Insurers accused of 'playing people for mugs'
Health insurers are spending more but leaving Australians with higher out-of-pocket expenses, sparking scorn from private hospitals.
A record $12.3 billion was dished out by private health insurers in the year to March, according to official data released on Friday.
But the same data shows the average Australian is paying $470.80 per hospital visit, about $46 more than a year earlier.
The average gap for general treatments rose $3 to $61.64 per service.
Insurers also covered less for services like accommodation, nursing, medical services and medical devices in the March quarter, compared with the December quarter.
Private hospitals - already suffering workforce shortages and rising costs for supplies - say insurers were being unfair to patients by allowing gaps to increase.
"Welcome to private health insurance in the modern era, too tricky by half in trying to play people for mugs," Australian Private Health Association chief executive Brent Heffernan said.
"If it costs me $10 to provide a service and you pay me $8, I'm $2 out of pocket.
"Next year it costs me $15 to provide that service and you pay me $10, so I'm even worse off despite you paying me more than you did last year."
Insurers say they are spending $61 more per person from last year to this year.
This is despite technology and changing clinical practice meaning people have shorter hospital stays.
They laid the blame for higher out-of-pocket claims on specialist doctors, whose consultations cannot be covered by health insurers.
"Several trends have been dampening demand for private hospital care, including the high cost to see a specialist doctor in the community," Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David said.
"A 7.7 per cent increase year-on-year is a good result for private hospitals that have had a hard time due to the pandemic and inflation."
Almost 12.5 million people in Australia have hospital cover, or about 45 in every 100 people.
About 15.1 million have general treatment cover.
More than 81,000 people signed up for hospital cover in the first three months of 2025, with the largest increase coming from 40-44 year olds.
The data from the financial regulator comes after the collapse of major hospital operator Healthscope after lenders voted to stop support for their parent company Brookfield.
Healthscope treats 650,000 patients a year and has 19,000 staff across 37 hospitals in the nation.
Insurers say they are optimistic the private system won't crumble.
"We have a good supply of private hospital services across most parts of the country, so we are confident people with hospital cover will retain access to high-quality services near their homes," Dr David said.
The Commonwealth Bank threw Healthscope a $100 million lifeline while fellow lender Westpac pledged to help the company sell to a new owner.
Health insurers are spending more but leaving Australians with higher out-of-pocket expenses, sparking scorn from private hospitals.
A record $12.3 billion was dished out by private health insurers in the year to March, according to official data released on Friday.
But the same data shows the average Australian is paying $470.80 per hospital visit, about $46 more than a year earlier.
The average gap for general treatments rose $3 to $61.64 per service.
Insurers also covered less for services like accommodation, nursing, medical services and medical devices in the March quarter, compared with the December quarter.
Private hospitals - already suffering workforce shortages and rising costs for supplies - say insurers were being unfair to patients by allowing gaps to increase.
"Welcome to private health insurance in the modern era, too tricky by half in trying to play people for mugs," Australian Private Health Association chief executive Brent Heffernan said.
"If it costs me $10 to provide a service and you pay me $8, I'm $2 out of pocket.
"Next year it costs me $15 to provide that service and you pay me $10, so I'm even worse off despite you paying me more than you did last year."
Insurers say they are spending $61 more per person from last year to this year.
This is despite technology and changing clinical practice meaning people have shorter hospital stays.
They laid the blame for higher out-of-pocket claims on specialist doctors, whose consultations cannot be covered by health insurers.
"Several trends have been dampening demand for private hospital care, including the high cost to see a specialist doctor in the community," Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David said.
"A 7.7 per cent increase year-on-year is a good result for private hospitals that have had a hard time due to the pandemic and inflation."
Almost 12.5 million people in Australia have hospital cover, or about 45 in every 100 people.
About 15.1 million have general treatment cover.
More than 81,000 people signed up for hospital cover in the first three months of 2025, with the largest increase coming from 40-44 year olds.
The data from the financial regulator comes after the collapse of major hospital operator Healthscope after lenders voted to stop support for their parent company Brookfield.
Healthscope treats 650,000 patients a year and has 19,000 staff across 37 hospitals in the nation.
