
No Reason To Panic About College Graduate Hiring Data
A now hiring and help wanted sign is posted in Morrisville, Pa., Monday, June 9, 2025. (AP ... More Photo/Matt Rourke)
Many observers, myself included, were surprised by data this past month showing that employment rates among young college graduates were worse than the rates for the population overall. It's a rare and troubling situation for current, future, and recently graduated students, and also a troubling dynamic for colleges and universities.
The two most important questions to ask are why, and whether this is a temporary and insignificant blip, or the start of a long-end trend.
The truth is that we don't know the answer to the first question. Speculation has included that large companies that traditionally bring on new college graduates are waiting to see how their staffing needs develop with new AI tools – tools that have been sold as ways to eliminate or reduce employees. That could be.
Although, as I speculated, it's possible that recent college graduates, and especially those who are getting their degrees this year or last year, simply did not learn very much. Over the last five years, these graduates have had online learning forced by Covid-19, and the arrival of ChatGPT, which surveys show is being used nearly universally by students to outsource the work of learning. It's possible, I guessed, that a college graduate today doesn't know how to do much beyond asking AI for the answer. And, if that's the case, that's not a skill any business would pay to have. They can just ask AI themselves.
But both are theories. We can't know for sure what's driving the dip in employment among recent college grads. And in reality, it's probably not just one thing anyway.
The bigger question is whether this is a long, deep trend or a freakish shooting star.
My money is on the table closer to shooting star than long trend.
One reason is that even the most consistent data will – even should – show an occasional deviation.
Steph Curry, perhaps the best shot-maker in the history of the NBA, has had more than ten games in his career in which he made exactly two baskets all game – each game resulting in a shooting percentage below 17%. After such a bad showing, do you bet that Curry will continue missing? Or do you bet with his history, that Curry can shoot and score at elite levels?
What we're seeing now in these labor statistics for recent college graduates is deeply against the history of the data – the first time we've seen it in a decade or better and one of just two or three such occasions in about 35 years. In other words, this data point is far less common than Steph Curry having a terrible shooting night.
Over the history of the data, the answer is unambiguous. For generations, those with a college degree have earned more money, had more economic ascent and stability, and enjoyed higher rates of employment than those without a degree. Historically, and still today, a college degree is one of the best investments anyone can make, paying for itself many, many times over. And not just financially.
Another reason the safe bet is in favor of college is that those investing in a college education are not backing away. In fact, the buying line is growing, indicating that those closest to the outcome are increasingly bullish on college.
Although it did not get much attention at the time, in January, total college enrollment passed pre-pandemic levels. New enrollments were up nearly 6%.
In an update released by the National Clearinghouse this Spring, college enrollment is still growing. According to that report, 'Total postsecondary enrollment is up 3.2 percent this spring (+562,000), compared to spring 2024.' Undergraduate enrollment grew 3.5%. Graduate enrollment grew 1.5%, and is now above pre-pandemic levels. For bachelor's and associate degree programs, the growth was 2.1% and 6.3%. Since associate programs feed into bachelor programs, those are good numbers.
It's not a good analogy to think of college students as buyers of a product. But to the extent they are, people are buying a college education. And they should.
One reason is that even if fewer recent college graduates are, right now, getting jobs, the jobs they are getting are better. College degree holders still earn more than non-degree holders both on average and at the very top-end of pay. For example, there simply are not very many people at desks in C-suite offices without a college degree, or several. The best paying and most prestigious careers still require advanced education. The pain is real right now, but the long-term realities still strongly favor college attainers.
If the history, the wage data, and the market conditions don't convince, then consider a simple, choice of logic – if it was as easy as just saying yes or no, would you rather have a college degree or not? It's one of those many things where it will be far better to have a degree and not need it, than to need one and not have it.
