Mowi ASA (OSE: MOWI): Share option scheme for senior executives and allocation of options 2025
At Mowi ASA's (the 'Company') annual general meeting ('AGM') on 4 June 2025 the Board of Directors was authorised to grant options under the Share Option Scheme to Senior Executives, as described in Mowi's guidelines for remuneration of leading personnel (the 'Guidelines'). On 19 June 2025 the Board of Directors granted 1.74 million options at a strike price of NOK 201.6860, corresponding to 107.5% of the volume weighted average share price on the Oslo Stock Exchange at the date of the AGM, to a total of 41 individuals.
In accordance with the Guidelines, the options have a term of 4 years but will become exercisable immediately if a mandatory bid is made for all of the shares in Mowi, if a voluntary offer is followed-up with a forced transfer of shares in accordance with the Norwegian Securities Trading Act or if Mowi is the non-surviving entity in a merger with another company.
The exercise of 50% of the options awarded to an option holder is conditional on achievement of performance criteria, measured in the development of the share price of the Company's shares compared with those of peers ("Performance-based Options"). The exercise of the remaining 50% of the options awarded to an option holder is not conditional on achievement of such performance criteria ("Ordinary Options").
The number of shares and the strike price will be adjusted for dividends and changes in the equity capital during the term of the option according to the Oslo Stock Exchange's derivative rules and provisions in the option agreements. Total profit through the exercise of Performance-based Options in a year is capped at one year's salary for the option holder, and total profit through the exercise of Ordinary Options in a year is capped at one year's salary for the option holder. If the profit exceeds this limit, the number of shares to be issued will be reduced accordingly.
The following primary insiders in the Company have been allocated options according to the above, please see attached allocation details. The primary insiders have the following number of shares and options, adjusted for dividends paid, in the Company.
Total number of
Options granted
Total options
Name
shares owned
in 2025
outstanding
Ivan Vindheim (CEO)
13,471
200,000
1,076,593
Kristian Ellingsen(CFO)
1,389
100,000
538,297
Øyvind Oaland (COO Farming Norway, Iceland)
5,777
100,000
538,297
Ben Hadfield (COO Farming Scotland, Ireland, Faroes and Canada East)
8,259
100,000
538,297
Fernando Villarroel(COO Farming Americas)
5,801
100,000
538,297
Ola Brattvoll (COO Sales & Marketing)
10,620
100,000
538,297
Atle Kvist(COO Feed)
932
100,000
538,297
Catarina Martins (CTO & Chief Sustainability Officer)
2,834
45,000
175,293
Kjersti Eikeseth(Chief HR Officer)
266
25,000
50,898
Kim Galtung Døsvig (Investor Relations & Head of Treasury)
1,525
25,000
134,575
Lars Tore Andersen(Group Accounting Director)
1,525
15,000
46,641
This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to section 5-12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Models, Robotaxi, and AI: Why Tesla's (TSLA) Still a Buy After Delivery Dip
Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:) is one of the . On July 2, Canaccord Genuity analyst George Gianarikas reiterated a Buy rating on the stock with a $303.00 price target. The rating affirmation follows Tesla's second-quarter delivery results, which exceeded Canaccord's recently lowered estimates by approximately 24,000 units. In particular, strong performance was witnessed in China, Norway, France, Spain, and Turkey, which led to the better-than-feared results. Regardless of this positivity, Tesla suffered its largest decline in year-over-year deliveries, falling 14% compared to Q2 2024. This is, the firm believes, largely due to Musk's political endeavors. Nevertheless, catalysts such as new models, traction from the revamped Model Y, and the expectations surrounding the Robotaxi announcement are likely to work for Tesla for the remainder of the year. Energy storage deployments also witnessed a slowdown, with the firm concerned about the development of energy structure for artificial intelligence. It stated that 'EVs drive the P&L, now and for the foreseeable future' and also stressed the need to see growth in Tesla's core business. Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) is an automotive and clean energy company that leverages advanced artificial intelligence in its autonomous driving technology and robotics initiatives. While we acknowledge the potential of TSLA as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 AI Stocks in the Spotlight and . Disclosure: None.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return
The country that invented 'flight shaming', a concept championed by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has scrapped its air tax in a bid to boost its ailing economy. As of July 1, Sweden has dropped the levy of 76–517 kroner (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger per flight, an eco measure introduced by the centre-left government in 2018. The U-turn will be seen as a disaster by environmentalists, and it exposes a tension at the core of the aviation versus climate debate. When jumbo jets disappear emissions drop, but other things begin to dwindle too: regional growth, connectivity and – it appears in Sweden – public support for eco concerns. Sweden introduced its air tax in the same year that a 15-year-old Greta Thunberg organised her first solo climate protest outside Swedish Parliament. In a short period of time the 'flight shaming' ('flygskam') movement took hold. A survey in 2019 showed that nearly a quarter of Swedes were abstaining from flying in a bid to reduce their climate footprint, up from 17 per cent the year before. The impact on Sweden's aviation industry was stark. Swedavia AB, which runs 10 Swedish airports, saw passenger numbers drop for seven consecutive months in 2019. The country witnessed its slowest growth in airline passenger numbers for a decade. Meanwhile, state train operator SJ saw passengers leap to 32 million citing 'big interest in climate-smart travel.' In the seven years that followed, international flights dropped by a third. Smaller airports, particularly in the wild and remote northern regions, saw fewer arrivals as airlines scaled back operations. Ryanair ceased all domestic flights in Sweden, while the domestic-focused Bromma Airport near Stockholm came to the brink of closure. Today, only one regional airline, Västfly, still uses the airport. The pandemic was the catalyst for change. The country suffered a recession in 2023 and the economy shrank by 0.3pc between April and July 2024. It was within this economic climate that the new right-wing government, elected in 2022, said that there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' as they announced plans to invest £76m into the aviation sector and drop the air tax entirely. Airlines were quick to praise the decision. Ryanair promptly re-introduced two new aircraft to its Swedish fleet and added ten new routes. EasyJet said 'we strongly welcome the abolition of taxes on passengers to help keep flying affordable' and Norwegian announced it would add new routes from Norway to Sweden. 