Africa in need of a robust strategy to mitigate conflicts
An Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) speed boat is sailing along the Persian Gulf during the IRGC marine parade to commemorate Persian Gulf National Day, near the Bushehr nuclear power plant in the seaport city of Bushehr, Bushehr province, in the south of Iran, on April 29, 2024.
Dr Sizo Nkala
The global shocks Africa has had to deal with have been coming fast and furious in recent years.
The COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war and the re-election of Donald Trump as the US President in 2024 are some of the external shocks that have had a massive impact on Africa's economic standing and prospects. As the continent was still trying to find its feet from the devastation caused by these geopolitical wrecking balls, another, potentially more devastating one, suddenly emerged on the horizon.
On the 14th of June, the world woke up to the news of Israel's surprise attack on its long-time foe, Iran in the so-called Operation Rising Lion. The Jewish state deployed hundreds of its warplanes over the Iranian skies dropping bombs on the Islamic Republic's nuclear and other military facilities while also targeting key military leaders and nuclear scientists.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified his country's actions arguing that Iran was rapidly moving towards developing a nuclear weapon which would have presented an existential threat to Israel. Netanyahu said Israel was therefore carrying out pre-emptive strikes to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
As expected, Israel retaliated with a barrage of missiles striking different cities in Israel proclaiming the right to defend itself. The latest attacks mark a significant escalation of long-simmering tensions between the Middle East's two largest and most powerful militaries.
The two countries exchanged limited attacks in April and October last year over Israel's assassination of the Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in Iran, the Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and the leader of the Iran Revolutionary Guard Council (IRGC) Abbas Nilforoushan.
The United States also joined the war on the side of Israel after Donald Trump ordered the bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran on June 21. Although the three countries - the US, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire – it is not certain how long the ceasefire will last.
A major war between the powerhouses in a region responsible for 26 per cent of global oil production is certain to have a catastrophic impact on the global economy from which no region, including Africa, would be spared. Immediately after the beginning of the conflict oil prices went up 7 percent because of the uncertainty over continued supplies from the Middle East.
Following the US attack, the Iranian parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's Supreme National Security Council had to make the final decision. The strait is a critical maritime chokepoint about 33 kilometers wide which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean.
About 20 per cent of the world's oil supplies – 20 million barrels – passes through the strait every day. Iran controls the north bank of the Strait of Hormuz while the south bank is in Omani territory. Major oil producers in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil exports.
While the world's oil supply has become significantly diversified ever since the development of the fracking technology which has seen the US become the world's largest oil producer, the closure or disruption of Hormuz chokepoint would have sent the oil prices through the roof. As a result, Africa's annual fuel import bill of approximately US$30 billion would have ballooned triggering a major economic fallout.
The increase in consumer inflation would have put the price of basic commodities beyond the reach of many thus exacerbating poverty, food insecurity and the risk of instability. It is not only through the disruption of oil supplies that Africa would have suffered had Iran followed through on its resolve to close the Strait of Hormuz.
About 20 per cent of global liquefied natural gas supplies go through the Strait of Hormuz. As LNG is a major input in the production of fertilizer, the decline in fertilizer supply would increase its prices with a negative impact on food production in Africa which imports 90 percent of its fertilizer consumption.
Fertilizer prices have increased by almost three times since 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war which made the critical input out of reach for the majority of Africa's small-scale farmers. Another increase would have spelt disaster for the continent's struggling agricultural sector which would have worsened food shortages.
Indirectly, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz would hit China the hardest as the Asian giant imports about 5 million barrels of oil per day through the strait. The economic damage this would cause in China would be felt in Africa as China is by far Africa's biggest bilateral trade partner. Approximately 20 per cent of Africa's exports are destined for China.
Chinese demand for African exports would be drastically reduced further diminishing African countries' revenue generation. All this is counterfactual now because Iran did not follow up on its threat to close the Strait of Hormuz. And the world should be thanking its stars.
