7 'captivating' period dramas on Amazon Prime that you can binge now
Is it any wonder, then, that period dramas have exploded in popularity in recent years as weary TV viewers seek some respite from buzzing phones, blinding lights, and busy brunch schedules?
No, of course it's not. Who doesn't love a bit of Regency pomp, some medieval intrigue, or even 1920s glam?
But where's the discerning TV fan supposed to find these shows? Well, Amazon Prime Video has a library crammed with enough historical dramas to keep even the most voracious TV binger busy.
Here are the 7 Amazon Prime historical dramas to watch if you love Peaky Blinders
For those who like their historical fantasy a bit more punk, I'd recommend My Lady Jane.
Set in an alternate 16th-century England, the series imagines a world where Lady Jane Grey's brief reign as Queen (she ruled for just nine days before being overthrown by Queen Mary) wasn't so brief.
Boasting an impressive 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, the series is a blast featuring thrilling court intrigue, scintillating romance, and even shape-shifting magical creatures (It's an alternate reality,y just roll with it).
Is it any wonder fans have labelled the series the 'best show of 2024' or that George RR Martin has been asking Amazon to consider commissioning a second season?
For a swashbuckling adventure, binge-watch Black Sails, a TV prequel to Robert Louis Stevenson's classic novel Treasure Island.
Set in the early 18th century, the historical drama follows the pirates of New Providence Island as they hunt for the Spanish shipwreck, Urca de Lima, to uncover treasures.
If that's not enough to entice you, Tom Long of the Detroit News previously said of Black Sails: 'Alliances are made and broken, power shifts go this way and that, blood is spilled, and wenches keep wenching. It's oddly addictive.'
Long before Christopher Nolan's Oscar-winning film Oppenheimer, there was Manhattan, which retold the creation of the atomic bomb in Los Alamos, New Mexico.
While the show wasn't strictly historically accurate (nor did it claim to be), it did feature real-life figures, including head scientist Robert Oppenheimer played by Daniel London.
Manhattan has flown woefully under the radar since its debut more than a decade ago in 2014, but fans, who have rediscovered it on Amazon Prime Video, have described it as 'captivating.'
If you're yearning for a British period drama that's more historically accurate than My Lady Jane, then The Tudors is the answer.
Starring Jonathan Rhys Meyers as King Henry VIII and following the monarch's many trials and tribulations as his ability to rule was put under strain by international conflicts and political power struggles playing out in his own court.
Upon hitting screens in 2007, the show became the highest-rated Showtime series debut in three years and has been hailed as a 'masterpiece' and 'phenomenal' by viewers.
Oh, you want to see more of King Henry VIII? Well, look no further than The Spanish Princess, based on the life of one of his many wives.
Running for two seasons, which aired in 2019 and 2020, it stars Charlotte Hope as Catherine of Aragon, the titular princess who was crowned the Queen of England when she married King Henry VIII, played by Ruairi O'Connor.
'The Spanish Princess is the ideal period soap, dexterously and intelligently balancing the webby intrigue of 16th-century court life with the dewy eroticism of a classic melodrama. There's no guilt here. Just pleasure,' The Hollywood Reporter wrote in its review.
Lavish series Versailles caused quite a stir when it premiered in 2016 for its graphic sex scenes, including a 24-person orgy, and not shying away from gory violence.
Set in the Baroque era, the show is a no-holds-barred depiction of the court of King Louis XIV (George Blagden) – and the continuous rumours of sex sessions and gluttony that took place in the period.
Speaking about the show previously to Metro, George said: 'I remember hearing this incredible phrase, 'bedrooms were boardrooms at Versailles', and it's just such an amazing idea and concept to play with.'
Leonardo has all the ingredients of a classic TV show – a beautiful period backdrop, a complex historical figure and an accusation of murder – so fetch your remote. More Trending
It stars Poldark's Aidan Turner as Leonardo da Vinci and lifts the lid on the Italian artist, inventor and Renaissance man's personal life, including the belief that he had male lovers.
Describing the series, Aidan previously told Metro: 'It's not just a straightforward historical look at his life. We were trying to get to the essence as to who the man was behind the artist.'
View More »
An earlier version of this story was published on February 19, 2025.
Got a story?
If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you.