Yes, the employment rate for recent college graduates is upside down right now. But a deep breath is in order. Let's see if the data holds for another month, or six. We will know soon enough. One data point, one bad shooting performance, is no reason to draw sweeping conclusions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
31 minutes ago
- CNN
Republicans introduce last-minute industry ‘killer' tax on solar and wind in spending bill
Source: CNN Business groups and clean-energy developers are apoplectic over a last-minute provision tucked into President Donald Trump's spending bill that will tax the solar and wind industry, making it much harder to get new, cheap electricity onto the grid. Senate Republicans revealed an entirely new tax for renewable energy this weekend, in the latest version of a bill that could be passed as early as Monday afternoon. The bill already stripped tax incentives for renewables by 2027 and gave developers stringent requirements to claim them. The new tax would come at the worst possible time for the American power grid, experts and trade groups say, as demand for more electricity spikes due to new data centers for artificial intelligence coming online. 'This new tax is just a killer to the wind and solar industry,' said Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst at Raymond James. 'You went from taking away a positive for the industry to implementing a negative.' The tax could change, as the Senate embarks on a marathon day of amendment votes on Monday. As it's currently written, the Senate bill will threaten to upend a huge amount of power that was set to come online in the next decade. Wind, solar and long-term storage batteries make up the vast majority of new electricity added to the grid over the past three years. It also encompasses about 85% of what's currently in the development pipeline, according to Ben King, an analyst at the non-partisan think tank Rhodium Group. Keeping Biden-era tax credits for wind and solar would have led to between 400 and 1,100 gigawatts of new, clean power being added to the grid by 2035, Rhodium modeling shows. In comparison, the capacity of the largest fossil fuel power plant in the country is close to 4 gigawatts. 'Increasing the price of this stuff that's actually getting built right now — and just making it harder to build — results in higher prices,' King told CNN. 'And (there's) a greater amount of concern whether the grid can respond.' That hole in energy capacity these taxes will create will be filled by new natural gas power plants and leaving aging coal plants online longer, and both solutions are more expensive than building wind and solar. Those costs will all but assuredly be passed on to the people who pay electric bills. The new obstacles for clean energy come as the AI boom is already consuming vast amounts of energy. By 2030, data centers that power AI are projected to consume a whopping 612 terawatt-hours of energy per year – equivalent to what Canada consumes annually, according to research from Accenture. The new tax, along with killing the tax credits, could raise taxes on utility-scale solar projects by 18%, according to Princeton University professor Jesse Jenkins. Jenkins wrote on X that raising taxes on America's 'most important new sources of electricity supply' is 'utter insanity.' Responding to a post about the new taxes on wind and solar, billionaire Elon Musk warned over the weekend the 'latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Pointing to the cost of the legislation, Musk added in a separate post that polls suggest the legislation will be 'political suicide for the Republican Party.' Even the US Chamber of Commerce, which is broadly supportive of the legislation, came out against the new renewable energy levies. 'Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables,' US Chamber of Commerce executive vice president Neil Bradley said in a post on X. 'Electricity demand is set to see enormous growth & this tax will increase prices. It should be removed.' The weekend changes to the bill were blasted by renewables trade groups, who had been pushing lawmakers for a more generous tax credit phaseout timeline for wind and solar projects. 'It is astounding that the Senate would intentionally raise prices on consumers rather than encouraging economic growth and addressing the affordability crisis facing American households,' American Clean Power Association CEO Jason Grumet said in a statement. Solar Energy Industries Association president Abigail Ross Hopper called the tax an 'unprecedented and punitive measure that would raise costs for American consumers' and a 'blanket penalty on solar,' in a statement. The renewable energy tax is part of a broader effort to wean critical US industry off components from China. 'The Trump administration and Congressional Republicans really dislike wind and solar, but apparently they hate China even more,' said Mills, the Raymond James analyst. 'We're trying to get China out of our supply chains.' However, the tax and restrictions will make the US far less competitive with China on AI and clean energy manufacturing, said Robbie Orvis, Energy Innovation's senior director of modeling and analysis Energy Innovation. 'This is just a gift to China; they must just be salivating over what's in this bill,' Orvis said. 'They would be very happy to have US energy costs go up so they can take on more of those data centers that might otherwise be located here.' While being tough on China has bipartisan appeal, many clean energy projects are major employers in purple and red districts. For instance, Texas is not just the leading state for oil and natural gas production, it's also No. 1 for wind-powered electricity generation. 