However, it would be foolhardy to believe that the temporary truce between Israel and Iran will hold indefinitely. Should there be a re-escalation of hostilities, Iran's closure of the critical chokepoint cannot be ruled out especially if such a development can be spun as a consequence of Israel's act of aggression.
It is important that Africa prepares for a worst-case scenario and enhances the resilience of its economy against the impact of global shocks.
* Dr. Sizo Nkala is a Research Fellow at the University of Johannesburg's Centre for Africa-China Studies.
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Rwanda, DRC sign peace deal in US to end fighting, attract investment
Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) signed a US-brokered peace agreement on Friday, raising hopes for an end to fighting that has killed thousands and displaced hundreds of thousands this year. The agreement marks a breakthrough in talks held by US President Donald Trump's administration and aims to attract billions of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. At a ceremony with US secretary of state Marco Rubio in Washington, the two African countries' foreign ministers signed the agreement pledging to implement a 2024 deal that would see Rwandan troops withdraw from eastern DRC within 90 days, according to a copy seen by Reuters. Kinshasa and Kigali will also launch a regional economic integration framework within 90 days, the agreement said. 'They were going at it for many years, and with machetes. It is one of the worst, one of the worst wars anyone has ever seen. I just happened to have somebody who was able to get it settled,' Trump said on Friday ahead of the signing of the deal in Washington. 'We're getting, for the US, a lot of the mineral rights from the DRC as part of it. They're so honoured to be here. They never thought they'd be coming.' Rwandan foreign minister Olivier Nduhungirehe called the agreement a turning point. Congo foreign minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner said it must be followed by disengagement. Trump later met both officials in the Oval Office, where he presented them with letters inviting DRC President Felix Tshisekedi and his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame to Washington to sign a package of agreements that Massad Boulos, Trump's senior adviser for Africa, called the 'Washington Accord'. Nduhungirehe told Trump past deals had not been implemented and urged him to stay engaged. Trump warned of 'very severe penalties, financial and otherwise', if the agreement is violated. Rwanda has sent at least 7,000 soldiers over the border, according to analysts and diplomats, in support of the M23 rebels who seized eastern DRC's two largest cities and lucrative mining areas in a lightning advance earlier this year. The gains by M23, the latest cycle in a decades-old conflict with roots in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, sparked fears that a wider war could draw in the DRC's neighbours. Boulos told Reuters in May Washington wanted the peace agreement and accompanying minerals deals to be signed simultaneously this summer. Rubio said on Friday heads of state would be 'in Washington in a few weeks to finalise the complete protocol and agreement'. However, the agreement signed on Friday gives the DRC and Rwanda three months to launch a framework 'to expand foreign trade and investment derived from regional critical mineral supply chains'. A source familiar with the matter told Reuters on Friday another agreement on the framework would be signed by the heads of state at a separate White House event at an unspecified time. There is an understanding that progress in ongoing talks in Doha, a separate but parallel mediation effort with delegations from the DRC government and M23, is essential before the signing of the economic framework, the source said. The agreement signed on Friday voiced 'full support' for the Qatar-hosted talks. It also said the DRC and Rwanda will form a joint security coordination mechanism within 30 days and implement a plan agreed last year to monitor and verify the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers within three months. DRC military operations targeting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR), a DRC-based armed group that includes remnants of Rwanda's former army and militias that carried out the 1994 genocide, are meant to conclude over the same time frame. Reuters reported on Thursday that DRC negotiators had dropped an earlier demand that Rwandan troops immediately leave eastern DRC, paving the way for the signing ceremony on Friday. The DRC, UN and Western powers said Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms. Rwanda has long denied helping M23, saying its forces are acting in self-defence against the DRC's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, including the FDLR. 'This is the best chance we have at a peace process for the moment despite all the challenges and flaws,' said Jason Stearns, a political scientist at Simon Fraser University in Canada who specialises in Africa's Great Lakes region. Similar formulas have been attempted before, Stearns said, and 'it will be up to the US, as they are the godfather of the deal, to make sure both sides abide by the terms'. The agreement signed on Friday said Rwanda and the DRC will de-risk mineral supply chains and establish value chains 'that link the countries, in partnership, as appropriate, with the US and US investors'. The terms carry 'a strategic message: securing the east also means securing investments', said Tresor Kibangula, a political analyst at the DRC's Ebuteli research institute. He said 'it remains to be seen whether this economic logic will suffice' to end the fighting.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Letters: Israel must be held accountable, and unethical reporting – do something about it!
