Delhi HC orders blocking of rogue sites streaming Tips Films' new releases
The bench of Justice Amit Bansal on July 11 directed that all listed websites be prohibited from hosting, streaming, or distributing any copyrighted content belonging to the plaintiff without appropriate authorisation. The court stated that failure to act swiftly would lead to 'irreparable harm or injury' to the intellectual property rights of Tips Films.
The next hearing is scheduled for November 17, with pleadings and service to be completed by September 15.
The film company had approached the court, citing the imminent threat of online piracy, particularly as Maalik premiered on July 11 and Sarbala Ji was slated for release on July 18. The plaintiff company asserted that the defendant's websites not only facilitated illegal access to copyrighted films but also shielded their identities using domain privacy services to evade detection.
After examining the evidence, the court found these actions to be a prima facie violation of Sections 51(a)(i), 51(a)(ii), and 51(b) of the Copyright Act, 1957. As a result, several directions were issued to curb further infringement.
Internet Service Providers across India were instructed to block access to the 56 websites immediately. Domain Name Registrars were ordered to suspend the domain registrations of the listed platforms and disclose registrant details, including names, emails, phone numbers, IP addresses, and payment methods, to aid Tips Films in pursuing legal remedies. Furthermore, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) were directed to issue official notifications and provide ongoing support in future piracy cases.
In clarification, the court permitted any website wrongly blocked under the order to approach it with a formal undertaking not to stream unauthorised content belonging to the plaintiff. Tips Films was also allowed to report additional infringing websites in the future, with a streamlined mechanism established for swift action. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Rajkummar Rao granted bail in 8-year-old case after surrendering in court
Actor Rajkummar Rao surrendered before the JMIC (Judicial Magistrate Ist Class) court of Judge Srijan Shukla in Jalandhar on Monday, July 28, in connection with a case related to hurting religious sentiments with the controversial poster during the promotion of his 2017 film Behen Hogi Teri. An arrest warrant had earlier been issued against Rao for failing to appear before the another hearing on July 30, Rao's lawyer, advocate Darshan Singh Dayal, argued that his client had joined the investigation once he was granted relief from the court. The police had completed the probe and filed a chargesheet. However, the summons sent by the court was addressed to an old residence in Prem Nagar, Gurgaon, where Rao no longer defense informed the court that Rao currently resides at Oberoi Springs in Andheri West, Mumbai, and did not receive the court summons. Once he became aware of the matter, he promptly surrendered before the court. Accepting the explanation, the court granted bail to Rajkummar Rao. According to ANI, advocate Darshan Dayal said, "The FIR was registered under Section 295A (act done with the intention of inciting religious sentiments), Section 120B (criminal conspiracy) and Section 67 of the IT Act, due to which non-bailable warrants were also issued against the actor."The advocate further added that Shruti Haasan was acquitted after the court found her not guilty. Meanwhile, the film's director, Ajay K Pannalal, appeared before the court today, and his petition has also been petition further stated that the actor was simply portraying a character in the film, where his role involved playing Lord Shiva as part of a Jagran troupe. It emphasised that the poster was purely an artistic expression, with no intention to offend or hurt the religious sentiments of any the actor is expecting his first child with his wife Patralekhaa. The couple had announced the pregnancy in July.(With inputs from Davinder Kumar)- Ends
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Delhi High Court seeks NIA's response on MP Abdul Rashid's plea in terror funding case
The Delhi High Court on Thursday (July 31, 2025) sought a response from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) on a plea filed by Baramulla MP Abdul Rashid Sheikh challenging the framing of charges against him in a terror funding case. The court also called for the trial court record in the matter and listed the plea for further hearing on October 6. Mr. Rashid has been lodged in Tihar Jail since 2019 following his arrest by the NIA under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act in connection with a 2017 terror funding case. On March 21, the trial court had dismissed his second regular bail application. In his appeal against the order, the Jammu and Kashmir MP submitted that he had already spent over five years in custody and that the delay in trial, which was unlikely to conclude soon, entitled him to bail. The bail plea also contended that the allegations against him were unfounded, asserting that he had never been involved in secessionist or terrorist activities. 'The appellant is a mainstream political leader of J&K having been elected twice as an MLA and recently as an MP. Due to his passionate engagement in mainstream politics, he became a potential target for those who preached separatist ideologies including militant outfits, labelling him as a traitor,' the plea submitted. 'A mere political comment made on the hanging of Afzal Guru showing disapprobation of the measures of the government or criticising a judgement of the courts cannot be construed to mean as an association with terrorists much less any association which has a nexus with the commission of any unlawful or terrorist activity,' it submitted. Mr. Rashid also sought interim bail to attend Lok Sabha sessions, contending that his presence was imperative as he represented 45% of the Kashmir valley and had been 'assigned the role to act as a bridge between Parliament and the people of his constituency'. The Baramulla MP, who defeated National Conference leader Omar Abdullah in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, is facing trial in a case alleging that he financed separatist and terrorist groups in Jammu and Kashmir. According to the NIA's FIR, Mr. Rashid's name had emerged during the interrogation of businessman and co-accused Zahoor Watali.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 hours ago
