logo
Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Harvey Weinstein cases test the limits and legacy of #MeToo movement

Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Harvey Weinstein cases test the limits and legacy of #MeToo movement

It started with a viral tweet that swept the globe — but now, some are wondering if the #MeToo movement is in its dying days.
For the last two months, two separate trials in New York have offered a pulse check on the phenomenon, which exposed rife harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond.
Earlier this month, a jury convicted the man who catalysed the movement, filmmaker Harvey Weinstein, of one of the top charges in his sex crimes retrial. But it acquitted him of another and was unable to reach a verdict on a third.
It was a split result that both sides could paint as a win.
Now, a different New York jury is about to begin deliberating on the fate of rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs in his sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy case.
While the movie mogul started the movement, the charges against the music mogul are an indirect result of it.
And just up the road from the Weinstein retrial, crowds have gathered every morning over the past seven weeks for the Combs case.
Among them is a small number of #MeToo advocates like Andreea Gray.
As she spoke to the ABC outside the Manhattan court, a pro-Diddy TikToker yelled over the top of her, claiming the case was all a cash grab.
"I thought I would see more women and allies … here, just protesting the atrocious crimes committed against the survivors," said the New Yorker, who has been following the case from day one.
In 2023, Combs's former girlfriend Casandra Ventura took advantage of a new law, which gave alleged victims of sexual violence a 12-month window to file civil claims even after the statute of limitations had lapsed.
It was among several law changes sparked by #MeToo, and Ventura cited it when she sued Combs for years of alleged abuse. "With the expiration of New York's Adult Survivors Act fast approaching it became clear that this was an opportunity to speak up," she said.
The civil case was settled within 24 hours for $US20 million ($30 million).
Months later, surveillance video emerged showing Combs grabbing, shoving, dragging and kicking Ventura in a hotel hallway in California in 2016.
The rapper's homes in Los Angeles and Miami were later raided and police found guns and ammunition, drugs and large amounts of baby oil and lubricant related to alleged days-long sex marathons dubbed "freak offs".
Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Prosecutors alleged that over almost two decades, he abused, threatened and coerced women "to fulfil his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct".
Like many advocates, Gray fears a not guilty verdict would have a chilling effect on survivors and work to further suppress their voices.
When the long-whispered accusations about Weinstein were made public back in 2017 in a blockbuster investigation by The New York Times, a movement began which quickly took on a life of its own.
Days after the allegations were published, actor Alyssa Milano tweeted: "If you've been sexually harassed or assaulted write 'me too' as a reply to this tweet."
When the hashtag went viral, no-one could have predicted the dam that would then burst.
Women were emboldened to come forward with stories of sexual harassment, abuse and assault. Powerful men fell. A system of tacit acceptance of misconduct was turned on its head.
But eight years later, as Weinstein faced a New York jury in the retrial of his rape and sexual abuse case, many of those gains had been lost.
And some women are left wondering if the #MeToo moment is over. Or if it even really happened at all.
As they closed their case earlier this month, Weinstein's lawyers portrayed him as the falsely accused "poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement".
It's true that the accusations against him helped spark the movement and opened the floodgates for a slew of allegations against powerful men in all corners of public life.
Within weeks of The New York Times report, actor Kevin Spacey was accused of sexual misconduct and NBC fired TV host Matt Lauer over harassment accusations against him.
