Woman Gets Annoyed After 'Pathetic' Co-Worker Reports Her for Using Phone in the Office. But Commenters Give Her a Warning
The woman, who shared her story on a community forum, claims she has only done this a 'handful' of times and says she thinks the person who reported her is 'a bit pathetic'
While some post commenters agreed with the woman, others said they think she should take the note more seriouslyA woman says a co-worker reported her for using her phone at the office, and she now worries things will get 'awkward.'
The woman detailed her experience in the 'Am I Being Unreasonable?' forum on the U.K.-based community site Mumsnet, a place where people can go to seek advice from others about a host of topics.
In her post, the woman explains that she works in a 'fairly large office' with a 'common sense approach to personal phone usage.'
'No one sits at their desk and takes lengthy personal calls, but management accepts there will be times people need to check/use their phones briefly, and that for anything longer, they'll step away from their desk or wait for breaks and lunch,' she adds.
The original poster (OP) goes on to say that she recently had a one-on-one with her manager, and the manager mentioned that another co-worker had complained that the OP 'conversed with delivery drivers' using her doorbell cam app.
The OP admits this has happened a 'handful of times,' but also says she generally schedules packages to arrive on her work-from-home days.
The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!
'My manager was clear she doesn't have an issue with my phone usage, and obviously she can't tell me who reported it, although I have an idea,' she continues.
'Am I wrong to find them reporting this a bit pathetic?' the OP asks at the end of her post, adding, 'It just risks an awkward atmosphere when we are generally a fairly harmonious team.'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
A number of commenters said they don't think the OP is being unreasonable — and also noted that the manager should not have passed the note along if the phone usage is a non-issue.
'I think if it's clear that your manager doesn't have an issue, she should not be discussing it with you at all. She should have put an end to it,' one person said.
'Your manager did not have to bring that up if she sees no issue,' added someone else.
However, other commenters brought up the possibility that the manager might be more bothered by the OP's phone usage than she let on, but blamed someone else to avoid an uncomfortable conversation.
'This is the kind of thing my manager would say if it was bugging him. He'd make out that someone had complained,' said one person.
Another person agreed, adding, 'Managers do sometimes say that 'someone' reported something when actually it's them that has an issue with it. So I'd be a bit careful [as] this could be a possibility.'
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ripple: Banks Have Invested Over $100 Billion in Blockchain Infrastructure Since 2020
Traditional banks have invested more than $100 billion in blockchain since 2020, according to a recent Ripple-backed report claiming digital assets are going mainstream. That figure comes from 'Banking on Digital Assets,' a joint study by Ripple, CB Insights and the UK Centre for Blockchain Technologies (UK CBT), which analyzed more than 10,000 blockchain deals and surveyed over 1,800 global finance leaders. According to the findings, major banks are ramping up investments in custody, tokenization, and payment infrastructure — despite regulatory uncertainty and market volatility. The report estimates that more than $100 billion has been invested in blockchain and digital asset initiatives globally between 2020 and 2024. It also found that 90% of surveyed finance leaders believe these technologies will have a significant or massive impact on finance within the next three years. From 2020 through 2024, traditional financial institutions participated in 345 blockchain deals globally, the report says. Payment-related infrastructure drew the largest share, followed by crypto custody, tokenization and on-chain foreign exchange. Roughly 25% of investments focused on infrastructure providers powering blockchain settlement and asset issuance rails. More than 90% of finance executives surveyed by Ripple believe blockchain and digital assets will have either a 'significant' or 'massive' impact on finance by 2028. Among bank respondents, 65% said they are actively exploring digital asset custody, with more than half citing stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets as top priorities. Examples cited include HSBC's tokenized gold platform, Goldman Sachs' blockchain settlement tool GS DAP, and SBI's work on quantum-resistant digital currency. Still, most respondents say consumer-facing digital assets are not the immediate focus — less than 20% of banks reported offering crypto trading or retail wallets. The report frames the shift as more infrastructural than speculative. Institutions are largely investing in blockchain to modernize cross-border payments, streamline balance sheet management, and reduce reliance on legacy rails. Ripple, which provides enterprise-grade blockchain solutions for banks, positioned the findings as evidence that 'real-world asset tokenization is entering the implementation phase.' Even as regulatory clarity lags in many jurisdictions, more than two-thirds of surveyed banks say they expect to launch a digital asset initiative within the next three years. Those efforts may range from piloting tokenized bonds to building interoperable settlement layers for CBDCs and private stablecoins. Despite recent setbacks in crypto markets, Ripple's report argues that capital formation is accelerating, not retreating. It notes that blockchain investment from traditional finance hit a post-FTX high in Q1 2024, and that emerging markets — including the UAE, India and Singapore—are driving adoption faster than the U.S. and Europe. For blockchain firms and infrastructure providers, the message is clear: the next wave of institutional adoption won't hinge on hype cycles or retail mania, but on quietly transforming the pipes of global finance.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?