Insurers say they are optimistic the private system won't crumble.
"We have a good supply of private hospital services across most parts of the country, so we are confident people with hospital cover will retain access to high-quality services near their homes," Dr David said.
The Commonwealth Bank threw Healthscope a $100 million lifeline while fellow lender Westpac pledged to help the company sell to a new owner.
Health insurers are spending more but leaving Australians with higher out-of-pocket expenses, sparking scorn from private hospitals.
A record $12.3 billion was dished out by private health insurers in the year to March, according to official data released on Friday.
But the same data shows the average Australian is paying $470.80 per hospital visit, about $46 more than a year earlier.
The average gap for general treatments rose $3 to $61.64 per service.
Insurers also covered less for services like accommodation, nursing, medical services and medical devices in the March quarter, compared with the December quarter.
Private hospitals - already suffering workforce shortages and rising costs for supplies - say insurers were being unfair to patients by allowing gaps to increase.
"Welcome to private health insurance in the modern era, too tricky by half in trying to play people for mugs," Australian Private Health Association chief executive Brent Heffernan said.
"If it costs me $10 to provide a service and you pay me $8, I'm $2 out of pocket.
"Next year it costs me $15 to provide that service and you pay me $10, so I'm even worse off despite you paying me more than you did last year."
Insurers say they are spending $61 more per person from last year to this year.
This is despite technology and changing clinical practice meaning people have shorter hospital stays.
They laid the blame for higher out-of-pocket claims on specialist doctors, whose consultations cannot be covered by health insurers.
"Several trends have been dampening demand for private hospital care, including the high cost to see a specialist doctor in the community," Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David said.
"A 7.7 per cent increase year-on-year is a good result for private hospitals that have had a hard time due to the pandemic and inflation."
Almost 12.5 million people in Australia have hospital cover, or about 45 in every 100 people.
About 15.1 million have general treatment cover.
More than 81,000 people signed up for hospital cover in the first three months of 2025, with the largest increase coming from 40-44 year olds.
The data from the financial regulator comes after the collapse of major hospital operator Healthscope after lenders voted to stop support for their parent company Brookfield.
Healthscope treats 650,000 patients a year and has 19,000 staff across 37 hospitals in the nation.
Insurers say they are optimistic the private system won't crumble.
"We have a good supply of private hospital services across most parts of the country, so we are confident people with hospital cover will retain access to high-quality services near their homes," Dr David said.
The Commonwealth Bank threw Healthscope a $100 million lifeline while fellow lender Westpac pledged to help the company sell to a new owner.
Health insurers are spending more but leaving Australians with higher out-of-pocket expenses, sparking scorn from private hospitals.
A record $12.3 billion was dished out by private health insurers in the year to March, according to official data released on Friday.
But the same data shows the average Australian is paying $470.80 per hospital visit, about $46 more than a year earlier.
The average gap for general treatments rose $3 to $61.64 per service.
Insurers also covered less for services like accommodation, nursing, medical services and medical devices in the March quarter, compared with the December quarter.
Private hospitals - already suffering workforce shortages and rising costs for supplies - say insurers were being unfair to patients by allowing gaps to increase.
"Welcome to private health insurance in the modern era, too tricky by half in trying to play people for mugs," Australian Private Health Association chief executive Brent Heffernan said.
"If it costs me $10 to provide a service and you pay me $8, I'm $2 out of pocket.
"Next year it costs me $15 to provide that service and you pay me $10, so I'm even worse off despite you paying me more than you did last year."
Insurers say they are spending $61 more per person from last year to this year.
This is despite technology and changing clinical practice meaning people have shorter hospital stays.
They laid the blame for higher out-of-pocket claims on specialist doctors, whose consultations cannot be covered by health insurers.
"Several trends have been dampening demand for private hospital care, including the high cost to see a specialist doctor in the community," Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David said.
"A 7.7 per cent increase year-on-year is a good result for private hospitals that have had a hard time due to the pandemic and inflation."
Almost 12.5 million people in Australia have hospital cover, or about 45 in every 100 people.
About 15.1 million have general treatment cover.
More than 81,000 people signed up for hospital cover in the first three months of 2025, with the largest increase coming from 40-44 year olds.
