Two fast-tracked mines delay applications
Bathurst Resources Limited doesn't expect to file a fast-track application for its West Coast coal project until November, instead of the original estimate of mid-June.
CEO Richard Tacon said the decision was made to ensure the company put its 'best foot forward' and ticked all boxes on the first go.
But conservation advocates say the announcement shows the Stockton project's vulnerabilities: 'every gust of public pressure brings it closer to collapse', said one.
Meanwhile, the company behind another listed fast-track gold mine, the Bendigo-Ophir project, announced a similar delay, but did not have an estimate of when it expects to file its application.
In March, Bathurst presented at a packed West Coast Conservation Board meeting. The company then estimated its fast-track application would be lodged around the middle of this month, and noted complexities and social licence as factors under consideration.
But on June 12, Bathurst presented to a higher power – the NZ Conservation Authority – and listed an estimated application date of November.
Tacon told Newsroom the project had had 'a bit of a slippage'. The complexity of the application meant 'the level of front-end loading needs to be probably a lot more than what we had originally planned for'.
Tacon said 'We're taking the view that we don't want to put an application that's going to get knocked back, particularly in the early stages. So we are consulting with a lot of people, including the NZ Conservation Authority.'
The meeting on Thursday was held in good faith, Tacon said. But before the company had the chance to notify the market and the public via an announcement, Tacon said he was fielding queries from interested parties, not more than 20 minutes after the meeting, which was 'pretty disappointing, actually'.
He acknowledged 'there's a lot of angst locally over whether this thing's going to be approved or not. And we want to make sure that we put our best foot forward.'
Some of that angst came from West Coast residents supporting the project, who wanted to see it approved and to boost employment in the community. But angst also came from conservationists, who didn't want to see the country's largest coal mine expanded.
Some of the latter group entered Stockton Mine's operation and occupied its coal transportation buckets for nearly three days before their arrest.
One of the protesters, 350 Aotearoa's Adam Currie, told Newsroom the delayed application 'gives us time, and you bet we will be using it'.
'Escalating uncertainty and delay is dragging the application process closer to the 2026 election and the real possibility of a new government less willing to greenlight coal mines on kiwi habitat,' Currie said.
Tacon was less concerned with activists and more concerned with local stakeholders. But opponents to the project had been an active presence at the site.
'You know, we've seen signs up to say that they're going to do harm to our diggers, which we're taking to mean our people. If that's the approach they want to take, well, then there's laws of the land that will deal with that,' Tacon said. According to Currie, whoever had displayed such signs was not a part of 350 Aotearoa, and he assumed 'blocking diggers' referred to machinery, not staff.
Tacon said the buck stopped with local stakeholders and regulatory decision-makers. 'Ultimately, if the people of the West Coast don't want us there, we won't be there,' he said.
Environmental organisation Forest & Bird ran a legal campaign against Bathurst's expansion plans in the past. Tacon said the effect of the protracted case 'is delays, it costs a lot more money, and we don't end up with a better result'.
But Forest & Bird's advocacy head Richard Capie said a delay wasn't enough. 'It needs to be ditched completely.'
He thought fast-tracked projects could face more opposition. 'The scale of opposition to a massive open cast coal mine which would permanently destroy this unique part of New Zealand and wipe out native species, and their habitats, is overwhelming.'
Bathurst wasn't the only mining company to post a delay. Santana Minerals Limited, operator of the Bendigo-Ophir gold mine, had its project listed on the fast-track.
A June 13 stock market update from the company announced it would not meet its original June 30 application target.
'While the majority of consultant reports required for the FTAA Application have now been completed and received, a group of ecological reports are still awaiting consultant finalisation, holding up the final submission,' read the submission.
Capie said the fast-track's history made a rocky road for projects in the pipeline. 'Years of community engagement and investment in building up social licence is clearly being placed at risk,' he said.
The Government's choice 'to ignore thousands of submissions that highlighted just how problematic and unworkable this legislation was going to be' meant the fast-track 'isn't working for anyone, let alone delivering anything 'fast'' he said.