MORE: Amazon Prime drops all episodes of 'one of the best TV shows ever made'
MORE: 20 best new TV shows of 2025, according to Rotten Tomatoes
MORE: 'Sinfully fun' new sequel on Amazon Prime lands surprising Rotten Tomatoes score
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump claims he never ‘wrote a picture.' His claim has now been exposed
When Donald Trump pushed back against a report alleging he drew a 'bawdy' sketch to celebrate convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 's 50th birthday, the president insisted he doesn't draw pictures. 'I never wrote a picture in my life,' he said in an awkwardly-phrased rebuttal to the Wall Street Journal last week, vehemently denying having anything to do with the birthday card. In a later Truth Social tirade he doubled down on the statement and bluntly declared: 'I don't draw pictures.' Despite the president's claims, multiple sketches by Trump have been made public over the years. Analysts were quick to pounce on Trump's denial, including Media Matters chief Angelo Carusone, who told MSNBC, 'I can think of three [Trump sketches] off the top of my head that were auctioned.' At least five sketches from the late 1990s and early 2000s have been sold at auction. Trump's take on the Empire State Building, scribbled in his signature black marker pen, from his days as a Manhattan real estate mogul when he was pursuing the prized property, went up for auction back in 1995. The 12-by-nine-inch piece was etched from his Mar-a-Lago estate for a charity auction, according to Julien's Auctions. The signed sketch sold in 2017 for $16,000, according to The New York Times. There was another marker and pencil drawing from the early 2000s, in which Trump depicted dollar bills falling from a spiral-leafed tree, punctuated by a large gold signature. A placard on the back read that 'The Donald' was known for his 'outspokenness and media exposure,' along with his 'distinct comb over.' The 'Money Tree Drawing' sold at the North Carolina-based auction house Lealand Little in December 2020 for $8,500, the website reads. In October 2003, Trump drew the 'Cityscape Skyline,' this time entirely in gold marker pen, originally done for a celebrity art auction to benefit the Capuchin Food Pantry. Dated 2004, the Art of the Deal author depicted a scene reminiscent of the Riverside South development project in Manhattan. The drawing was sold in January for $15,000, according to Sotheby's auction house. Trump drew a more minimalist rendition of his New York City skyline piece in 2005, which sold at Nate D. Sanders auctions in 2017 for $29,000. The auction house stated that there was an additional variant of the drawing. In 2006, Trump scrawled the George Washington Bridge in black marker. That drawing, which was sold by Julien's auctions for $4,480 in April 2019, was described as an 'original ink illustration on paper' and 'signed in black ink by Donald Trump lower center.' In his 2010 book Trump Never Give Up, the president boasted, 'Each year I donate an autographed doodle to the Doodle for Hunger auction at Tavern on the Green.' 'Art may not be my strong point,' he admitted.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'This St Moriz self-tan remover took my tan off in minutes without the need for scrubbing'
Shopping Writer Meghan has just found an affordable game-changing self-tan remover that stripped off her fake tan 'in a matter of minutes, with no scrubbing or scraping needed' If there's one task I hate doing, it's taking my tan off when it's time to reapply. You have to spend an age scrubbing the tan off with exfoliants and gloves or brushes to remove all the dry skin and pigment to get that clean canvas ahead of your next application. This is a long and boring process, but it can always be relatively painful - I suffer from sensitive skin and eczema, so a lot of rigorous scrubbing and exfoliating can leave my skin feeling raw and inflamed. That's why I've been looking for a top-notch tan remover that reduces, if not eliminates, the need to spend hours in the bathroom with harsh body scrubs. And I think I found the perfect one with an enticingly affordable price tag. I will admit I picked this St Moriz Self Tan Removing Foam up on a whim, as it promises professional levels of tan removal for the low price of £4.99. I thought that at least if it didn't work, I hadn't spent a fortune. But this tan remover blew me away. No scrubbing or painful exfoliating required. This foaming tan is incredible on so many levels. First, it's easy to apply; it's a foam that can easily be wiped across the skin but dries down incredibly fast, which makes it even more convenient to leave on for the instructed 5 minutes before jumping into the shower to rinse off. The seamless spread of the foam and super lightweight formula make it super convenient, whether you're removing tan from just one area or your whole body. As I mentioned above, it's suggested you leave the remover on for a