The following year, comedian Bill Cosby was jailed for drugging and assaulting Andrea Constand, one of his scores of accusers, and actor Amber Heard published an article in The Washington Post speaking out about domestic abuse.
But as quickly as it began, the movement soon began to unravel.
In 2021, the Philadelphia Supreme Court overturned Cosby's conviction and freed him.
The following year, Heard lost a $US10 million defamation case to her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, in a trial widely seen as undermining the #MeToo movement.
The year after that, Spacey was acquitted of sexual assault charges in the UK.
And last year, Weinstein had his conviction overturned on appeal — hence the recent retrial.
Jennifer Mondino from the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, an organisation launched in 2018 to support survivors who don't have access to the media or the money to file a lawsuit, describes the retrial as "a travesty".
"I think there was a serious error in legal judgment with the courts, and I wish that the survivors didn't have to be telling their stories again," she told the ABC.
Regardless of the retrial outcome in New York, Weinstein was always going to remain a convicted sex offender in California, where he was sentenced to 16 years in prison in 2022.
"It doesn't change what has already happened here," Mondino said.
"Which is that all of these very brave people spoke out about their experiences with harassment and abuse by Harvey Weinstein and a jury believed them — and people all across the country believed them."
Accusations of sexual misconduct are no longer political kryptonite either.
In fact, arguably the most powerful man in the world, who was once caught on tape bragging about grabbing women "by the pussy", is back in the White House.
A year after Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil trial in 2023, the American people elected him for a second time.
In New York City, where the Weinstein retrial and Diddy trial took place, two of the contenders for mayor have faced accusations of sexual misconduct.
The incumbent, Eric Adams, was accused in a lawsuit of sexually assaulting a colleague in 1993.
In 2021, Scott Stringer was accused by two women of sexual harassment.
A third candidate, former governor Andrew Cuomo, who was just knocked out of the Democratic primary, resigned from office four years ago after an investigation found he sexually harassed 11 women.
All three men deny the accusations against them.
Advocates for the #MeToo movement argue it has brought about real change for survivors and say reports the movement are dead are grossly overstated.
Mondino says, since launching in 2018, the Time's Up legal fund has supported 430 workplace harassment cases and connected more than 5,000 people to lawyers for similar matters.
"I would say that the MeToo movement is absolutely alive and well and going forward," she said.
"And the reason that I know that to be true is because we have survivors coming to us every day, getting connected to attorneys in our legal network."
Outside the court during the first week of the Combs trial, prominent #MeToo lawyer Gloria Allred said the case was another sign the movement was far from over.
"People keep saying to me the MeToo movement is dead," she told the ABC.
"I don't know why they say that. There's no evidence of that and I say, to the contrary, it's alive and well and living in this country and in many countries."
Allred has represented accusers against Weinstein, Cosby and now Combs, and points out there are also many confidential settlements that are never made public.
"Women are coming forward. They're … not going to be silenced anymore if they believe that they have been the victims of injustice … by rich, powerful famous men."
However, the rate of criminal convictions following sexual assault accusations in the United States remains low.
For every 1,000 reported assaults, fewer than 30 people are convicted.
Mondino admits the movement has had some setbacks but believes that's the nature of social change.
"It isn't a perfect straight line. There is always going to be some victories and some losses and some blowback," she said.
"When there is blowback like this, it means it's working. It means that people are really paying attention.
"And so I take it not as a sign of the movement being dead, but the movement actually gaining traction."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry's incredible 'disappearing act'
Prince Harry's incredible 'disappearing act'