The data from the financial regulator comes after the collapse of major hospital operator Healthscope after lenders voted to stop support for their parent company Brookfield.
Healthscope treats 650,000 patients a year and has 19,000 staff across 37 hospitals in the nation.
Insurers say they are optimistic the private system won't crumble.
"We have a good supply of private hospital services across most parts of the country, so we are confident people with hospital cover will retain access to high-quality services near their homes," Dr David said.
The Commonwealth Bank threw Healthscope a $100 million lifeline while fellow lender Westpac pledged to help the company sell to a new owner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canberra Times
an hour ago
- Canberra Times
Health levy prescription hurts. And it's only addressing a symptom of a terrible disease
At more than $80 billion a year, public hospitals are the biggest and fastest-growing part of Australian governments' health spending. It's not just that we need more care as we get older and sicker: the cost of each admission is rising sharply too.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Editorial: NDIS changes hurt kids in need
Reining in the budget blackhole that is the National Disability Insurance Scheme is undoubtedly one of the greatest challenges ahead of the Albanese Government. The most recent NDIS financial sustainability report warned that without reform, the cost of running the scheme would balloon to $66.1 billion in 2027-28 — greater than Australia's annual defence budget. By 2034, it's expected that number will hit $93b. That's simply not sustainable. A significant factor in the scheme's rapid growth is the unexpected number of children with autism or developmental conditions. Sixty-nine per cent of new NDIS participants are kids under the age of 15. The amount of children on the scheme is close to double original projections from the Productivity Commission at its inception. The original purpose of the NDIS — to enable vulnerable Australians with serious disability to live full and independent lives — is an admirable one and one which has the continued support of the nation. But gradual mission creep has pushed the scheme to the brink, and become a financial albatross around the nation's neck. This is something that has been recognised by the Albanese Government, which wants to pare back the NDIS' growth from 12 per cent to 8 per cent — still far greater than the 4 per cent annual growth originally forecast and well above growth targets in other social programs. The search for serious savings within the scheme is on. One move, due to come into effect on July 1, is to reduce or freeze the hourly rates physiotherapists, psychologists, speech pathologists and dietitians can charge NDIS patients. Claimable travel time will be capped at 50 per cent. That will see physiotherapist rates will drop $10 to $183.99 per hour and dietitians and podiatrists drop $5 to $188.99 per hour. In WA, psychologists will receive a reduction of $11.23 an hour. It's a change that clinicians and patients say will leave many children with disabilities without access to life-changing treatment. Already, speech pathologist Demi Williams says she will have to close her mobile service to areas including Wundowie, Chidlow and Wooroloo, disadvantaging patients without the ability to come to her. Holly Tickner from Next Bite Paediatric Feeding Centre says mobile services are a lifeline for many families. 'Some of the kids I see have significant physical disabilities, they are in wheelchairs or have oxygen tanks, it's not easy for them to jump in the car or for mums to take half a day off work to get them to appointments several times a week.' Health Minister Mark Butler says the pricing changes — which were announced just a fortnight before coming into effect — were made after analysis showed NDIS participants were paying more for therapy services than Australians outside the scheme. A workable and sustainable NDIS is essential for the future of Australia. And value for taxpayer money must be central to that mission. But so too must ensuring that vulnerable participants get the care they need, where they need it.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
Researchers find promising results in implant trial which treats spinal cord injuries with red light
Scientists say they are already seeing 'tantalising' early results in an innovative trial of an implant which emits red light to treat spinal cord injuries. A research team from UWA and the Perron Institute was recently awarded a $1 million grant to do preclinical trials into red and near-infrared light therapy (photobiomodulation) for spinal cord injuries using implanted devices. There is currently no cure for spinal cord injury, which affects more than 20,000 Australians, often in a devastating, life-changing and lifelong way. Lead investigator Stuart Hodgetts said the wireless red light devices could eventually be implanted into a person's spine after a spinal cord injury to limit damage and improve function. 'What we're trying to do with the red light is to reduce the harmful secondary changes that follow the injury, and those are really responsible for a lot of the deficits that you see,' he said. 'The initial trauma is one thing, but then how badly the secondary responses are activated is really key to how much more damage that individual is going to receive. 