logo
NatWest: Key dates in the bank's history from rescue to privatisation

NatWest: Key dates in the bank's history from rescue to privatisation

The banking group – which was previously called RBS – was rescued during the 2008 financial crisis with payments worth £45.5 billion, which led to it become part-owned by taxpayers.
The Treasury has been rapidly selling down its shareholding over the past 18 months, whittling it down to zero and meaning the bank is once again in private hands.
Here's a timeline with key dates from the bailout of NatWest through to its return to privatisation on Friday.
2000:
RBS Group bought NatWest for £21 billion which, at the time, was the largest in British banking history.
The combined group operated a number of separate banking brands, including the Royal Bank of Scotland, NatWest and Ulster Bank.
2007:
RBS was part of a consortium that acquired the Dutch bank ABN AMRO. This decision, which propelled the group into investment banking and sapped its capital levels, proved to be destructive for RBS.
Key dates for NatWest Group (PA Graphics/PA)
The takeover was ultimately found to have taken place with 'inadequate due diligence' and was one of the key reasons why it was on the brink of collapse the following year.
2008:
The Government makes a capital payment worth £20 billion to RBS.
Then-prime minister Gordon Brown and chancellor Alistair Darling engineered the rescue after being warned the bank was facing imminent collapse and could run out of cash in a matter of hours.
It was the fallout of the financial crash, combined with its structural weaknesses, which triggered a major bank run and pushed it to the brink of failure.
Chief executive Fred Goodwin, who was in charge of the bank for nine years, stepped down the same month and was replaced by Stephen Hester.
He had been nicknamed 'Fred the Shred' for his aggressive management style that oversaw thousands of job cuts at NatWest after it was taken over by the RBS at the turn of the century. He was later stripped of his knighthood.
2009:
February: RBS unveiled its largest annual loss in the bank's history – an operating pre-tax loss of £40.7 billion.
April: The Government's stake in NatWest increased to 70.3%.
December: The Government injected another £25.5 billion into RBS, taking its shareholding to 84.4%, where it peaked.
2013:
Ross McEwan stepped in as chief executive after a five-year tenure for Mr Hester.
2015:
The first sale of Government-owned shares took place.
2018:
RBS announced its first bottom-line profit in a decade, of £752 million. A second sale of shares of £2.5 billion took place.
2019:
Dame Alison Rose took over as chief executive of the group – the first woman to lead a major UK high street bank.
Dame Alison Rose, NatWest former chief executive, was forced to step down in 2023 in the wake of the debanking saga (James Manning/PA)
2020:
Under Dame Alison's leadership, RBS changed its name to NatWest Group, saying it was the right time to align the group name with the brand under which it does the majority of its business. NatWest represented about 80% of its customer base at the time.
2023:
Dame Alison was forced to step down as the NatWest's chief executive in the wake of the debanking scandal, when she admitted being the source of an inaccurate story about politician Nigel Farage's finances in relation to his account with the group's subsidiary Coutts.
She was replaced by Paul Thwaite, the bank's former chief executive of commercial and institutional business.
2024:
March: The Government's stake in NatWest dropped below 30%, meaning it was no longer classed as being a controlling shareholder.
July: The Treasury began accelerating the sale process and its shareholding dropped below 20%.
December: The Treasury's shareholding fell below 10%.
2025:
May: The Government sells its remaining shares in NatWest, returning it to private ownership for the first time since 2008.
The Treasury confirmed that the sale came at a £10.5 billion loss to the UK taxpayer. But Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the bailout was 'the right decision then to secure the economy'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says 50-50 odds of trade deal with EU
Trump says 50-50 odds of trade deal with EU

Daily Mail​

time23 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump says 50-50 odds of trade deal with EU

Published: | Updated: President Donald Trump gave even odds for reaching a trade deal with the European Union as he left Washington to begin his trip to Scotland – with a path to a solution where the Europeans 'buy down' the tariffs he is imposing. 'I would say that we have a fifty-fifty chance,' Trump said, amid reports that the two sides are narrowing in on a possible deal. 'Maybe less than that,' he hedged. 'But a fifty-fifty chance of making a deal with the EU. And It will be a deal where they have to buy down their tariffs. Because they're right now at 30 percent,' Trump said, referencing the tariff set to take effect by the new 'doomsday' August 1 deadline unless there is an agreement. 'They'll have to buy them down - maybe. Or they can leave them the way they are.' Trump, using a favorite negotiating tactic, described his counterparts as desperate. 'But they want to make a deal very badly. I would have said we have a 25 percent chance with Japan and they kept coming back and we made a deal,' Trump said. He was referencing the deal he announced days ago, which has Japan paying a 15 percent tariff, lower than the threatened 25 percent tariff, while opening markets to U.S. exporters. Trump and his top negotiators continue to gush about the Japanese investment – while describing it in terms different than what is coming out of Tokyo. 'Don't forget Japan's putting up $550 billion,' Trump said Friday. 'That's a lot of money. And also paying tariffs. The biggest part of the Japan deal and maybe we get this with EU maybe we don't is we have the right to go in and trade. They've totally opened Japan just for the U.S.' Trump made the comments as he left the White House at the start of a five-day trip that will have him visit his two Scottish golf courses – and meet with British PM Keir Starmer to try to 'refine' an existing U.S.-UK trade deal. He had earlier escalated his demands with the EU in mid-July by raising the tariff threat. In his Truth Social post announcing the deal, Trump said: 'Japan will invest, at my direction, $550 billion dollars into the United States, which will receive 90 percent of the profits.' Andy Laperriere, head of U.S. policy research at Piper Sandler, told CNBC that Japanese officials are 'describing it differently' and 'see the $550 billion figure as a cap and inclusive of government loan guarantees.' But Commerce Secretary Lutnick has been describing it as an investment kitty that Trump can personally direct to ramp up industrial production – with no mention of a legislative role. 'This is literally the Japanese government giving Donald Trump $550 billion, and says: Go fix whatever you need to fix,' he told host Laura Ingraham on Fox News. 'Donald Trump can take the Japanese money and say 'let's go build a factory. Let's get an American company to operate it, we'll lease them the factory. They don't make much money - so what. That's the beauty of this deal,' he said. As he calls for the Europeans to 'buy down' tariffs, Trump may have been emboldened by other moves besides the Japan deal. On Thursday, Columbia University reached a settlement with the Justice Department where it will pay $200 million and a civil rights investigation will be dropped.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismisses 'daft' wealth tax - 'be serious'
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismisses 'daft' wealth tax - 'be serious'