minimum of 5 minutes before you begin the removal process. I believe I left mine on for a few minutes longer, as this remover makes it super easy to carry on about your day while you're waiting for it to work its magic. When you're ready or the 5 minutes are up, hop into the shower or bath and begin rinsing. You'll notice almost immediately that colour starts running off in the water, and it is noticeably lifted from the skin. With just the water pressure, some areas are already tan-free (though I imagine this happens more if you leave the remover on for longer, as I did). Expecting to still need to scrub to get the majority of the tan off, I used my go-to pair of exfoliating gloves, which are available on Amazon. I simply had to wipe the gloves over the skin with very minimal pressure, and there was no need to scrub at each spot for a prolonged period of time. I swiped a hand down my arm and boom, there's my pale, tan-less skin pretty much 100% back to normal. I noticed a couple of patches that needed a tad more attention, areas of dry skin from eczema, as well as the stubborn areas you'd expect, hands, feet, elbows and knees. By no means do you need to spend ages rubbing at them; it just requires a few more passes with the gloves or a brush. Even my armpits, one of the worst areas for refusing to let tan budge when you need to take it off, were super easy to restore, with very little effort required.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Fantastic Four: First Steps is Marvel's best film in a decade
Considering this is the fourth big-screen adaptation of Marvel 's Fantastic Four comics to date – or fifth, if you count the unreleased 1994 Roger Corman version – First Steps turns out to be a surprisingly fitting subtitle. Because after spending the best part of a decade since Iron Man 3 blundering into the furniture, Marvel has finally learned how to put one foot in front of the other again – and in doing so, arrived at the studio's funniest, most exciting, moving and complete film in more than 10 years. Much like Warner Bros' slightly superior new Superman reboot, the studio has cooked up a new approach that's brightly in step with mid-2020s pop cinema trends. First Steps is earnest, colourful, upbeat – and asks its audience to bring nothing to the table beyond a willingness to be wowed. The fact that its tale of four unfashionably strait-laced comrades defending Earth from impending cosmic destruction largely takes place in a pointedly untopical (and richly imagined) Mad Men-era version of Manhattan doesn't hurt in this regard. Why do Pedro Pascal 's elastic-limbed Mister Fantastic, Vanessa Kirby's Invisible Woman, Ebon Moss-Bachrach's rock-skinned Thing and Joseph Quinn's fiery Human Torch make such a refreshingly human quartet of heroes? It's partly because the casting allows all four to play to their strengths – and as the team's steadfast matriarch, Kirby is especially good value – but also because the film keeps putting them into the sort of human spaces where human behaviour naturally occurs. This iteration of the Fantastic Four spends less time in wormholes (though there is a fair bit of that, much of which owes a noticeable debt to Christopher Nolan 's Interstellar) than in kitchens, bedrooms, familiar downtown streets and crowded family vehicles. Reed Richards, Pascal's science whizz, and his partner, Kirby's Sue Storm, do resemble a real married couple, while all four leads' scenes with Reed and Sue's newborn son Franklin (whose impending arrival consumes much of the opening act) run on the sort of natural, found-in-the-moment chemistry which Marvel formerly seemed intent on stomping out. The villains are necessarily more cosmically aloof: Julia Garner appears as the female Silver Surfer, while Ralph Ineson is Galactus, an otherworldly titan intent on devouring the Earth as part of his never-ending planetary bulking diet. The visual effects design here shows admirable faith in the original atomic-age aesthetic of Jack Kirby, the pioneering comics artist who co-created the Fantastic Four in 1961 with Stan Lee. Yet even the antagonists' CG carapaces allow through some lovely actorly touches: there is a low-level malignancy to the way Ineson's Galactus pulls up a handful of soil on his arrival in New York and gives it an approving sniff. There's no bold genre reinvention afoot in this reboot, and its thwart-the-baddies plot remains bound to familiar equations, though at least now the equations actually balance. Viewers who have failed to stay studiously abreast of the latest Disney+ hubbub – indeed, viewers who haven't seen a Marvel movie before in their lives – will find just as much here to please them as the bingeing disciples. It all makes you wish that Marvel had reached this point years ago – imagine if 2019's Avengers: Endgame had been followed by this. Yet at least they're here now, and the result is a very unusual sort of franchise instalment: one that feels every inch a one-off.
