
Survivors welcome commission of investigation into handling of sexual abuse in schools
The commission follows a scoping inquiry last year that detailed almost 2,400 allegations of sexual abuse across more than 300 religious-run schools.
The soon-to-be-established commission will examine the handling of allegations, suspicions, and concerns of sexual abuse in all schools, including primary and post-primary.
It will also examine the handling of these complaints by religious bodies and State agencies, including the Department of Education, the HSE, and An Garda Síochána.
Announcing the establishment of the commission, education minister Helen McEntee vowed that the institutions and religious orders 'involved in these awful crimes' will contribute to redress.
The State has a track record of failure when it comes to compelling religious orders to contribute financially towards victims.
Most recently, it emerged that just two of the eight religious orders linked to mother and baby homes offered to contribute to the €800m redress scheme for survivors.
Ms McEntee said more work is needed to decide how a redress scheme for victims of sexual abuse in schools is to progress.
'It's very clearly the wish of survivors but what's very clear also is that any redress scheme would be funded by the religious orders and by those who were accountable for the awful abuses which happened in our schools.'
This work will continue 'in parallel' with the work of the commission and will focus on further examination of the religious orders.
'What funds they have, what assets they have, what levers may be used by government to ensure that funding is provided by those religious groups and orders,' Ms McEntee said.
This is being worked on by the Attorney General.
'It is important to stress that the preferred outcome here is that religious institutions and organisations would come forward,' she added.
Survivor advocacy group One in Four welcomed the move to formally approve a commission of investigation into the handling of child sexual abuse in schools across Ireland from 1927 to 2013.
The scale reflects the thousands of lives affected and the deep impact on families and communities for generations, according to One in Four chief executive Deirdre Kenny.
'We recognise the complexity of the commission's work and what it represents for survivors and for Irish society,' she said.
'Examining how concerns were managed is vital for understanding past failures and building a safer, more accountable future for all children.'
Concern around redress delays
However, the group also expressed concerns about further delays to redress for victims.
'While we appreciate this is complex, survivors have shown immense resilience and patience. Therefore, we are concerned about any further delay.
'Delays disadvantage survivors and may allow institutions to avoid accountability and responsibility,' said Ms Kenny.
The commission is set to run for the next five years, and will cost 'tens of millions', Ms McEntee said.
Earlier this year, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said there is a need to 'fundamentally reflect' on costly and lengthy commissions of investigation which come up with 'deeply unsatisfactory' findings.
Mr Martin was speaking after the publication of the Farrelly Commission report into the 'Grace' foster home case, which took eight years at a cost of €13.6m so far, with the final bill set to top €20m.
The commission published its 2,000-page report into the case in April.
The report was subsequently roundly criticised by whistleblowers, Ireland's Special Rapporteur on Child Protection, and across political parties.
- If you are affected by any of the issues raised in this article, please click here for a list of support services.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Book review: The short but extraordinary life of the Border Commission
While the IRB held the higher ground on the battlefields of Ireland during the War of Independence, Lloyd George and his team of negotiators had the advantage of experience in the subsequent Treaty negotiations. It was Michael Collins who first suggested the establishment of a border commission to decide the jurisdictions of the Dublin and Belfast governments. Lloyd George adopted the idea and produced an ambiguous clause that became Article 12 of the Treaty. Notwithstanding the extreme pressure the Irish negotiating team was subjected to, its decision not to refer the wording of Article 12 for legal opinion was, at best, naïve. The story of the Irish Boundary Commission, and the four years it took to establish that body, is outlined in Cormac Moore's latest book, The Root of All Evil. Moore has previous publications on various aspects of Irish history, these include The GAA v Douglas Hyde, Birth of a Border, and The Irish Soccer Split. The Root of All Evil is a thorough and insightful investigation of all aspects of the Border Commission. The book explains in detail the drawn-out attempts to set up the commission, its short but extraordinary life, and its inevitable end. It has long been argued that Sinn Féin had more interest in the Oath of Allegiance than in partition; Moore argues that this opinion does not stand up to scrutiny. He argues that considerable time and effort was spent on using the Commission as a means of rescuing Fermanagh, Tyrone, and possibly south County Down from Ulster. This optimism was ill-founded, as Moore shows that Britain intended to side with unionist leader, James Craig, whose motto was 'not an inch'. Indeed, Craig's description of the Boundary Commission, 'the root of all evil,' gave Moore the title of the book. The Boundary Commission should have begun