'We congratulate the Swedish government for abolishing the aviation tax. It is excellent news, which recognises that taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally,' was the international aviation body IATA's response to the news. The climate lobby, however, is disheartened by the news. Justin Francis, co-founder and executive chair of Responsible Travel, tells The Telegraph: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't, and aviation will account for an ever-increasing percentage of total global carbon emissions and the massive costs of climate change to business and society.' No doubt politicians in neighbouring countries will be watching keenly from the sidelines to see how Sweden's U-turn plays out. That's because since Sweden introduced its eco-war against aviation, other countries have followed suit. In 2020, Germany increased its domestic and intra-European flight taxes by 75 per cent, while Belgium imposes a €10 'boarding tax' for flights of less than 500km (310 miles). In the Netherlands passengers must pay a departure tax of €29.40 per flight, regardless of the destination. Denmark is the latest to join the party. As of January 1 this year, passengers have had to pay 50DK (£5.73) for intra-European flights, 310DK (£35.83) for medium-haul and DK410 (£47.55) for long-haul flights. Ryanair was quick out of the blocks to criticise the tax. The Irish airline publicly described it as a 'discriminatory, fake eco-tax', criticising Denmark for penalising short-haul passengers while not taxing transfer passengers travelling far greater distances. The airline has scrapped its services from Billund and Aalborg, in response. Other countries are clamping down on short-haul aviation through other means. In 2023, France passed a law banning domestic flights on routes where the journey could be made by rail in less than 2hr 30m. While this was hailed as a 'domestic flight ban', effectively ruling out air travel between Paris Orly and Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, some argued they could have been more ambitious by extending the train travel time to four hours, or to measure from city to city rather than airport to airport. In its current form, where you can still fly from Paris Charles de Gaulle to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux. Because of this, the domestic flight ban has been criticised for being more gestural than anything else. Spain is considering mirroring the policy, banning flights where you can make the same journey in 2hr 30m. This would rule out 11 domestic air routes, reducing the country's domestic aviation emissions by an estimated 10 per cent. But, as in France, climate activists said it didn't go far enough. Ecologistas en Acción described the measures as 'purely symbolic'. The question is where these countries will go next. Clearly the Swedish U-turn highlights the complexities around marrying green policies with national interconnectivity and regional prosperity. 'Until electric planes and emissions-free aviation are viable options, we all need to fly less,' says Justin Francis. 'Aviation fuel needs to be taxed in line with other transport fuels. The industry has had a free pass here for too long, and the proceeds need to be ring fenced for investment in lower-carbon aviation and improving rail infrastructure.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Carbon capture and storage ‘becoming a practical solution' despite hurdles
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is no longer just a future concept but is becoming a practical solution helping companies to plan cleaner energy projects and meet climate and sustainability goals, a new report outlines. According to GlobalData's newly published Carbon Capture and Storage report, over 54 commercial-scale carbon capture projects were active in the energy sector globally as of 2024, with that figure expected to rise to upwards of 350 by 2030. It adds that over 80% of carbon capture units around the world, both active and upcoming, are attached to energy assets as the industry seeks to address its emissions. 'Over the past few years, CCS has gained significant momentum across the oil, gas and power sectors, driven by a convergence of technological advancement, policy support and investor demand for decarbonisation,' the report says. 'Companies are increasingly retrofitting facilities with advanced CCS technologies to reduce emissions, while governments in regions such as the US, UK and Norway are backing these efforts through targeted incentives and funding programmes.' Despite this progress, GlobalData notes that the broader carbon capture, utilisation and storage (CCUS) industry still faces economic, regulatory and infrastructure barriers. Chief among these, it asserts, are the high capital and operational costs associated with the technology, relatively limited commercial use for carbon dioxide (CO₂) and a lack of strong market incentives. 'Infrastructure gaps, particularly in CO₂ transport networks and storage facilities, compound the issue, as does the complexity of retrofitting capture systems onto existing industrial emitters,' the report states. 'Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around cross-border CO₂ transport, permitting delays and undefined long-term liability for stored CO₂, further discourage investment, while the fragmented nature of the CCUS value chain makes end-to-end integration difficult.' Other hurdles for CCUS include social acceptance and the technical complexities of the technology. Not only can it be viewed as a tool to prolong fossil fuel use rather than a genuine climate solution, but there is also a lack of public understanding about CCUS. In addition, the report notes that 'challenges around capture efficiency, monitoring of CO₂ storage and also carbon pipelines and the lack of standardised approaches complicate deployment at scale.' "Carbon capture and storage 'becoming a practical solution' despite hurdles" was originally created and published by Energy Monitor, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