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Prince Harry's incredible 'disappearing act'

Is it harder to spy in California the Dusky Warbler or The Duke of Sussex? One's a rarely sighted migratory bird and the other is a blood prince but it's tricky to spot either of them these days. So far 2025 feels like it could be one of the quietest ever with Harry 's public footprint seeming to be on the wane. Consider: In 2019, his last year of official royalling, he undertook 201 engagements. This year he has undertaken charitable outings on about 17 days as far as is publicly known and at the time of writing. (That includes the ten days of the Invictus Games and on seven others including, for example, him discreetly thanking volunteer firefighters during the LA blazes.) The duke and the Dusky Warbler – neither are California natives and neither can be seen all that much. Back in 2022 the duke was being asked to address the UN General Assembly; now he is being tasked with holding his wife Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex's iPhone. The 40-year-old might contain multitudes but he appears to be increasingly keeping himself on the down low, aside from his willingness to still lob an occasional grenade over the palace walls. By and large the most common place to catch a glimpse of the duke these days is the duchess' Instagram feed thanks to her muscular posting regimen. In recent weeks we've been treated to seeing Harry's joy at a Disneyland jaunt with their kids and his unfortunately Dadish dance moves. But while Meghan is busy beavering away at building an empire (something her in-laws know a brutal thing or two about) off the back of tea bags and rose petals, selling out her second drop of As Ever products and launching her own rosé, Harry circa 2025 remains something of a blank. While the duchess is transitioning and evolving her brand into that of go-getting entrepreneur, it feels like duke is trapped in something of an identity crisis, stuck in a reputational no man's land. It's easier to define Harry today by what he is not. Royal? He might still have his titles but what are they but shiny appendages he can have printed on his reams of unused letterhead but the royal family appear to want to have about as much to do with him as with zero proof gin. His own father King Charles won't speak to him, as he himself told the BBC in May, giving the British broadcaster an explosive interview and laying bare the full extent of the family destruction wrought by the last few years. His brother Prince William, formerly 'burning' about his brother's energetic dishing of Windsor dirt is now 'indifferent' towards the duke, the Sunday Times revealed this week. His coterie of cousins are no longer photographed in his orbit and we are coming up, in September, on it being three years since the late Queen's funeral and the last time the Duke of Sussex was seen with anyone who knows the Buckingham Palace Wi-Fi code. But royalty you might say. That's defined by service. By steadfast doing and by helping those less fortunate with a certain indefatigable, unflagging Blitz-era spirit. Harry is by all accounts a man who cares and cares deeply, with him coming up on him having worked with some of his philanthropic organisations for two decades. Unfortunately he has faced controversy and setbacks on this front. In late March he and co-founder Prince Seeiso of Lesotho resigned from their charity, Sentebale, along with the entirety of the board, as part of a dispute with the chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka. She later accused Harry and the organisation of 'bullying and harassment at scale'. The UK's Charity Commission is investigating and Harry has spoken about his 'heartbreak' over the situation. In May, the charity African Parks, with which Harry has been involved since 2016, acknowledged that rangers employed by the organisation had committed 'human rights abuses' against indigenous people in the Congo. He has continued with this longtime associations, like speaking about mental health at the New York Times ' Dealbook Summit in December, supporting The Diana Awards in Las Vegas in May, and flying more than 10,000km to give a speech about his sustainable travel initiative Travelyst at a summit in China the same month. None of it really managed to make any sort of bigger splash or was particularly noticed by the wider world. The shining star in the duke's philanthropic quiver is the Invictus Games, the sporting event for wounded current and veteran service personnel that is the definition of 'life-changing'. The Games' ongoing success reflects what Harry can pull off – but he has not launched or done anything that even vaguely matches up to this since landing Stateside in 2020 and learning how to mispronounce 'tomato'. Unlike last year, the Sussexes have not taken themselves off for any sort of DIY 'royal' overseers tour either, visiting Nigeria and Colombia in 2024. Nor does Harry appear to be a paid worker these days. No podcasts, books, TV series, docos, films or even his own branded line of ducally-approved creatine seem to be in the pipeline. (Lucky those As Ever bits keep selling out.) With his story told, his family trauma catharted, and Oprah no longer out on the porch with a camera crew, what comes next? I suppose there's always bird watching. His country might no longer want him but the Dusky Warbler? Why not.

Truth no bride will admit about Kylie Jenner's wedding guest move
Truth no bride will admit about Kylie Jenner's wedding guest move

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Truth no bride will admit about Kylie Jenner's wedding guest move

