Census cut puts data on homeless at risk: DCC
Photo: ODT files
Scrapping the census has thrown up issues for the Dunedin City Council's social housing policy.
Speaking to a report on the Ōtepoti Dunedin Housing Plan at yesterday's council meeting, housing principal policy adviser Gill Brown said she was unsure where data on the city's homeless would come from in future.
"The census is the only place where we get a lot of our homeless data specifically and it's the only time we get the data on the uninhabitable homes, because people are specifically asked about it.
"I can't see where else we will get moving forward."
Last week, Statistics Minister Shane Reti announced the census — which had existed in a similar format for more than 70 years — would be replaced with a combination of administrative data from other government agencies and smaller annual surveys completed by a population sample.
There was to be no census in 2028.
The change follows a major review carried out last year; Mr Reti said the traditional model was "no longer financially viable".
In Ms Brown's report, census data showed 4092 Dunedin residents were in need of urgent housing as they were either unsheltered (267) or living in temporary housing (933), overcrowded conditions (792) or uninhabitable homes, for example due to mould or disrepair (2100).
Ms Brown said although homelessness figures recorded in the census were often estimates, the level of data moving forward would be incomplete.
Cr Christine Garey said the "abolition" of the census was concerning as the information was vital to decision making.
Cr Sophie Barker said the decision to scrap the census would present a problem for the council and she hoped there would be an opportunity for the council to advocate for its retention.
"If you don't know how big an issue is then how can you actually address it?
"I know the census if super expensive, but we do need to know what's going on."
Cr Mandy Mayhem said the council's hands appeared tied over the government's decision.
"Now there's a serious risk that smaller data from tax records and school enrolments is going to inform our population stats.
"There is a huge amount of information that is just going to disappear."
ruby.shaw@odt.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Unelected reps should not vote: Simms
A Dunedin mayoral hopeful says unelected representatives have no place voting in city council processes. Over the weekend, mayoral candidate Andrew Simms lodged his firm opposition to Māori wards and voting rights for unelected representatives. Following social media comments on the subject, Mr Simms told the Otago Daily Times he disagreed with any unelected representatives having voting rights during the council process, regardless of who they were representing. "From my point of view, the community choose the councillors ... to represent them," Mr Simms said. "I see the inclusion of unelected representatives at any level having a vote as being the thin end of the wedge a bit and I don't think that fits with democracy. "At that point, the community loses control of who they have to represent them." Several of the Dunedin City Council's committees or sub-committees have non-elected members. These included infrastructure services and strategy as well as planning and engagement, which each have two local rūnaka representatives with voting rights. Ms Simms said, if elected mayor in October, he would put the matter up for discussion in the council. His preference was for experts to participate in discussions, but not to have voting rights. "It's any unelected representation, it's not a Māori issue whatsoever at that point," he said. "There are numerous people that I could think of within the Dunedin community who are either mana whenua or mātāwaka [Māori from an iwi outside the area] who ... would absolutely waltz in as councillors if they put themselves forward purely on their own merits." Mr Simms said his position on Māori wards was based, in part, on an apparent lack of support for the wards from mana whenua. He said these were conscience issues and candidates on his ticket, Future Dunedin, were free to form their own opinions. Yesterday, other mayoral candidates spoke in favour of unelected representatives. Cr Mandy Mayhem said she had "no issue whatsoever" with mana whenua representatives having voting rights as it was important to have shared responsibility on decision making. Māori perspectives should be incorporated in local governance and steps like developing "culturally appropriate consultation processes" and supporting self-determination could ensure Māori participation. Fellow councillor and mayoral candidate Sophie Barker said she believed in Māori representation and input into council decision-making. "I realise people can be nervous about unelected representatives on committees. However, I think committee representation is useful to ensure we have mana whenua views." Cr Barker said people she had spoken to felt comfortable with the arrangement as committees did not have the same powers as council. "A Māori ward was raised recently by a member of mātāwaka. Some Māori, while respecting and honouring the rights of local iwi, feel that their voices are not being heard in decision making ... it's worth thinking about." Green Party nominee Mickey Treadwell said Māori had "long been under-represented in local government" and committee representation and Māori wards were an important part of addressing the inequity. "Both the DCC and the [regional council] have independent accountants on their audit and risk subcommittees, and this somehow escapes controversy." Other mayoral candidates Lee Vandervis and Jules Radich did not respond to questions.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: electricity, bombs and gumboots