Capie believed the existing Covid-19 fast-track would've achieved the efficacy sought by developers But the new regime's 'removal of environmental safeguards, closing down of community participation and resurrection of zombie projects' made it ripe for opposition.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
5 days ago
- Newsroom
Why agreeing on infrastructure priorities matters to sick kids
Analysis: First, Erin Speedy shed tears of frustration, trying to bring up her children in a cold military house at Waiouru. It was damp, it was mouldy, and her children suffered respiratory infections. Then, she stopped crying and picked up a pen. Speedy, the wife of an army corporal, published an open letter to the Defence Minister at Newsroom Pro. 'I ask you minister, have you visited one of your military camps to speak to those on the ground? Do you truly understand the sacrifices we make as families?' That was in May last year. The following month, the Defence Force advertised for a builder to begin work on 50 new homes, along with a park and playground, at the Waiouru camp – but still nothing happened. Then in this year's Budget, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced $16 million to lease better homes, while designing fit-for-purpose modern homes for personnel and their families. And this week, the NZ Infrastructure Commission publishes its first, groundbreaking draft National Infrastructure Plan, in which it endorses 17 projects as priorities. The big winner is the Defence Force, whose nine bases and camps have been green lit for big upgrades, especially to troop and family accommodation. Defence infrastructure general manager Phil Gurnsey says the endorsements reflect the national significance of future investment in the defence estate, and benefits to the NZ people, economy and security. 'It gives ministers further assurance that our investment aligns with national objectives.' According to the commission's assessment, which has been provided at Newsroom's request, the Defence Force provides about 1800 houses to 1400 regular force members – but those houses are more than 60 years old, in poor condition, and require upgrading urgently to improve poor conditions and to meet Healthy Homes legislation. 'Endorsement as a national infrastructure priority at Stage 2 indicates that this is a priority proposal, which can progress to a detailed business case to identify a preferred option,' the assessment says. 'Monetising the costs and benefits of options where possible would significantly strengthen the case.' Infrastructure Commission chief executive Geoff Cooper says the Defence Force was able to quantify its problems, provide proportionate solutions, and demonstrate how they'd worked through the options to get there. Essentially, he explains to Newsroom, this evidence-based endorsement is intended to take key infrastructure projects out of the political bear-pit, so the construction sector, international investors and all New Zealanders can be confident the country's priorities won't chop and change with every change of government. The Defence Force Homes for Family programme and Devonport naval base regeneration have both been endorsed to stage 2; its plans to build new Linton army camp barracks and upgrade Ohakea air force base have been endorsed to stage 3. 'When we endorse a project to stage 3, the advice is, we think this one's ready to go,' Cooper says. KiwiRail and the NZ Transport Agency have been less successful. The commission has released to Newsroom a list of the 31 applications that have not achieved even stage 1 endorsement, at this stage. Most are the pipe dreams of individual activists and lobby groups, but among them are the Auckland Strategic Rail Programme, and the Marsden Point Rail Link, as well as highway upgrades from Tauranga through to the Desert Road. Let's highlight one major concern identified in this first draft plan, and one solution. The concern is New Zealand's utter inability to get bang for its buck from capital spending. In the last decade, this country invested more public capital in infrastructure, as a share of GDP, than any other country in the OECD – yet it ranked 37th on the efficiency of that investment. As the problems with our drinking water and wastewater networks have shown, we're putting money into vote-winning glamour projects while failing to fund basic maintenance and renewals. The OECD ranks New Zealand fourth-to-last for asset management practices, the report says. Cooper sees that, as a runner, getting out and about. 'I've been in Wellington now for about five years, and the first thing that strikes you when you run around Wellington is just that there's water everywhere. And that's what happens when leakage rates are in the order of 40 to 50 percent.' How does that manifest? 'That looks like schools with leaking roofs, lessons taught in rotting buildings; sewage leaks in our hospitals; mouldy, poor quality defence accommodation; service outages of commuter rail and ferries; and police stations with black mould, leaks, and asbestos. We can do better.' The commission points to fragmented planning, regulatory inefficiencies, complex approval processes and suboptimal use of existing assets. It warns politicians against repeatedly changing key rules such as resource management legislation, and energy market and emissions reduction policies. These changes disrupt investment. Infrastructure providers hold off until policy settles down, leading to a backlog of investment and extra congestion on networks. Nick Leggett, the chief executive of the infrastructure industry body, goes further. 'This report is candid and honest about the poor bang for the buck that we get from infrastructure,' he says. 'When you have a whole lot of projects planned and the sector is geared up to deliver them, and then they're cancelled because of political change, and you have to make a whole lot of people redundant – and then the tap gets turned on again two years later, and you've got to bring everybody back … that's what costs us the money. So that's why pipeline certainty is so important.' Who's to blame for this inefficiency? 'Pipeline uncertainty costs us between $2.3 billion and $4.7 billion a year. The private sector will price a lack of certainty and clarity into a job.' Surely, the infrastructure and construction sector itself must bear some responsibility for using the investment more efficiently? 'The sector could bring more to the table, yes, absolutely.' Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop agrees politicians and the sector need to work together. He says the Government is determined to work alongside the industry and other political parties to establish a broad consensus about what needs to change. A key solution (beyond maintaining our existing infrastructure!) is user-pricing. The draft plan recommends user charges fully fund investment, guide efficient use of networks, and distribute the benefits of network provision. New Zealanders will soon see that rolling out in, for instance, water metering in pretty much every district, the tolling of new highways, and time-of-use charges starting on Auckland's roads. When I press Cooper on this recommendation, he acknowledges that the commission isn't saying all infrastructure should pay its own way. For instance, he wouldn't argue that cyclists should bear the full cost of cycleways, or that EV owners should pay higher road user charges because their heavy cars cause more wear and tear. But these are discussions worth having, he agrees. Social infrastructure such as schools, hospitals and the defence estate are also public goods that shouldn't be funded through user charges. Clearly, it would be hard to demand that families struck by storms and other natural disasters should have to pay the military to evacuate them from their rooftops. Which brings us back to the Defence estate. Erin Speedy has now founded advocacy group Mission Homefront. 'It does make me a little bit emotional,' she says. 'I mean, if these projects go ahead, it's going to make a huge difference to the quality of life on so many Defence personnel and their whānau. Successive governments have made the Defence estate a political kicking ball.' Both sides of Parliament agree on the value of the Infrastructure Commission drawing up an evidence-led pipeline of priorities, so that key long-term infrastructure decisions can be removed from the cynical cut and thrust of electioneering. 'It's really heartening to see an independent commission recognise the desperate and dire need that something needs to be done, and urgently,' Speedy says. 'It absolutely does need to be taken out of the bear pit and depoliticised.'