When Kylie Jenner stepped out at Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's wedding, she knew exactly what she was doing. Her plunging, corsetted 'icy blue' dress (which, to anyone with eyes, is white) was destined for a million paparazzi photos and a thousand online debates. In the age of Instagram, every celebrity outing is an opportunity to make a statement, and the Bezos-Sanchez wedding was no exception. It was all about the spectacle. Jenner's bride-adjacent outfit felt intentional and designed to go viral – and it did. Social media erupted. Vogue 's Instagram post of the look was flooded with comments like, 'Who the f**k wears white to a wedding?' Others called it 'tacky' and said, 'You can't buy class'. One commenter asked, 'Has Kylie never been to a wedding before?' Now, you might think this is a trivial matter about rich people and fashion faux pas. And it is. But as someone who got married this year, I can tell you the personal toll a move like this can take. At my April wedding, which, surprisingly, didn't cause an entire Italian city to grind to a halt and was not attended by the Kardashian-Jenner clan, one of my friends wore cream. I know what you're thinking. Cream isn't white. And you're right. But it was close enough to cause a double-take in photos. I gently let her know it made me uncomfortable, but she insisted it 'wasn't white,' so it wasn't going to be an issue. And while, yes, it technically wasn't white, it did make me wonder why, out of all the colours in the world, she had to pick that dress. Here's the thing. In this day and age, many wedding guests, whether they're Kylie Jenner or my friend, seem to forget the basics of wedding etiquette. They get caught up in the moment, in what they're wearing, in how they will look in photos. And I get it. Weddings are a rare chance to dress up, to be seen, and frankly, to look hot. But somewhere along the way, the unspoken rule of 'don't wear white' has been forgotten. In fear of being labelled a 'bridezilla', I let the issue go and didn't say anything more about it. When the big day arrived, I was so caught up in the excitement of getting married that I hardly noticed or cared what anyone else was wearing. I was too busy laughing, dancing, and trying not to make ugly crying faces as I walked down the aisle (I didn't quite succeed at that last one). But in the months afterwards, a sour taste lingered whenever I thought about that cream dress. It wasn't really about the dress itself – it was about the fact that, out of all the possible outfits, my friend chose to flirt with crossing the line, and even after I told her I wasn't okay with it, she persisted. And while everyone told me I was being petty to care, I couldn't shake the feeling that it was about more than just the dress. You really don't understand until you're a bride, groom, or anyone planning a wedding, for that matter. You (hopefully) only get one day in your life where everything is about you. When a friend, who could quite literally wear anything to your wedding, chooses to push boundaries with their outfit, it makes you wonder: why? Is it an innocent choice, or a subtle power play? In the words of Succession, 'Was this a snubbing?!' My friend told me it was the only dress she could find that made her feel confident, and while I want her to feel her best, surely, there's a wedding pecking order in terms of who deserves to feel the best. I even worry I seem vain for discussing this. But the comments on Vogue 's post validate me, suggesting that for most people, wearing white to a wedding is still a big no-no. If we give Jenner the benefit of the doubt and assume Sanchez approved her outfit, I'm still baffled as to why she chose to make a statement at that moment, on someone else's special day. But honestly, maybe I shouldn't be that surprised. For celebrities, controversy is just another form of publicity, and maybe Sanchez was even in on it to create more buzz for the wedding, not that it needed it. But for the rest of us, it can feel more like a personal slight. So, if you're invited to a wedding soon, please, please, please, think twice about wearing pale colours. You might just make someone feel a little less special on their big day.

Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Harvey Weinstein cases test the limits and legacy of #MeToo movement
Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Harvey Weinstein cases test the limits and legacy of #MeToo movement

ABC News

time6 hours ago

  • ABC News

Sean 'Diddy' Combs and Harvey Weinstein cases test the limits and legacy of #MeToo movement