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including when cheap power was an advantage, why nuclear bombs are no good to Iran, and the charm of gumboots. Shooting ourselves in the foot over reforms In New Zealand we seem to have developed a talent for turning competitive advantages into disadvantages. Remember the days when cheap electricity was a competitive advantage for New Zealand. We had industries here based on that cheap electricity. Then we had the Bradford reforms to make electricity even cheaper. Somehow that ended up maximising the price for all New Zealanders and contributing to the closure of those once burgeoning industries. Now something similar seems to be happening to other New Zealand products. Dairy and other commodity export prices are good, benefitting some. However, as detailed in the ODT (18.6.25), the hospitality industry is finding that butter, cheese and milk are becoming luxury items. If we are indeed the most efficient producers of dairy products in the world, why is this not giving a competitive advantage to other related New Zealand businesses and why are consumers being held to ransom? Economists I have heard on the subject simply shrug their shoulders and say we are an export-led economy. To me that sounds too simplistic, and I do not think it passes the sniff test. Something is off. There is no doubt that we need to seriously rework our electricity system. I think that present circumstances, where good export income results in benefit for a few, and high prices and inflation for the rest, suggests that there are other areas that deserve close attention. PTSD In response to Dave Tackney (Letters ODT 24.6.25), hasn't it occurred to Mr Tackney that Māori people, as a collective and in general, have Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. After being invaded by the English, lied to, manipulated, subjugated with superior weapons, their land and sources of food stolen, made third-class citizens and impoverished, it is understandable that a chasm would manifest in their spirit. And let's not forget that the English, whether royalists or Cromwellians had perfected their tactics on the Irish for centuries, leading to expulsion from their land and famine. I will not say that the Māori people are victims of abuse by a foreign power because the word victim is demeaning and patronising to them. Obviously, their trauma and anger are misdirected and it is always with sorrow that we hear about the children who are victims in their turn. Metiria Stanton Turei is not trying to divide the country along racial lines, the arrival of the colonising English did it, then subsequent governments enforced it. Atomic fallout Re Greg Glendining letter (25.6.25) claiming our learned Prof Robert Patman to be stunningly naive believing Iran's claims they don't want a nuclear bomb, they just want uranium for peaceful purposes like other countries for electricity etc. A fact Mr Glendining strongly disagrees with. Well I will tell you why a nuclear bomb is no good to Iran and useless on Israel. Grab a map of the Middle East and see how close the borders are to Gaza, Lebanon and Syria. These countries are packed together. If they drop a nuclear bomb on Israel the nuclear radiation fallout would destroy the very people Iran claims to be fighting for. That's why they have developed non-nuclear drones and missiles. At the same time, if Iran did have a nuclear weapon as a deterrent against attack, Israel and the Zionists of Israel and America would not have attacked Iran, the very same reason they haven't attacked North Korea which has nuclear weapons as a deterrent. Photo heart-warming moment in week of woes Amongst all the doom and gloom of articles and photographs in current newspapers, especially those relating to terrible events overseas, how lovely to see that wonderful photograph on the front page of the Otago Daily Times (25.6.25), of the little boy seated amongst all the discarded muddy gumboots, as one of his own falls to the ground. Hopefully his mum or dad was standing there to retrieve it for him. I often smile when I see rows of bashful muddy gumboots standing in a row outside country cafes in New Zealand. I find the sight quite charming, as it is I think very much a Kiwi custom; I never saw this in any other country overseas. How nice of our farmers and workmen to be so considerate, and also not to risk a rebuke if they trail mud inside. The only thing I wonder at, looking at that photo of the very many pairs left in rows of disarray outside the Hindon Hall on Saturday, is that they all look the same (apart from various layers of mud on them) and how does each owner recognise his or her own rightful pair? But I bet they do. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
Otago Daily Times
21 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: Q'town, therapy dogs and elections