its work immediately in 1922. The outbreak of the Civil War, however, delayed the process. Political upheaval in Britain, resulting in a change of government, further added to the delay. Even more time was lost as Britain searched the Empire for a 'suitable' independent chairman. Richard Feetham, a judge in the South African Supreme Court, was appointed. Ireland appointed Eoin MacNeill as its commissioner. This was a grave error. MacNeill, who was also minister for education, proved to be inept in the commissioner role. Belfast had to be forced to appoint a commissioner by the British government. The fact that Belfast refused to engage should not be taken to mean that they were preparing to thwart any potential unsatisfactory findings of the commission. Between 1921 and 1925, proportional representation (PR) voting was abolished in Ulster. Following this many local councils had their voting areas gerrymandered to ensure Unionist majorities. Councils with nationalist majorities such as Tyrone and Fermanagh became unionist councils. The three-man commission eventually got to work in 1925. It decided there would be no communication with the London, Dublin, and Belfast governments. MacNeill abided by this decision, but the Ulster commissioner, Joseph Fisher, had no such qualms; he fed everything back to the Ulster Unionists. MacNeill resigned from the commission as it was about to publish its findings. It had become obvious that the proposed changes were little more than the straightening of some jagged border lines. The Irish government decided it would be best to bury the report for all time. In an effort to save face with voters in the South, the Dublin government sought other financial concessions from Britain. Some concessions on war retribution payments were achieved. This left thousands of nationalists, who live near the northern side of the border, believing they were sold out for cash. What The Root of All Evil clearly shows is neither Sinn Féin nor the subsequent Free State government had a coherent plan on how to deal with the Ulster Unionists. As Moore says, '[The Irish government] failed to grasp that Ulster unionism's hatred of Dublin was stronger than its love for the Empire.' One hundred years on, one wonders if anything has changed? Read More Book review: A salacious tale of murder on the border of fact and fiction

The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
The telling three-word answer that indicated how George Gibney plans to plead
Jane Moore reports from Orlando WHEN YOU WALK into the Four Courts on Dublin's Inns Quay, the building is usually bustling with life. Under the domed ceiling of the landmark building that houses Ireland's main courts, solicitors and barristers can be seen coming and going in their robes, with some lugging trolleys carrying boxes of files behind them. Those waiting for their cases to be heard are often seen occupying benches outside the numerous courtrooms, with members of the public – and members of the media – also found wandering the corridors of the 18th century building. This scene could not have been further from what The Journal encountered inside the US Middle District Court in Florida. Shortly before 9am on Friday morning (that's 2pm Irish time), there was no one to be found on the ground floor of the large, modern building on West Central Boulevard in downtown Orlando save for some friendly security staff, who informed me that electronics were not permitted beyond that point. In Ireland, journalists are not allowed to broadcast proceedings within a courtroom, though writing on a phone or a laptop is permitted. They frequently file their stories to the newsroom right from where they're sitting in court. In Florida, I was going to have to make do with the trusty pen and paper. After taking the lift to the fifth floor of the vast, light-filled federal building and walking along the gleaming black-tiled floor, I reached the double doors of courtroom 5C, where George Gibney was the only show in town. The former Irish national swimming coach was scheduled to appear at 10am for a detention hearing, having been arrested in Florida last week on foot of an extradition warrant from Ireland. Initially, he was all set to challenge this in the courts. Extradition requests are complex, and it was not clear whether this would be the end of a life on the run, or the beginning of a long, drawn-out process that would potentially not see him return to Ireland for years, if at all. But on Thursday, while I was less than halfway through a nine-hour flight to the Sunshine State to cover the hearing, freshly-filed court documents confirmed that he had agreed to be returned to Ireland. It is not known what changed his mind. Inside the courtroom, the 77-year-old was already in place waiting for the hearing to begin. He was sitting in a wheelchair in front of a desk on the right of the room speaking quietly to his defence lawyer Aisha Nash. Twice, he looked over at the three journalists sitting at the back of the wood-panelled room on the left. The large courtroom was almost empty, aside from staff and a security guard. Advertisement Seeing him sitting with his fingers intertwined in his lap, looking old and frail and wearing prison-issue clothes with flip flops and what appeared to be bandages on his feet, it was difficult to comprehend the crimes that he has been accused of, which span decades. Previous case collapsed Gibney was an internationally-renowned swimming coach in the 1980s and early 1990s. In Ireland, he enjoyed somewhat of a celebrity status and regularly appeared in the media as the celebrated Olympic coach in a decade where the country saw Gary O'Toole