Newsroom
7 days ago
- Newsroom
Big tech wants Luxon to turn NZ into ‘sandbox'
Overseas venture capitalists want to use New Zealand as a 'sandbox' for testing new technologies, including artificial intelligence and genetic engineering. According to meeting notes obtained by Newsroom under the Official Information Act, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held one-on-one meetings with potential overseas investors last year. Several times, the investors steered the conversation away from general policy discussion and towards the potential of using New Zealand as a base for developing their 'specific interests'.
Newsroom
19-06-2025
- Newsroom
Primary sector firmly on China agenda despite education and tourism focus
Despite China's economic slowdown, primary producers are holding onto value by offering premium products that appeal to a Chinese middle class focused on health and wellness. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has touched down in Shanghai as China's booming economic growth is slowing. China is New Zealand's largest trading partner and took $21.5 billion of New Zealand exports in the year to March. Two-way trade totalled $39.1b during that same period. Luxon says there's still a lot of economic opportunity in the market. But some have described New Zealand as reaching 'peak China' and should look elsewhere amid a softening Chinese market, while others continue to warn of overexposure in some areas of primary exports. Ahead of this trip, which kicks off with two business-focused days in Shanghai, followed by the politics and foreign diplomacy in Beijing, Luxon told Newsroom his main objective was to help boost the lagging tourism and education markets. Though China is New Zealand's largest source of international tourists and third-largest tourism market, those numbers were still lagging behind pre-Covid levels. If Luxon were able to help New Zealand get 'share of mind' in those areas and help remove any policy barriers, then it'd be a success. Among the 28-strong business delegation were a strong contingent of tertiary education leaders, including Victoria University of Wellington and Te Pūkenga, as well as Tourism NZ, Māori Tourism and other organisations with tourism wings, such as Ngāi Tahu Holdings. And though the three-day programme would no doubt include visits to universities and tourism-focused events, the primary sector would also be a core part of the Prime Minister's agenda for the week with dairy, meat and produce-focused events. According to the latest MPI annual report, food and fibre sector exports were expected to increase 12 percent to $59.9b for the year to June 30, and a further 2 percent in the coming financial year. 'Food and fibre sector export revenue is performing well despite geopolitical turbulence, shifting trade policies, and elevated uncertainty,' MPI said, 'While some industries remain more vulnerable to external pressures, others are well-positioned to withstand volatility, ensuring overall sector stability.' Among those primary producer categories, dairy exports were expected to hit a record high and horticulture revenue was forecast to grow 19 percent, reaching $8.5b. This growth was primarily driven by the kiwifruit industry, with exports expected to reach $3.9b, after a record 2024 crop and forecasts for an even larger crop in 2025. Among those traveling to China with the Prime Minister is global kiwifruit marketing company Zespri. Zespri – the umbrella brand selling New Zealand kiwifruit around the world – has been exporting to China for 26 years, and in earnest for the last two decades. The last 10 years has seen a rapid rise, thanks in large part to the expansion of China's middle class. Now, Zespri is selling about 22 percent of its kiwifruit into China, accounting for 27 percent of the brand's global value. Chair Nathan Flowerday told Newsroom that although Zespri was a global brand, China was an important market. But that didn't mean there weren't challenges facing primary producers as they faced the country's economic slowdown. The primary sector food and fibre exports accounted for $17.9b of New Zealand's goods shipped to China, but a slowdown in economic growth meant prices were softening and middle-class consumers were needing to be more selective with how they spent their money. Beyond the slowing economic growth, the Chinese Government had also proven it was not above using economic coercion to hit back at countries making diplomatic statements or actions it didn't like. Though Australia had been hit hard by this in the past, New Zealand had only suffered isolated suspected cases of shots across the bow, including limited shipments of goods sitting at China's ports and a government safety notice to tourists travelling to New Zealand. Both came in the wake of the Huawei saga during the Jacinda Ardern administration, and in both instances the government denied they were in retaliation for New Zealand's refusal of Huawei 5G infrastructure. But the possibility China could pull that lever in the future underscored an added need for the export sector to diversify away from China, as well as maintaining a strong diplomatic and leader-to-leader relationship. In 2016 Zespri was caught up in a short-lived diplomatic spat over an investigation into the dumping of Chinese steel. Media reported that Zespri's China representative was warned by Chinese officials that New Zealand could face economic retaliation if New Zealand went ahead with the investigation. Trade Minister Todd McClay was trade minister then too, and apologised to the Prime Minister for not being better briefed about China's threat of trade retaliation. Flowerday said Zespri was well insulated against these possibilities. In regard to the potential for a diplomatic blowback, he said it was up to the Government to make its decisions. But Zespri's focus was on building strong relationships within China. 