- Business Standard
Delhi HC judge recuses from Sanjay Bhandari plea on 'fugitive offender' tag
A judge of the Delhi High Court on Thursday recused himself from hearing a plea by UK-based arms consultant Sanjay Bhandari challenging a trial court's order declaring him a "fugitive economic offender". Justice Girish Kathpalia, who was dictating the order and fixing the hearing for Friday on the maintainability of the plea, transferred the matter to another bench when the counsel for Bhandari and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) could not come to a consensus on the date of hearing. The case is listed before the trial court on August 2. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Bhandari, insisted that the matter be heard today itself as he was not available on Thursday, or it be heard after some days till when the court should direct the ED not to confiscate Bhandari's assets. However, ED's counsel was of the view that the court should not pass any interim order without hearing the agency's submissions, as he had preliminary objection on the maintainability of the plea and that it be heard on Friday itself. As the court was dictating the order, Sibal said, "Why don't you (ED counsel) just get an order in your favour now and get it all done. Your lordship may pass any order, let it (assets) be confiscated, it does not matter." In reply, ED's lawyer Zoheb Hussain said this was "extremely unfair". As both the counsels remained adamant, the judge said it cannot hear the matter in this manner, stating, "List before some other bench subject to orders of the judge in-charge of the criminal side tomorrow itself at 10:30 am." The trial court on July 5 declared Bhandari a "fugitive economic offender" on a plea by the ED, an order that will allow the agency to confiscate all his assets worth crores of rupees. District Judge (Tis Hazari) Sanjeev Aggarwal said in his order the court was satisfied that "Sanjay Bhandari, S/o Late R K Bhandari, is a fugitive economic offender under Section 12(1) of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, and is declared as such under the above provision(s) of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018". The order came as a shot in the arm for the federal probe agency, as it will now be able to confiscate assets worth crores of rupees of Bhandari, whose chances to come to India have been virtually nullified after a UK court recently ruled against his extradition. Bhandari's legal team, while opposing the ED's move to get him declared a fugitive offender, claimed that its "client's stay could not be called illegal in the UK as he has a legal right to reside in the UK and the government of India is bound by the judgment of the UK court... Bhandari is legally living there, and declaring him a 'fugitive' in that scenario is legally wrong". The trial court had said the "extradition attempt may have failed, but it will not make the accused an angel or immune from the prosecution for the violation of Indian laws". Bhandari (63) fled to London in 2016, soon after the Income-Tax (I-T) Department raided him in Delhi. The ED filed a criminal case against Bhandari and others under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in February 2017, taking cognisance of an I-T chargesheet filed against him under the anti-black money law of 2015. The court said when an accused chooses not to return to India, he cannot take the plea of avoiding all the legal consequences, including that of Section 14 of the FEO Act. "In any case, those who play with fire should be known to be aware of its consequences," it said. The court held that the undisclosed foreign income or assets of Bhandari were worth Rs 655 crore and the total tax evaded by him, including penalty and interest, was Rs 196 crore. The ED filed its first chargesheet against Bhandari in 2020. The agency is probing Bhandari's links with Robert Vadra, the businessman husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. The ED filed a supplementary chargesheet in the case in 2023, alleging that Bhandari "acquired" the 12, Bryanston Square house in London in 2009 and got it renovated "as per the directions of Robert Vadra and the funds for renovation were provided by Robert Vadra". Vadra has denied owning any London property directly or indirectly, and termed the charges a "political witch-hunt" against him, claiming that he is being "hounded and harassed" to subserve political ends. Bhandari, who was a resident in India for tax purposes in 2015, is also accused of concealing overseas assets using backdated documents, benefitting from the assets not declared to Indian tax authorities, and then falsely informing the authorities that he did not possess any overseas assets. He, however, has denied the allegations. Bhandari's assets worth about Rs 21 crore have been attached by the ED under PMLA. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