It started with a viral tweet that swept the globe — but now, some are wondering if the #MeToo movement is in its dying days. For the last two months, two separate trials in New York have offered a pulse check on the phenomenon, which exposed rife harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond. Earlier this month, a jury convicted the man who catalysed the movement, filmmaker Harvey Weinstein, of one of the top charges in his sex crimes retrial. But it acquitted him of another and was unable to reach a verdict on a third. It was a split result that both sides could paint as a win. Now, a different New York jury is about to begin deliberating on the fate of rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs in his sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy case. While the movie mogul started the movement, the charges against the music mogul are an indirect result of it. And just up the road from the Weinstein retrial, crowds have gathered every morning over the past seven weeks for the Combs case. Among them is a small number of #MeToo advocates like Andreea Gray. As she spoke to the ABC outside the Manhattan court, a pro-Diddy TikToker yelled over the top of her, claiming the case was all a cash grab. "I thought I would see more women and allies … here, just protesting the atrocious crimes committed against the survivors," said the New Yorker, who has been following the case from day one. In 2023, Combs's former girlfriend Casandra Ventura took advantage of a new law, which gave alleged victims of sexual violence a 12-month window to file civil claims even after the statute of limitations had lapsed. It was among several law changes sparked by #MeToo, and Ventura cited it when she sued Combs for years of alleged abuse. "With the expiration of New York's Adult Survivors Act fast approaching it became clear that this was an opportunity to speak up," she said. The civil case was settled within 24 hours for $US20 million ($30 million). Months later, surveillance video emerged showing Combs grabbing, shoving, dragging and kicking Ventura in a hotel hallway in California in 2016. The rapper's homes in Los Angeles and Miami were later raided and police found guns and ammunition, drugs and large amounts of baby oil and lubricant related to alleged days-long sex marathons dubbed "freak offs". Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking. Prosecutors alleged that over almost two decades, he abused, threatened and coerced women "to fulfil his sexual desires, protect his reputation, and conceal his conduct". Like many advocates, Gray fears a not guilty verdict would have a chilling effect on survivors and work to further suppress their voices. When the long-whispered accusations about Weinstein were made public back in 2017 in a blockbuster investigation by The New York Times, a movement began which quickly took on a life of its own. Days after the allegations were published, actor Alyssa Milano tweeted: "If you've been sexually harassed or assaulted write 'me too' as a reply to this tweet." When the hashtag went viral, no-one could have predicted the dam that would then burst. Women were emboldened to come forward with stories of sexual harassment, abuse and assault. Powerful men fell. A system of tacit acceptance of misconduct was turned on its head. But eight years later, as Weinstein faced a New York jury in the retrial of his rape and sexual abuse case, many of those gains had been lost. And some women are left wondering if the #MeToo moment is over. Or if it even really happened at all. As they closed their case earlier this month, Weinstein's lawyers portrayed him as the falsely accused "poster boy, the original sinner, for the #MeToo movement". It's true that the accusations against him helped spark the movement and opened the floodgates for a slew of allegations against powerful men in all corners of public life. Within weeks of The New York Times report, actor Kevin Spacey was accused of sexual misconduct and NBC fired TV host Matt Lauer over harassment accusations against him. The following year, comedian Bill Cosby was jailed for drugging and assaulting Andrea Constand, one of his scores of accusers, and actor Amber Heard published an article in The Washington Post speaking out about domestic abuse. But as quickly as it began, the movement soon began to unravel. In 2021, the Philadelphia Supreme Court overturned Cosby's conviction and freed him. The following year, Heard lost a $US10 million defamation case to her ex-husband, Johnny Depp, in a trial widely seen as undermining the #MeToo movement. The year after that, Spacey was acquitted of sexual assault charges in the UK. And last year, Weinstein had his conviction overturned on appeal — hence the recent retrial. Jennifer Mondino from the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, an organisation launched in 2018 to support survivors who don't have access to the media or the money to file a lawsuit, describes the retrial as "a travesty". "I think there was a serious error in legal judgment with the courts, and I wish that the survivors didn't have to be telling their stories again," she told the ABC. Regardless of the retrial outcome in New York, Weinstein was always going to remain a convicted sex offender in California, where he was sentenced to 16 years in prison in 2022. "It doesn't change what has already happened here," Mondino said. "Which is that all of these very brave people spoke out about their experiences with harassment and abuse by Harvey Weinstein and a jury believed them — and people all across the country believed them." Accusations of sexual misconduct are no longer political kryptonite either. In fact, arguably the most powerful man in the world, who was once caught on tape bragging about grabbing women "by the pussy", is back in the White House. A year after Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in a civil trial in 2023, the American people elected him for a second time. In New York City, where the Weinstein retrial and Diddy trial took place, two of the contenders for mayor have faced accusations of sexual misconduct. The incumbent, Eric Adams, was accused in a lawsuit of sexually assaulting a colleague in 1993. In 2021, Scott Stringer was accused by two women of sexual harassment. A third candidate, former governor Andrew Cuomo, who was just knocked out of the Democratic primary, resigned from office four years ago after an investigation found he sexually harassed 11 women. All three men deny the accusations against them. Advocates for the #MeToo movement argue it has brought about real change for survivors and say reports the movement are dead are grossly overstated. Mondino says, since launching in 2018, the Time's Up legal fund has supported 430 workplace harassment cases and connected more than 5,000 people to lawyers for similar matters. "I would say that the MeToo movement is absolutely alive and well and going forward," she said. "And the reason that I know that to be true is because we have survivors coming to us every day, getting connected to attorneys in our legal network." Outside the court during the first week of the Combs trial, prominent #MeToo lawyer Gloria Allred said the case was another sign the movement was far from over. "People keep saying to me the MeToo movement is dead," she told the ABC. "I don't know why they say that. There's no evidence of that and I say, to the contrary, it's alive and well and living in this country and in many countries." Allred has represented accusers against Weinstein, Cosby and now Combs, and points out there are also many confidential settlements that are never made public. "Women are coming forward. They're … not going to be silenced anymore if they believe that they have been the victims of injustice … by rich, powerful famous men." However, the rate of criminal convictions following sexual assault accusations in the United States remains low. For every 1,000 reported assaults, fewer than 30 people are convicted. Mondino admits the movement has had some setbacks but believes that's the nature of social change. "It isn't a perfect straight line. There is always going to be some victories and some losses and some blowback," she said. "When there is blowback like this, it means it's working. It means that people are really paying attention. "And so I take it not as a sign of the movement being dead, but the movement actually gaining traction."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store