'China is no different to any other market that we treat with transparency and respect … to make sure that we've got really clear, open communication channels with our partners in the market. I mean, that's the best that we can do.' In terms of the wider story of a softening Chinese market, Zespri – like other food producers – was looking to offer a high-end, niche product that played to consumers' focus on health and wellness. 'We spend a lot of time and money to educate … our Chinese consumers of just the health benefits that Zespri kiwifruit provides to them.' So, although fruit prices in China had softened, Zespri products had managed to hold their value. Everyone wanted to live a healthy life, Flowerday said. 'They are choosing that over and above something else that they could choose in the supermarket, which they know is not quite as healthy for them.' The fact the brand was synonymous with New Zealand, which was a trusted producer of safe, high-quality food, also helped. NZ Inc would be looking to leverage that niche, high-quality, well-trusted brand while in China this week, using announcements and events in Shanghai to market innovations in the primary sector. Last week, during Fieldays, the Government announced a grass-fed certification scheme in a bid to take on global competitors. Though previous standards applied, the new certification sought to clarify how many days a year and what percentage of an organisation's stock needed to be freely grazing on grass to achieve certification. Then, that certification could be used as a point of difference – and quality – when competing with overseas producers that primarily grain-fed their animals indoors. 'This is about more than a label—it's a commercial tool to push into premium segments and stay ahead of competitors. We're relentlessly focused on improving the value of our exports and backing farmers,' McClay said. So far, Fonterra and Westland Milk Products had gained certification among the dairy sector. Both businesses – and a2 milk along with the likes of Silver Fern Farms, and industry bodies representing the red meat and deer sectors – joined Luxon on this week's trip to China. Another food producer looking to find innovative ways to set itself apart was Rockit – a company that produced 'snack-sized' apples. Rockit Global chief executive Grant McBeath said China was a key market, with growth in China reaching more than 50 percent per year. This trip represented a significant opportunity to grow brand recognition, build trust and accelerate growth, he said. While on the ground, Rockit would sign a partnership deal with Chinese fruit store chain Xian Feng, which had 2000 stores across the country. But having a coveted brand didn't come without challenges. Zespri has been involved in a legal stoush in recent years, after clippings of its Sun Gold kiwifruit were stolen and taken to China. The company that took the clippings was ordered to pay $12m in reparations, but didn't have the money to do so. Since then, Sun Gold – or 'G3' – kiwi have been grown locally. And in some cases, the local growers have slapped counterfeit Zespri labels on the fruit. Earlier this year, a counterfeiter of the Zespri kiwifruit labels was sentenced to jail for more than three years for their part in the brand fraud scheme. Flowerday said it was monitoring the growing of the G3 kiwifruit in China, because there was a risk some of this fruit could make its way into Zespri's distribution channel. There could be an opportunity in the future to partner with local growers, he said, but they'd first have to ensure the fruit was up to Zespri's safety and quality standards. The brand employs about 100 people in-country, which allows them to keep their finger on the pulse, properly understand systems and ensure connections are forged with the right people. Building relationships on the ground was key to success in any market, Flowerday said, but especially in China. 'It's all about respect.' And showing up. Last year, during his first 12 months as chair, Flowerday travelled to China four times. In the last decade, he's been there more than a dozen times. Though trips like this were an opportunity for well-established and new businesses to get a better feel for the local market, travelling together as a group on the Air Force Boeing-757 also allowed New Zealand businesses to connect and learn from each other – what's working, what's not, what trends are being established. It also allowed them coveted photo opportunities at deal signings and announcements with the Prime Minister. 'Being part of the New Zealand team, going up there, it's always just a great privilege,' Flowerday said.