and Michelle Smith compete for medals. This came to an end in the early 1990s, after six swimmers came forward and made sworn statements to gardaí alleging that they had been abused by Gibney. In 1993, he appeared in court in Dún Laoghaire facing 27 charges of child sexual abuse beginning as far back as 1967 – though under Irish law, the media was not permitted to publish his name. What happened next is almost incomprehensible. His lawyers argued that the length of time since the alleged offences meant it could prejudice his right to a fair trial, that the dates of the alleged offences were not specific enough and that he could not hope to find witnesses to establish an alibi. Gibney's challenge was successful, and the case collapsed. He left Ireland to work as a swimming coach at a club in Edinburgh. But when parents discovered the allegations against him, he fled to the United States in 1995. He has been there ever since. In 2020, Gibney was brought back into the spotlight by the BBC and Second Captains podcast titled 'Where is George Gibney?' , which covered the history of the sexual abuse allegations against him. The ten-part series featured interviews with swimmers he allegedly abused as well as coaches he worked with and journalists who reported on his alleged crimes at the time, interwoven with the producers tracking him down to Altamonte Springs, a small city in Florida. The podcast prompted four women to come forward to gardaí and allege that Gibney had sexually abused them between 1971 and 1981. They were aged between eight and 15 when the alleged abuse took place. Their allegations are the reason why Gibney was sitting in an Orlando courthouse today. 'All rise,' the bailiff said as Magistrate Judge Daniel C Irick entered courtroom 5C at 10.04am. All did rise, apart from Gibney, who put his two hands together in a prayer motion and nodded at the judge. After confirming that he had received the affidavit from Gibney's legal team in which he consented to be extradited to Ireland, Judge Irick asked that he be placed under oath and moved in front of a microphone so that he could hear him clearly. 'Mr Gibney is in desperate need of glasses,' defence lawyer Aisha Nash said when asked if her client had the affidavit in front of him. She told the judge that while he 'can't see too well', she had read through the document verbatim with Gibney and that he understood that he was waiving his right to a hearing and agreeing to be returned to Ireland. A telling response Judge Irick proceeded to go through the waiver with Gibney to confirm what he had sworn to. After each question the judge posed, Gibney looked from the bench to Nash, who then repeated the question to him. Related Reads George Gibney tells Florida court he intends to challenge the case against him in Ireland George Gibney agrees to be extradiated to Ireland 'as soon as possible' to face 79 charges Former Irish swimming coach George Gibney agrees to extradition from US to face 79 charges for sexual offences 'Do you admit that you are the individual whom charges are pending against?' the judge asked. 'Yes,' Gibney answered. He answered yes to almost every question in a low, somewhat hoarse tone, apart from to say 'no' when asked if he had a medical condition or mental issue, and when asked if he had been coerced in any way into his decision to waive his rights. But the answer that stood out from the 11-minute hearing came after the judge asked Gibney if he understood that he could challenge the extradition request. 'Oh, I will,' he said clearly. There was a brief moment of pause before his lawyer leaned in to clarify the question to him. She could be heard saying 'not here', and appeared to be explaining to him that while he was not challenging the extradition request to Ireland, he was free to challenge the case against him once he is returned. This was followed by a 'yes' into the microphone from Gibney in answer to the judge's question. His initial three-word answer was telling. From a man who has not been heard from for nearly 30 years, who is accused of sexual abuse dating back five decades, it was a clear indication that he intends to fight the charges. Before the hearing concluded at 10.15am, Judge Irick said Gibney had answered all of his questions appropriately, and he ordered that he be extradited to Ireland. All-but-one rose again as he left the courtroom, and Gibney was wheeled out by two US Marshals. He will remain in custody in Orange County Jail until his extradition. This is a process that can take months or sometimes years to finalise, but a source has told The Journal that the planning is well underway. It is expected that a date will likely be decided next week. Once he returns to Ireland, Gibney will be brought to court, hear the charges against him read aloud and asked how he intends to plead. If his telling response today is anything to go by, it looks likely that he already knows how he intends to plead. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Sexual abuse in schools inquiry
Sir, –This week the Minister for Education Helen McEntee announced the establishment of a Commission of Investigation into sexual abuse in all day and boarding schools. I attended Willow Park and Blackrock College as a boarder in the 1960s. Sadly, I experienced many years of physical and mental abuse. It is very disappointing that the dreadful abuse of corporal punishment, suffered by so many in this country, has not been included in this investigation. Any kind of abuse, be it sexual or otherwise, leaves dreadful lifelong scars, and stays with victims for the rest of their lives. – Yours, etc, BRIAN McDEVITT, READ MORE Glenties, Co Donegal.