defended KwaZulu-Natal government's decision to place the ANC-led municipality under administration. Image: Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs / Facebook The IFP has vowed to defend the KwaZulu-Natal government's decision to place the struggling ANC-led Umkhanyakude District Municipality under administration despite the ANC's defiance. In a media briefing on Monday afternoon, President Velenkosini Hlabisa dismissed ANC's assertion that the provincial government is targeting municipalities under its leadership for political reasons. There was a drama last week when IFP's Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi was physically prevented from entering the premises of the municipality, in the north of the province, to formally introduce the appointed administrator, Bamba Ndwandwe. Hlabisa stated that the government's decision remains firm and will not be influenced by political pressures. 'This is not a political intervention. This is a Cabinet decision. As long as municipalities are passing unfunded budgets, Section 139 will apply. You can go and check the financial audit outcome of that municipality. It is not good; therefore, it qualifies for an intervention of this kind,' said Hlabisa. Premier Thamsanqa Ntuli, who was at the briefing, said there was a unanimous decision in the Cabinet with all MECs, including the three from the ANC; therefore, he did not understand why the leadership is challenging it. He said Umkhanyakude was placed under administration alongside two IFP-led district municipalities, so the assertion by the ANC that it is targeting its municipalities was unfounded. 'We removed an ANC-led Mooi Mpofana Local Municipality from the administration in the same Cabinet meeting, so we do not understand why the ANC is complaining in Umkhanyakude,' said Ntuli. He also announced that the municipality has taken the government to court for the matter. In a statement last week, the ANC said it vehemently rejected the unwarranted and politically charged decision by MEC Buthelezi to invoke Section 139(1)(b) of the Constitution in the uMkhanyakude District Municipality. It said the so-called intervention is nothing short of abuse of constitutional provisions for political gain, adding that it lacks merit, rationale, and integrity. 'The ANC is appalled by the continued misuse of Section 139(1)(b) by the MEC, who has turned what should be a last-resort mechanism into a political weapon, one that is selectively and cynically deployed against ANC-led municipalities, regardless of their performance. 'The uMkhanyakude District Municipality has made tangible progress in governance, financial recovery, and service delivery. There is no objective basis for this draconian step, which appears designed not to improve governance, but to score narrow political points and destabilise a functional administration,' read the statement. The party said it stands with the Council of uMkhanyakude District Municipality in resisting the opportunistic, mischievous, and dangerous actions of a power-mongering MEC who is hell-bent on destabilising a functional municipality and undermining service delivery to communities. It vowed to actively mobilise its supporters and communities to resist the advances of an MEC who the party described as having clearly defined himself outside of the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU). There are fears that the continued souring of relations between these two major partners of the GPU may create instability in the province, which is known for its political complexities. [email protected].