'Republicans have long supported an all-of-the-above energy policy. With this tax provision, the all-of-the-above policy has an asterisk where wind and solar are no longer included,' Mills said. Still, Mills added it's not entirely clear the wind and solar taxes will survive the political sausage-making process. 'Does this ever get implemented? Does it get softened? Does it get repealed? All of those are in the realm of possibility,' he said. Kevin Hassett, director of the White House's National Economic Council, told CNBC on Monday that the Trump administration remains focused using 'all-of-the-above approaches to get energy production to go through the roof.' 'That means using coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear and, to the extent it passes a market test; these other solar and wind type things can be part of the picture too,' Hassett said. For context, solar, wind and batteries are far cheaper than fossil fuels and nuclear power, because they have no fuel costs and currently cost less to build. Hassett disagreed with the characterization that lawmakers are not just taking away tax breaks for clean energy, they are also penalizing the industry with new taxes. 'I don't think that's the way to think about it. In the end, solar is going to be in people's grids,' Hassett said. Even without the new tax, the Republican spending bill will cause household energy bills to rise over the next decade, CNN previously reported. When combined with the electric vehicle consumer tax credit likely being cut, annual electricity and transportation costs in every state in the continental United States will be higher than they would have if the tax credits stayed intact, analysis from think tank Energy Innovation found. Red states including Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas could see up to 18% higher energy costs by 2035 if Trump's bill passes, compared with a scenario where the bill didn't pass. See Full Web Article
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Red Violet (RDVT) Surges 6.3%: Is This an Indication of Further Gains?
Red Violet, Inc. RDVT shares rallied 6.3% in the last trading session to close at $50.96. This move can be attributable to notable volume with a higher number of shares being traded than in a typical session. This compares to the stock's 3.4% loss over the past four weeks. Red Violet is benefiting from strong customer demand across diversified verticals, increased adoption by medium and large enterprise customers, and investments in proprietary data generation, automation, and AI-driven risk solutions. This company is expected to post quarterly earnings of $0.28 per share in its upcoming report, which represents no change from the year-ago quarter. Revenues are expected to be $24.5 million, up 28.5% from the year-ago quarter. Earnings and revenue growth expectations certainly give a good sense of the potential strength in a stock, but empirical research shows that trends in earnings estimate revisions are strongly correlated with near-term stock price movements. For Red Violet, the consensus EPS estimate for the quarter has remained unchanged over the last 30 days. And a stock's price usually doesn't keep moving higher in the absence of any trend in earnings estimate revisions. So, make sure to keep an eye on RDVT going forward to see if this recent jump can turn into more strength down the road. The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) stocks here >>>> Red Violet is part of the Zacks Internet - Software and Services industry. Globant GLOB, another stock in the same industry, closed the last trading session 0.4% lower at $91.13. GLOB has returned -6.4% in the past month. Globant's consensus EPS estimate for the upcoming report has changed -0.5% over the past month to $1.52. Compared to the company's year-ago EPS, this represents a change of +0.7%. Globant currently boasts a Zacks Rank of #4 (Sell). Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Globant S.A. (GLOB) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jennifer Neundorfer on how AI is reshaping the way startups are built — live at TechCrunch All Stage
AI marks the most significant revolution in startup development since the advent of cloud computing. This isn't just an incremental change; AI is fundamentally reshaping every facet of company building, from the initial spark of idea validation and the intricate process of product development to the critical areas of team structuring and go-to-market strategies. Jennifer Neundorfer, co-founder and managing partner at January Ventures, unpacks the new rules of engagement for the AI era, offering essential insights for the next generation of founders at every stage. Catch her at TechCrunch All Stage on July 15 at Boston's SoWa Power Station. Lean into this session and other expert-led scaling sessions, and save up to $425 on your pass for a limited time. Jennifer Neundorfer is an operator turned investor who has been investing in early-stage startups for the last decade. She is currently the managing partner of January Ventures, a pre-seed-focused venture capital firm investing in B2B startups leveraging software to transform legacy industries. She founded January Ventures to rewrite the networks in venture capital and invest in the most ambitious founders regardless of pedigree, network, or access. Prior to January, Jennifer was co-founder of Flashstarts, a startup accelerator focused on software startups outside of Silicon Valley. Jennifer is based in Boston. For a limited time, TechCrunch All Stage brings back early launch prices. Founders pay just $155. Investors, only $250. Register now and get up to $425 in savings on your pass! Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data