Please correct unethical reporting I am writing to formally raise a concern about reporter, Zainul Dawood's deliberate dissemination of misinformation that not only violates journalistic ethics but also contravenes the principles enshrined in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, particularly the right to freedom of expression and access to truthful information. It is deeply concerning that the article in the edition of the Daily News published on June 26, 2025, published on the front page titled: 'Ratepayers face big losses due to delays' included claims that were factually incorrect and presented in a misleading manner. This report by Dawood appears to be intentionally skewed, lacking proper context, or balance, thus compromising the public's right to accurate and fair information. The article falsely reported that ongoing delays by a contractor to improve the infrastructure at the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works has cost eThekwini ratepayers R60 million. The article is misleading and has distorted the facts from the Executive Committee (Exco) meeting, where the eThekwini Water and Sanitation Directorate tabled a report seeking approval to amend the contract of the consultant responsible for the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works project. This is a major project that has two main contractors, one being a consultant, JG Afrika (Pty) Ltd, whose contract is being extended in terms of the Municipal Finance Management Act since being appointed in February 2020. The other is a contractor, Stefanutti Stocks-WPCP JV, which was appointed in November 2023 for the implementation of the necessary upgrades, and whose contract is still in progress. The function of the consultant is the execution and completion of multi-disciplinary engineering design work and construction supervision required for the functional upgrade of the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works. It must be noted that the required improvements to this facility are critical to industrial and commercial growth in the Hammersdale is important to first point out that the delays reflected in the Exco report were not the result of the contractor's conduct or the municipality's fault. The reasons are explicitly stated in the report, including the Covid-19 challenge in 2020-2021 as there was a national lockdown prohibiting construction work to take place, associated budgetary constraints, technical issues arising during construction, and general project delays due to the complex nature of the engineering work being undertaken. Delays are normal in a project of this magnitude and complexity especially because of the explanation stated above and such unforeseen delays are often taken into consideration for budgeting purposes. This project has always been budgeted at R260m for construction, taking into account contingencies and escalation. Six months prior to tender, the cost of construction was estimated at R200m, which at the time did not include contingencies and escalation. However, your article creates an incorrect perception that the City is incurring 'additional costs of R60 million' which will be paid for by ratepayers due to delays caused by the contractor, which is not true. The cost of this project currently remains within budget, despite extending the contract for the consultant. The media was part of the project launch on January 26, 2024 and the project is well on track, and construction is in progress. The project includes a 30% CPG component amounting to R58m and local contractors have already benefited by over R15m. As per the Exco report, the reason for amending the contract of the consultant is to extend their term to attend to the project until its completion and commissioning, currently estimated to be in November 2026. Additionally, it is unethical for your reporter to quote the mayor, Councillor Cyril Xaba, on this matter in his article as if the mayor's comments were directly related to the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works project. Dawood attended the Exco meeting and knows that the Mayor's remarks about contract management were made in general and prior to the deliberation of all agenda items. The mayor's comments and the agenda report on the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works are therefore completely unrelated. Furthermore, Asad Gaffar from the eThekwini Ratepayers Protest Movement who was also quoted in this incorrect article was not at the Exco meeting where the Hammarsdale Wastewater Treatment Works report was discussed. This therefore means that Dawood deliberately gave Mr Gaffar false information for him to respond and react in the manner that he did in order to give his unethical and incorrect article credibility. According to Section 16 of the Constitution, all South Africans have the right to freedom of expression, which includes freedom of the press and other media. This right comes with the expectation that journalistic conduct must be responsible, ethical, and accountable. Spreading misinformation undermines public trust, inflames divisions, and endangers the democratic values