338 days without a government: Can Brussels break the deadlock?
Van den Brandt also touched on the uncertain future of the Metro 3 project, aimed at connecting the city's northern and southern neighbourhoods, and the criticism of her vision to make Brussels liveable.
We also head to the Western Balkans for the start of European Council President's four-day tour as part of diplomatic efforts to keep candidate countries on an EU path. And finally, Europe's rapidly ageing population is posing an existential threat to the continent's healthcare system. Which countries are worst affected?
This episode of Radio Schuman is hosted and produced by Lauren Walker. Audio editing by David Brodheim. Music by Alexandre Jas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
a few seconds ago
- France 24
Heavy monsoon rains in Pakistan kill 63 people in 24 hours
01:39 18/07/2025 Sirens wail, cities shut down as Taiwan simulates Chinese air raid 18/07/2025 Child labour rises in Gaza as families struggle to survive 18/07/2025 Spain taming fire that belched smoke cloud over Madrid 18/07/2025 Syria: Renewed Druze and Bedouin clashes, UN rights chief urges prompt probe 18/07/2025 New clashes rock Syria's Druze heartland as tribal fighters reinforce Bedouin 18/07/2025 Germany: Top EU officials gather to discuss stricter migration measures 18/07/2025 European interior ministers gather for meeting on migration policy in Germany 18/07/2025 Trump threatens to sue WSJ over story on alleged letter to Epstein 18/07/2025 Russian deputies back fines for clicking on 'extremist' content
Euronews
33 minutes ago
- Euronews
Will the EU budget turn cohesion policy into regional 'Hunger Games'?
The EU's proposed budget for 2028 until 2034 runs the risk of turning its cohesion policy into a competition for funding, as it would merge it with other major spending areas. There are now concerns over reduced local control and lack of support for disadvantaged regions. For decades, cohesion funds have helped reduce regional disparities across the EU, supporting everything from road construction and hospital upgrades to unemployment, training programmes and green initiatives. As one of the EU's most tangible policy tools, cohesion funding has delivered visible results in citizens' daily lives — but that may be about to change. This week, the European Commission unveiled its proposed EU long-term budget — the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2028–2034 — which could fundamentally reshape how cohesion policy works, while also potentially marking the end of the system as we know it. Under the new proposal, cohesion policy would be absorbed into a single mega-fund, combining it with other major spending areas such as agriculture, rural development, migration and border control. The stated aim? Simplification. But critics warn this approach could ignite intense competition among regions, sectors and interest groups. 'Putting agriculture, migration, border control, and cohesion policy into one container will turn it into a 'Hunger Games',' said Kata Tüttő, President of the European Committee of the Regions, in an interview with Euronews. She warned that the new structure risks pitting farmers against city mayors, and those in need of agricultural support with those seeking unemployment support, for example. Fears of fragmentation and lost priorities Out of the total proposed €2 trillion budget, €865 billion would be allocated to this consolidated fund, which merges long-standing programs like the EU's Common Agricultural Policy, cohesion funds (accounting for two-thirds of the current EU budget) and the European Social Fund, which supports employment and education. The competition between different lines in the single fund has raised alarm bells among regional leaders, who fear cohesion funding may be deprioritised in the budget negotiations. According to the Commission, €450 billion of the merged fund would still go toward regional development, fisheries and rural areas. Additionally, the proposal includes a minimum allocation of €218 billion specifically earmarked for less developed regions, one of the three traditional pillars of cohesion funding — with the others being developing and developed regions. While this minimum allocation offers a safeguard for the EU's most disadvantaged areas, the remaining categories could face fluctuating support, as they are not ringfenced under the new plan. Centralisation vs. local engagement Beyond the battle for funding, critics have also voiced concerns regarding governance. The proposed delivery model marks a shift away from the EU's tradition of shared management with local and regional authorities. Tüttő sees the move as a clear case of centralisation: 'We will be kicked out from the design, the management and the creation parts of the policy. We will just become implementers, fighting for money,' she said. With many aspects of the proposal still unclear, the coming months will be critical. Local governments across the EU are calling for more involvement in the process — and potentially a rethinking of the proposal before the budget is finalised. 'This is a proposal from the European Commission — it is not the final step, but a starting point,' said Raffaele Fitto, Executive Vice-President for cohesion, while presenting the budget. He added, however, that the EU budget needs more flexibility to respond to evolving challenges.
France 24
33 minutes ago
- France 24
EU encourages sustainable journeys by rail: Are trains the future of travel?
Europe 12:07 From the show The EU is aiming to double high-speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple it by 2050. But harmonising rail networks across the continent is easier said than done. While some cross-border routes have opened in 2025, other projects have been hampered by a lack of infrastructure or investment, as well as vested interests in the EU member states. Our panelists discuss what it would take to change this situation – rail travel being a component of the EU 's stated goal of becoming climate-neutral by 2050.
