Passenger Rail protester hopes precedent set for future climate change activism after charges dropped
Restore Passenger Rail protestors appear in Wellington District Court. Defendant Thomas Brydone Taptiklis, 44.
Photo:
The Post/David Unwin
A protester agitating for climate change action feels no joy after the Crown abandoned the prosecution of more than 20 defendants, including his own, in the Wellington District Court.
The Crown confirmed on Tuesday that it would no longer pursue a retrial of three defendants on
charges of endangering transport
and that it would also drop a further six trials related to protests under the banner of Restore Passenger Rail in 2022 and 2023.
The jurors in the first trial couldn't reach an agreement on whether the protests carried an unreasonable risk to the public.
Now, the Crown said any future trials would face the same issue and it was not in the public interest to continue.
Protesters brought rush-hour traffic to a halt in Wellington when they staged sit downs and stuck their hands to the road, abseiled above Mount Victoria tunnel and hung banners from gantries above State Highway 1.
Some defendants were discharged without conviction, while others await sentencing on guilty pleas - however, most of the charges were dismissed.
The trial for Andrew Sutherland, Michael Apathy, Thomas Taptiklis, and Te Wehi Ratana began on 26 February.
All four faced charges of endangering transport, with a maximum penalty of 14 years in prison.
After more than three days of deliberation, Sutherland was acquitted on 10 March - a day later, the jury was dismissed and a retrial ordered after jurors were unable to reach a verdict for the other three defendants.
The Crown has now abandoned the retrial and a further six trials for other defendants.
However, Thomas Taptikilis said it was far from a personal triumph.
"The climate is worse than ever. There's no going on with my life and being happy.
"I'm sad that it feels like we have to go to such lengths to try to get adequate action and we haven't remotely got [it] ... so, I can't say I feel any joy about this."
He said he hoped it set a precedent and that protesters would not face prosecution for future climate change activism.
Te Wehi Ratana said while the issue of climate change hadn't gone away, the result was a vindication.
"When the jury was given all the facts, and the evidence from our two expert scientists - who made it very clear what was going on - the jury were unable to convict us and say what we did was unreasonable.
"Because what we did was reasonable within the context of the climate crisis."
In a memorandum to the court, Crown prosecutors said it was clear that the jury became deadlocked on the issue of whether the risk each defendant took was unreasonable across three protests in 2022.
"Given the way the trial developed, and the issue on which the jury became deadlocked, the Crown does not consider a re-trial is in the public interest.
"Similarly, the remaining six prosecutions would have the same issue. The Crown does not consider that continuing with those prosecutions is in the public interest."
Four defendants had charges dismissed without conviction, while six pleaded guilty to lesser charges.
Sutherland and Taptiklis pleaded guilty to wilful damage charges and await sentencing.
Defendants whose charges were also dismissed include; Rachael Mary Andrews, Susan Melanie Boyde, James Louis Cockle, Carrillon Dawn Cowan, Jill Jackson, Timothy Richard Musson, Anne Margueretta Smith, John Wilson Tovey, Dominic James Grose, Alex Sidney Jacobsen, Jenniffer Mary Olsen, Alex Harry, Gregor Morgan, Kaile Quian, Caroline Rousseau Sheldon-Williams, Julian John Warmington, Jenny Whittington, Rosemary Anne Penwarden, Alexander Henry Cockle and Joanne Kathleen Sutherland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Prominent figure with name supression set to reappear in court
Photo: RNZ / Dan Cook A prominent New Zealander is set to reappear in court on Monday. RNZ earlier revealed a prominent New Zealander had been arrested . After being made aware of the man's arrest, RNZ approached the Wellington District Court to see if there were any suppression orders and when he would be appearing in court. In response, a registrar said the man faced eight charges, all of which are category three offences meaning the offence is punishable by imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for two years or more. However, an application had been granted prohibiting media from being able to report the man's name, identifying particulars as well as the nature of the charges he faced before his first appearance. The man appeared in the Wellington District Court via audio visual link on 3 July. Media opposed the suppression orders. However, the defendant's lawyers asked for the orders to continue on an interim basis until their next appearance. Judge David Laurenson agreed to continue the orders. The man was remanded on bail without plea until his next appearance on Monday. Under the Criminal Procedure Act a court may make an order forbidding publication of the name of a person who is charged with an offence if the court is satisfied publication would be likely to result in eight different outcomes including causing extreme hardship and creating a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. The fact a defendant is well known does not, of itself, mean that publication of his or her name will result in extreme hardship. At first appearance a defendant only needs to advance an "arguable case" that one of the eight grounds applies. The only section in the Criminal Procedure Act that permits suppression of the charges is section 199C, which permits suppression of "trial-related information" where the court is satisfied publication of that information is likely to create a real risk of prejudice to a fair trial. Trial-related information includes "any other specific information in relation to any trial". Where an interim order is made under section 199C it only lasts until the defendant's next court appearance. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
Police charge man with $2m worth of Auckland home burglaries
A man who allegedly burgled around $2 million worth of property from more than 50 homes across Auckland in two years has been arrested by police — who say he was on his way to his next job. Detective Sergeant Amanda Reed said police had been collecting evidence and information on the 51-year-old's movements for several months and had intercepted a burglary attempt on Friday. Police sighted a vehicle belonging to the man travelling on Shore Rd in Remuera just after 6pm, she said. "Based off inquiries made into his movements in recent months, it was believed that he was on his way to commit another burglary." Extra police units were deployed along with assistance overhead from the Eagle helicopter. He was tracked from a distance to Waterview and was blocked in by police when he turned into a service station. ADVERTISEMENT Reed said the man was taken into custody without incident. "Upon searching his vehicle, a number of tools were located, which police believe are used to assist him with his offending." It is alleged the man committed more than 50 residential burglaries across Auckland in the past two years, including in the North Shore, Remuera, and Sunnyhills areas. Reed said police estimated he had stolen around $2 million worth of property. "This is a significant result for the team, not only because this is someone who we've been keeping an eye on for a lengthy period of time, but also due to the large scale of his offending." Investigation into the man's offending continued and police were hopeful some of the stolen property could be returned, she said. "We hope this result comes as a relief to his victims, and that both the North Shore and Remuera communities feel some reassurance knowing a prolific offender is off the street." The 51-year-old man was due to appear in the Auckland District Court charged with seven counts of burglary on August 4. Police said further charges had not been ruled out.