'If you can get in at a particular intervention point and reduce that, you're actually protecting what tissue you have left at that particular time.' Red light therapy has been around for decades, and mounting research is now showing how it can help with a wide range of health issues, including neurodegenerative disorders, gut problems and muscle and ligament damage. Red light is known to reduce inflammation and speed up healing, with the benefit of having no adverse risks or side-effects. Dr Hodgetts, who heads the Spinal Cord Repair Laboratory at the Perron Institute and UWA, said only about 10 per cent of red light applied non-invasively to the spine — using devices located outside of the skin — reaches the spinal cord. So the team has developed an implant that can be placed inside the body directly above a spinal cord injury (SCI) so that the tissue can receive a more controlled dose of red light. The implant, around the size of a little fingernail, with a red LED on it is currently being tested on animal models of SCI in the laboratory. Dr Hodgetts said it was known that exercise improved outcomes with regenerative therapies. 'The big plus for this project was that the animals could have the red light on and exercise at the same time. These two things would be additive and we would see, hopefully, beneficial outcomes,' he said. Co-investigator, UWA Emeritus Professor Alan Harvey, said he envisioned the implant, which is left in the body once inserted, being powered by an induction coil in a person's wheelchair. 'This kind of technology almost seems like magic, and there's a grassroots sense that it should work,' he said. 'Eventually, for this to become established — as what could be an effective and simple way of treating a whole bunch of different things — you've got to understand exactly how red light therapy works.' Professor Harvey, who is also a Perron Institute Honorary Senior Research Fellow, said it was most likely going to work best on people who have recently suffered a spinal cord injury because of the red light's ability to minimise secondary problems, such as inflammation, that happen in the days and weeks after the trauma. 'What is not clear is, if someone who was injured 10 years ago, if they were given one of these, and no one's ever really done anything like this, would it still be of benefit? Who knows that? That's a whole different ball game,' he said. The research will look into the how red light implants affect both acute and chronic spinal cord injury. A third co-investigator, UWA physicist Professor Vince Wallace, is providing guidance on the construction and maintenance of the new implant devices. PhD student Isabella Drew, who has just submitted a review on photobiomodulation, said red light helps to stimulate the body's natural healing responses. 'At appropriate settings it is able to stabilise injured tissue and help protect damaged nerve cells,' she said. 'Unfortunately, there are many complex and interactive components to light therapy and as yet there is no consensus about the optimal mode of treatment.' The $1m grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council is funding three years of preclinical trials of the implant. Soon a PhD student will join the research team to help develop an implant design for humans. The research was welcomed by Tayla Stone, a 31-year-old woman who has been dealing with a spinal cord injury since she was 16 years old. 'Just to know that they're still trying to find a way to help people sustaining these sorts of injuries is a good thing because obviously I don't want other people to go through what I've been through,' the mother-of-two from Mandurah said. 'Hopefully it can help another 16-year-old who may break their back.' Ms Stone, who was paralysed after a dirt bike crash, recalled how immediately after her accident, surgery was delayed for a few days because there was so much swelling around the injury. Metal rods were then inserted to support her injured spine, and she wore a back brace for weeks after her accident. But Ms Stone said other than that, treatment was more about adapting her to a new life in a wheelchair than trying to heal her spinal injury. 'I was given a percentage for recovery — what that would look like for my body to go back to normal — of 5 per cent,' she said. Ms Stone said the physiotherapy she was given was not about trying to regain any use of her legs but adapt her body to them not working. 'It was very, very disappointing,' she said. 'Because I was so young at the time, if anything, it would have been probably better for me to go harder because my body was still growing.' In the 15 years since her accident, Ms Stone has tried various complementary and alternative therapies. She said she regained some sensation in her feet with Emmett therapy — a technique that involves a pplying light finger pressure to specific points on the body —while acupuncture relieved her nerve pain. Ms Stone said it was important that the implants be tested on older spinal cord injuries as well as recent ones. 'When you do hear these things, it's like, 'That would be cool if something could make it better', but we don't put all our eggs in that basket,' she said. 'The majority of us, we understand that it might not work, it might not do anything, but then it may.'