our media is supposed to protect. I respectfully request that Dawood's unethical conduct be investigated and that appropriate action be taken to uphold professional journalistic standards. We request your publication to issue a public retraction and an apology to correct the misleading article. | Mandla Nsele Director, Communications and Marketing Directorate eThekwini Municipality When Convenience Trumps Conviction The DA has once again shown South Africans that political survival – not principle – is at the core of its decisions. The recent sacking of its Deputy Minister by President Ramaphosa has exposed the glaring contradictions and moral gymnastics the DA is willing to perform to remain in power. Let's be clear: cabinet ministers and deputy ministers are appointed by the president. This is not up for debate; it is a constitutional fact. They serve at the president's pleasure and are ultimately accountable to him. Yet, under this loose, hastily stitched-together arrangement called the so-called Government of National Unity (GNU), we have seen members from different political parties, including the DA, acting as if they are accountable to their party first, and to the president second. The case of the Basic Education Minister refusing to sign the Bela Bill – an ANC-driven policy – is a prime example. That DA minister was quickly brought to order, reminding us all that no matter the party colour on your tie, the president holds the final say in Cabinet. The DA, however, appears deeply uncomfortable with this arrangement. And rightfully so. They are there out of convenience, not conviction. The decision to join the GNU was done overnight, in back rooms, without consulting its own members or the broader electorate. John Steenhuisen and his inner circle pushed it through, offering a pathetic explanation – that it was done to 'save the country from chaos.' Really? This is not a coalition built on shared values. It is a coalition built on political desperation and opportunism. How can the DA sit in a Cabinet that implements ANC policies – policies fundamentally opposed to the DA's own manifesto – and still pretend to be a credible opposition force? The DA's hypocrisy was further exposed during the budget debate, where John Steenhuisen unceremoniously replaced the scheduled speaker to grandstand about the firing of his deputy minister. Instead of using the debate to address the real economic crisis facing South Africans – rising unemployment, collapsing municipalities, rampant corruption – Steenhuisen chose to whine about a decision his party knew was constitutionally correct. He told us things we already knew: That the ANC's Cabinet is full of ministers implicated in various scandals. But this is nothing new. The DA knew this when they enthusiastically joined the GNU. They knew they would have to share a table with the same ministers they once labeled as enemies of progress. Yet they signed up anyway. And now, as if to cement their hypocrisy, they suddenly oppose the R700 million 'national dialogue' – a dialogue they quietly supported when their seat at the Cabinet table was still warm. Only after losing a member did they find their spine. Suddenly, the DA remembers that R700m could be used to build classrooms, fix hospitals, or fund job creation programs. Convenient timing, don't you think? The DA's moral inconsistency does not stop here. They have criticized cadre deployment for years – yet they gleefully accepted Cabinet positions handed out by the very party they accused of state capture. They lament state corruption – yet now they share in the spoils of power, feigning innocence when the same corruption machine spits out one of their own. What we are witnessing is the death of principle in South African politics. The DA has shown that it will sacrifice its stated values at the altar of political expediency. It cannot claim to be an alternative to the ANC while propping up the very system it has spent years condemning. The people of South Africa deserve honest leaders who do not shift their moral compass depending on what's politically convenient. They deserve parties that stand on principle, not on opportunistic deals struck in smoke-filled back rooms. The DA must decide: Is it an opposition party, holding the ruling party to account and presenting a real alternative? Or is it simply another cog in the ANC's machinery, desperate to cling to whatever scraps of power it can get? Until they answer this question truthfully, South Africans will continue to see the DA for what it truly is – a party of convenience, not conviction. | Visvin Reddy MP MK Party Israel must be held accountable US President Donald Trump claimed that the airstrikes on Isfahan, Natanz and Fordow, the crucial Iranian nuclear facilities have been destroyed, and were a 'spectacular success'. I believe, only time will tell if Trump's statement that Tehran's nuclear programme has actually been obliterated is correct. Iran has consistently stated that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, such as energy production, medical research and is purely of a civilian nature. In spite of this proclamation by Iran, a