SC to hear plea on Maratha reservation in Maharashtra in July
Supreme Court
on Thursday decided to hear in July a plea over the issue of
Maratha reservation
in
Maharashtra
.
The matter came up for urgent listing before a bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh.
The counsel appearing in the case referred to a June 11 order of the
Bombay High Court
deciding to hear afresh the pleas against the constitutional validity of the law providing Maratha reservation from July 18.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Klang: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
The lawyer informed the bench that the
apex court
had previously asked the high court to constitute a bench and hear the matter on interim relief.
He said the high court declined to grant any interim relief in the matter and would continue to hear the matter.
Live Events
The top court posted the matter for the July 14 week.
A special bench of the high court was constituted last month to hear and decide the pleas related to the Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2024.
The 2024 law, which provided 10 per cent reservation in education and government jobs to the
Maratha community
, constituting nearly one-third of Maharashtra's population, had been at the forefront of political discourse last year during the Lok Sabha and the assembly elections.
Last year, a full bench headed by then High Court Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya commenced hearing the challenge to the law on the ground that the Maratha community was not a backward one that requires benefits of reservation.
The pleas also claimed that Maharashtra has already crossed the 50 per cent cap on reservation.
However, the hearing came to a standstill after Chief Justice Upadhyaya was transferred to the Delhi High Court in January.
On May 14, the apex court directed the high court to constitute a special bench and urgently hear the matter.
In March last year, when the petitions against the reservation were filed, the high court in an interim order said that applications for
NEET 2024
admission to undergraduate medical courses, in which a 10 per cent reservation granted to members of the Maratha community was applicable, would be subject to further orders in the pleas challenging the law.
On April 16, 2024, the full bench also clarified that till further orders, any applications for admissions to educational institutions or jobs at government authorities taking benefit of the Act will be subject to further orders in the present proceedings.
The SEBC Act was passed on February 20 last year.
It was formulated by then chief minister Eknath Shinde-led government based on a report of the retired Justice Sunil Shukre-led Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission (MSBCC) that found "exceptional circumstances and extraordinary situations exist" to grant reservation to the Maratha community in excess of 50 per cent total reservation in the state.
In December 2018, a batch of petitions was filed in the high court challenging the earlier SEBC Act of 2018 that granted Marathas 16 per cent reservation in government jobs and education.
In June 2018, the high court upheld the 2018 Act but reduced the quota to 12 per cent in education and 13 per cent in government jobs.
This was challenged in the apex court, which in May 2021 struck down the entire Act.
A review petition filed by the
Maharashtra government
was also rejected by the Supreme Court in May 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
26 minutes ago
- India Today
Supreme Court allows Trump to restart mass layoffs at education department
The US Supreme Court on Monday gave the Trump administration the green light to resume layoffs of over 1,300 employees at the Department of Education and press forward with a controversial plan to dismantle the agency an unsigned order, the justices lifted a lower court's block on the firings, enabling President Donald Trump to push ahead with one of his boldest efforts to shrink the federal government and shift power over education back to the will likely cripple the department,' warned US District Judge Myong Joun of Boston in a previous ruling, which reinstated nearly 1,400 laid-off employees and froze the administration's attempts to redistribute the department's responsibilities to other federal agencies. That ruling was backed by a federal appeals court, but the Supreme Court, in a 6–3 decision with the three liberal justices dissenting, paused the order, clearing the way for the White House to continue winding down the layoffs and departmental shutdown have been opposed by a coalition of 21 Democratic attorneys general, school districts, and education unions. In court filings, they argued that the administration's actions risk undermining key federal education duties, such as enforcing civil rights, managing student loans, and supporting students with disabilities.'Trump's shutdown efforts threatened to impair the department's ability to perform its core duties,' the plaintiffs Secretary Linda McMahon said it's a 'shame' it took the Supreme Court's intervention to let Trump's plan move ahead.'Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organisation, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies,' McMahon said in a Department of Education, established by Congress in 1979, does not dictate curriculum or classroom instruction—those powers are left to states and localities, which provide the lion's share of school funding. But it plays a critical role in distributing aid to needy schools, ensuring compliance with federal education law, and collecting national data on student Monday, more than 20 states also sued the administration over billions of dollars in frozen education funding for after-school care, summer programs and more. Education Department employees who were targeted by the layoffs have been on paid leave since March, according to a union that represents some of the agency's staff.- EndsTune InMust Watch
India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump threatens 100% tariffs on Russia, US conducts military drills at Panama Canal, more
24:09 The case of Nimisha Priya, a Kerala nurse facing execution in Yemen on July 16th for murdering a Yemeni national in 2017, has reached a critical juncture. The Indian government informed the Supreme Court that despite diplomatic efforts, including recent talks with Yemeni authorities, no reprieve has been granted.
Mint
30 minutes ago
- Mint
US Supreme Court greenlights Donald Trump's education department layoffs
The Supreme Court allowed President Trump to restart mass layoffs at the U.S. Education Department, impacting nearly 1,400 employees. In a 6-3 decision, the conservative majority lifted a lower court's order that had blocked the firings and required worker reinstatements. Education Secretary Linda McMahon called the ruling a 'significant win,' enabling her to advance Trump's executive order to close the department 'to the maximum extent permitted by law'. The layoffs, affecting one-third of the agency's workforce, are part of Trump's broader push to shrink federal government roles and return education oversight to states. Justice Sonia Sotomayor led a fiery dissent, joined by liberal justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. She accused the majority of enabling 'lawlessness,' writing that Trump's plan 'usurps Congress's power' by effectively abolishing a congressionally created agency. Sotomayor warned the cuts would 'unleash untold harm,' crippling enforcement of civil rights laws, support for disabled students, and anti-discrimination efforts. The dissent highlighted Trump's public vow to eliminate the department—evidence that the administration aimed to 'break the law'. Twenty-one Democratic states and teachers' unions sued, arguing the layoffs would paralyze critical programs. They cited risks to $1.6 trillion in student loans, special education services, and aid for low-income schools—all congressionally mandated duties. Massachusetts districts warned of irreversible damage, like delayed financial aid that could force teacher layoffs. Employees, on paid leave since March, now face termination. A union representative lamented, 'This guts our capacity to protect students'. This ruling follows last week's Supreme Court approval of Trump's federal workforce reductions, cementing his campaign promise to 'dismantle the administrative state'. The Education Department's closure plan includes transferring student loans to the Small Business Administration and disability programs to Health and Human Services. Legal challenges continue in lower courts, but the administration can now proceed during appeals. Critics fear similar targets for USAID and diversity programs under Trump's 'Department of Government Efficiency'.