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including unsustainable housing in Queenstown, the joy of therapy dogs, and name recognition for electoral candidates. Vulnerable cash cow must be protected Queenstown and surrounds are heritage treasures of natural beauty. A cash cow, the area is vulnerable, endangered by tourism expansion and unrestrained development, unsupported by services and infrastructure. Just released for public comment is the Homestead Bay development on SH6 beyond Jack's Point. Part of Te Tapuae Southern Corridor development plan, this slick document claims to address points including: "For the landscape to retain its timeless identity and its connections between Tangaroa, Tāwhiri-mātea and Tāne, land and waters, people and place." Proposed development fulfils no stated aspirations with big interests and profits at play. Everyone interested in maintaining the area's unique beauty must comment. The uninterrupted view from the Remarkables across SH6 to Homestead Bay, majestic Cecil Peak and the Bayonets will be trashed by 2800 sardine dwellings and retail area. Infrastructure discussion is fanciful, with "active travel" (walking or bike riding) suggested. A moratorium on development must be placed, immediately. The region and country must decide, why and for whom development is proceeding, limits and the huge toll on this environment and landscapes. If rubber-stamped, then infrastructure, services, building and staffing a new hospital, must leap ahead and in place before encroachment from unsustainable housing. Elizabeth Corbett McCusker Eloquent art Excellent cartoon by Yeo in the ODT (20.6.25) — pictures speak louder than words. There is not enough money to build our new hospital but the person called in to progress the build will be paid $2500 per day plus expenses for the three months of his contract. I query how $2500 per day would not cover anyone's expenses. Yeo's cartoon (20.6.25) is what a lot of Dunedinites are thinking. It was absolutely mind-blowing to read the article about the appointment of Evan Davies. He said he was too busy to complete his previous time in the job because of a promotion. Apparently he still holds that job so how has the situation changed? His remuneration (plus expenses) surely requires his full attention, not an hour or two here and there. More than a hall As a Tahakopa Valley resident I must say that at no time have the locals been consulted regarding the last school reunion on March 29 2025. The Board of Trustees decided it was their school to make all decisions and they are upset about community money going back to the Ministry of Education. A trust account would have been sensible to have set up for such money. Is there not a rule whereby such money if singled out, should be shared in such a community, not just to one entity? There is the Our Hut heritage hub plus a local Sir Truby King railway bridge walking track which are visited by people from all over the world. Rachel Napier (Letters ODT 17.6.25) is making out that the community hall is the only entity in the district. Over the past 10 years the hub has funded renovation of its building and created a world class walking track. It is about to start a project doing a "Storymapp" about the Sir Truby King Track, and his life and work here in the Tahakopa Valley. Perhaps the Tahakopa Hall Committee will just have to do some work in raising some funds for the hall? Bedside visit from Staffy a delightful moment During a recent stay in Dunedin Hospital I had the most uplifting moment with a 9-month old Staffy dog named Nancy, brought in for patients who wished to spend a few minutes with her to pat and cuddle. For my interactions with Nancy, a therapy animal, I was rewarded with facelicks. Thank you to the hospital for permitting this, and very special thanks to Nancy and her owner, who brought myself and others a very real uplift. Cleaning bill The taxpayer should not have to pick up the bill from failed coal ventures. ( ODT 18.6.25). Compared to the budgeted $443 million the taxpayer is on the hook for to clean up the Tui oil field, the West Coast coal mess at less than $100m is relatively minor. How much will the taxpayer pay if Aussie miner Bathurst Resources decides destroying what is left of the Stockton and Denniston Plateaus is not economic? Bilious rhetoric re Bill decried Acting Prime Minister David Seymour's Facebook trolling of those exercising their democratic right to challenge the Regulatory Standards Bill reveals the extent to which he is not interested in any opinion other than his own. When any leader is unable to engage with and reply to others' expert opinions they reveal their lack of respect for everybody's democratic rights. We should all be very grateful that Seymour has exposed his narrow definition of democracy and the depravity to which he will stoop to obfusticate legal processes. How do you do? I read Brian Ellis' letter (25.6.25) with great interest and agree wholeheartedly with his observation that name recognition provides a real advantage in the upcoming 2025 local body elections. As he rightly points out, former MPs and high-profile sports figures benefit from this familiarity. To that list I would add incumbent councillors. The mechanics of the STV voting system only serve to amplify this advantage. Unfortunately, name recognition can sometimes save underperforming or fatigued councillors from being removed, limiting the opportunity for new people bringing fresh ideas and renewed energy to council. That is a shortcoming in the system which has not served Dunedin well. Mr Ellis goes on to criticise the campaign spending by myself and the Future Dunedin team, suggesting we are investing "vast sums of money". I'd like to reassure him and readers that this is simply not the case. Our campaign budget allocates approximately $9000 per candidate for media, considerably less than the $17,274.13 per candidate declared by Green Dunedin during the 2022 elections. If not through a media campaign, how else are new candidates to introduce themselves to voters? Our campaign addresses the very issue identified by Mr Ellis at the outset of his letter. Mayoral and council candidate, Future Dunedin Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
