
The new right is splintering
Musk's flirtation with a new political movement stems from his clash with Trump over fiscal policy. Musk's platform – slashing deficits, deregulating business and boosting high-skilled immigration – appeals to tech-savvy moderates and disillusioned independents. On X, Musk has framed himself as a voice for the pragmatic middle, critiquing both parties' extremes. But his vision lacks the cultural red meat – 'America First' border control or anti-woke rhetoric – that fuels Trump's MAGA base. Musk's $250 million investment in America PAC for Trump's 2024 campaign shows his financial clout, but he would struggle to go it alone.
The US electoral landscape is unforgiving to new parties. In 1992, Ross Perot's Reform party won 19 per cent of the vote but zero electoral votes, a cautionary tale for any Musk-led venture. State-by-state ballot access laws, such as California's requirement of roughly 131,000 signatures, would also pose logistical hurdles. Musk's wealth – estimated at $400 billion in 2025 – could fund signature drives and ad campaigns, but building a national infrastructure by 2026 is daunting. Republican strategists have suggested that Musk could reshape the party from within, using his America PAC influence and X's narrative-shaping power, rather than risk starting a third party and failing. Others have warned that his centrist pitch – pro-immigration, pro-tech – alienates voters demanding border security and cultural conservatism. Polls, while unconfirmed for 2025, suggest Republicans view third-party efforts sceptically.
Across the Atlantic, Habib and Lowe embody a parallel populist surge. Habib has launched a new political party, Advance UK, which he says stands for a 'proud' and 'independent' United Kingdom, where 'the political views you hold won't land you in jail'. It is billed as an alternative to Reform. Lowe, meanwhile, has just launched Restore Britain, a 'movement' that will pressure political parties to 'slash immigration, protect British culture, restore Christian principles, carpet-bomb the cancer of wokery'. The UK's first-past-the-post system is brutal – Reform's 14 per cent in 2024 yielded just five MPs – and so a fragmented populist vote could split the right and gift Labour seats.
Populism in the US and UK shares politics but fights different battles. Musk decries bureaucratic bloat and unfulfilled 2016 promises, while Habib and Lowe target Labour's cultural shifts and attack Farage personally. Musk's X is the transatlantic wildcard, shaping narratives but fuelling polarisation. Reports earlier this year suggested Musk was thinking about making a significant investment in UK politics. In the US, his $250 million America PAC war chest (and X's reach) give him leverage, but Republican loyalties and the Electoral College limit third-party impact.
Disruption without cohesion breeds division. The US and the UK need fresh ideas, but splitting conservative votes could empower the elites they oppose. The lesson is clear: conservatives must channel their zeal to reform existing parties from within. To do otherwise risks electoral failure.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
39 minutes ago
- NBC News
Watch: Jeffries concludes record-breaking 8-hour House floor speech
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries delivered an 8 hour and 44 minute speech blasting Republicans and delaying passage of their sweeping tax and spending bill. He ended with a message to the American people: 'We're going to press on.'


BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Welfare system will 'explode' without reform, says Ian Murray
The UK's welfare system will "explode" and become unaffordable if it is not reformed, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray has Keir Starmer's government has been forced into a series of climbdowns on its benefits bill by Labour backbenchers at insisted that "really positive, progressive" changes were being made to fix a "broken" comes after First Minister John Swinney accused the UK government of taking an "absolutely appalling" approach to reform. Labour ministers were forced to U-turn on some cuts to Universal Credit and plans to introduce stricter eligibility rules for personal independence payment (Pip) changes to Pip would not have directly applied in Scotland, where the benefit is being phased out for a devolved alternative but could have affected the amount of money allocated to Holyrood. Despite being gutted of its most significant measures, Murray said the bill would make important changes to Universal Credit and employability support, and that Pip would be reformed after the publication of a government review late next year."These are really positive progressive reforms," he told BBC Scotland News."If we don't reform the welfare system it will explode in terms of there being unsustainable financially for the taxpayer, but also we're writing hundreds of thousands of people out of the workforce."More than 120 Labour MPs - including 12 from Scotland - had threatened to vote down the bill until initial concessions were Scottish Labour MPs - Brian Leishman, Irene Campbell, Tracey Gilbert and Euan Stainbank - ultimately voted against the final bill, which was further watered down. Asked what he would say to Scottish Labour rebels, Murray replied: "The one thing that unites us all is that the welfare system is broken and it needs to be reformed and therefore we have to do that properly." He said that involved helping people back into work while "looking after those who could never work and have the most severe disabilities". "Those are two key Labour value principles," Murray told the BBC. "We are the party of work, we need to make sure we've got a system in place that doesn't trap people on benefits, trap people in poverty, and gives them those pathways back into work."The Scottish secretary accepted that it had been a "very difficult" year for the Labour administration, but said that the hard choices taken since last July would bear fruit and that people would feel the difference in their added he was "100%" confident the prime minister and chancellor would be in their jobs come the next general election. How much does welfare cost? Treasury spending on working-age benefits is forecast to rise by £27bn to £75.7bn by 2030. The UK government says that is original welfare reforms were expected to save £5bn a year by the end of the decade. The last-minute concessions are expected to have significantly reduced any savings, and may have added some additional costs. The Scottish government is also facing questions about how it will fund its more generous social security system. Holyrood spending on social security is already £1.2bn higher than the block grant funding it receives from the Treasury. The gap is forecast to grow to £2bn by 2030. Swinney said the UK government's handling of the welfare reforms had been "shocking".He said the original reforms would have "essentially preyed on some of those vulnerable within our society".The first minister called for Labour ministers to find other ways to raise funds, suggesting changes to income tax or the Treasury's self-imposed fiscal rules. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to come back before the Commons next rebels have warned they could still vote it down if the government does not follow through on its concessions.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Democrat pride in America hits all-time low
Democrat pride in America has fallen to a record low, a new survey has found. Only 36 per cent of Democrats are 'very' or 'extremely' proud to be an American, down from 62 per cent last year, according to a Gallup Survey. It is only the second time the majority of Democrats have admitted to not feeling strong pride about their country – the other time being 2020, during Donald Trump's first term. The pride of political independents has also hit a new low, with 53 per cent expressing patriotic fervour, down seven points from last year. Republicans, meanwhile, are much more consistent in expressing national pride, with those feeling extremely or very proud this year soaring to 92 per cent, following Mr Trump's return to office. This is up from 85 per cent last year. National patriotic decline The slump in national pride among Democrats and independents is driving a national patriotic decline, with only 58 per cent of US adults admitting they feel a strong sense of pride being American, down nine percentage points from last year. The latest figure is five percentage points below the previous low watermark in 2020, when 63 per cent of Americans professed to be extremely or very proud of their country. At the same time, 20 per cent of US adults said they are 'only a little' or 'not at all' proud to be an American – just beneath the 21 per cent record set in 2020. The survey, carried out between June 2-19, asked 1,000 adults from across the country and found that younger generations are significantly less likely to express national pride than their seniors. The data shows just 41 per cent of Gen Z adults are extremely proud to be American, compared to 75 per cent of baby boomers. It comes as a separate poll found that a staggering one in three Gen Z adults would support replacing the president with the British monarch. The survey of 1,000 US voters, carried out by JL Partners for Politico ahead of Independence Day, found 19 per cent of Americans supported the return of British rule, with 48 per cent opposed or sitting on the fence.