Daily Mirror

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds dismisses 'daft' wealth tax - 'be serious'

It is the first time a Government minister has explicitly ruled out a wealth tax since plans to cut disability benefits were gutted, leaving Chancellor Rachel Reeves with a battle to balance the books The Business Secretary has hit out at "daft" demands for a "magic wealth tax" to plug holes in the public finances. ‌ Jonathan Reynolds rubbished speculation that Chancellor Rachel Reeves could balance the books after U-turns on disability benefit cuts and winter fuel with a levy on the wealthiest Brits. ‌ Ms Reeves has refused to rule out a tax on wealth, which has been backed by Labour figures, including former leader Lord Neil Kinnock and Wales's First Minister Eluned Morgan. ‌ But Mr Reynolds dismissed the idea and told supporters to "be serious", in comments likely to anger some on the Labour left where support is growing for the move. It is the first time a Government minister has explicitly ruled out a wealth tax since Keir Starmer was forced to gut his plans to cut disability benefits last month. ‌ The Chancellor has been left to make up the shortfall, while battling sluggish growth and higher than expected borrowing. Experts believe she may be forced to put up taxes in the autumn if she wants to avoid making cuts to public services - triggering calls for a new tax on wealth. But Mr Reynolds told GB News: "This Labour Government has increased taxes on wealth as opposed to income - the taxes on private jets, private schools, changes through inheritance tax, capital gains tax. ‌ "But the idea there's a magic wealth tax, some sort of levy... that doesn't exist anywhere in the world. "Switzerland has a levy but they don't have capital gains or inheritance tax. "There's no kind of magic (tax). We're not going to do anything daft like that. ‌ "And I say to people: 'Be serious about this.' The idea you can just levy everyone... What if your wealth was not in your bank account, (what if it was) in fine wine or art? "How would we tax that? This is why this doesn't exist." The Chancellor recently told the Mirror that ordinary workers won't see their VAT, income tax or national insurance contributions rise. And Ms Reeves signalled a lack of enthusiasm for a dedicated wealth tax, saying she had already asked the wealthiest and businesses to pay more in last year's Budget, which included a £40billion tax raid to fund cash-strapped public services like hospitals and schools.

Chancellor faces fiscal risks and ‘significant challenges' amid trade war
Chancellor faces fiscal risks and ‘significant challenges' amid trade war

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Chancellor faces fiscal risks and ‘significant challenges' amid trade war

The IMF said the UK's 'limited' so-called headroom on its public finances gave little room to manoeuvre and called on Rachel Reeves to consider some tax changes or spending cuts. In its annual report on the UK economy, the IMF said: 'Risks to this strategy must be carefully managed. 'In an uncertain global environment and with limited fiscal headroom, fiscal rules could easily be breached if growth disappoints or interest rate shocks materialise.' The IMF praised the Government's fiscal plans, saying they 'strike a good balance between supporting growth and safeguarding fiscal sustainability'. It added that the pro-growth agenda 'covers the right areas to lift productivity'. But the IMF cautioned that 'delivering on this agenda will require overcoming significant challenges' amid the fallout from US President Donald Trump's trade war. 'Shockwaves from trade policies and rapid geopolitical developments are affecting global growth and creating heightened levels of volatility in financial markets,' it said. Added to this, it said, 'fiscal space is limited and constrained by an elevated interest burden and increasing demands on public resources, including defence and aging-related spending'. Ms Reeves said the report 'confirms that the choices we've taken have ensured Britain's economic recovery is under way, and that our plans will tackle the deep-rooted economic challenges that we inherited in the face of global headwinds'. 'Our fiscal rules allow us to confront those challenges by investing in Britain's renewal,' she said. The Washington-based IMF also recommended cutting the number of assessments of whether the Government is on track with its fiscal rules by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) from two to just once a year, ahead of the autumn budget. This could 'reduce pressure for overly frequent changes to fiscal policy', it said. The Chancellor's headroom against her main fiscal rule was estimated at £9.9 billion at the time of the spring statement in March. But the Government's U-turns on planned cuts to spending since then, such as changes to the welfare bill, are seen as having wiped this out, according to experts. This has raised fears that Ms Reeves will be forced to raise taxes or cut spending in the autumn budget. The IMF left its forecasts unchanged for the economy to grow by 1.2% this year and 1.4% in 2026. However, it added a note of caution, saying that 'risks to growth remain to the downside'. 'Tighter-than-expected financial conditions, combined with rising precautionary saving by households, would hinder the rebound in private consumption and slow the recovery,' the IMF said. Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'This is yet more confirmation that Labour's mismanagement means that yet more tax rises are coming in the autumn.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store