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
The NZ economy is still sick, doubts are growing about the Govt prescription
Are these the right antibiotics? Are the antibiotics making me feel sick? I do feel a little better I think. But it's taking longer than I expected. Maybe I should see the doctor again. Or am I just being impatient? Ugh, so much uncertainty. Hopefully, those who've tuned in for a fresh read on the state of the economy can see where this is going. Never let a metaphor go by, I say! Anyway, here's me and the New Zealand economy, both sick in the midst of a miserable wet winter and worrying about whether our recoveries have stalled. A run of negative data has knocked the wind out of the nation's sails. The bad vibes are being pushed along by a strong political current. Both the left and right are telling us that the Government has prescribed the wrong medicine. The left blames the Government for cutting spending into a downturn. The logic is pretty simple. Any good Keynesian will tell you, when demand in the private sector falls, that's the time for the Government to come to the party. Borrow a bit more, don't slash and burn civil service, hire more teachers and nurses, build more stuff ... it won't be inflationary because it won't be crowding out private sector competition, which is in recession. The trouble is, we're still in the aftermath of the last big spend-up, which went on too long. Labour's stimulus, once we got through the initial Covid shock, did clash with a private sector boom and exacerbated inflation. That muddied the political narrative. It made it inevitable that the incoming centre-right coalition would cut back despite the extra damage that would do to economic growth. In the context of using fiscal policy to drive economic prosperity, you can make a good case that successive governments have got things completely arse about face. You'd expect this argument from the left. But Christopher Luxon and Nicola Willis are being savaged even more aggressively from their right flank. The monetarists, the supply-side guys, the neo-liberals, (whatever you want to call them) are berating the Government for not dealing with the national debt and Crown deficit by administering a Rogernomics-style reboot of the whole economy. I doubt that would make the current downturn any more pleasant, but they argue it couldn't be much worse. And the payoff would be longer-term gains as the economy found a more productive and financially secure baseline. Both arguments can be compelling and, if nothing else, add to the concern that the current strategy of subtle market-oriented tweaks risks underdelivering on all sides. But through all of this gloom, one thing we need to remember is that most economists still believe the foundations of recovery are in place. Step back a bit from the mess of ugly recent economic data – the second quarter sucked, we get it! What are we actually experiencing? The labour market is tough. Unemployment is rising, and new job creation is almost non-existent. But this is not a surprise. In fact, while economists do get things wrong, they've been forecasting unemployment to be about where it is now for more than a year. We know it's one of the last pieces of data to turn in any recovery. Unfortunately, it is now overlapping with an unwanted and unexpected spike in inflation. Like a jump scare in the final scene of a horror movie, food prices (with rates and power, and insurance) have conspired to pause Reserve Bank rate cuts and rattled our faith in the recovery. Then there are tariffs and global unrest and all of that. It's not really surprising that it all feels bleak. So it's a bit ironic to be writing an optimistic take on the economy, especially given the rough week stuck at home that I've just had. My view wouldn't have been so upbeat if I hadn't been woken from my sick bed on Friday morning by a text from investment bank HSBC's Australian head of communications. He was asking how far away I was from my scheduled meeting with their global chief economist, Janet Henry and and Australia-New Zealand chief economist Paul Bloxham. Oops ... I was a long way away. But they kindly let me Zoom in later, and I'm very glad I did. As anyone with Australian cousins will know, sometimes it's healthy to be slapped in the face with a slightly condescending, external view of the New Zealand condition. Bloxham told me his forecasts currently make him one of the gloomiest economists on Australian growth. However, he's one of the most positive on New Zealand growth. Last year, New Zealand had the single largest contraction of any economy in the developed world, Bloxham points out. That inevitably comes with a hangover. But if you believe in the fundamentals of the New Zealand economy, which he does, there is no reason to assume the cycle won't turn. 'I suspect why I'm a little bit more upbeat than others is I sit in Sydney and watch it from the outside and go: hey, you've got two big forces at work that are set to continue to lift growth and give you a recovery.' No prizes for guessing those two forces – falling interest rates and booming agricultural commodity prices. The money flowing into the rural economy must eventually flow through to the cities and lift growth, Bloxham says. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen (my words, not his). We've had a big downswing, which means we're due a pretty big upswing to get back to trend, he says. And we've got monetary policy and the terms of trade in place to drive that cyclical upswing. 'All cycles look different. We always ask the same question going through: oh, it's not quite happening as quickly as we thought. 'The question you ask yourself is: is that because it's not working? Is it that interest rates aren't going to have the same effect? That a positive-terms-of-trade shock won't have the same effect? Or are things just a bit different this time around?' Great question. And look, the sun's finally out and I think my head's clearing. Time to go for a walk and ponder it all. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