Professor Andrew Urquhart is Professor of Finance and Financial Technology and Head of the Department of Finance at Birmingham Business School (BBS). This is the eighth installment of the Professor Coin column, in which I bring important insights from published academic literature on cryptocurrencies to the Decrypt readership. In this article, I discuss what gives Bitcoin value. In just over a decade, Bitcoin has gone from a niche innovation in cryptography to a globally traded asset with a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions. Yet despite its prominence, a persistent question remains: what gives Bitcoin its value? Bitcoin doesn't generate cash flow like a company, isn't backed by physical reserves like gold, and has no central authority guaranteeing its worth. So why are people willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a digital token? Recent academic research points to several factors. Scarcity and Monetary Policy The first pillar of Bitcoin's value is its programmed scarcity. Bitcoin has a fixed supply: only 21 million coins will ever be created. This limit is enforced by the network's consensus rules and is viewed by supporters as a bulwark against inflation. Academic studies have likened Bitcoin to gold because of this scarcity. Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) model Bitcoin as a decentralized network whose value stems from user adoption and security, both of which are underpinned by the incentives embedded in its monetary policy. In their equilibrium framework, scarcity plays a key role in sustaining long-term value. Why is Bitcoin's supply limit set to 21 million? Scarcity makes Bitcoin attractive as a hedge against inflation, particularly in a world of expanding money supply. A number of economists have investigated whether Bitcoin's scarcity can explain its valuation with Kruger, Meyer, and Withagen (2022) showing the widely discussed stock-to-flow model fits historical data reasonably well, reaffirming the importance of scarcity as one component of Bitcoin's perceived value. Network Effects and Utility Scarcity is not sufficient without demand—and Bitcoin's demand comes from its use as a peer-to-peer digital asset and from the belief that others will accept it in the future. This is where network effects come into play. According to Cong, Li, and Wang (2021) Bitcoin's value grows with its user base. Their tokenomics model shows that the more people adopt and trust Bitcoin, the more valuable the network becomes. This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has survived multiple boom-and-bust cycles. Furthermore, Bolt and van Oordt (2016) argue that the value of a virtual currency arises if users expect it to retain value and be accepted in transactions. Their model formalizes how expectations of acceptance can stabilize a volatile asset like Bitcoin. Cost of Production and Network Security Bitcoin is also underpinned by a real-world cost: mining. To secure the network and process transactions, Bitcoin relies on a system called proof-of-work, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles using electricity and hardware. This energy-intensive process is not without controversy, but researchers such as Hayes (2015) have shown that the cost of production provides a fundamental floor for Bitcoin's price. He finds that Bitcoin rarely trades below the marginal cost of mining, reinforcing the idea that energy and security provision matter for valuation. Moreover, the work of Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) supports this by showing that mining incentives and the strength of the network's security are central to Bitcoin's equilibrium value, not just supply and demand in the traditional sense. Speculation, Sentiment, and Attention In practice, however, Bitcoin's price also reflects investor sentiment and speculation. A surge in media coverage or social media buzz can trigger price rallies or sharp selloffs. Studies by Urquhart (2018) and Shen et al (2019) demonstrate that Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with online search trends and that trading volume in turn, drives investor attention. Similarly, Liu and Tsyvinski (2021) show that cryptocurrency returns are significantly predicted by investor attention proxies. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin lacks ties to macroeconomic fundamentals, so sentiment and belief play an outsized role. Macroeconomic Role and Portfolio Demand Bitcoin's value is also shaped by its role in the broader financial system. In a low-interest-rate environment and amid concerns about fiat currency debasement, investors have turned to Bitcoin as a non-sovereign store of value. This is demonstrated by early work by Baur et al (2018) who show that investors are holding Bitcoin for long periods, but is supported by followup work by Jahanshahloo et al (2025). Recent research has reassessed Bitcoin's role in portfolios, particularly in times of market stress. Corbet, Larkin, and Lucey (2020) find that Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a traditional safe haven, but it can act as a weak diversifier under certain market conditions. In a similar vein, Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2021) use time-varying spillover models and show that Bitcoin's hedging properties fluctuate significantly, with greater hedging effectiveness during tranquil periods rather than during crises. Professor Coin: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold? Conclusion: Value from Code, Community, and Belief Bitcoin's value emerges from a blend of engineering and economics: scarcity enforced by code, utility derived from decentralized consensus, and demand shaped by sentiment, costs, and macro conditions. It behaves like a commodity, a tech stock, and a speculative token—often all at once. That complexity is what makes Bitcoin both so fascinating and so difficult to value with traditional models. In the end, Bitcoin's worth is anchored not in what it does today, but in what its users believe it can become tomorrow. And as long as that belief persists—backed by utility, adoption, and incentives—the value may persist too. References Baur, D. G., Hong, K-H., Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189. Bolt, W., & van Oordt, M. R. C. (2016). On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 81–91. Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1105–1155. Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. Hayes, A. (2015). A Cost of Production Model for Bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308–1321. Jahanshahloo, H., Irresbeger, F., Urquhart, A. (2025). Bitcoin under the microscope. British Accounting Review, forthcoming. Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101670. Kruger, P., Meyer, C., & Withagen, P. (2022). Is Bitcoin's Stock-to-Flow Model Valid? Finance Research Letters, 48, 102956 Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency. NBER Working Paper No. 24877. Pagnotta, E., & Buraschi, A. (2018). An Equilibrium Valuation of Bitcoin and Decentralized Network Assets. Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3498–3531. Shen, D., Urquhart, A., Wang, P. (2019). Does twitter predict Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 174, 118-122. Urquhart, A. (2018). What Causes the Attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166, 40-44. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Who could lead Apple after Tim Cook
There are no indications that Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook is planning on leaving his role anytime soon. But the company's underwhelming AI developments have some questioning if it's time for new leadership. Yahoo Finance Tech Editor Dan Howley takes a closer look at some of the potential contenders. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Related videos £50k in savings? Here's how to unlock up to £4.5k in passive income overnight Down 55% in 5 years, but this FTSE stock offers a 9.5% dividend yield for income investors! How will the Lloyds share price be affected by today's Supreme Court ruling? Meet the 75p dividend stock with a higher yield than Legal & General shares Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data