paranoid apartheid Israel, without evidence, consistently insisted that Iran plans to build nuclear bombs. With Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu achieving his objective of getting the US to buy into his long-standing exaggerated claim and strike Iran's nuclear facilities and emerge as the main recipient of this unlawful strike on Iran, now what? Will Israel stop the imposed starvation on the Palestinians, the ongoing weaponisation of aid and the genocide in Gaza, and agree to a permanent ceasefire? The way forward and to bring about sanity, not only in the Middle East, but around the world is to support the different international campaigns to abolish nuclear weapons. It is more important than ever that we campaign to get rid of all nuclear weapons globally. Together with campaigning for a nuclear-free world, apartheid Israel, the occupying regime, that has illegally occupied Palestinian land must be accountable for breaches of international law. | MOHAMED SAEED Pietermaritzburg DAILY NEWS


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Cyril must seize opportunity
Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed and its confidence has been shaken. The Israel-Iran war lasted only 12 days but its consequences will reshape global politics for years. One positive is that the battering taken by South Africa's ally, Iran, could paradoxically greatly benefit this country, if President Cyril Ramaphosa had the wit and courage to seize the opportunity. SA-Iran ties The greatest impediment to a good relationship with the United States has been SA's support of Iran. It is hardly surprising, then, that SA's increasing alignment with Iran's 'axis of resistance' and its self-appointed role as a spokesperson for the global south in siding with Russia and China against Western democracies, has caused the US steadily growing concern over the past dozen or so years. This came to a head in February under the combative presidency of Donald Trump, who issued a punishing executive order against SA. Despite these substantial economic costs caused by the order and Ramaphosa speaking fervently about the need to 'reset' ties with the US, the government seems paralysed. It boils down to the fact that foreign policy is not determined by pragmatism and national interest, but by ideology and party interest. The foundation of SA's post-1994 risky friendship with Iran stems from an anti-Western ideological outlook that the ANC has historically shared. This has been amplified by a powerful Islamist clique within the department of international relations and cooperation that is strong enough within ANC party structures to dictate a harder line on Middle East matters than many in the Cabinet would choose. ALSO READ: Iran voices 'serious doubts' over Israel commitment to ceasefire Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed The drubbing that Iran took in the 12-day war changes everything. Iran's new precariousness as a functional state, its wavering status as a revolutionary beacon and its more circumscribed financial circumstances reduce Monday 10 30 June 2025 its usefulness to the ANC on all fronts. Whether its nuclear programme has been destroyed or only set back months, Iran undoubtedly will have reduced capacity for mischief-making in the Middle East, while preoccupied with internal reconstruction. Infrastructure has to be rebuilt, lost nuclear and military expertise replaced and weaponry stocks replenished, all while fretting whether the ayatollah's government might be toppled in a popular uprising. Iran's vulnerabilities have been exposed and its confidence has been shaken. Israel effortlessly thwarted its much-hyped missile barrages, while the US demonstrated decisively that it would not sit idle while Tehran lashed out. The loop of perpetual Middle East conflict has been broken, or at least dramatically reset. Iran's terror proxies are isolated, vulnerable and on the back foot. ALSO READ: Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank Israel's upper hand and mending ties For the first time in decades, the strategic initiative lies firmly with Israel. Militarily, the Jewish state has never been stronger but it is being comprehensively bested on the battlefield of international public opinion over the conflict in Gaza. With Iran down, for the moment, and Syria making noises, this is Israel's best window yet to resolve the Palestinian question; to trade restraint for recognition and to convert tactical dominance into a durable regional peace through a revitalised and expanded Abraham Accords. South Africa faces its own fork in the road. It can continue acting as a megaphone for radical Islam and a cheerleader for rogue states or it, too, can seize the moment. Re-establishing ties with Israel, mending its fractured relationship with Washington and offering itself as a credible, post-ideological broker in the Middle East would not only serve the national interest, it would rescue a South African foreign policy now adrift in ANC moral incoherence, under Ramaphosa's timorous captaincy. READ NEXT: Zelensky signs decree for Ukraine's withdrawal from anti-landmine treaty